다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기
Quality improvement in health care : QIH = 한국의료질향상학회지, v.27 no.1, 2021년, pp.2 - 9
AI-Helper
Patient safety remains one of the most important health care issues in Korea. To improve patient safety, we have introduced concepts from the field of safety science such as the Swiss cheese model, and adopted several methodologies previously used in other industries, including incident reporting sy...
Kohn KT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, D.C., United States of America: National Academies Press; 1999.
Haskins J. 20 years of patient safety [Internet]. Washington, D.C., United States of America: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2019 [cited 2021 March 18]. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/20-years-patient-safety
Vincent C, Aylin P, Franklin BD, Holmes A, Iskander S, Jacklin A, et al. Is health care getting safer? British Medical Journal. 2008;337(7680):1205-7.
Bates DW, Singh H. Two decades Since to err is human: an assessment of progress and emerging priorities in patient safety. Health Affairs. 2018;37(11):1736-43.
Wears R, Sutcliffe K. Still Not Safe: Patient safety and the middle-managing of American medicine. New York, Untied States of America: Oxford University Press; 2019.
Aven T. What is safety science? Safety Science. 2014;67:15-20.
Borys D, Else B, Leggett S. The fifth age of safety: the adaptive age. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2009;1(1):19-27.
Hollnagel E. Safety-I and Safety-II: the past and future of safety management. London, Unithed Kingdom: CRC Press; 2014.
Yang JY. Brief review of resilience engineering. Occupational Safety & Health Issue Report 2019;13(1):14-23.
Hollnagel E, Paries J, Woods D, Wreathall J. Resilience engineering in practice: a guidebook. Farnham, Unithed Kingdom: Ashgate Pub Co; 2011.
Rasmussen J. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Safety Science. 1997;27(2):183-213.
Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science. 2003;42(4):237-70.
Hollnagel E. FRAM : the functional resonance analysis method. Farnham, Unithed Kingdom: Ashgate Pub Co; 2012.
Filho APG, Jun GT, Waterson P. Four studies, two methods, one accident - an examination of the reliability and validity of accimap and STAMP for accident analysis. Safety Science. 2019;113: 310-7.
Underwood P, Waterson P. A critical review of the STAMP, FRAM and accimap systemic accident analysis models. In Stanton NA(ed). Advances in Human Aspects of Road and Rail Transportation. Boca Raton, Untied States of America: CRC Press, 2012.
Hollnagel E, Wears RL, Braithwaite J. From Safety-I to Safety-II: A White Paper. [Internet]. [cited 2021 March 29]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/signuptosafety/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2015/10/safety-1-safety-2-whte-papr.pdf
Wachter R, Gupta K. Understanding Patient Safety, 3rd Edition. New York, United States of America: McGraw-Hill; 2018.
ISQua J. Safety-II - the changed paradigm of patient safety. [Internet]. [cited 2021 March 29]. Available from: https://isqua.org/news/safety-iithe-changed-paradigm-of-patient-safety
Righi AW, Saurin TA, Wachs P. A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: Research areas and a research agenda proposal. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2015;141:142-52.
McNab D, Bowie P, Morrison J, Ross A. Understanding patient safety performance and educational needs using the 'safety-II' approach for complex systems. Education for Primary Care. 2016;27(6):443-50.
Mannion R, Braithwaite J. False dawns and new horizons in patient safety research and practice. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2017;6(12):685-9.
Carson-Stevens A, Donaldson L, Sheikh A. The rise of patient safety-II: should we give up hope on safety-I and extracting value from patient safety incidents? comment on "false dawns and new horizons in patient safety research and practice". International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2018;7(7):667-70.
Vincent C, Amalberti R. Safer Healthcare: Strategies for the Real World. [Internet]. [cited 2021 March 29]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-25559-0
Shebl NA, Franklin BD, Barber N. Failure mode and effects analysis outputs: are they valid? BMC Health Services Research. 2012;12:150.
Catchpole K, Russ S. The problem with checklists. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2015;24(9):545-54.
Macrae C. The problem with incident reporting. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2016;25(2):71-5.
Peerally MF, Carr S, Waring J, Dixon-Woods M. The problem with root cause analysis. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2017;26:417-22.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
Copyright KISTI. All Rights Reserved.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.