최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기韓國 家政科敎育學會誌 = Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, v.32 no.3, 2020년, pp.135 - 159
양지선 (이화여자대학교 교육대학원) , 이경숙 (경상대학교 사범대학 부설고등학교)
The purpose of this study was to develop items of an essay response assessment that could align with the instructions and assessments in the high school home economics curriculum. The contents of the study were as follows. First, to establish an assessment plan, 14 achievement standards were analyze...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
기존의 학습결과에 대한 평가는 어떤 중심의 평가였나? | 기존의 학업성취를 중심으로 행해지는 ‘학습결과에 대한 평가(assessment of learning)’의 역할에서는 교육과정 성취에 근거하여 교사중심의 평가였다면 학습의 주요 도구로 유의미한 학습 경험이 되도록 상황, 맥락에 근거한 평가, 의미창출을 위한 평가의 방향을 강조하며 평가와 학습을 통합하는 기능을 적용하는 ‘학습으로서의 평가(assessment as learning)’, ‘학습을 위한 평가(assessment for learning)’로 변화하고 있다(McMillan, 2014). 이러한 측면에서 Stiggins(1991, 1995)는 21세기의 교실수업을 위해 ‘바람직한 원칙을 이해하는 것’이라는 의미로 ‘평가 리터러시(assessment literacy)’라는 용어를 사용해왔다. | |
서술형 문항을 통한 평가방식은 어떤 것에 유용한가? | Park 외(2019)에 의하면 서술형 문항을 통한 평가방식은 학습자가 배운 내용을 이해했는지를 확인할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 어떤 방식으로 이해하고 있는지와 정답에 도달하는 과정까지를 평가할 수 있다. 이것은 단일답 중심의 단답형, 완성형, 선택형 문항이 측정하기 어려운 영역에서 평가의 범위를 확장하여 고차적인 기술과 능력을 활용할 수 있는 통합적인 능력을 측정할 수 있고(Downing, 2006), 단순한 이해가 아닌 심층적인 이해나 복합적 정보의 활용을 측정하는데 유용한 방법(McMillan, 2014)으로 알려져 있다. 이와 같은 평가방식은 평가정보를 바탕으로 학생들이 가진 오개념 혹은 오류를 찾아내고 학생의 능력에 대해 깊이 있는 추론을 가능하게 한다. | |
최근 사회가 요구하는 인재상은 어떤 방향으로 변화하는가? | 최근 사회가 요구하는 인재상은 창의성과 협동, 비판적 사고력을 함양하는 방향으로 변화하고 있으며 이와 더불어 학습 전략과 평가 패러다임도 변화하고 있다. 이러한 경향을 반영하여 세계 각국은 평가방식의 변화를 꾀하고 있으며 학생들의 학습수준을 진단하고 학업 향상을 지원하기 위한 다양한 노력을 기울이고 있다. |
Aleksandrzak, M. (2011). Problems and challenges in teaching and learning speaking at advanced level. Glottodidactica, 37(1), 37-48.
American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 30-32. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1990.tb00391.x
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Becker, A. (2011). Examining rubrics used to measure writing performance in US intensive English programs. The CATESOL Journal, 22(1), 113-130.
Bloom, B. S., Madaus, G. F., & Hastings, J. T. (1981). Evaluation to improve learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Cho, M. K. (2007). A Study on the development of open-ended tasks and assessment rubrics for elementary school mathematics. The Mathematical Education, 46(2), 207-226.
Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S. M., & Rachor, R. E. (1996). Teachers' assessment practices: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3(2), 159-179. doi:10.1207/s15326977ea0302_3
Daniel, L. G., & King, D. A. (1998). Knowledge and use of testing and measurement literacy of elementary and secondary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(6), 331-344. doi:10.1080/00220679809597563
Doolittle, E. P. (2000). Section IV: Supply items. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University. Retrieved from http://www.aui.ma/personal/-A.Cads/services/facdev/2002/assessment4.pdf
Downing, S. M. (2005). The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: The consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 10(2), 133-143. doi:10.1007/s10459-004-4019-5
Downing, S. M. (2006). Selected-response item formats in test development. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 287-301). NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Earl, S., McConnell, M., Middleton, I., & Ellington, H. (1998). Assessing student performance. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon University. Retrieved from http://www2.rgu.ac.uk/celt/pgcerttlt/assessing/assess1.htm
Finson, K., Ormsbee, C., & Jensen, M. (2011). Differentiating science instruction and assessment for learners with special needs, K-8. Thousand Oaks: Corwin, A SAGE Company.
Gronlund, N. E. (1988). How to construct achievement tests (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications.
Guskey, T. R. (2007). Multiple sources of evidence: An analysis of stakeholders' perceptions of various indicators of student learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(1), 19-27.
Hatch, J. A. (2010). Rethinking the relationship between learning and development: Teaching for learning in early childhood classrooms. The Educational Forum, 74(3), 258-268. doi:10.1080/00131725.2010.483911
Hong, J. Y., Kim, M. K., Noh, S. S., & Kwon, J. R. (2008). A case study on the development of descriptive problems in grade 4 mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 18(3), 335-352.
Huot, B. A. (1990). Reliability, validity, and holistic scoring: What we know and what we need to know. College Composition and Communication, 41(2), 201-213. doi:10.2307/358160
Jin, B. S. (2007). 현장연구노트: 사회과 서술형 평가 문항 작성의 실제 [Field study note: Item development of descriptive assessment in social studies]. Living and Education, 7, 92-108.
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
Kim, S. (2002). A study on the teacher's competence for classroom assessment. Journal of Education Evaluation, 15(1), 67-85.
Kim, S. (2007). Teacher assessment literacy and student assessment training for teachers. Journal of Education Evaluation, 20(1), 1-16.
Kim, S. H. (2013). Analysis on current status of descriptive test items in the Korean language curriculum: On the base of descriptive items in academic high schools. Korean Language Education, 140, 479-508.
Kim, S. N., Im, H. J., Sohn, H. K., & Kwon, J. K. (2013). A study on the improvement of the methods of student evaluation. Seoul: Korean Educational development Institute.
Lee, S. K., & Lee, H. J. (2011). The development and application of the descriptive evaluation questionnaire on the clothing and textiles section of the middle school Technology & home economics textbook. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 23(3), 69-90.
Lee, Y. J. (2012). A study on the development of test tools and scoring methods for Korean language essay test. Korean Language Education Research, 45, 413-449. doi:10.20880/kler.2012..45.413
Legg, S. M. (1998). Reliability and validity. In W. Wolcott & S. M. Legg (Eds.), An overview of writing assessment: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 124-142). Urbana, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English.
Linn, R. L., & Miller, M. D. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching (9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson.
Marso, R. N., & Pigge, F. L. (1992). A summary of published research: Classroom teachers' knowledge and skills related to the development and use of teacher-made tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, CA: San Fransico.
McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective instruction (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Ministry of Education (1992). Middle school curriculum. Seoul: Author.
Ministry of Education (1997). Elementary and secondary school curriculum: National common basic education curriculum. Seoul: Author.
Ministry of Education (1998). 수행평가의 이해 [Understanding of performance assessment]. The Press release, Seoul: Author.
Ministry of Education (2018). 서.논술형 평가 정책 관련 정리 자료 [Organizational data on descriptive and essay-type assessment policies]. Sejong: Author.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2009). General guidelines of elementary and secondary school curriculum. Seoul: Author.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011a). 2009 개정 총론 해설서 [2009 revised General guidelines of elementary and secondary school curriculum]. Seoul: Author.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011b). Practical Arts (Technology, Home Economics) curriculum. Seoul: Author.
Myford, C. M., & Wolfe, E. W. (2003). Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part I. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4(4), 386-422.
National Forum (2017). Expanding our understanding of assessment and feedback in Irish higher education. National Forum Insight.
Park, E. A., Park, S. H., Son, M. J., Lee, C. H., Seo, M. H., Kim, J. Y., ...Yeon, J. Y. (2013). A study on developing operational plans for implementing achievement Standards-based assessment in high schools. Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
Park, E. A., Seo, M. H., Kim, J. Y., Kang, M. Y., Ahn, Y. M., & Kim, J. H. (2014). A study on the operational plans for empowering teachers' competency in ASA(Achievement Standards-based Assessment). Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation. doi:10.23000/TRKO201800022978
Park, H. Y., Kim, S. S., Kim, K. H., Lee, M. J., Kim, K. K., & Kim, J. Y. (2019). Substantializing methods of restricted and extended response essay assessment through enforcing the instruction-assessment alignment. Jincheon: Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation.
Popham, W. J. (1978). Criterion-referenced measurement. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Randall, C., & Lester, F. (1992). How to evaluate progress in problem solving. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Saddler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77-84. doi:10.1080/0969595980050104
Scriffiny, P. L. (2008). Seven reasons for standards-based grading. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 70-74.
Seo, M. H., Park, E. A., Chon, K. H., Kang, M. K., Sung, K. H., Choi, J. S.,...Lee, H. S. (2014). 2014년 고등학교 보통교과 성취평가제 운영 현황 및 개선 방안 [Current status and improvement plan of the achievement evaluation system for common high schools in 2014]. Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education (2018). 2018 주요업무계획 [2018 Major work plan]. Seoul: Author.
Son, M. J., Seo, M. H., Park, J. I., Kim, Y. H., & Lee, H. S. (2015). Analysis of implementing achievement standards-based assessment in high schools and the directions for its improvement. Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation. doi:10.23000/TRKO201800023003
Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534-539.
Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238-245.
Stiggins, R. J. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328. doi:10.1177/003172170508700414
Stiggins, R. J., & Bridgeford, N. J. (1985). The ecology of classroom assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22(4), 271-286. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1985.tb01064.x
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wang, S. S., & Jeong, K. H. (2001). Research and development of the achievement and assessment standards, and of exemplary test items of Practical Arts at the primary school level. Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiseman, C. S. (2012). A comparison of the performance of analytic vs. holistic scoring rubrics to assess L2 writing. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 2(1), 59-92.
Yu, H. J. (2002). Research on the development and practice of performance assessment task for the growth of the mathematical power. School Mathematics, 4(3), 513-537.
Zane, T. W. (2009). Performance assessment design principles gleaned from constructivist learning theory (part 1). Teach Trends, 53(1), 81-88. doi:10.1007/s11528-009-0242-5
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.