$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 4차 산업혁명시대 법정보기술의 현황과 발전방안
The Present Status of and Development Plans for Legal Technology in the Fourth Industrial Revolution 원문보기

정보화 정책 = Informatization policy, v.28 no.1, 2021년, pp.3 - 21  

이성진 (Department of Forensics in Sungkyunkwan University) ,  이연주 (Department of Forensics in Sungkyunkwan University) ,  손형근 (Department of Forensics in Sungkyunkwan University) ,  김기범 (Department of Forensics in Sungkyunkwan University)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

4차 산업혁명에 대한 클라우스 슈밥(Klaus Schwab)의 논의는 법정보기술의 발전 방향을 예측할 수 있는 하나의 프레임이다. 4차 산업혁명의 핵심개념인 기술 융합은 법정보기술 분야에 상당한 영향을 미치고 있다. 해외 법조계에서는 법률 챗봇 및 플랫폼 등의 다양한 최신 기술을 도입하여 법률 업무의 효율성과 접근성을 증대시키고 있으나, 국내는 리걸테크 산업이 아직 초기단계에 머물러 있어 법정보기술 활성화를 위한 제도적 개선이 필요하다. 이를 위하여 본 논문에서는 제2장에서 법정보기술의 개념과 분류체계를 구체화하고 제3장에서 법정보기술 활용 현황과 한계를 살펴본 후, 제4장에서는 법정보기술 발전을 위한 개선 방안을 고찰하였다. 법정보기술의 활성화를 위해서는 판례 등의 법률 자료를 적극적으로 공개하고 공개된 자료를 자유롭게 활용할 수 있는 법적 규제 방안 마련이 필요하다. 또한, 법률 영역에 있어 인공지능의 안전성, 개인정보보호, 윤리기준 등의 다양한 쟁점이 예상되므로 본 논문을 통해 대응책이 마련되기를 기대한다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Klaus Schwab's discussion on the Fourth Industrial Revolution provides a framework for predicting the direction of legal technology development. Technological convergence, which has emerged as the core concept of the Fourth Industrial Revolution has a significant effect on legal technology. In parti...

주제어

표/그림 (3)

참고문헌 (68)

  1. Al, P. (2017). "Persuadable: How Great Leaders Change Their Minds to Change the World." Educational Leadership, June 1. 

  2. Asan Nanum Foundadtion (ANF) (2020). 2020 Startup Korea. Seoul: Asan Nanum Foundation. 

  3. Ahn, D. (2021). "[Digital Life] AI and Ethics seen through 'Iruda' controversy." KyeongNam Newspaper, January 19. 

  4. Ahn, H. (2018). "[Editor goes] The first AI lawyer in Korea to go to a law firm...'just 20 seconds', analysis that even the prosecutor missed." JoongAng Ilbo, April 15. 

  5. Baek, S., Lim, G. & Yu, D. (2016). "Exploring Social Impact of AI." Informatization Policy, 23(4), 3-23. 

  6. Baek, Y. (2011). Basics of Law and Legal Informatics. Korean Studies Information Service System. 

  7. Baster, R. (2015). "Legal Tech 2.0: The World We Live in Now." https://www.legalexecutiveinstitute.com/legal-tech-2-0-the-world-we-live-in-now-byralph-baxter/, (Retrieved on December 27, 2020). 

  8. Breydo, L. (2019). "LegalTech VC Investment Trends: Finally, An Industry Inflection Point?." https://businesslawtoday.org/2019/09/legaltech-vcinvestment-trends-finally-industry-inflectionpoint. (Retrieved on December 26, 2020) 

  9. Byun, S. (2020). "A Study on the Problem of AI Bias in Data Ethics." Journal of Ethics, 148, 143-158. 

  10. Chang, B. (2018). "Artificial Intelligence and Civil Law." HUFS Law Review, 43(4), 43-71. 

  11. Cho, H. & Lee, J. (2016). "A Study on Artificial Intelligence, Law and Argument." Journal of Law and Politics Research, 16(2), 295-320. 

  12. Choi, M. (2020). "Who is responsible for damages due to AI errors?' Artificial intelligence regulatory maintenance roadmap confirmed." Hankyoreh, December 24. 

  13. Codex (2020). https://law.stanford.edu/codex-thestanford-center-for-legal-informatics. (Retrieved on December 26, 2020) 

  14. Eun, J. & Hwang, S. (2020). "Exploratory Study on Policy Decision Making with Artificial Intelligence: Applying Problem Structuring Typology on Success and Failure Cases." Informatization Policy, 27(4), 47-66. 

  15. Gang, H. (2020). "Passed 7 cases of public welfare bill in the ""Disclosure of unconfirmed judgments." Law Times, November 23. 

  16. Goodenough, O. (2015). "Legal Technology 3.0." https://www.huffpost.com/entry/legaltechnology-30_b_6603658, (Retrieved on December 27, 2020). 

  17. Han, H. (2018). "A Basic Study on the Possibility of Artificial Intelligence as a Legal Entity." Chungang Law Review, 20(3), 375-411. 

  18. Han, A. (2020). "A Study on the Regulations of the Automated Legal Document Drafting Service." Civil Procedure, 24(3), 391-449. 

  19. Hong, S. (2018). A.I. Algorithm and Discrimination. Science and Technology Policy Institute. 

  20. Hongdao, Q., Bibi, S., Khan, A., Ardito, L. & Khaskheli, M. (2019). "Legal Technologies in Action: The Future of the Legal Market in Light of Disruptive Innovations." Sustainability, 11(4). 

  21. Jang, W. (2020). "The advent of Legal Tech Era and Challenges." Civil Procedure, 24(1), 229-257. 

  22. Jeon, M. (2020). "The government presents a roadmap for overhauling laws, systems, and regulations in preparation for the era of artificial intelligence... 30 tasks." Artificial Intelligence Times, December 25. 

  23. Judicial Policy Research Institute (JPRI) (2018). Research on cooperation of Legal Information between the Legislature and the Judiciary. Gyeonggi Province: Judicial Policyi Research Institute. 

  24. Jung, J. (2018). "DDR & AJU, Introduces AI Lawyer for the First Time in Korea...If you ask in everyday language, AI Lawyer finds laws and precedents." Chosunmedia, Febrary 27. 

  25. Kim, D. (2019). "National Assembly introduces artificial intelligence to legislative information system." IT Chosun, September 2. 

  26. Kim, H. (2020). "Legal Tech startup pioneering "half-price" legal services." Asia Economy News, May 15. 

  27. Kim, I. (2016). "[Because it is a person, it is management, by Kim In-soo] Why can't the judge himself realize it?" Mail Business News, March 15. 

  28. Kim, J. (2020a). "A Legal Policy Study on the Safety of Artificial Intelligence and Human Ethics." Law Review, 20(1), 1-35. 

  29. Kim, J. (2020b). "Verhaltenssteuerung durch Algorithmen und der virtuelle Verwaltungsakt im KI(AI)-Zeitalter." Public Law, 48(3), 287-312. 

  30. Kim, S. (2018). "The computer programing of legal analysis and legal reasoning of AI." Law & Technology, 14(2), 33-40. 

  31. Kim, S. & Jeong, G. (2018). "Suggestions for the introduction of Artificial Intelligence into the legal field - Focused on cases of trade secret infringement." Law & Technology, 15(2), 68-89. 

  32. Kim, S. (2020d). "[FACT CHECK] The choice of AI is value-neutral?... Experts "It's just an illusion"." Yonhap News, October 9. 

  33. Kim, S. (2020e). "Seeking development of Legal Tech in the AI era and Changes in the Future Legal Markt." Legal Theory and Practice Review, 8(3), 85-128. 

  34. Korea Government (KG) (2020). Artificial Intelligence Law, System, and Regulation Maintenance Roadmap. Seoul: Korea Government. 

  35. Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA) (2020). Major Contents and Prospects of Three Data Bills. Naju: Korea Internet & Security Agency. 

  36. Korea Legislation Research Institute (KLRI) (2019). Development and utilization of Legal Tech.Legal AI. Sejong: Korea Legislation Research Institute. 

  37. Learning Hub (2019). "What Is Legal Tech? (+How It's Changing the Legal Industry)." https://learn.g2.com/legal-tech. (Retrieved on December 26, 2020). 

  38. Lee, I. & Kang, C. (2018). "A Study on the Theory of Criminal Law of Artificial Intelligence Robots - Focusing on criminal ability and criminal liability." Law Review, 18(3), 21-54. 

  39. Lee, W. (2018). "The Limitations of Criminal Law Theory in the Response to Artificial Intelligence." Contemporary Review of Criminal Law, 59, 444-475. 

  40. Ministry of Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (MMCST) (2021). Three Data Bills. Sejong: Policy Briefing. 

  41. Lew, I. (1992). "What is Legal Informatics?" Korean Journal of Law & Society, 5, 233-244. 

  42. National Assembly Research stkththdService (NARS) (2019a). A study on the possibility of introducing artificial intelligence (AI) to the work of the National Assembly Research Service. Seoul: National Assembly Research Service. 

  43. National Assembly Research Service (NARS) (2019b). Legislative Status and Prospects Related to Artificial Intelligence. Seoul: National Assembly Research Service. 

  44. National Assembly Research Service (NARS) (2019c). Artificial Intelligence Technology.Utilization.Talent Status and Implications. Seoul: National Assembly Research Service. 

  45. Oh, B. (2017). "Legal Protection and Utilization of Lawfully Published Personal Information." Kyung Hee Law Journal, 38(2), 1-25. 

  46. Park, K. (2018). "Data Protection Laws on Publicly Available Data." Chonnam Law Review, 38(2), 1-25. 

  47. Park, S. (2018b). "Innovating the Implementation of Law Based on Artificial Intelligence and Other Information Technology." Journal of Korea Information Law, 22(2), 133-162. 

  48. Richards, R. (2014). From the People's Perspective: Assessing the Representational Validity of a Coding Scheme of Citizens' Legal Communication about Ballot Initiatives, Paper represented at National Communication Association Annual Convention. 

  49. Reuters (2018). "Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women." https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobsautomation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-airecruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-againstwomen-idUSKCN1MK08G (Retrieved on November 20, 2019). 

  50. Schwab, K. (2016a). "The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means and How to Respond." World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrialrevolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond. (Retrieved on June 25, 2020). 

  51. Schwab, K. (2016b). "2016 International Legal Symposium." Supreme Court, https://tv.naver.com/v/1198460. (Retrived on June 25, 2020). 

  52. Seo, H. (2019). "A Preliminary Discussion on Policy Decision Making of AI in The Fourth Industrial Revolution." Informatization Policy, 26(3), 3-35. 

  53. Seul, M. (2016). "Current Status and Future Developments of Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence in Law:Focusing the Cusp of Machine Learning in U.S. and Discourses over Legal Profession and Law School Education." The Justice, 156, 269-302. 

  54. Shai, D., Jonathan, L., Liora, A. & Daniel, K. (2011). "Extraneous factors in judicial decisions." National Academy of Sciences, 108(17), 6889-6892. 

  55. Shim, J. (2018a). "IBM, AI bias, don't worry now." Byline Network, October 19. 

  56. Shim, W. (2018b). "Artificial Intelligence and IT Legal System : Focusing on Implications of the Legal Informatics." Northeast Asian Law Journal, 12(1), 55-86. 

  57. Shim, W. (2018c). "Legislative Studies in the Era of Artificial Intelligence." Law Review, 29(2), 11-49. 

  58. Shim, W. (2019). "Data Science and Legislative Practice : A Pilot Design for Introduction Strategy of National Assembly Research Service." Korean Journal of Law & Society, 62(0), 1-36. 

  59. Shin, S. (2015). "Study on the Korea Information System of Criminal Justice Services." Convergence Security Journal, 15(4), 147-153. 

  60. Shin, J. (2016). "The era when online divorce and judgment results can be predicted is coming soon." Law Times, October 20. 

  61. Shin, Y. (2019), "Policy and Legislation related to Safety of Artificial Intelligence." The Magazine of the IEEE, 46(10), 17-22. 

  62. Software Policy & Research Institute (SPRI) (2020). "Trends and issues following the digital transformation of the legal industry." https://spri.kr/posts/view/22504?codeindustry_trend, (Retrieved on December 27). 

  63. Son, H. (2019). IT&Media Law in the 4th Industrial Revolution. Seoul: Parkyoungsa. 

  64. Song, S. (2019). "Legal Ethics in LegalTech Age." Aju Law Review, 12(4), 173-201. 

  65. Wikipedia (2020). "Legal technology." https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Legal_technology. (Retrieved on December 26, 2020) 

  66. Won, D. & Lee, S. (2016), "Implication of AI and 4th Industrial Revolution." Induristrial Engineering Managine, 23(2), 13-22. 

  67. Yang, J. (2016), "The Regulation of Total Surveillance." The Law Reasearch institutute of Hongik Univ., 17(2), 277-305. 

  68. Zion Market Research (ZMR) (2020). "Legal Practice Management Software Market- By Deployment (Cloud-Based Deployment, On-Premise Deployment), By Application (Legal Firms, Attorneys, Law Courts)- Global Industry Perspective Comprehensive Analysis And Forecast, 2020 - 2026." https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/legal-practice-management-softwaremarket, (Retrieved on December 29). 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

BRONZE

출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로