[논문]공동주택 하자소송 사례분석을 통한 분쟁방지 대책에 관한 연구

편수정; 김종호; 김규용; 최경철; 손민재; 남정수

doi:10.5345/jkibc.2021.21.4.257

공동주택 하자소송 사례분석을 통한 분쟁방지 대책에 관한 연구
A Study of the Prevent Measure by Case Analysis of Apartment Building Defect Lawsuit 원문보기

한국건축시공학회지 = Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, v.21 no.4, 2021년, pp.257 - 268

편수정 (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungnam National University) , 김종호 (Division of Architecture, POSCO E&C) , 김규용 (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungnam National University) , 최경철 (Institute of Social Infrastructure Technology, Chungnam National University) , 손민재 (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungnam National University) , 남정수 (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungnam National University)

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구는 최근 급증하고 있는 공동주택의 하자분쟁과 관련하여 하자소송이 급증한 시점인 2013년을 기준으로 2013년 이전과 이후의 하자소송 판례 24건의 공종별 주요 쟁점사항에 대하여 분석한 결과 세대당 하자적출금액은 2013년 이후는 2013년 이전과 비교하여 약 5% 감소한 세대당 2,572천원이나, 세대당 판결금액은 오히려 약 19%가 증가하여 2013년 이후에는 세대당 1,916천원으로 나타났다. 공종별로 살펴보면 균열에 대한 하자가 2013년 이전과 이후 가장 큰 비율을 차지하였고, 2013년 이전에는 설비, 타일, 창호 순으로 나타났고, 2013년 이후에는 조경, 타일, 단열 및 창호공사 순으로 나타났다. 이러한 하자분쟁 예방을 위해서는 설계단계, 시공단계 및 유지보수단계에서 하자분쟁 방지 노력이 필요할 것이다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

This study analyzed the major issues of 24 defect litigation precedents before and after 2013, based on 2013, when defect litigation in relation to the rapidly increasing defect disputes in apartment houses. The amount of defect removal per household is 2,572 thousand won per household, which is about 5% less than before 2013 from 2013, but the judgment amount per household has rather increased by about 19%, showing 1,916 thousand won per household after 2013. By type of construction, defects on cracks accounted for the largest proportion before and after 2013. Before 2013, equipment, tiles, and windows appeared in the order, and after 2013, landscaping, tiles, insulation and window work were in the order. In order to prevent such defect disputes, efforts to prevent defect disputes will be needed in the design stage, construction stage, and maintenance stage.

주제어

표/그림 (13)

그림 Figure 1. Changes in the amount of judgment in defect lawsuits
표 Table 1. Case of judgement on defect litigation
표 Table 2. Judgement amount by type of work
표 Table 3. Fire door litigation status
표 Table 4. Case law for calculating defect repair costs due to lack of fire door performance
표 Table 5. Case law for calculating defect repair costs due to lack of waterproof
표 Table 6. Contents of judgement on condensation
그림 Figure 2. Checklist for preventing defects in apartment houses
표 Table 7. Case law for the occurrence of mold on the balcony
그림 Figure 3. Checklist for review of completed drawings
표 Table 8. Design document precedent as the criterion for determining defects
그림 Figure 4. Number of defects by detailed work type
표 Table 9. Step-by-step procedure for quality improvement in the construction stage

참고문헌 (47)

Population and Household. Population Census [Internet]. DaeJeon (Korea): Statistics Korea. [cited 2019 Oct]. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/1/10/2/index.board
Recent trends and countermeasures of litigation for defective planning[Internet]. DaeJeon (Korea): Construction and Economy Research Institute of Korea. [cited 2015 Oct.] Available from: http://www.cerik.re.kr/report/issue/detail/1804
Choi JH, Park JM, Seo DS, Park KW, Kim OK, Jo JH. A study on legal issues about defect repair claim on apartment building. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2012 Jan;12(1):42-53. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2012.12.1.042
Lee SH, Kim JJ, Lee SH. Evaluating importance of defect through defect dispute case study in apartment buildings. Journal of the korea academia-industrial cooperation society. 2019 Mar;20(3):56-64. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.3.56

원문보기 상세보기
Court of Korea, Seoul central district court. Construction appraisal practice. 2016.
Court of Korea, Suwon district court. 2005Gahab21428. 2005.
Court of Korea, Seoul high court. 2005Gahab16204. 2005.
Court of Korea, Daejeon district court. 2006Gahab4987. 2006.
Court of Korea. 2006Gahab7751. 2006.
Court of Korea, Seoul central district court. 2006Gahab14276. 2006.
Court of Korea. 2006Na3034. 2006.
Court of Korea, Suwon district court. 2007Gahab2253. 2007.
Court of Korea, Suwon district court. 2007Gahab3141. 2007.
Court of Korea, Seoul central district court. 2007Gahab65189. 2007.
Court of Korea, Seoul central district court. 2007Gahab77755. 2007.
Court of Korea, Seoul central district court. 2007Gahab35898. 2007.
Court of Korea, Seoul central district court. 2007Gahab28241. 2007.
Court of Korea. 2013Na52936. 2013.
Court of Korea, Daejeon district court. 2015Gahab102631. 2015.
Court of Korea, Busan district court. 2015Gahab102216. 2015.
Court of Korea. 2016Gahab54539. 2016.
Court of Krea, Chuncheon district court. 2016Gahab83. 2016.
Court of Korea, Daejeon district court. 2016Gahab102057. 2016.
Court of Korea, Busan high court. 2016Na2680. 2016.
Court of Korea, Incheon district court. 2016Gahab102848. 2016.
Court of Korea, Gwangju high court. 2017Na13037. 2017.
Court of Korea, Gwangju district court. 2017Na56129. 2017.
Court of Korea, Busan high court. 2017Na32. 2017.
Court of Korea, Busan district court. 2017Gahab44509. 2017.
Reliable ministry of government legislation, Korea law information center. Investigation of defects in apartment houses, calculation of repair costs and criteria for determining defects (Article 15, Condensation). 2020, Ministry of land, infrastructure and transport notification No.2020-858.
Reliable ministry of government legislation, Korea law information center. Construction standard specification. (3.2) 2016, Ministry of land, infrastructure and transport notification No.2015-1072.
Reliable ministry of government legislation, Korea law information center. Standard for automatic fire shutter and fire door, (Article 5, Performance criteria). 2012, Ministry of land, transport and maritime affairs notification No.2012-552.
Court of Korea, Supreme court. 2012Da18762. 2012
Court of Korea, Incheon district court. 2007Gahab14076. 2007.
Court of Korea, Incheon district court. 2012Gahab10627. 2012.
Court of Korea. 2015Gahab563121. 2015.
Court of Korea. 2015Gahab34635. 2015.
Court of Korea, Seoul central district court. 2013Gahab88985. 2013.
Court of Korea, Busan district court. 2015Gahab45034. 2015.
Court of Korea, Gwangju district court. 2016Gahab53857. 2016.
Ministry of land, infrastructure and transport. Detailed guidelines for preventing condensation in apartment houses. 2014. p. 3-95
Court of Korea, Seoul southern district court. 2014Gahab11995. 2014.
Court of Korea, seoul high court. 2013Gahab108656. 2013.
Court of Korea. 2016Gahab104352. 2016.
Reliable ministry of government legislation, Korea law information center. Housing law (Article 33, Design and construction of a house). 2021. Act No.17486.
Reliable ministry of government legislation, Korea law information center. Criteria for drawing up a design document for a house (Attach 1, Details of basic design drawing). 2012, Ministry of land, infrastructure and transport notification No.2012-533.
Apartment houses and strength tenants' rights[Internet]. DaeJeon (Korea): Ministry of land, infrastructure and transport. [cited 2019 Sep]. Available from: http://www.molit.go.kr/mtc/USR/N0201/m_36770/dtl.jsp?lcmspage10&id95082445

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증