매도후임대의 리스크 대비 성과의 비교분석: 선박투자회사 출자 및 선박 인수 사례를 중심으로 A Comparative Analysis of Risk-to-Performance of Sale and Lease Back: Based on the cases of ship investment company investment and ship acquisition원문보기
Purpose - I analyzes risk-to-performance evaluated in the market using data from sale and lease back. Specifically, I analyze from the perspective of financial institutions that purchase sale and lease back based on the cases of investment by ship investment companies and acquisition of ships. Desig...
Purpose - I analyzes risk-to-performance evaluated in the market using data from sale and lease back. Specifically, I analyze from the perspective of financial institutions that purchase sale and lease back based on the cases of investment by ship investment companies and acquisition of ships. Design/methodology/approach - I use 49 sale and lease back data from 2017 to 2019 for empirical analysis. Findings - The main results of this paper are as follows. First, after sale and lease back of domestic ships, the average amount of sales by the leased shipping company is 25.1 billion won, the average amount of investment by the purchased financial institution is 14.6 billion won (60%) and the average length of the ship is nine years. In ship finance, sale and lease back is deemed to be appropriately used as a means of restructuring for a large amount of money. Second, the main risk factor for sale and lease back of domestic ships is credit risk and can be measured in VaR in practice. As a result of the empirical analysis, the average credit risk burden ratio is 9%. As a major risk factor, low creditworthiness of restructuring companies is the key. Third, as a result of measuring the profitability of financial institutions that purchase sale and lease back of domestic ships at a net current price, it has an average value of 300 million won, but the deviation by case is very large. Fourth, the risk adjusted performance of sale and lease back of domestic ships is 0.54 on average compared to the total risk capital, and 0.52 compared to the stock-risk capital, and as with profitability earlier, the deviation of each case is very large and misaligned. In order to boost the sale and lease back market for large and long-term assets, in order to overcome low profitability as a prerequisite for future participation of commercial purchased financial institutions, it is expected that purchase decisions based on expectations versus risk will be necessary. Research implications or Originality - The results of this paper are expected to broaden the understanding of sale and lease back and foster the ability to assess long-term risk and performance. Based on this, it is believed that rapid restructuring of companies through sale and lease back of large amounts of long-term assets will greatly increase the utility of the domestic financial market.
Purpose - I analyzes risk-to-performance evaluated in the market using data from sale and lease back. Specifically, I analyze from the perspective of financial institutions that purchase sale and lease back based on the cases of investment by ship investment companies and acquisition of ships. Design/methodology/approach - I use 49 sale and lease back data from 2017 to 2019 for empirical analysis. Findings - The main results of this paper are as follows. First, after sale and lease back of domestic ships, the average amount of sales by the leased shipping company is 25.1 billion won, the average amount of investment by the purchased financial institution is 14.6 billion won (60%) and the average length of the ship is nine years. In ship finance, sale and lease back is deemed to be appropriately used as a means of restructuring for a large amount of money. Second, the main risk factor for sale and lease back of domestic ships is credit risk and can be measured in VaR in practice. As a result of the empirical analysis, the average credit risk burden ratio is 9%. As a major risk factor, low creditworthiness of restructuring companies is the key. Third, as a result of measuring the profitability of financial institutions that purchase sale and lease back of domestic ships at a net current price, it has an average value of 300 million won, but the deviation by case is very large. Fourth, the risk adjusted performance of sale and lease back of domestic ships is 0.54 on average compared to the total risk capital, and 0.52 compared to the stock-risk capital, and as with profitability earlier, the deviation of each case is very large and misaligned. In order to boost the sale and lease back market for large and long-term assets, in order to overcome low profitability as a prerequisite for future participation of commercial purchased financial institutions, it is expected that purchase decisions based on expectations versus risk will be necessary. Research implications or Originality - The results of this paper are expected to broaden the understanding of sale and lease back and foster the ability to assess long-term risk and performance. Based on this, it is believed that rapid restructuring of companies through sale and lease back of large amounts of long-term assets will greatly increase the utility of the domestic financial market.
Adams, A. T., and R. T. Oarke (1996), "Stock Market Reaction to Sale and Leaseback Announcements in the UK," Journal of Property Research, 13(1), 31-46.
Alvayay, J. R., R. C. Rutherford, and W. S. Smith (1995), "Tax Rules and the Sale and Leaseback of Corporate Real Estate," Real Estate Economics, 23(2), 207-238.
Gavalas, D. and T. Syriopoulos (2014), "An integrated credit rating and loan quality model: application to bank shipping finance", Maritime Policy & Management, 42(6), 533-554. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2014.904948)
Grant Thornton (2019), Insights into IFRS 16: Sale and leaseback accounting.
Jarrow, R. A., and M. T. Stuart (1995). "Pricing Derivatives on Financial Securities Subject to Credit Risk," Journal of Finance, 50(1), 53-85. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2329239)
Jarrow, R. A., D. Lando, and S. M. Turnbull (1997), "A Markov Model for the Term Structure of Credit Risk Spreads," Review of Financial Studies, 10(1), 411-453. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812819222_0018)
Kavussanos, M. G. and D. A. Tsouknidis (2016), "Default risk drivers in shipping bank loans", Transportation Research Part E, 94, 71-94. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.07.008)
Kim, E. H., W. G. Le wellen, and J. J. McConnell (1978), "Sale-and-Leaseback Agreements and Enterprise Valuation", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 13(5),871-883.
Lozinskaia, A., A.Merikas, A. Merika and H. Penikas(2017), "Determinants of the probability of default: the case of the internationally listed shipping corporations", Maritime Policy & Management, 44(7), 837-858. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2017.1345018)
Mitroussi, K., W. Abouarghoub, J.J.Haider, S.J. Pettit and N. Tigka(2016), "Performance drivers of shipping loans: An empirical investigation", International Journal of Production Economics, 171(3), 438-452. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.041)
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.