$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

일반 고등학교 1학년 학생들의 과학적 탐구의 본성에 관한 이해
Investigation into Tenth Graders' Understanding of the "Nature of Scientific Inquiry" 원문보기

한국지구과학회지 = Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, v.41 no.3, 2020년, pp.273 - 290  

조은진 (서울대학교 과학교육과)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구에서는 서울 지역 일반 공립 고등학교 2019학년도 1학년 재학생 100명의 과학적 탐구의 본성에 대한 이해 양상을 탐구하여, 학생들의 과학적 탐구 역량 배양을 위한 과학교육의 개선과 발달에 함의를 제공하고자 하였다. 이에 과학적 탐구의 본성 8가지 측면을 평가 내용으로 하는 VASI 검사 도구를 사용하여 학생들의 과학적 탐구의 본성 이해 양상을 조사하였다. 학생들의 응답 자료에 대해 반복적 비교법을 적용하여 분석한 결과, 5명의 학생이 과학적 탐구의 본성의 8가지 측면에 대해 일관되게 전문적 관점을 소유한 것으로 나타났으며, 대부분 학생의 이해에서, 3가지 측면, 즉 '모든 과학자가 같은 과정을 수행한다 해도 같은 결론을 얻게 되는 것은 아니다.', '탐구 과정은 탐구 문제에 의해 안내된다.', '연구 결론은 수집된 자료에 모순되지 않아야 한다.'에 대해서는 전문적 관점이, 4가지 측면, 즉 '과학적 탐구는 서로 다른 방법을 취할 수 있다.', '모든 과학적 탐구는 질문을 제기하여 시작하지만, 반드시 가설을 시험하는 것은 아니다.', '탐구 과정은 그 결과에 영향을 미칠 수 있다.', '과학적 자료와 증거는 다르다.'에 대해서는 혼합적 관점이 우세하였다. 하지만 1가지 측면, 즉 '수집된 자료와 이미 알려진 바를 종합하여 설명이 구축된다.'에 대해서는 초보적 관점을 표출한 학생들이 가장 많았다. 이러한 연구 결과에 대한 분석 및 해석과 현시점의 과학 교육과정 사이의 관련성을 논하면서, 장차 학생들의 과학적 탐구의 본성 이해 및 과학 탐구력 신장을 위한 교육적 시사점을 제시하고, 연구 관련 제안을 하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study aims to investigate tenth graders' understanding of the nature of scientific inquiry (NOSI). A total of 100 public school students participated. A questionnaire of Views about Scientific Inquiry was used to assess their understanding of the NOSI, and data were collected using qualitative ...

주제어

#고등학생   #과학적 탐구의 본성에 관한 이해   #과학적 탐구력  

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., 2012, Examining the sources for our understandings about science: enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353-374. 

    상세보기 crossref

  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS], 1990, Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press, New York, USA. 

  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS], 1993, Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Oxford University Press, New York, USA. 

  4. Baykara, H., Yakar, Z., and Liu, S.Y., 2018, Preservice Science Teachers' Views about Scientific Inquiry. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(10), 128-143. 

  5. Chen, S., 2006., Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science. Science Education, 90(5), 803-819. 

    상세보기 crossref

  6. Chinn, C.A. and Malhotra, B.A., 2002, Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218. 

    상세보기 crossref

  7. Council of Ministers of Education of Canada, 1997, Common Framework of Science Learning Outcomes, K to 12: Pan-Canadian Protocol for Collaboration on School Curriculum for Use by Curriculum Developers. Council of Ministers of Education, Toronto, Canada. 

  8. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., and Scott, P., 1996, Young People's Images of Science. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK. 

  9. Dudu, W.T., 2014, Exploring South African high school teachers' conceptions of the nature of scientific inquiry: a case study. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1-19. 

  10. Dudu, W.T. and Vhurumuku, E., 2011, Exploring learners' understandings of the nature of scientific inquiry (NOSI): The validation of a research Instrument. International Journal of Learning, 18(2), 67-84. 

    상세보기

  11. Dunbar, K., 2001, What scientific thinking reveals about the nature of cognition. In Crowley, K., Shunn, C., and Okada, T. (eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday classroom and professional settings. Lawrence Associations, Inc., Mahwah, USA, 115-140. 

  12. Duschl, R.A., 1994, Research on the history and philosophy of science. In Gabriel, D.L. (ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. MacMillan, New York, USA, 443-465. 

  13. Duschl, R.A. and Grandy, R.E., 2011, Demarcation in science education: Toward an enhanced view of scientific method. In Taylor, R.S. and Ferrari, M. (eds.), Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the Evolution. Springer, Routledge, The Netherlands, 3-19. 

  14. Erduran, S. and Dagher, Z.R., 2014, Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. 

  15. Gaigher, E., Lederman, N.G., and Lederman, J.S., 2014, Knowledge about inquiry: A study in South African high schools. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3125-3147. 

    상세보기 crossref

  16. Gall, M.D., Borg., W.R., and Gall, J.P., 1996, Educational research: An introduction. Longman, White Plains, USA. 

  17. Grandy, R.E. and Duschl, R.A., 2008, Consensus: Expanding the scientific method and school science. In Duschl, R.A. and Grandy, R.E. (eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation. Sense Publishers, New Milford, USA, 304-325. 

  18. Hodson, D., 2009, Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 

  19. Hodson, D., 2014, Nature of science in the science curriculum: Origin, development, implications and shifting emphases. In Matthews, M.R. (ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 911-970. 

  20. Hodson, D. and Wong, S.L., 2017, Going beyond the consensus view: Broadening and enriching the scope of NOS-oriented curricula. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(1), 3-17. 

    상세보기 crossref

  21. Jho, H., 2018, An Analysis of Elements of Scientific Inquiry Presented in 2015 Revised National Science Curriculum: Focusing on Scientific Inquiry Experiment. Journal of Research in Curriculum and Instruction, 22(3), 208-218. (in Korean) 

    상세보기 crossref

  22. Kim, H.-K. and Na, J., 2018, A study on high school teachers' perception on the field application of 2015 revised science curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(10), 565-588. (in Korean) 

    상세보기

  23. Knorr-Cetina, K., 1999, Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA. 

  24. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S., 1979, Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Sage, London, UK. 

  25. Lederman, N.G., Antink, A., and Bartos, S., 2014, Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science and Education, 23(2), 285-302. 

    상세보기 crossref

  26. Lederman, N.G. and Lederman, J.S., 2014, Research on Teaching and Learning of Nature of Science. In Abell, S.K. and Lederman, N.G. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education. Routledge, New York, USA, 1739-1815. 

  27. Lederman, N.G. and Lederman, J.S., 2019, Teaching and Learning of Nature of Scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry: building capacity through systematic research-based professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(7), 737-762. 

    상세보기 crossref

  28. Lederman, J.S., 2009, Teaching scientific inquiry: Exploration, directed, guided, and open-ended levels. In National geographic science: Best practices in science education. Retrieved from http://www.ngspscience.com/profdev/Monographs/SCL22-0439A_SCI_AM_Lederman_lores.pdf [Google Scholar] 

  29. Lederman, J.S., Lederman, N.G., Bartos, S.A., Bartels, S.L., Meyer, A.A., and Schwartz, R.S., 2014, Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry-The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65-83. 

    상세보기 crossref

  30. Lee, Y., 2014, What do scientists think about the nature of science?-exploring views of the nature of science of korean scientists related with life science area. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(7), 677-691. (in Korean) 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  31. Mathews, M.R., 2012, Changing the focus: From nature of science (NOS) to features of science (FOS). In Khine, M.S. (ed.), Advances in nature of science research: Concepts and methodologies. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 3-26. 

  32. Ministry of Education [MOE], 2015, National science curriculum. No. 2015-74. Ministry of Education, Sejong, Korea. (in Korean) 

  33. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, 2009, A Handbook of Science Curriculum for High School Students. No. 2009-41. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean) 

  34. National Academy of Sciences, 2002, National Science Education Standards. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA. 

  35. National Research Council [NRC], 1996, National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA. 

  36. National Research Council [NRC], 2000, Inquiry and the national science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA. 

  37. Next Generation Science Standards [NGSS] Lead States, 2013, Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA. 

  38. OECD, 2017, PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative problem Solving. OECD Publishing, Paris, France. 

  39. Park E.W. and Lee, Y.H., 2016, The analysis of inquiry activities in high school science textbooks for the 2009 revised curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(8), 419-438. (in Korean) 

  40. Park, W., Yang, S., and Song, J., 2020, Eliciting students' understanding of nature of science with text-based tasks: insights from new Korean high school textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 42(3), 426- 450. 

    상세보기 crossref

  41. Schwartz, R.S., Lederman, N.G., and Crawford, B.A., 2004, Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610-645. 

    상세보기 crossref

  42. Senler, B., 2015, Middle School Students' Views of Scientific Inquiry: An International Comparative Study. Science Education International, 26(2), 166-179. 

  43. Song, J., Kang, S.-J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., ..., and Son, Y.A., 2018, A development of Korean science education standards [KSES] for the next generation. KOFAC, Seoul, Korea. 

  44. Sung, H.S., Shim, J., and Chun J., 2016, Pre-service Biology Teachers' Understanding about Nature of the Scientific Inquiry-The Views about Scientific Inquiry (VASI) QuestIonnaire-. Biology Education, 44(2), 191-209. (in Korean) 

    상세보기 crossref

  45. Thompson, I., 2015, Introduction: tasks, concepts and subject knowledge. In Thompson, I. (ed.), Designing Tasks in Secondary Education: Enhancing subject understanding and student engagement. Routledge, Abingdon, UK, 3-12. 

  46. United Kingdom Department for Education. 2015. National curriculum in England: Science programmes of study. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nationalcurriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study. 

  47. Wong, S.L. and Hodson, D., 2009, From the horse's mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93(1), 109-130. 

    상세보기 crossref

  48. Wong, S.L. and Hodson, D., 2010, More from the horse's mouth: What scientists say about science as a social practice. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1431-1463. 

    상세보기 crossref

  49. Yang, I.H., Park, S.W., Shin, J.Y., and Lim, S.M., 2017, Exploring korean middle school students' view about scientific inquiry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3935-3958. 

  50. Zeidler, D.L., Walker, K.A., Ackett, W.A., and Simmons, M.L., 2002, Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343-367. 

    상세보기 crossref

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로