[논문]성별에 따른 우세손과 비우세손의 파악력, 협응력, 기민성 비교

박찬현; 손호희

doi:10.21598/jkpnfa.2022.20.1.73

성별에 따른 우세손과 비우세손의 파악력, 협응력, 기민성 비교
Comparison of Grip Force, Coordination, and Dexterity Between Dominant and Non-dominant Hand According to Gender 원문보기

PNF and movement, v.20 no.1, 2022년, pp.73 - 81

박찬현 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 물리치료학과) , 손호희 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 물리치료학과)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Purpose: The aim of this study was to present specific criteria for setting goals for hand rehabilitation by comparing the degree of difference in grip force, coordination, and dexterity between the dominant and non-dominant hand according to gender. Methods: We recruited 100 healthy adults in their 20s and 30s. A handheld digital dynamometer was used to evaluate the grip force of each of the dominant and non-dominant hand, a chopsticks manipulation test was used to evaluate coordination, and the Purdue Pegboard test was used to evaluate agility. Results: In all subjects, the grip force, coordination, and dexterity showed statistically significant difference (p <0.01) between the dominant and non-dominant hand. In the comparison according to gender, both male and female dominant and non-dominant hands showed statistically significant differences in grip force, coordination, and dexterity (p <0.01). In the comparison according to grip force, there was a statistically significant difference between the dominant and non-dominant hand, and men showed stronger result values in both hands compared to women (p 0.05). In the comparison according to dexterity, there was a statistically significant difference between the dominant and non-dominant hand, and women were shown to be faster in performance time with both hands, compared to men (p <0.01). Conclusion: Differences according to gender exist in grip force and dexterity but not coordination, and differences between dominant and non-dominant hand exists across all measurements. The results suggest setting a recovery goal according to dominance and gender during rehabilitation of hand function.

주제어

표/그림 (6)

표 Table 1. General characteristics of subjects. (N=100)
표 Table 2. Difference of the dominant hand and non-dominant hand grip force, coordination, dexterity of all participants. (N=100)
표 Table 3. Ratio and difference of the dominant hand and non-dominant hand grip force, coordination, dexterity of all participants. (N=100)
표 Table 4. Comparison of the grip force, coordination, dexterity between dominant and non-dominant hands of male and female participants (N=100)
표 Table 5. Ratio and difference of the dominant hand and non-dominant hand grip force, coordination, dexterity of male and female participants (N=100)
표 Table 6. Test of between-Subjects Effects

참고문헌 (20)

Annett M. Hand preference observed in large healthy samples: Classification, norms and interpretations of increased non-right-handedness by the right shift theory. British journal of Psychology. 2004;95(3):339-353.

상세보기
Armstrong C, Oldham JA. A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths. The Journal of Hand Surgery: British & European Volum. 1999;24(4):421-425.

상세보기
Carmeli E, Patish H, Coleman R. The aging hand. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2003;58(2):M146-M152.

상세보기
Chang J, Chien T, Lin Y. Comparison of various patterns of chopstick use and functional performance. The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences. 1993;9(7):428-434.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39(2):175-191.

상세보기
Han SH, Nam KS, Ahn TK, et al. Analysis of Grip and Pinch Strength in Korean People. Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association. 2009;44(2):219-225

상세보기
Haward BM, Griffin MJ. Repeatability of grip strength and dexterity tests and the effects of age and gender. International archives of occupational and environmental health. 2002;75(1):111-119.

상세보기
Innes E. Handgrip strength testing: a review of the literature. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 1999;46(3):120-140.

상세보기
Johnston JA, Bobich LR, Santello M. Coordination of intrinsic and extrinsic hand muscle activity as a function of wrist joint angle during two-digit grasping. Neuroscience letters. 2010;474(2):104-108.

상세보기
Kamarul T, Ahmad TS, Loh W. Hand grip strength in the adult Malaysian population. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2006;14(2):172-177.

상세보기
Kim JS, Lee SG, Park SK, et al. Comparison of grip and pinch strength between dominant and non-dominant hand according to type of handedness of female college students. Journal of International Academy of Physical Therapy Research, 2011;2(1):201-206.

원문보기 상세보기
Lee SM. The Difference of Hand Functions in Dominant Hand Types. Korean Society of Clinical Health Science. 2014;2(2):119-125.

원문보기 상세보기
Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97-113.

상세보기
Ozcan A, Tulum Z, Pinar L, et al. Comparison of pressure pain threshold, grip strength, dexterity and touch pressure of dominant and non-dominant hands within and between right-and left-handed subjects. Journal of Korean medical science. 2004;19(6):874-878.

상세보기
Puh U. Age-related and sex-related differences in hand and pinch grip strength in adults. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2010;33(1):4-11.

상세보기
Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age and Ageing. 2011;40(4):423-429.

상세보기
Schreuders T, Roebroeck M, van der Kar TJ, et al. Strength of the intrinsic muscles of the hand measured with a hand-held dynamometer: reliability in patients with ulnar and median nerve paralysis. The Journal of Hand Surgery: British & European Volume. 2000;25(6):560-565.

상세보기
Tiffin J, Asher EJ. The Purdue Pegboard: norms and studies of reliability and validity. Journal of applied psychology. 1948;32(3):234.

상세보기
You JS, Kim SW. Body composition and subcutaneous fat distribution in east asian adolescents. Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies. 1993;75(3):479-82.
White K. Are some of your students "left" out. Business Education Forum. 1986;40(4):16-17.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

성별에 따른 우세손과 비우세손의 파악력, 협응력, 기민성 비교
Comparison of Grip Force, Coordination, and Dexterity Between Dominant and Non-dominant Hand According to Gender 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

표/그림 (6)

표/그림 (6)

참고문헌 (20)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

성별에 따른 우세손과 비우세손의 파악력, 협응력, 기민성 비교 Comparison of Grip Force, Coordination, and Dexterity Between Dominant and Non-dominant Hand According to Gender 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

표/그림 (6) 모든 표/그림 보기

표/그림 (6) 슬라이드로 보기

참고문헌 (20)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

성별에 따른 우세손과 비우세손의 파악력, 협응력, 기민성 비교
Comparison of Grip Force, Coordination, and Dexterity Between Dominant and Non-dominant Hand According to Gender 원문보기

표/그림 (6)

표/그림 (6)