$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

FPS게임의 사용자 현존감과 플레이어 경험에 대한 키워드 연구 - Steam 리뷰와 게임 이용 시간을 중심으로
Key words research of players' experience and presence in FPS genre-focusing on game play time and Steam reviews 원문보기

한국게임학회 논문지 = Journal of Korea Game Society, v.21 no.6, 2021년, pp.13 - 30  

최영우 (강원대학교 영상문화학과) ,  유승호 (강원대학교 영상문화학과)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 논문은 스팀(Steam)의 리뷰 데이터를 활용하여 게임이용시간에 따른 FPS에서의 사용자 현존감 경험과 플레이어 경험을 분석했다. Python을 활용하여 크롤링을 통해 데이터를 얻었다. 분석 결과 게임 이용 시간이 적은 집단에서는 통제 가능한 물리적 현존감과 통제 불가능한 사회적 현존감에 관한 이슈가 나왔고 게임이용시간이 많은 집단에서는 이전 집단에 있던 물리적 현존감 요인이 통제 가능한 사회적 현존감으로 변화한 것을 알 수 있었다. 더 나아가 플레이어 경험 분석을 통해 게임 플레이 요인인 "반동(recoil)"이란 키워드가 중요하다는 것을 알 수 있었다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This paper analyzed the user's presence experience and player experience in FPS according to game usage time using Steam's review data. Data was obtained through crawling using Python. In analysis result, it was confirmed that issues related to controllable physical presence and uncontrollable socia...

주제어

표/그림 (11)

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B, "The social psychology of telecommunications.", Toronto; London; New York: Wiley, 1976. 

  2. Minsky, M, "Telepresence.", pp. 45-51, 1980. 

  3. Lombard, M, "Direct responses to people on the screen: Television and personal space.", Communication research, pp. 288-324, 1995. 

  4. Nass, C., and Moon, Y. "Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers.", Journal of social issues, 56(1), pp. 81-103, 2000. 

  5. Lee, K. M, "Presence, explicated. Communication theory.", 14 (1), pp 27-50, 2004. 

  6. Jin, Y. and Li, J, "When newbies and veterans play together: The effect of video game content, context and experience on cooperation." Computers in Human Behavior 68: pp. 556-563, 2017. 

  7. Yoon, S. J. and Lim Y. H., "Analysis of Successful Possibility of CCG Based on Transmedia Storytelling Using Heuristic Evaluation and Game QA", The Korean Jornal of animation, 17(3), pp.167-188, 2021. 

  8. Li, X., Zhang, Z., and Stefanidis, K. "A data-driven approach for video game playability analysis based on players' reviews", Information, 12(3), 129, 2021. 

  9. Goffman, E., "Embarrassment and social organization.", 1963. 

  10. Biocca, F. Harms, C. and Burgoon, J. K., "Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria.", Presence: Teleoperators & virtual environments, 12(5), pp. 456-480, 2003. 

  11. Rice, R. E. and Case, D., "Electronic message systems in the university: A description of use and utility.", Journal of communication, pp. 131-152, 1983. 

  12. Walther, J. B., "Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication research", 19(1), pp. 52-90, 1992 

  13. Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., and Welch, G. F., "A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications.", Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, pp. 114, 2018. 

  14. Xu, K., and Lombard, M., "Persuasive computing: Feeling peer pressure from multiple computer agents.", Computers in Human Behavior, 74, pp. 152-162, 2017. 

  15. PENA, J. et al. "Effects of human vs. computer-controlled characters and social identity cues on enjoyment.", Journal of Media Psychology, pp. 35-47, 2017. 

  16. CROES, E. A. et al, "Teasing apart the effect of visibility and physical co-presence to examine the effect of CMC on interpersonal attraction.", Computers in Human Behavior, 55: pp. 468-476, 2016. 

  17. Jeong, J. H. and Ryu, S. H, "A Study on Collaboration Mechanism in Online FPS Game - Focused on the Reciprocal View -", Journal of Cyber communication Academic Society, 34(1), pp. 49-106. 2017. 

  18. Robb, A. et al, "Training together: How another human trainee's presence affects behavior during virtual human-based team training.", Frontiers in ICT, 3, pp. 17, 2016. 

  19. Schumann, S. et al. "When is computer-mediated intergroup contact most promising? Examining the effect of out-group members' anonymity on prejudice.", Computers in Human Behavior, 77: pp. 198-210, 2017. 

  20. Lim, J., and Richardson, J. C., "Exploring the effects of students' social networking experience on social presence and perceptions of using SNSs for educational purposes.", The Internet and Higher Education, 29, pp. 31-39. 2016. 

  21. Kim, K. et al. "The Influence of Real Human Personality on Social Presence with a Virtual Human in Augmented Reality.", In: ICAT-EGVE, pp. 115-122, 2016. 

  22. Wirth, W, et al. "A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences.", Media psychology 9.3 pp. 493-525, 2007. 

  23. Reeves, B. and Nass, C, "The media equation. How people treat computers, television and new media like real people and places.", Stanford: CSLI Publishing, 1996. 

  24. Rebenitsch, L., and Owen, C. "Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays.", Virtual Reality, 20(2), pp. 101-125, 2016. 

  25. Lee, K. M., "Why presence occurs: Evolutionary psychology, media equation, and presence.", Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 13(4), pp. 494-505, 2004. 

  26. Cummings, J. J., and Bailenson, J. N., "How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence.", Media Psychology , 19 (2), pp. 272-309, 2016. 

  27. Lee, H. and Chung. D, "Influence of gaming display and controller on perceived characteristics, perceived interactivity, presence, and discomfort.", International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp.258-265, 2013. 

  28. Kwon, H. I., Rhee, H. J. and Park, J. W., "Exploring the Immersion Degree Difference Between 3D and 2D: Focus on Action-Adventure Game", The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 11(1), pp. 157-164, 2011 

  29. Skalski, P. and Whitbred, R., "Image versus sound: A comparison of formal feature effects on presence and video game enjoyment". PsychNology Journal, 8(1), pp. 67-84, 2010. 

  30. Hou, J, et al., "Effects of screen size, viewing angle, and players' immersion tendencies on game experience." Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), pp. 617-623, 2012. 

  31. Jeong, E. J., Biocca, F. A. and Bohil, C. J., "Advertising effects through violent virtual experience-Presence, arousal, brand memory and attitude in 3D violent games.", studies, 5(6), 7., 2009. 

  32. Gandy, M. et al., "Experiences with an AR evaluation test bed: Presence, performance, and physiological measurement.", 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. IEEE, pp. 127-136, 2010. 

  33. Lim, S. and Reeves, B., "Being in the game: Effects of avatar choice and point of view on psychophysiological responses during play.", Media psychology, 12(4), pp. 348-370, 2009. 

  34. Felnhofer, A., Heinzle, A. K., and Kothgassner, O. D., "Game experience and behavior in young women: A comparison of interface technologies." Proceedings of the Usability Day XI, pp. 1-6. 2013. 

  35. ISO 9241-11:2018(en), "Ergonomics of human -system interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts". 

  36. White, G. R. "The playthrough evaluation framework: reliable usability evaluation for video games", Doctoral dissertation, University of Susse, 2014. 

  37. Poels, K., De Kort, Y. and IJsselsteijn, W. "Identification and categorization of digital game experiences: a qualitative study integrating theoretical insights and player perspectives." Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 9(1), pp. 107-129, 2012. 

  38. Denisova, A., Nordin, A. I. and Cairns, P, "The convergence of player experience questionnaires", In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 33-37, 2016. 

  39. Paavilainen, Janne. "Defining playability of games: functionality, usability, and gameplay", pp. 55-64. 10.1145/3377290.3377309, 2020. 

  40. Kern, M. L., Park, G., Eichstaedt, J. C., Schwartz, H. A., Sap, M., Smith, L. K., and Ungar, L. H, "Gaining insights from social media language: Methodologies and challenges", Psychological methods, 21(4), 507, 2016. 

  41. Ferreira, M., Rolim, V., Mello, R. F., Lins, R. D., Chen, G., and Gasevic, D, "Towards automatic content analysis of social presence in transcripts of online discussions." In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge, pp. 141-150, 2020. 

  42. Pittman, M., and Reich, B, "Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words". Computers in Human Behavior, 62, pp. 155-167, 2016. 

  43. Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., and Ruis, A. R. "A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data." Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), pp. 9-45, 2016. 

  44. Lim, Y. H., Kim, S. W., Nam, S., Chun, K. W., & Kim, M, "A Comparison of Current Trends in Soil Erosion Research Using Keyword Co-occurrence Analysis." Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 34(5), pp. 413-424, 2020 

  45. Brade, J., Lorenz, M., Busch, M., Hammer, N., Tscheligi, M., and Klimant, P, "Being there again-Presence in real and virtual environments and its relation to usability and user experience using a mobile navigation task",. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 101, pp. 76-87, 2017. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로