참고문헌 (39)

1. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32. 

   

2. Choi, J., Song, H., & Nam, K. (2010). Formulaic Expressions in Korean. Discourse and Cognition, 17(2), 163-190. 

3. Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321. 

   상세보기

4. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science education, 84(3), 287-312. 

   상세보기

5. Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of research in education, 32(1), 268-291. 

   상세보기

6. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science education, 88(6), 915-933. 

   상세보기

7. Fauzi, M. A., Utomo, D. C., Setiawan, B. D., & Pramukantoro, E. S. (2017, August). Automatic essay scoring system using N-gram and cosine similarity for gamification based E-learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Image Processing (pp. 151-155), Bangkok, Thailand. 

8. Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404-423. 

   상세보기

9. Gonzalez-Howard, M. & McNeill, K. L. (2017, April). Variation in how teachers support critique in argumentation discussions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching(NARST), San Antonio, TX. 

10. Grooms, J., Sampson, V., & Enderle, P. (2018). How concept familiarity and experience with scientific argumentation are related to the way groups participate in an episode of argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1264-1286. 

    상세보기

11. Ha, M., Lee, G.-G., Shin, S., Lee, J.-K., Choi, S., Choo, J., Kim, N., Lee, H., Lee, J., Lee, J., Jo, Y., Kang, K., & Park, J. (2019). Assessment as a Learning-Support Tool and Utilization of Artificial Intelligence: WA3I Project Case. School Science Journal, 13(3), 271-282. 

    

12. Henderson, J. B., & Osborne, J. F. (2019). Using computer technology to support the teaching and learning of argumentation in chemistry. In Erduran, S. (Eds), Argumentation in Chemistry Education (pp. 79-105). London: Royal Society of Chemistry. 

13. Jeong, A. C. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25-43. 

    상세보기

14. Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International journal of science education, 20(7), 849-871. 

    상세보기

15. KICE(Korea Institute Of Curriculum & Evaluation). (2006). A Study on the Development and Introduction of an Automated Scoring Program(RRI 2006-6). Retrieved from http://kice.re.kr/resrchBoard/view.do?seq19388&skice&m030102 

16. Kil, H.-h. (2018). The Study of Korean Stopwords list for Text mining. The Korean Language and Literature, 78, 1-25. 

17. Kim, M., & Ryu, S. (2020). Teacher Feedback on Process-Centered Assessment for Scientific Argumentation. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 40(3), 271-289. 

    원문보기 상세보기

18. Kim, S.-J. (2019). Exploring the Possibility of Using N-gram Feature for Automatic Scoring of Argumentative Writing Tasks. The research in writing, 41, 37-62. 

19. Lee, G.-G., Ha, H., Hong, H.-G., & Kim, H.-B. (2018). Exploratory Research on Automating the Analysis of Scientific Argumentation Using Machine Learning. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 38(2), 219-234. 

    원문보기 상세보기

20. Lee, M., & Ryu. S. (2020). Automated Scoring of Scientific Argumentation Using Expert Morpheme Classification Approaches. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 40(3), 321-336. 

    원문보기 상세보기

21. Liu, O. L., Rios, J. A., Heilman, M., Gerard, L., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Validation of automated scoring of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 215-233. 

    상세보기

22. Maeng, S., Park, Y.-S., & Kim, C.-J. (2013). Methodological Review of the Research on Argumentative Discourse Focused on Analyzing Collaborative Construction and Epistemic Enactments of Argumentation. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 33(4), 840-862. 

    원문보기 상세보기

23. McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Middle school students' use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. In Marsha C. Lovett & Priti Shah (Eds), Thinking with Data (pp. 233-265). NY: Taylor & Francis. 

24. Nam, J., Kwak, K.,, Jang, K., & Hand, B. (2008). The Implementation of Argumentation Using Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) in Middle School Science. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 28(8), 922-936. 

25. Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Dialectical features of students' argumentation: A critical review of argumentation studies in science education. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 371-393. 

    상세보기

26. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(10), 994-1020. 

    상세보기

27. Osborne, J. F., Henderson, J. B., MacPherson, A., Szu, E., Wild, A., & Yao, S. Y. (2016). The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 821-846. 

    상세보기

28. Park, C., Kim, Y, Kim, J, Song, J., & Choi, H. (2015). R data mining. Seoul: Kyowoo. 

29. Park, E. L., & Cho, S. (2014). KoNLPy: Korean natural language processing in Python. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Human & Cognitive Language Technology (pp. 133-136), Chuncheon, Korea. 

30. Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2015). The influence of group dynamics on collaborative scientific argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), 335-351. 

31. Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science education, 92(3), 447-472. 

    상세보기

32. Sampson, V., Enderle, P. J., & Walker, J. P. (2012). The development and validation of the assessment of scientific argumentation in the classroom (ASAC) observation protocol: A tool for evaluating how students participate in scientific argumentation. In M. S. Khine(2012).(Ed.), Perspectives on scientific argumentation (pp. 235-264). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. 

33. Shin, H. S., & Kim, H.-J. (2012). Development of the Analytic Framework for Dialogic Argumentation Using the TAP and a Diagram in the Context of Learning the Circular Motion. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(5), 1007-1026. 

    원문보기 상세보기

34. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 

35. Tsoumakas, G., & Vlahavas, I. (2007, September). Random k-labelsets: An ensemble method for multilabel classification. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 406-417), Warsaw, Poland. 

36. Yang, I. H., Lee, H. J., Lee, H. N., & Cho, H. J. (2009). The development of rubrics to assess scientific argumentation. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 29(2), 203-220. 

37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

38. Wachsmuth, H., Al Khatib, K., & Stein, B. (2016, December). Using argument mining to assess the argumentation quality of essays. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 1680-1691), Osaka, Japan. 

39. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62. 

    상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

유선아 (7)