Comparison of the Immediate Effects of Kinesio Taping on the Dynamic Balance of Stable Ankle and Functional Ankle Instability among Young Adults in Their Twenties: a preliminary study원문보기
Purpose : Kinesio taping applied to the ankle varies, and if the overall ankle is taped as much as possible, several effects, including balance, can be expected, but clinically the cost reduction for intervention is very important. Therefore, this study attempted to find out the optimal way to the e...
Purpose : Kinesio taping applied to the ankle varies, and if the overall ankle is taped as much as possible, several effects, including balance, can be expected, but clinically the cost reduction for intervention is very important. Therefore, this study attempted to find out the optimal way to the effect and cost of kinesio taping on ankle dynamic balance. Methods : The subject of this study was 24 university students in their 20s (male: 13, female: 11), who received sufficient explanation of the purpose and method of the study. The Cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT) questionnaire was used for the degree of ankle instability of the study subjects. If the subject's CAIT score was 28 points or more, it was classified as a stable ankle, and if the score was 24 points or less, it was classified as functional ankle instability (FAI). In this study, Biodex Balance System® measurement equipment was used to calculate the dynamic balance of study participants. The application of kinesio taping was performed by one physical therapist to attach in the same way, and a method of wrapping the ankle joint was applied in the eight-shaped bandage. Results : The results are as follows in before and after taping of the stable ankle and FAI group. There was no significant difference in the overall, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral stability index. The comparison is as follows between groups for the differences (post-pre value) in before and after the application of kinesio taping. There were no significant differences between groups in all the overall, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral stability index. Conclusion : In this study, no significant difference in kinesio taping was found in the dynamic balance of stable ankle and FAI (overall, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral). It is necessary to continue to study ways to find the maximum effect while minimally attaching them to the application method of ankle kinesio taping.
Purpose : Kinesio taping applied to the ankle varies, and if the overall ankle is taped as much as possible, several effects, including balance, can be expected, but clinically the cost reduction for intervention is very important. Therefore, this study attempted to find out the optimal way to the effect and cost of kinesio taping on ankle dynamic balance. Methods : The subject of this study was 24 university students in their 20s (male: 13, female: 11), who received sufficient explanation of the purpose and method of the study. The Cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT) questionnaire was used for the degree of ankle instability of the study subjects. If the subject's CAIT score was 28 points or more, it was classified as a stable ankle, and if the score was 24 points or less, it was classified as functional ankle instability (FAI). In this study, Biodex Balance System® measurement equipment was used to calculate the dynamic balance of study participants. The application of kinesio taping was performed by one physical therapist to attach in the same way, and a method of wrapping the ankle joint was applied in the eight-shaped bandage. Results : The results are as follows in before and after taping of the stable ankle and FAI group. There was no significant difference in the overall, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral stability index. The comparison is as follows between groups for the differences (post-pre value) in before and after the application of kinesio taping. There were no significant differences between groups in all the overall, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral stability index. Conclusion : In this study, no significant difference in kinesio taping was found in the dynamic balance of stable ankle and FAI (overall, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral). It is necessary to continue to study ways to find the maximum effect while minimally attaching them to the application method of ankle kinesio taping.
In addition, even kinesio taping applied to the ankle varies, and if the overall ankle is taped as much as possible, several effects, including balance, can be expected, but clinically the cost reduction for intervention is very important. Therefore, this study attempted to find out the optimal way to the effect and cost of kinesio taping on ankle dynamic balance.
제안 방법
In this study, dynamic balance was measured by dividing it into before (first assessment) and after the taping application (second assessment). The two measurement methods of balance are the same, and no intervention has been applied.
The only difference between measurements is the non-taping and the attachment. The dynamic balance was assessed by the first and second measurements at intervals of approximately four weeks in order for subjects to avoid errors in outcome values due to adaptation of experimental equipment in BBS (Jeong et al., 2017).
대상 데이터
The subject of this study was 24 university students in their 20s (male; 13, female; 11), who received sufficient explanation of the purpose and method of the study. This study was conducted by the informed consent of the subjects.
데이터처리
The data of this study were assessed by a normality test. As a result, the data was calculated through a nonparametric test. Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was conducted to find out the differences before and after the intervention within the group and to find out the differences (post-pre values) of each group were first calculated, between the groups, and then the results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
, Armonk, NY, USA). Frequency analysis and descriptive statistics (average, standard deviation) were conducted to evaluate the general characteristics of all subjects. The data of this study were assessed by a normality test.
Frequency analysis and descriptive statistics (average, standard deviation) were conducted to evaluate the general characteristics of all subjects. The data of this study were assessed by a normality test. As a result, the data was calculated through a nonparametric test.
As a result, the data was calculated through a nonparametric test. Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was conducted to find out the differences before and after the intervention within the group and to find out the differences (post-pre values) of each group were first calculated, between the groups, and then the results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The significance level was set to α=.
이론/모형
This study was conducted by the informed consent of the subjects. The Cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT) questionnaire was used for the degree of ankle instability of the study subjects. If the subject's CAIT score was 28 points or more, it was classified as a stable ankle, and if the score was 24 points or less, it was classified as FAI (Kim & Yoo, 2020).
성능/효과
We would like to interpret it as follows. First, it is estimated that the subjects who participated in this experiment were college students with living their daily without major problems, and although they had felt FAI, there was no serious problem with ankle stability. This is supported by the fact that the CAIT score was from 17 to 24 in this study of FAI subjects.
The authors explain the results of this study as follows. First, kinesio taping may not be effective in dynamic balance of the ankle. According to the results of a previous study, when kinesio taping is applied to FAI, it may not be as effective in static and dynamic balance as expected (Kim & Gang, 2020).
In this study, no difference was found in the dynamic balance (overall, anterior-posterior, medial-lateral stability) index in before and after taping in the subjects of stable ankle and FAI. The results of this study are different from those initially expected by the authors.
In this study, no significant difference in kinesio taping was found in the dynamic balance of stable ankle and FAI (overall, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral). However, as a preliminary study, this study provided a foothold for further research in the future.
Authors think more accurate information will be obtained through more subjects and various age groups. Second, ankle instability was not sufficiently subdivided. The CAIT average score of FAI in this study is 20.
Therefore, kinesio taping was applied to the ankle, but it did not significantly affect the dynamic balance, so there would have been no crucial difference in the results before and after. Second, it may be because the method was different to attach the taping to the ankle. For example, the methods of taping were varied in each of the preceding studies (Bicici et al.
Second, ankle instability was not sufficiently subdivided. The CAIT average score of FAI in this study is 20.8, but if the lower score is divided, more accurate results could be produced. For example, if the CAIT score is divided into 0-9, 10-19, and 20~24 points to analyze the kinesio taping effect, the results of application to the ankle can be analyzed in more detail.
This is supported by the fact that the CAIT score was from 17 to 24 in this study of FAI subjects. Therefore, kinesio taping was applied to the ankle, but it did not significantly affect the dynamic balance, so there would have been no crucial difference in the results before and after. Second, it may be because the method was different to attach the taping to the ankle.
후속연구
In this study, no significant difference in kinesio taping was found in the dynamic balance of stable ankle and FAI (overall, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral). However, as a preliminary study, this study provided a foothold for further research in the future. In addition, it is necessary to continue to study ways to find the maximum effect while minimally attaching them to the application method of ankle kinesio taping.
However, as a preliminary study, this study provided a foothold for further research in the future. In addition, it is necessary to continue to study ways to find the maximum effect while minimally attaching them to the application method of ankle kinesio taping.
, 2021). This study also requires further research, but it may show similar results. Second, there may be a difference in the degree of ankle instability of the study participants compared to previous studies.
참고문헌 (24)
Barelds I, van den Broek AG, Huisstede BMA(2018). Ankle bracing is effective for primary and secondary prevention of acute ankle injuries in athletes: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Sports Med, 48(12), 2775-2784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-993-2.
Bicici S, Karatas N, Baltaci G(2012). Effect of athletic taping and kinesiotaping® on measurements of functional performance in basketball players with chronic inversion ankle sprains. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 7(2), 154-166.
Botsis AE, Schwarz NA, Harper ME, et al(2019). Effect of kinesio(®) taping on ankle complex motion and stiffness and jump landing time to stabilization in female ballet dancers. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol, 4(2), Printed Online. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk4020019.
Doherty C, Bleakley C, Delahunt E, et al(2017). Treatment and prevention of acute and recurrent ankle sprain: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med, 51(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1136/jsports-2016-096178.
Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, et al(2014). The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med, 44(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0102-5.
Fereydounnia S, Shadmehr A, Attarbashi Moghadam B, et al(2019). Improvements in strength and functional performance after Kinesio taping in semi-professional male soccer players with and without functional ankle instability. Foot (Edinb), 41, 12-18. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.foot.2019.06.006.
Feuerbach JW, Grabiner MD, Koh TJ, et al(1994). Effect of an ankle orthosis and ankle ligament anesthesia on ankle joint proprioception. Am J Sports Med, 22(2), 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659402200212.
Fraser JJ, Feger MA, Hertel J(2016). Clinical commentary on midfoot and foreroot involvement in lateral ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability. Part 2: Clinical considerations. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 11(7), 1191-1203.
Halseth T, McChesney JW, Debeliso M, et al(2004). The effects of kinesio TM taping on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med, 3(1), 1-7.
Kim KJ, Gang MY(2020). Effect of taping and virtual reality combined exercise on static and dynamic balance with functional ankle instability. Phys Ther Korea, 27(4), 292-297. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.
Kim KJ, Yoo CU(2020). Comparison of effects after applying virtual reality ankle exercise and high-frequency current to functional ankle instability. Korean J Neuromuscul Rehabil, 10(2), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.37851/kjnr.2020.10.2.9.
Jeong CJ, Kim KJ, Yang HS, et al(2017). Effects of virtual reality exercise program after applying taping and microwave on balance with functional ankle instability. J Korean Soc Integr Med, 5(3), 63-70. https://doi.org/0.15268/ksim.2017.5.3.063.
Lazarou L, Kofotolis N, Pafis G, et al(2018). Effects of two proprioceptive training programs on ankle range of motion, pain, functional and balance performance in individuals with ankle sprain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 31(3), 437-446. https://doi.org/10.3233/MR-170836.
McKeon PO, Paolini G, Ingersoll CD, et al(2009). Effects of balance training on gait parameters in patients with chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil, 23(7), 609-621. https://doi.org/0.1177/0269215509102954.
Nunes GS, Feldkircher JM, Tessarin BM, et al(2021). Kinesio taping does not improve ankle functional or performance in people with or without ankle injuries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil, 35(2), 182-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520963846.
Nunes GS, Vargas VZ, Wageck B, et al(2015). Kinesio taping does not decrease swelling in acute, lateral ankle sprain of athletes: a randomised trial. J Physiother, 61(1), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2014.11.002.
Park SE, Kim KJ(2021). The comparison of immediate effects of kinesio taping on static balance for stable and functional instability ankles: a pilot study. Korean J Neuromuscul Rehabil, 11(3), 20-29. https://doi.org/0.37851/kjnr.2021.11.3.3.
Raymond J, Nicholson LL, Hiller CE, et al(2012). The effect of ankle taping or bracing on proprioception in functional ankle instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport, 15(5), 386-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2012.03.008.
Saltan A, Baltaci G, Ankarali H(2019). Does kinesio® taping improve balance and functional performance in older adults? a pilot study. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 59(8), 1346-1352. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.18.9207-1.
Sarvestan J, Ataabadi PA, Svoboda Z, et al(2020). The effect of ankle kinesio TM taping on ankle joint biomechanics during unilateral balance status among collegiate athletes with chronic ankle sprain. Phys Ther Sport, 45(161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.06.007.
Tekin D, Agopyan A, Baltaci G(2018). Balance training in modern dancers: proprioceptive-neuromuscular training vs kinesio taping. Med Probl Perform Art, 33(3), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.21091/mppa.2018.3022.
Vuurberg G, Kluit L, van Dijk CN(2018). The cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT) in the Dutch population with and without complaints of ankle instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 26(3), 882-891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4350-4.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.