최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.41 no.6, 2021년, pp.501 - 517
In the present age, when the development of science and technology is leading the changes, this study supports the view that students should possess the literacy to participate democratically and critically in socio-scientific issues, and should be positioned as agentic and participatory citizens. A...
Ahn, J. (2004). Characteristics and grammaticalization of modal verb '- l su iss-', Korean Language & Literature, 53, 207-232.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1-52.
Alsop, S., & Bencze, L. (2014). Activism! Toward a more radical science and technology education. In L. Bencze, J. Lawrence, & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist Science and Technology Education, (pp. 1-19). Springer.
Arnold, J. (2012). Science students' classroom discourse: Tasha's umwelt. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 233-259.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Basu, S. J., Calabrese-Barton, A., Clairmont, N., & Locke, D. (2009). Developing a framework for critical science agency through case study in a conceptual physics context. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 345-371.
Bencze, L. (2017). STEPWISE: A framework prioritizing altruistic actions to address scioscientific issues. In L. Bencze (Ed.), Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments, (pp. 19-45). Springer.
Bencze, L., Reiss, M. J., Sharma, A., & Weinstein, M. (2018). STEM Education as "Trojan Horse": Deconstructed and reinvented for all. In L. Bryan & K. Tobin (Eds.), 13 Questions: Reframing Education's Conversation: Science, (pp. 69-87). Peter Lang.
Bencze, L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students' research-informed socio-scientific activism: Re/visions for a sustainable future. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 129-148.
Berge, M., Danielsson, A., & Lidar, M. (2020). Storylines in the physics teaching content of an upper secondary school classroom. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 63-83.
Birmingham, D., & Calabrese-Barton, A. (2014). Putting on a green carnival: Youth taking educated action on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 286-314.
Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7).
Bosser, U., & Lindahl, M. (2019). Students' positioning in the classroom: A study of teacher-student interactions in a socioscientific issue context. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 371-390.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
Calabrese-Barton, A. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 899-917.
Calabrese-Barton, A. & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin'! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187-229.
Calabrese-Barton, A. & Tan, E. (2020). Beyond equity as inclusion: A framework of "Rightful Presence" for guiding justice-oriented studies in teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 49(6), 433-440.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739-755.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Hodder Arnold.
Harre, R. (2005). Positioning and the discursive construction of categories. Psychopathology, 38(4), 185-188.
Harre, R. (2015). The person as the nexus of patterns of discursive practices. Culture & Psychology, 21(4), 492-504.
Harre, R. & Moghaddam, F. (2003). The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Harre, R., Moghaddam, F. M., Cairnie, T. P., Rothbart, D., & Sabat, S. R. (2009). Recent advances in positioning theory. Theory & Psychology, 19(1), 5-31.
Harre, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Malden.
Havinghurst, R. (1972). Development tasks and education. David McKay.
Herman, B. C., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. (2020). Students' emotive reasoning through place-based environmental socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 50(5), 2081-2109.
Hodson, D. (2010). Science education as a call to action. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(3), 197-206.
Hodson, D. (2014). Becoming part of the solution: Learning about activism, learning through activism, learning from activism. In L. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education, (pp. 67-98). Springer.
Hong, E.-M., & Choe, J.-Y. (2007). Biomass and bioenergy: Potential estimation and current status and outlook. KCID Journal, 14(2), 255-260.
Hwang, C. H., & Lee, Y. L. (2013). A study of methodology on critical ethnography: Explore the area and an understanding of the procedures. Journal of Education & Culture, 19(3), 31-68.
Hwang, C-h, Lee, Y-h. (2013). A study of methodology on critical ethnography: Explore the area and an understanding of the procedures. Inha Educational Research Institute, 19(3), 31-68.
Hyun, J. H., & Hong, S. O. (2012). Scientific governance through public participation: Historical epistemology of divergent positions in the participatory turn of STS. Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 12(2), 33-79.
IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC.
IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5℃, An IPCC special reprot on the impacts of global warming of 1.5℃ above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty: Summary for Policymakers. World Meteorological Organization.
Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D.L. (2019). A conceptual analysis of perspective taking: Positioning a tangled construct within science education and beyond. Science & Education, 28, 605-638.
Kempton, W. & Holland, D. C. (2003). Identity and sustained environmental practice. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature. pp 317-341, MIT Press.
Kim, M. (2018). Understanding children's science identity through classroom interactions. International Journal of Science Education, 40(1), 24-45.
Kim, J. -U., Gwak, J. -Y., Kwon, J. -Y., Ha, Y. -H., Lee, J. -A., Kim, C. -J., & Choe, S. -U. (2018). The Aspects of Small Group Decision-making Process based on Reading News Reports: Focused on Climate Change related Socio-scientific Issues Activity. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 38(2), 203-217.
Kolsto, S. D. (2001a). 'To trust or not to trust,...'-pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientificissue. International journal of science education, 23(9), 877-901.
Kolsto, S. D. (2001b). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socio-scientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310.
Kolsto, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., & Ulvik, M. (2006). Science students' examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90(4), 632-655.
Krstovic, M. (2017). Learning about youth engagement in research-informed and negotiated actions on socio-scientific issues. In J. Bencze (Ed.), Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments. (pp. 93-114). Springer.
Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: Background, federal policy and legislative action. Retrived from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/35/
Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, S., Kim, S., Krajcik, S., Herman, B., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113.
Lee, J. -A, & Kim, C. -J. (2019). Teaching and learning science in authoritative classrooms: Teachers' power and students' approval in Korean elementary classrooms. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1367-1393.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language learning and values. Ablex Publishing.
Levinson, R. (2018). Introducing socio-scientific inquiry-based learning (SSIBL). School Science Review, 100(371), 31-35.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. sage.
Ministry of Education. (2015). Elementary.secondary school curriculum. MoE, No. 2015-80, [1].
Martin, J. (2020). Researching teacher agency in elementary school science using positioning theory and grammar of agency, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(1), 94-113.
Maeng, S., & Kim, C. J. (2011). Variations in science teaching modalities and students' pedagogic subject positioning through the discourse register and language code. Science Education, 95(3), 431-457.
Murcia, K. (2009). Science in the news: An evaluation of students' scientific literacy. Teaching Science, 55(3), 40-45.
National Research Council(2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The National Academies Press.
Park, E. J. (2015). Hyeondae gugeo insik yangtae busaui yuui gwangye yeongu. [Master thesis. Korea University].
Pierce, C. (2017). Actor network theory and STEPWISE: A case study on learning about food justice with plants. In L. Bencze (Ed.), Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments, (pp. 449-466). Springer.
Phillips-MacNeil, C., Krstovic, M., & Bencze, L. (2017). Students' Socioscientific Actions: Using and Gaining 'Street Smarts'. In L. Bencze (Ed.), Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments, (pp. 295-314). Springer.
Roth, W. M. & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 33-56.
Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science education, 88(2), 263-291.
Rymes, B. (2015). Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection. Routledge.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
Sadler, T. D. (2006). Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(4), 323-346.
Sadler, T.D., Barab, S.A. & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socio-scientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371-391.
Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education, 90(6), 986-1004.
Sadler, T. D., Klosterman, M. L., & Topcu, M. S. (2011). Learning science content and socio-scientific reasoning through classroom explorations of global climate change. In T. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom, (pp. 45-77). Springer.
Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., & Topcu, M. S. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: A multi-level assessment study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622-1635.
Sadler, T. D. & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socio-scientific decision-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.
Seo, S. (2021). Environmental identity of students participated in a social action-oriented climate change SSI club. [Master thesis. Seoul National University].
Simonneaux, L. (2013). Questions socialement vives and socioscientific issues: New trends of research to meet the training needs of post-modern society. In C. Bruguiere, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clement (Eds.), 9th ESERA Conference Selected Contributions. Topics and trends in current science education, (pp. 37-54). Springer.
Sjostrom, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. n Y. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds.). Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Eucation, (pp. 65-88). Springer. L. Bencze (Ed.), Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments, (pp. 449-466). Springer.
STEPI. (2008). The fourth industrial revolution: Things that haven't been said yet. E-SAE.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage publications.
Tseng, A. S. (2018). Students and evaluation of web-based misinformation about vaccination: Critical reading or passive acceptance of claims?. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(3), 250-265.
Williams, J. (2011). STEM Education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education, 16(1), 26-35.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science education, 89(3), 357-377.
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343-367.
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.