$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

공공기록의 개념 및 범위에 관한 논의
A Study on the Legal Concept and the Scope of Public Records 원문보기

정보관리학회지 = Journal of the Korean society for information management, v.40 no.1, 2023년, pp.95 - 119  

이경남 (한신대학교 대학원 기록관리학과)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

공공기관이 기록관리의 대상 범위를 규정하는 것은 설명책임을 다하고 국민의 알권리를 보장하기 위한 선결조건이라 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 공공기록물의 개념에 대해 정책적으로 접근하여 기록의 범위를 정함에 있어 포함해야 할 요건들을 식별하였다. 이를 위해 공공기록물법 및 전자정부법, 전자문서법 등의 현행법에서 정하고 있는 공공기록물의 개념과 범위를 분석하였다. 또한 전자화기록의 법적 증거력에 대해 국내외 사례를 검토하여 제도적 보완사항을 제시하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Public institutions defining the legal scope of records management are a prerequisite to ensure the accountability and public's right to know. In this study, the requirements essential for determining the legal scope of the concept of public records were identified. For this, the concept of policies...

주제어

#공공기록물   #범위   #법적 증거력   #전자화기록   #기록 유형  

표/그림 (1)

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Act on The Management of Presidential Archives. Act No. 17573. 

  2. Criminal Act. Act No. 17571. 

  3. Electronic Government Act. Act No. 18744. 

  4. Enforcement Decree of The Public Records Management Act. Presidential Decree No. 32772. 

  5. Enforcement Rules of The Public Records Management Act. Ordinance of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security. 340. 

  6. Framework Act on Electronic Documents and Transactions. Act No. 18478. 

  7. Hwang, jin hyun, Baek, young mi, & Yim, jin hee (2021). Study on public institution dataset identification and evaluation process: focusing on the case of KR electronic procurement system. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 70, 41-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2021.70.041 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  8. Jang, Dae Hwan & Kim, Ik Han (2019). Memory, records and archival justice. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 89, 277-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.59.277 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  9. Kim, Myungok (2021). A case study on the question & answer of public records management act. Records Management Issue Paper, 29, 3-23. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea. 

  10. Kim, Su Young (2022), A study on the practical implementation of records management of administrative information dataset applying administrative information system classification, The Korean Journal of Archival, Information and Cultural Studies, 1(14), 55-88. https://doi.org/10.23035/KAICS.2022.1.14.055 

    crossref

  11. Korean Society of Archival Studies (2008). Dictionary of Records and Archival Terminology. Seoul: Crritical Review of History. 

  12. Lee, Cheolhwan & Zoh, Youngsam (2021). A study on the established requirements for records through precedent analysis: focusing on "Inter-Korean Summit Meeting Minutes Deletion" cases. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 21(1), 41-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2021.21.1.041 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  13. Lee, Gemma & Oh, Kyung-Mook (2020). A study on the judgment of authoritative records by applying the concept of authenticity and reliability. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 20(3), 77-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.3.077 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  14. Lee, Gemma (2019). The Concept and Requirements of Establishment of Records. Records Management Issue Paper, vol.02. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea. 

  15. Lee, Jung-eun & Youn, Eun-ha (2018). A study on the major characteristics of the revised ISO 15489 in 2016. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 57, 75-111. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2018.57.075 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  16. Lee, Kyong Rae & Lee, Kwang-Suk (2017). Documenting contemporary 'Counter-memories': focused on the Yongsan tragedy. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 53, 45-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2017.53.045 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  17. Lee, Kyungnam, Choi, Kwanghoon, & Yim, Jinhee (2021). A study on the role of records center for dataset records management: focused on case study of KR project management system. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 38(3), 263-285. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2021.38.3.263 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  18. Lee, Sang-Min (2008). Presidential archives management in crisis: an archival approach to the solutions. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 18, 281-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2008.18.281 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  19. Office management regulations. Presidential Decree No. 20331. 

  20. Oh, Gilyoung (2012). Injustice in the process of forensic examination on digital evidence: focusing on the so-called 'Wangjaesan' case. Democratic Legal Study, 48, 159-195. https://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15756/dls.2012..48.159 

    상세보기 crossref

  21. Park, Ji Hye (2019). The recent trend and task on the storage media for preservation. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 63, 227-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2020.63.227 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  22. Public Records Management Act. Act No. 18740. 

  23. Regulations on administrative efficiency and promotion of collaboration. Presidential Decree No. 31380. 

  24. Seol, Moon-won (2019). Exploring the concepts of records as persistent representation of activities. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 59, 5-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.59.005 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  25. Seol, Moon-won (2020). Meaning of memory in archival activism. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 67, 267-318. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2021.67.267 

    crossref

  26. Seol, Moon-won (2022). Archival meaning of legal evidence. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 22(1), 219-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2022.22.1.219 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  27. Seoul Central District Court 2011gohap1131, 2011gohap1143, 2011gohap1144, 2011gohap1145, 2011gohap1146 (23. Feb. 2012) 

  28. Seoul Central District Court 2013gohap1232 (6. Feb. 2015) 

  29. Seoul High Court 2012no805 (8. Feb. 2013) 

  30. Seoul High Court 2015no622 (24. Nov. 2015) 

  31. Sinn, Donghe & Kim, You-seung Kim (2016). Archivists for memory: a theoretical study on archives and memory. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(1), 41-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.041 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  32. Supreme Court of Korea 2013do2511 (26. Jul. 2013) 

  33. Supreme Court of Korea 2015do19296 (10. Dec. 2020) 

  34. Woo, Jee-Won (2021). A study on ways to recognize the originals of electronic records for records management in the digital era. The Korean Journal of Archival, Information and Cultural Studies, 13, 65-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.23035/kaics.2021.1.13.065 

    crossref

  35. Youn, Eunha & Kim, You-seung (2016). Understanding No Gun Ri records from the perspective of social memory. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(2), 57-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.2.057 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  36. Youn, Eunha (2019). A study on the concepts of record from a legal perspective. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 60, 89-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.089 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  37. Zoh, Youngsam (2009). The current status and prospect of presidential records management. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 21, 283-322. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2009.21.283 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  38. Disposal of Records. United States Code 44 Chapter33. 

  39. Electronic records as documentary evidence. National standard of Canada. CAN/CGSB-72.34 

  40. Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act. Public Law 106-229. 

  41. Electronic Transactions Act. SBC 2001 Chapter10. 

  42. Government of New Brunswick Digitization Standard. Provincial Archives of New Brunswick. 2013. 

  43. Information and documentation - Records management - Part 1: Concepts and principles. ISO 15489-1: 2001. 

  44. Information and documentation - Records management - Part 1: Concepts and principles. ISO 15489-1: 2016. 

  45. InterPARES 2 Project (2008a). Dictionary. 

  46. InterPARES 2 Project (2008b). Ontology B: Concept of the status of Transmission of a Record. 

  47. Legal Admissibility of Records. Tasmanian Office of the State Archivist. 2020. 

  48. NARA (2018). National Archives and Records Administration 2018~2022 Strategic Plan. 

  49. Queensland State Archives (2010). Glossary of Archival and Recordkeeping Terms. ICA, Multilingual Archival Terminology. 

  50. Shepherd, E. & Yeo, G. (2003). Managing records: A Handbook of Principles and Practice. London: Facet Publishing. 

  51. The European Union's Regulation. No. 910. 

  52. Uniform Electronic Transaction Act. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Law. 1999. 

  53. Yeo, G. (2008). Concepts of Records (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects, The American Archivist, 71(1), 118-143. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로