$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

온라인 리뷰어의 과소보고 편향에 관한 실증 연구: 온라인 게임 플랫폼 스팀을 중심으로
An Empirical Study on the Under-reporting Bias of Online Reviewers: Focusing on Steam Online Game Platform 원문보기

지식경영연구 = Knowledge Management Research, v.23 no.2, 2022년, pp.229 - 251  

장주혁 (고려대학교 미디어학과) ,  백현미 (고려대학교 미디어학부) ,  이새롬 (경북대학교 경영학부) ,  배성훈 (경북대학교 경영학부)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

온라인 리뷰는 제품에 대한 이전 구매자들의 경험을 제공함으로써 다른 소비자들이 합리적인 구매 의사결정을 하는데 유용하게 활용되고 있다. 하지만 온라인 리뷰가 제품의 질과 특성을 정확히 반영하지 않고 편향되어 작성된다면 온라인 리뷰를 더이상 신뢰할 수 없는 문제가 발생한다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 대표적인 온라인 리뷰의 편향 중 하나인 과소보고 편향의 특성을 실증 데이터를 통해 살펴보고자 한다. 구체적으로 온라인 게임 플랫폼인 스팀의 14,165개의 리뷰 데이터를 활용하여 과소보고하는 성향을 지니는 리뷰어의 특성을 살펴보고자 하였다. 분석결과, 과소보고하는 리뷰어는 주로 추천 의도를 담은 리뷰를 작성하고, 게임 출시일로부터 짧은 기간 안에 리뷰를 작성하나 다소 긴 시간동안 게임을 플레이한 후 리뷰를 작성하는 경향이 있으며, 높은 가격의 게임을 구매했을 때 리뷰를 작성하는 경향을 보였다. 본 연구는 과소보고하는 리뷰어의 특성을 탐색적으로 살펴보았기에 과소보고 편향에 대한 이해를 확장시키는 기초 연구로서 의미를 지닐 것이다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Online reviews are useful for other consumers to make reasonable purchase decisions by providing previous buyers' experiences. However, when online reviewers are biased, online reviews do not accurately reflect the true quality of the product. Therefore, we investigated the characteristics of review...

주제어

참고문헌 (77)

  1. 야오즈옌, 박지영, 홍태호 (2021). 레스토랑의 온라인 리뷰를 통해 감성과 감정이 리뷰 유용성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 지식경영연구, 22(1), 243-267. 

  2. 이은주, 박도형 (2021). 평점이 수렴되지 않는 리뷰의 제품들이 더 좋을 수도 있을까?: 제품 리뷰평점의 분산과 소비자의 조절초점 성향에 따른 소비자 태도 변화. 지식경영연구, 22(3), 273-293. 

  3. 장리, 최강준, 이재영 (2017). 온라인 구전량 및 평점과 시기별 영화 흥행과의 관계. 지식경영연구, 18(2), 65-83. 

  4. 정희정, 이현애, 정남호, 구철모 (2018). Which is more important in useful online review? Heuristic-systematic model perspective. 지식경영연구, 19(4), 1-17. 

  5. Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 5-17. 

  6. Archak, N., Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management Science, 57(8), 1485-1509. 

  7. Askay, D. A. (2015). Silence in the crowd: The spiral of silence contributing to the positive bias of opinions in an online review system. New Media & Society, 17(11), 1811-1829. 

  8. Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243-268. 

  9. Baek, H., Ahn, J., & Choi, Y. (2012). Helpfulness of online consumer reviews: Readers' objectives and review cues. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(2), 99-126. 

  10. Bakshi, S., Dogra, N., & Gupta, A. (2019). What motivates posting online travel reviews? Integrating gratifications with technological acceptance factors. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 25(2), 335-354. 

  11. Balahur, A., Hermida, J. M., & Montoyo, A. (2012). Detecting implicit expressions of emotion in text: A comparative analysis. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 742-753. 

  12. Ballantine, P. W., & Yeung, C. A. (2015). The effects of review valence in organic versus sponsored blog sites on perceived credibility, brand attitude, and behavioural intentions. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(4), 508-521. 

  13. Bethlehem, J. (2010). Selection bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review, 78(2), 161-188. 

  14. Bhole, B., & Hanna, B. (2017). The effectiveness of online reviews in the presence of self-selection bias. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 77, 108-123. 

  15. Bjering, E., Havro, L. J., & Moen, O. (2015). An empirical investigation of self-selection bias and factors influencing review helpfulness. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(7), 16-30. 

  16. Brandes, L., Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2019). What drives extremity bias in online reviews? Theory and experimental evidence. Theory and Experimental Evidence. 

  17. Brightlocal. (2020). Local Consumer Review Survey. http://www.brightlocal.com/learn/local-consumer-review-survey. Accessed on 2020.10.25. 

  18. Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews: Do consumers use them? ACR 2001 Proceedings, 129-134. 

  19. Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2012). What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 218-225. 

  20. Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345-354. 

  21. Chua, A. Y., & Banerjee, S. (2015). Understanding review helpfulness as a function of reviewer reputation, review rating, and review depth. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 354-362. 

  22. Chua, A. Y., & Banerjee, S. (2018). Intentions to trust and share online health rumors: An experiment with medical professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 1-9. 

  23. Clemons, E. K. (2008). How information changes consumer behavior and how consumer behavior determines corporate strategy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(2), 13-40. 

  24. Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What's mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400-421. 

  25. De Langhe, B., Fernbach, P. M., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (2016). Navigating by the stars: Investigating the actual and perceived validity of online user ratings. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 817-833. 

  26. Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X., & Awad, N. F. (2007). Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 23-45. 

  27. Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales-An empirical investigation of the movie industry. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 233-242. 

  28. Floyd, K., Freling, R., Alhoqail, S., Cho, H. Y., & Freling, T. (2014). How online product reviews affect retail sales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 217-232. 

  29. Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 291-313. 

  30. Gao, G., Greenwood, B. N., Agarwal, R., & McCullough, J. S. (2015). Vocal minority and silent majority: How do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality. MIS Q, 39(3), 565-590. 

  31. Ghasemaghaei, M., Eslami, S. P., Deal, K., & Hassanein, K. (2018). Reviews' length and sentiment as correlates of online reviews' ratings. Internet Research, 28(3), 544-563. 

  32. Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(10), 1498-1512. 

  33. Ham, J., Lee, K., Kim, T., & Koo, C. (2019). Subjective perception patterns of online reviews: A comparison of utilitarian and hedonic values. Information Processing & Management, 56(4), 1439-1456. 

  34. Han, S., & Anderson, C. K. (2020). Customer motivation and response bias in online reviews. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 61(2), 142-153. 

  35. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52. 

  36. Hlee, S., Lee, J., Yang, S. B., & Koo, C. (2019). The moderating effect of restaurant type on hedonic versus utilitarian review evaluations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 195-206. 

  37. Hong, H., Xu, D., Wang, G. A., & Fan, W. (2017). Understanding the determinants of online review helpfulness: A meta-analytic investigation. Decision Support Systems, 102, 1-11. 

  38. Hu, N., Pavlou, P. A., & Zhang, J. (2006, June). Can online reviews reveal a product's true quality? Empirical findings and analytical modeling of online word-of-mouth communication. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 324-330. 

  39. Hu, N., Pavlou, P. A., & Zhang, J. J. (2009). Why do online product reviews have a J-shaped distribution? Overcoming biases in online word-of-mouth communication. Communications of the ACM, 52(10), 144-147. 

  40. Hu, N., Pavlou, P. A., & Zhang, J. J. (2017). On self-selection biases in online product reviews. MIS Q, 41(2), 449-471. 

  41. Huang, A. H., Chen, K., Yen, D. C., & Tran, T. P. (2015). A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 17-27. 

  42. Huang, L., Tan, C. H., Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. (2018). Helpfulness of online review content: The moderating effects of temporal and social cues. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(6), 3. 

  43. Kapoor, G., & Piramuthu, S. (2009). Sequential bias in online product reviews. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 19(2), 85-95. 

  44. Katawetawaraks, C., & Wang, C. (2011). Online shopper behavior: Influences of online shopping decision. Asian Journal of Business Research, 1(2). 

  45. King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What we know and don't know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 167-183. 

  46. Koh, N. S., Hu, N., & Clemons, E. K. (2010). Do online reviews reflect a product's true perceived quality? An investigation of online movie reviews across cultures. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(5), 374-385. 

  47. Korda, A. P., & Snoj, B. (2007, September). Direct and indirect effects of perceived price on perceived value of mobile phones. In Annales des telecommunications (Vol. 62, No. 9, pp. 967-989). Springer-Verlag. 

  48. Kordzadeh, N. (2019). Investigating bias in the online physician reviews published on healthcare organizations' websites. Decision Support Systems, 118, 70-82. 

  49. Korfiatis, N., Garcia-Bariocanal, E., & Sanchez-Alonso, S. (2012). Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(3), 205-217. 

  50. Lauw, H. W., Lim, E. P., & Wang, K. (2008). Bias and controversy in evaluation systems. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering, 20(11), 1490-1504. 

  51. Lee, I. (2018). Usefulness, funniness, and coolness votes of viewers: An analysis of social shoppers' online reviews. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(4), 700-713. 

  52. Lee, M., & Youn, S. (2009). Electronic word of mouth (eWOM): How eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgement. International Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 473-499. 

  53. Li, Q., Cui, J., & Gao, Y. (2015, January). The influence of social capital in an online community on online review quality in China. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, 562-570. 

  54. Li, X., & Hitt, L. M. (2008). Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 456-474. 

  55. Lis, B., & Nessler, C. (2014). Electronic word of mouth. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(1), 63-65. 

  56. Liu, Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 74-89. 

  57. Liu, Z., & Park, S. (2015). What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites. Tourism Management, 47, 140-151. 

  58. Luo, Y., Pan, R., Choi, J. H., Mellish, L., & Strobel, J. (2011). Why choose online learning: Relationship of existing factors and chronobiology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(4), 379-397. 

  59. Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). Research note: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185-200. 

  60. Park, S., & Nicolau, J. L. (2015). Asymmetric effects of online consumer reviews. Annals of Tourism Research, 50, 67-83. 

  61. Peddibhotla, N. B., & Subramani, M. R. (2007). Contributing to public document repositories: A critical mass theory perspective. Organization Studies, 28(3), 327-346. 

  62. Pinch, T., & Kesler, F. (2011). How aunt Ammy gets her free lunch: A study of the top-thousand customer reviewers at amazon. com. Managing Overflow in Affluent Societies. 

  63. Racherla, P., & Friske, W. (2012). Perceived 'usefulness' of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 548-559. 

  64. Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., & Friedman, E. (2000). Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 45-48. 

  65. Rucker, D. D., Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E., & Brinol, P. (2014). Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 119-136. 

  66. Schindler, R. M., & Bickart, B. (2005). Published word of mouth: Referable, consumer-generated information on the Internet. Online Consumer Psychology: Understanding and Influencing Consumer Behavior in the Virtual World, 32, 35-61. 

  67. Schuckert, M., Liu, X., & Law, R. (2016). Insights into suspicious online ratings: Direct evidence from TripAdvisor. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 21(3), 259-272. 

  68. Shen, X., Pan, B., Hu, T., Chen, K., Qiao, L., & Zhu, J. (2020). Beyond self-selection: The multilayered online review biases at the intersection of users, platforms and culture. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 4(1), 77-97. 

  69. Sikora, R. T., & Chauhan, K. (2012). Estimating sequential bias in online reviews: A Kalman filtering approach. Knowledge-Based Systems, 27, 314-321. 

  70. Smironva, E., Kiatkawsin, K., Lee, S. K., Kim, J., & Lee, C. H. (2020). Self-selection and non-response biases in customers' hotel ratings-a comparison of online and offline ratings. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(10), 1191-1204. 

  71. Tormala, Z. L., Clarkson, J. J., & Henderson, M. D. (2011). Does fast or slow evaluation foster greater certainty? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 422-434. 

  72. Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 90-102. 

  73. Yang, S. B., Hlee, S., Lee, J., & Koo, C. (2017). An empirical examination of online restaurant reviews on Yelp. com: A dual coding theory perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(2), 817-839. 

  74. Ye, Q., Li, H., Wang, Z., & Law, R. (2014). The influence of hotel price on perceived service quality and value in e-tourism: An empirical investigation based on online traveler reviews. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 38(1), 23-39. 

  75. You, L., & Sikora, R. (2014). Performance of online reputation mechanisms under the influence of different types of biases. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(3), 417-442. 

  76. Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133-148. 

  77. Zhu, H., Tu, R., Feng, W., & Xu, J. (2018). The impacts of evaluation duration and product types on review extremity. Online Information Review, 43(5), 694-709. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로