$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

환경 DNA 메타바코딩을 활용한 멧돼지 및 육상 포유류 출현 모니터링 - 경기도 양평군 일대를 중심으로 -
Monitoring the presence of wild boar and land mammals using environmental DNA metabarcoding - Case study in Yangpyeong-gun, Gyeonggi-do - 원문보기

環境復元綠化 = Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, v.24 no.6, 2021년, pp.133 - 144  

김용환 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경조경학과) ,  한윤하 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경조경학과) ,  박지윤 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경조경학과) ,  김호걸 (청주대학교 휴먼환경디자인학부 조경도시계획전공) ,  조수현 (국립생물자원관 식물자원과) ,  송영근 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경조경학과)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study aims to estimate location of land mammals habitat by analyzing spatial data and investigate how to apply environmental DNA monitoring methodology to lotic system in Yangpyeong-gun, Gyeonggi-do. Environmental DNA sampling points are selected through spatial analysis with QGIS open source p...

주제어

표/그림 (5)

참고문헌 (49)

  1. Acevedo P., Vicente J., Hofle U., Cassinello J., Ruiz-Fons F. and Gortazar C. 2007. Estimation of European wild boar relative abundance and aggregation: a novel method in epidemiological risk assessment. Epidemiology & Infection 135(3): 519-527. 

  2. Alexander, N. S., Massei, G., & Wint, W. (2016). The European distribution of Sus scrofa. Model outputs from the project described within the poster-where are all the boars? An attempt to gain a continental perspective. Open Health Data, 4(1). 

  3. An DM and Kim MS. 2003. Environment Friendly Urban Open Space Planning - Enhancing the Connectivity of Habitats in Seoul, Korea. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 31(1): 34-41. (in Korean with English summary) 

  4. An SP, Lee JM and Kim DS. 2018. Design and Implementation of Mobile Platform for Wildlife Monitoring System. Proceedings of Symposium of the Korean Institute of communications and Information Sciences. 765-766. (in Korean with English summary) 

  5. Baldassarre G. A. and E. G. Bolen. . 1994. . Waterfowl Ecology and Management. New York: John Wiley, New York. 

  6. Choi YS, Hur WH, Kim SH, Kang SG, Kim JH, Kim HJ, Son JS, Park JY, Yi JY, Kim CH, Kang JH and Han SH. 2012. Population Trends of Wintering Ducks in Korea.. The Korean Journal of Ornithology. 19(3): 185-200. 

  7. Fischer J. and Lindenmayer D. B. 2007. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 16(3): 265-280. 

  8. Gibson L. A., Wilson B. A., Cahil D.M. and Hil J. 2014. Modeling habitat suitabilty of the swamp antechinus (Antechinus minimus maritmus) in the coastal heathlands of southern Victoria, Australia.. Biological Conservation. 17(2): 143-150. 

  9. Gonzalez L. F., Montes G. A., Puig E., Johnson S., Mengersen K. and Gaston K. 2016. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing Wildlife Monitoring and Conservation. Sensors. 16(1): 97. 

  10. Gray M. J., Chamberlain M. J., Buehler D. A. and Sutton W. B. 2013. Wetland Wildlife Monitoring and Assessment. Wetland Techniques. 2: 265-318. 

  11. Hauger A. N., Hollis-EtterK. M., Etter E. R., Roloff G. J. and Mahon A. R. 2020. Use of environmental DNA(eDNA) in streams to detect feral swine(Sus scrofa). PeerJ 8: 1-15. 

  12. Jo T., Arimoto M., Murakami H., Masuda R. and Minamoto T. 2019. Particle size distribution of environmental DNA from the nuclei of marine fish. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53(16): 9947-9956. 

  13. Kang BC. 2017. Zoonosis and the Future of Mankind. Health and Social. 7: 12-21. (in Korean with English summary) 

  14. Kim GW and Song YK. 2021. Identification of Freshwater Fish Species in Korea Using Environmental DNA Technique - From the Experiment at the Freshwater Fish Ecological Learning Center in Yangpyeong, Gyeonggi Do. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 30(1): 1~12. (in Korean with English summary) 

  15. Kim JH, Jo HB, Chang MH, Woo SH, Cho YH and Yoon JD. 2020. Application of Environmental DNA for Monitoring of Freshwater Fish in Korea. KJEE 53(1): 63-72. (in Korean with English summary) 

  16. Kim KD, Kil JH, Choi BJ, Suh MH, Koh KS and Choi DI. 1998. The conditions of Fragmentation of Ecosystem and Ecological corridor building through the analysis of Environmental Impact Statements. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 7(2): 15-26. 

  17. Kim WM, Kim SY, Park IS, Lee HJ, Kim KT, Kim Y, Kim HJ, Kwak MH, Lim TY, Park C and Song WK. 2020. Review and application of environmental DNA (eDNA) investigation of terrestrial species in urban ecosystem. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 23(2): 69-89. (in Korean with English summary) 

  18. Kim WR, An HC, Song JC and Lee JH. 2001. The roadkill Damage of Wild animal by fragmentation of Habitat in Gyeongsangnam-do province. J. Agric. Tech. Res. Inst. 14: 97-110. (in Korean with English summary) 

  19. Kim YJ, Han BH and Park SC. 2015. A Study on the monitoring and management for Alternative Habitats of Kaloula borealis at the University of Seoul. Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture Conference. 2015(1): 121-122. (in Korean with English summary) 

  20. Korea National Park Research Institute. 2014. . Investigation on Natural Resources(Terrestrial) in Hallyeohaesang National Park. Research Report of Korea National Park. 

  21. Lee DK, Yi HY and Kim EY. 2007. Analysis of Fragmentation and Heterogeneity of Tancheon Watershed by Land Development Projects. J. Korean Env. Res. & Reveg. Tech. 10(6): 120-129. (in Korean with English summary) 

  22. Lee KJ and Han BH. 2002. Planting Plan of Ecological Corridor at Destroyed Mountain Area as a Result of Road Construction. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 16(3): 321-337. (in Korean with English summary) 

  23. Lee MH. 2011. Present and Future of R&D Responding to Domestic Animal Disease to Reinforce Korean Social Infrastructure. (in "SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY POLICY(182)"). Science and Technology Policy Institute. pp. 3-16. 

  24. Lee SG, Kim NC and Shin JH. 2014. Population Change of Each Ardeidae Species in Damaged Habitats of Development Area. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 17(1): 147-162. (in Korean with English summary) 

  25. Lee SM, Lee EJ, Park HB and Seo CW. 2018. Factors affecting Crop Damage by the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa): A case study in Geochang County, Gyeongnam Province, Korea. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 32(2): 140-146. (in Korean with English summary) 

  26. Leempoel K., Hebert T. and Hadly E. A. 2020. comparison of eDNA to camera trapping for assessment of terrestrial mammal diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences. 287(1918): 20192353-20192353. 

  27. Lyet A., Pellissier L., Valentini A., Dejean T., Hehmeyer A. and Naidoo R. 2021. eDNA sampled from stream networks correlates with camera trap detection rates of terrestrial mammals. Scientific Reports. 11(11362). 

  28. Meriggi A., Lombardini M., Milanesi P., Brangi A., Lamberti P. and Giannini F. 2016. Management of wild boar in protected areas: the case of Elba Island. Problematic Wildlife: 229-251. 

  29. Ministry of Environment. 2020. Enforcement Regulation of the Wildlife Protection and Management Act 

  30. Munnangi S. K. and Paruchuri P. 2020. Improving Wildlife Monitoring using a Multi-criteria Cooperative Target Observation Approach. The Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 

  31. National Institute of Biological Resources. 2019. A study for efficient management of native wild boars (first year). 

  32. National Institute of Biological Resources. 2020. Wildlife Survey (2020). 

  33. Penas J., Benito B., Lorite J., Ballesteros M., Canadas E. M. and Martinez-Ortega M. 2011. Habitat Fragmentation in Arid Zones: A Case Study of Linaria nigricans Under Land Use Changes (SE Spain). Environmental Management (2011) 48: 168-176. 

  34. Pilliod, D.S., Goldberg, C.S., Arkle, R.S. and Waits, L.P. 2014. Factors influencing detection of eDNA from a stream-dwelling amphibian. Molecular Ecology Resources, 14(1), pp.109-116. 

  35. Sales, N. G., Wangensteen, O. S., Carvalho, D. C., & Mariani, S. 2019. Influence of preservation methods, sample medium and sampling time on eDNA recovery in a neotropical river. Environmental DNA, 1(2). 

  36. Seo HM. 2020. Bird collision with transparent structures in the Republic of Korea: current status and annual mortality estimates. Master dissertation, Seoul National University. 

  37. Sin SA. 2015. A Certificate system for Animal Well-being Poultry Farm. (in "Korean Poultry journal"). Seoul: Korea Poultry Assosiation. 47(3). pp. 144-147. 

  38. Song YK, Kim JH, Won SY and Park C. 2019. Possibility in identifying species composition of fish communities using the environmental DNA metabarcoding technique - with the preliminary results at urban ecological streams. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 22(6): 125-138. (in Korean with English summary) 

  39. Staley, Z. R., Chuong, J. D., Hill, S. J., Grabuski, J., Shokralla, S., Hajibabaei, M., & Edge, T. A. 2018. Fecal source tracking and eDNA profiling in an urban creek following an extreme rain event. Scientific reports, 8(1), 1-12. 

  40. Theobaldd D. M., Miller J. R. and Hobbs N. T. 1997. Estimating the cumulative effects of development on wildlife habitat. Landscape and Urban Planning. 39: 25-36. 

  41. Ushio M., Fukuda H., Inoue F., Makoto K., Kishida O., Sato K., Murata K., Mikaido M., Sado M, Sato Y., Takeshita M., Iwasaki W., Yamanaka H., Kondoh M. and Miya M. 2017. Environmental DNA enables detection of terrestrial mammals from forest pond water. Molecular ecology resources. 17(6): 63-75. 

  42. Valentin R. E., Fonseca D. M., Gable S., Kyle K. E., Hamilton G. C., Nielsen A. L. and Lockwood J. L. 2020. Moving eDNA surveys onto land: Strategies for active eDNA aggregation to detect invasive forest insects. Molecular ecology resources. 20(3): 746-n/a. 

  43. XIAO WH, ZHOU QS, ZHU CD, WU DH and XIAO ZS. 2020. Advances in techniques and methods of wildlife monitoring. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 44 (4): 409-417. 

  44. http://data.nsdi.go.kr/ 

  45. http://egis.me.go.kr 

  46. http://jr1000ecocenter.nowon.kr 

  47. https://www.naturing.net 

  48. https://www.nie-ecobank.kr 

  49. https://www.snu-wildlife.org/%EC%A7%80%EC%9B%90%EA%B3%B5%EA%B3%A0 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로