최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.41 no.4, 2021년, pp.339 - 358
This study explores the agency of a student leader, expressed through efforts to distribute power and encourage participation in elementary scientific modeling classes. The study also analyzes the context in which the leader's agency was expressed and the context in which the development of a collec...
Anderson, L. (2010). Embedded, emboldened, and (net)working for change: Support-seeking and teacher agency in urban, high-needs schools. Harvard Educational Review, 80, 541-586.
Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin'! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 187-229.
Basu, S. J. (2008). How students design and enact physics lessons: Five immigrant Caribbean youth and the cultivation of student voice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 881-899.
Basu, S. J., Barton, A. C., Clairmont, N., & Locke, D. (2009). Developing a framework for critical science agency through case study in a conceptual physics context. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(2), 345-371.
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191-216.
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
Cho, Y. D. (2001). Understanding Korean secondary school classroom classes. Seoul, Korea: Company of Education and Science.
Clement, J. J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism. In G. Glover & R. Ronning, C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Assessment, theory and research (pp. 341-381). New York: Plenum.
Clement, J. J. (2008). Student/teacher co-construction of visualizable models
Damsa, C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143-186.
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291.
Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A.(1998) What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962-1023.
Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explainingan emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
Goulart, M. I., & Roth, W. M. (2010). Engaging young children in collective curriculum design. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 553-562.
Han, M. H. (2018). Role of Epistemic Affect in Elementary School Students' Scientific Modeling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Korea.
Han, M. H., Kim, H, -B. (2012). Elementary Student's Reasoning Patterns Represented in Constructing Models of "Food Web and Food Pyramid". Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 71-83.
Han, M. H., Kim, H, -B. (2017). Elementary Students' Cognitive-Emotional Rebuttals in Their Modeling Activity: Focusing on Epistemic Affect. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 37(1), 155-168.
Harris, E. M., & Ballard, H. L. (2021). Examining student environmental science agency across school science contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Holland, D. (1998). Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2009). Social practice theory and historical productions of persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 1-15.
Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Engaging in science: A feeling for the discipline. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 156-202.
Jeon, E. (2021). Exploring Students' Epistemic Agency Expressed in Collaborative Scientific Modeling. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Korea.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modeling, teachers' views on the nature of modeling, and implications for the education of modelers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369-387.
Ke, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2021). Supporting students' meaningful engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages: A case study of contrasting teaching approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 335-365.
Kim, H., Kim, H. -B., Kang, E. (2015). Expression of Students' Agency in an Elementary School Science Class: A Focus on Teaching and Learning Contexts. Biology Education, 43(3), 289-301.
Ko, M. L. M., & Krist, C. (2019). Opening up curricula to redistribute epistemic agency: A framework for supporting science teaching. Science Education, 103(4), 979-1010.
Lee, C. -E., & Kim, H. -B. (2016). Understanding the Role of Wonderment Questions Related to Activation of Conceptual Resources in Scientific Model Construction: Focusing on Students' Epistemological Framing and Positional Framing. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(3), 471-483.
Lee, M., & Kim, H. -B. (2019). Key Stages of a Research and Students' Epistemic Agency in a Student-Driven R&E. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 39(4), 511-523.
Lee, S., & Kim, H. -B. (2017). Exploring Secondary Students' Dialogic Argumentation Regarding Excretion via Collaborative Modeling. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 37(6), 1037-1049.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and science literacy. In W. Damon, R. Lerner, K. A.Renninger, & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology in practice (6th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 153-196). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lim, S. -E., Choe, S. -U., Park, C., Kim, C. -J. (2020). Exploring the Influence of an Explicit and Reflective Modeling Instruction on Elementary Students' Metamodeling Knowledge. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 40(2), 127-140.
Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D., & Berland, L. (2018). Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1053-1075.
Ministry of Education (2015). Science curriculum. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education.
National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts,and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework of New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The NationalAcademies Press.
NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Noh, T., Kim, Y., Han, S., Kang, S. (2002). Reserch Article : Elementary School Students' Views on the Nature of Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(4), 882-891.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Education Working Papers.
Paris, C., & Lung, P. (2008). Agency, and child-centered practices in novice teachers: Autonomy, efficacy, intentionality, and reflectivity. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 29, 253-268.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta(Eds.). Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice(pp. 187-206). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Rea-Ramirez, M. A., Clement, J., & Nunez-Oviedo, M. C. (2008). An instructional model derived from model construction and criticism theory. In Model based learning and instruction in science (pp. 23-43). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839-858.
Sandoval, W. A., Bell, P., Coleman, E. B., Enyedy, N., & Suthers, D. D. (2000). Designing Knowledge Representations for Learning Epistemic Practices of Science.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37-68.
Schenkel, K., & Barton, A. C. (2020). Critical science agency and power hierarchies: Restructuring power within groups to address injustice beyond them. Science Education, 104(3), 500-529.
Schenkel, K., Barton, A. C., Tan, E., Nazar, C. R., & Flores, M. D. G. D. (2019). Framing equity through a closer examination of critical science agency. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(2), 309-325.
Sharma, A. (2008). Making (electrical) connections: Exploring student agency in a school in India. Science Education, 92(2), 297-319.
Shim, S. -Y. (2015). Shift in epistemological framing of small group students during their social construction of scientific models. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Korea.
Shultz, J. J., Florio, S., & Erickson, F. (1982). Aspects of the cultural organization of social relationships in communication at home and in school. Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education, 88-123.
Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn scienceas-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487-516.
Stroupe, D., Caballero, M. D., & White, P. (2018). Fostering students' epistemic agency through the co-configuration of moth research. Science Education, 102(6), 1176-1200.
Uhm, J., Kim, H. -B. (2020). Changes in Teaching Practices of Elementary School Teachers in Scientific Modeling Classes: Focused on Modeling Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK). Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 40(5), 543-563.
Wegerif, R., Li, L., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2015). The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking. Routledge.
Wray, K. A., & Richmond, G. (2018). Factors shaping the agency of beginning science teachers working in high-poverty schools. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(8), 785-803.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yoo, Y. J., Oh, P. S. (2016). Effects of Modeling-Based Science Inquiry Instruction on Elementary Students' Learning in the Unit of Seasonal Changes. Elementary Science Education, 35(2), 265-276.
Zimmerman, H. T., & Weible, J. L. (2018). Epistemic agency in an environmental sciences watershed investigation fostered by digital photography. International Journal of Science Education, 40(8), 894-918.
Zivic, A., Smith, J. F., Reiser, B., Edwards, K., Novak, M., & McGill, T. (2018). Negotiating Epistemic Agency and Target Learning Goals: Supporting Coherence from the Students' Perspective. In Kay, J. and Luckin, R. (Eds.) Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: Making the Learning Sciences Count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018, Volume 1. (pp. 25-32). London, UK: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.