최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.41 no.3, 2021년, pp.203 - 220
We explored the performance improvement method of automated scoring for scientific argumentation. We analyzed the pattern of argumentation using automated scoring models. For this purpose, we assessed the level of argumentation for student's scientific discourses in classrooms. The dataset consists ...
Choi, J., Song, H., & Nam, K. (2010). Formulaic Expressions in Korean. Discourse and Cognition, 17(2), 163-190.
Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science education, 84(3), 287-312.
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of research in education, 32(1), 268-291.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science education, 88(6), 915-933.
Fauzi, M. A., Utomo, D. C., Setiawan, B. D., & Pramukantoro, E. S. (2017, August). Automatic essay scoring system using N-gram and cosine similarity for gamification based E-learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Image Processing (pp. 151-155), Bangkok, Thailand.
Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404-423.
Gonzalez-Howard, M. & McNeill, K. L. (2017, April). Variation in how teachers support critique in argumentation discussions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching(NARST), San Antonio, TX.
Grooms, J., Sampson, V., & Enderle, P. (2018). How concept familiarity and experience with scientific argumentation are related to the way groups participate in an episode of argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1264-1286.
Henderson, J. B., & Osborne, J. F. (2019). Using computer technology to support the teaching and learning of argumentation in chemistry. In Erduran, S. (Eds), Argumentation in Chemistry Education (pp. 79-105). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Jeong, A. C. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25-43.
Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International journal of science education, 20(7), 849-871.
KICE(Korea Institute Of Curriculum & Evaluation). (2006). A Study on the Development and Introduction of an Automated Scoring Program(RRI 2006-6). Retrieved from http://kice.re.kr/resrchBoard/view.do?seq19388&skice&m030102
Kil, H.-h. (2018). The Study of Korean Stopwords list for Text mining. The Korean Language and Literature, 78, 1-25.
Kim, S.-J. (2019). Exploring the Possibility of Using N-gram Feature for Automatic Scoring of Argumentative Writing Tasks. The research in writing, 41, 37-62.
Liu, O. L., Rios, J. A., Heilman, M., Gerard, L., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Validation of automated scoring of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 215-233.
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Middle school students' use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. In Marsha C. Lovett & Priti Shah (Eds), Thinking with Data (pp. 233-265). NY: Taylor & Francis.
Nam, J., Kwak, K.,, Jang, K., & Hand, B. (2008). The Implementation of Argumentation Using Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) in Middle School Science. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 28(8), 922-936.
Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Dialectical features of students' argumentation: A critical review of argumentation studies in science education. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 371-393.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
Osborne, J. F., Henderson, J. B., MacPherson, A., Szu, E., Wild, A., & Yao, S. Y. (2016). The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 821-846.
Park, C., Kim, Y, Kim, J, Song, J., & Choi, H. (2015). R data mining. Seoul: Kyowoo.
Park, E. L., & Cho, S. (2014). KoNLPy: Korean natural language processing in Python. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Human & Cognitive Language Technology (pp. 133-136), Chuncheon, Korea.
Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2015). The influence of group dynamics on collaborative scientific argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), 335-351.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science education, 92(3), 447-472.
Sampson, V., Enderle, P. J., & Walker, J. P. (2012). The development and validation of the assessment of scientific argumentation in the classroom (ASAC) observation protocol: A tool for evaluating how students participate in scientific argumentation. In M. S. Khine(2012).(Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation (pp. 235-264). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tsoumakas, G., & Vlahavas, I. (2007, September). Random k-labelsets: An ensemble method for multilabel classification. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 406-417), Warsaw, Poland.
Yang, I. H., Lee, H. J., Lee, H. N., & Cho, H. J. (2009). The development of rubrics to assess scientific argumentation. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 29(2), 203-220.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wachsmuth, H., Al Khatib, K., & Stein, B. (2016, December). Using argument mining to assess the argumentation quality of essays. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 1680-1691), Osaka, Japan.
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.