참고문헌 (82)

1. Ahn, J. (2004). Characteristics and grammaticalization of modal verb '- l su iss-', Korean Language & Literature, 53, 207-232. 

2. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1-52. 

   상세보기

3. Alsop, S., & Bencze, L. (2014). Activism! Toward a more radical science and technology education. In L. Bencze, J. Lawrence, & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist Science and Technology Education, (pp. 1-19). Springer. 

4. Arnold, J. (2012). Science students' classroom discourse: Tasha's umwelt. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 233-259. 

   상세보기

5. Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press. 

6. Basu, S. J., Calabrese-Barton, A., Clairmont, N., & Locke, D. (2009). Developing a framework for critical science agency through case study in a conceptual physics context. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 345-371. 

   상세보기

7. Bencze, L. (2017). STEPWISE: A framework prioritizing altruistic actions to address scioscientific issues. In L. Bencze (Ed.), Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments, (pp. 19-45). Springer. 

8. Bencze, L., Reiss, M. J., Sharma, A., & Weinstein, M. (2018). STEM Education as "Trojan Horse": Deconstructed and reinvented for all. In L. Bryan & K. Tobin (Eds.), 13 Questions: Reframing Education's Conversation: Science, (pp. 69-87). Peter Lang. 

9. Bencze, L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students' research-informed socio-scientific activism: Re/visions for a sustainable future. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 129-148. 

   상세보기

10. Berge, M., Danielsson, A., & Lidar, M. (2020). Storylines in the physics teaching content of an upper secondary school classroom. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(1), 63-83. 

    상세보기

11. Birmingham, D., & Calabrese-Barton, A. (2014). Putting on a green carnival: Youth taking educated action on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 286-314. 

    상세보기

12. Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7). 

13. Bosser, U., & Lindahl, M. (2019). Students' positioning in the classroom: A study of teacher-student interactions in a socioscientific issue context. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 371-390. 

    상세보기

14. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press. 

15. Calabrese-Barton, A. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 899-917. 

    상세보기

16. Calabrese-Barton, A. & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin'! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187-229. 

    상세보기

17. Calabrese-Barton, A. & Tan, E. (2020). Beyond equity as inclusion: A framework of "Rightful Presence" for guiding justice-oriented studies in teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 49(6), 433-440. 

    상세보기

18. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage. 

19. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge. 

20. Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739-755. 

    상세보기

21. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press. 

22. Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Hodder Arnold. 

23. Harre, R. (2005). Positioning and the discursive construction of categories. Psychopathology, 38(4), 185-188. 

    상세보기

24. Harre, R. (2015). The person as the nexus of patterns of discursive practices. Culture & Psychology, 21(4), 492-504. 

    상세보기

25. Harre, R. & Moghaddam, F. (2003). The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts. Greenwood Publishing Group. 

26. Harre, R., Moghaddam, F. M., Cairnie, T. P., Rothbart, D., & Sabat, S. R. (2009). Recent advances in positioning theory. Theory & Psychology, 19(1), 5-31. 

    상세보기

27. Harre, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Malden. 

28. Havinghurst, R. (1972). Development tasks and education. David McKay. 

29. Herman, B. C., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. (2020). Students' emotive reasoning through place-based environmental socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 50(5), 2081-2109. 

    상세보기

30. Hodson, D. (2010). Science education as a call to action. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(3), 197-206. 

31. Hodson, D. (2014). Becoming part of the solution: Learning about activism, learning through activism, learning from activism. In L. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education, (pp. 67-98). Springer. 

32. Hong, E.-M., & Choe, J.-Y. (2007). Biomass and bioenergy: Potential estimation and current status and outlook. KCID Journal, 14(2), 255-260. 

33. Hwang, C. H., & Lee, Y. L. (2013). A study of methodology on critical ethnography: Explore the area and an understanding of the procedures. Journal of Education & Culture, 19(3), 31-68. 

34. Hwang, C-h, Lee, Y-h. (2013). A study of methodology on critical ethnography: Explore the area and an understanding of the procedures. Inha Educational Research Institute, 19(3), 31-68. 

35. Hyun, J. H., & Hong, S. O. (2012). Scientific governance through public participation: Historical epistemology of divergent positions in the participatory turn of STS. Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 12(2), 33-79. 

36. IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC. 

37. IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5℃, An IPCC special reprot on the impacts of global warming of 1.5℃ above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty: Summary for Policymakers. World Meteorological Organization. 

38. Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D.L. (2019). A conceptual analysis of perspective taking: Positioning a tangled construct within science education and beyond. Science & Education, 28, 605-638. 

    상세보기

39. Kempton, W. & Holland, D. C. (2003). Identity and sustained environmental practice. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature. pp 317-341, MIT Press. 

40. Kim, M. (2018). Understanding children's science identity through classroom interactions. International Journal of Science Education, 40(1), 24-45. 

    상세보기

41. Kim, J. -U., Gwak, J. -Y., Kwon, J. -Y., Ha, Y. -H., Lee, J. -A., Kim, C. -J., & Choe, S. -U. (2018). The Aspects of Small Group Decision-making Process based on Reading News Reports: Focused on Climate Change related Socio-scientific Issues Activity. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 38(2), 203-217. 

    원문보기 상세보기

42. Kim, J. -U., & Kim, C. -J. (2021). Understanding and Applicability of Identity-in-practice Theory. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 41(3), 267-281. 

    원문보기 상세보기

43. Kolsto, S. D. (2001a). 'To trust or not to trust,...'-pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientificissue. International journal of science education, 23(9), 877-901. 

    상세보기

44. Kolsto, S. D. (2001b). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socio-scientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310. 

    상세보기

45. Kolsto, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., & Ulvik, M. (2006). Science students' examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90(4), 632-655. 

    상세보기

46. Krstovic, M. (2017). Learning about youth engagement in research-informed and negotiated actions on socio-scientific issues. In J. Bencze (Ed.), Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments. (pp. 93-114). Springer. 

47. Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: Background, federal policy and legislative action. Retrived from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/35/ 

48. Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, S., Kim, S., Krajcik, S., Herman, B., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113. 

    상세보기

49. Lee, H, Choi, Y., Nam, C.-H., Ok, S.-Y., Shim, S. S., Hwang, Y., & Kim, G. (2020). Development of the ENACT model for cultivating social responsibility of college students in STEM fields. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 23(6), 3-16. 

    원문보기 상세보기

50. Lee, J. -A, & Kim, C. -J. (2019). Teaching and learning science in authoritative classrooms: Teachers' power and students' approval in Korean elementary classrooms. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1367-1393. 

    상세보기

51. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language learning and values. Ablex Publishing. 

52. Levinson, R. (2018). Introducing socio-scientific inquiry-based learning (SSIBL). School Science Review, 100(371), 31-35. 

53. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. sage. 

54. Ministry of Education. (2015). Elementary.secondary school curriculum. MoE, No. 2015-80, [1]. 

55. Martin, J. (2020). Researching teacher agency in elementary school science using positioning theory and grammar of agency, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(1), 94-113. 

    상세보기

56. Maeng, S., & Kim, C. J. (2011). Variations in science teaching modalities and students' pedagogic subject positioning through the discourse register and language code. Science Education, 95(3), 431-457. 

    상세보기

57. Murcia, K. (2009). Science in the news: An evaluation of students' scientific literacy. Teaching Science, 55(3), 40-45. 

58. Mun, J., Kim, E., & Kim, S. (2017). College students' evaluation of scientific information: Focusing on the trustworthiness of information. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17, 143-165. 

    

59. National Research Council(2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The National Academies Press. 

60. Park, E. J. (2015). Hyeondae gugeo insik yangtae busaui yuui gwangye yeongu. [Master thesis. Korea University]. 

61. Pierce, C. (2017). Actor network theory and STEPWISE: A case study on learning about food justice with plants. In L. Bencze (Ed.), Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments, (pp. 449-466). Springer. 

62. Phillips-MacNeil, C., Krstovic, M., & Bencze, L. (2017). Students' Socioscientific Actions: Using and Gaining 'Street Smarts'. In L. Bencze (Ed.), Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments, (pp. 295-314). Springer. 

63. Roth, W. M. & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 33-56. 

    상세보기

64. Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science education, 88(2), 263-291. 

    상세보기

65. Rymes, B. (2015). Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection. Routledge. 

66. Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. 

    상세보기

67. Sadler, T. D. (2006). Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(4), 323-346. 

    상세보기

68. Sadler, T.D., Barab, S.A. & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socio-scientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371-391. 

    상세보기

69. Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education, 90(6), 986-1004. 

    상세보기

70. Sadler, T. D., Klosterman, M. L., & Topcu, M. S. (2011). Learning science content and socio-scientific reasoning through classroom explorations of global climate change. In T. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom, (pp. 45-77). Springer. 

71. Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., & Topcu, M. S. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: A multi-level assessment study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622-1635. 

    상세보기

72. Sadler, T. D. & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socio-scientific decision-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. 

    상세보기

73. Seo, S. (2021). Environmental identity of students participated in a social action-oriented climate change SSI club. [Master thesis. Seoul National University]. 

74. Simonneaux, L. (2013). Questions socialement vives and socioscientific issues: New trends of research to meet the training needs of post-modern society. In C. Bruguiere, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clement (Eds.), 9th ESERA Conference Selected Contributions. Topics and trends in current science education, (pp. 37-54). Springer. 

75. Sjostrom, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. n Y. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds.). Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Eucation, (pp. 65-88). Springer. L. Bencze (Ed.), Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments, (pp. 449-466). Springer. 

76. STEPI. (2008). The fourth industrial revolution: Things that haven't been said yet. E-SAE. 

77. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage publications. 

78. Tseng, A. S. (2018). Students and evaluation of web-based misinformation about vaccination: Critical reading or passive acceptance of claims?. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(3), 250-265. 

79. Williams, J. (2011). STEM Education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education, 16(1), 26-35. 

80. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science education, 89(3), 357-377. 

    상세보기

81. Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343-367. 

    상세보기

82. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62. 

    상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

김찬종 (110)