[논문]FIDIC Red Book의 Engineer가 합의 또는 결정해야할 핵심 리스크 세부조항 도출 -FIDIC Red Book 2017년 개정판 기준으로-

제재용; 홍성열; 서성철; 박형근

doi:10.12652/ksce.2023.43.2.0239

FIDIC Red Book의 Engineer가 합의 또는 결정해야할 핵심 리스크 세부조항 도출 -FIDIC Red Book 2017년 개정판 기준으로-
Deriving Key Risk Sub-Clauses which the Engineer of FIDIC Red Book Shall Agree or Determine according to Sub-Clause 3.7 -based on FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Construction, Second Edition 2017- 원문보기

KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research = 대한토목학회논문집, v.43 no.2, 2023년, pp.239 - 247

제재용 (충북대학교 토목공학과) , 홍성열 (충북대학교 토목공학과) , 서성철 (충북대학교 토목공학과) , 박형근 (충북대학교 토목공학과)

초록
AI-Helper

FIDIC Red Book은 발주자가 설계를 하고 시공자가 시공을 하는 국제표준계약조건이다. FIDIC Red Book의 Engineer는 발주자의 대리인 으로서가 아닌, 중립적으로 3.7조에 따라 클레임 또는 모든 사안에 대하여 합의하거나 결정하여야 한다. 본 연구는 델파이 기법을 이용하여 18년 만에 최근 개정된 FIDIC Red Book의 Engineer가 3.7조에 따라 합의하거나 결정해야할 49개의 세부조항들 중 핵심 리스크 세부조항 도출을 목표로 하였다. 국제건설계약에 대한 10년 이상의 경험과 전문지식을 보유한 35명의 전문가 패널을 구성하여 총 3회의 델파이 설문조사 과정을 통해 판단과정에서의 오류 및 편향을 방지하여 신뢰성을 향상시켰다. 연구 수행 방법은 계약조건 분석을 통해 FIDIC Red Book 3.7조에 따라 Engineer가 합의하거나 결정해야 하는 세부조항들을 49개로 조사하였다. 49개의 세부조항들별 계약적 리스크 발생도와 영향도를 평가하기 위해 델파이 조사는 리커트 10점 척도로 폐쇄형 설문조사를 3회 반복 수행하였다. 델파이 1차 설문조사 결과를 2차 설문조사 시 전달하고 2차 설문 조사 결과를 3차 설문조사에 전달하여 전문가 의견의 일치성을 높이는 방향으로 재평가하였다. 델파이 3차 조사 결과의 신뢰성은 변이계수 COV 값으로 검증하였다. 49개의 세부조항들 각각의 리스크 발생도와 영향도 평균값을 PI Risk Matrix를 적용하여 최종적으로 Extreme Risk 범위에 속하는 9개의 핵심 리스크 세부조항들을 도출하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The FIDIC Red Book is an international standard contract condition in which the Employer designs and the Contractor performs the construction. The Engineer of FIDIC Red Book shall agree or determine any matter or Claim in accordance with Sub-Clause 3.7 neutrally, not as an agent of the Employer. This study aimed to derive Key Risk Sub-Clauses out of 49 Sub-Clauses that the Engineer of FIDIC Red Book recently revised in 18 years shall agree or determine according to Sub-Clause 3.7 using the Delphi method. A panel of 35 experts with more than 10 years of experience and expertise in international construction contracts was formed, and through total three Delphi surveys, errors and biases were prevented in the judgment process to improve reliability. As for the research method, 49 Sub-Clauses that engineers shall agree on or determine according to Sub-Clause 3.7 of the FIDIC Red Book were investigated through the analysis of contract conditions. In order to evaluate the probability and impact of contractual risk for each 49 Sub-Clause, the Delphi survey conducted repeatedly a closed-type survey three times on a Likert 10-point scale. The results of the first Delphi survey were delivered during the second survey, and the results of the second survey were delivered to the third survey, which was re-evaluated in the direction of increasing the consensus of experts' opinions. The reliability of the Delphi 3rd survey results was verified with the COV value of the coefficient of variation. The PI Risk Matrix was applied to the average value of risk probability and impact of each of the 49 Sub-Clauses and finally, 9 Key Risk Sub-Clauses that fell within the extreme risk range were derived.

주제어

표/그림 (11)

그림 Fig. 1. Research Process
표 Table 1. Summary of Sub-Clauses which is Providing Engineer'S Roles (FIDIC, 2017)
표 Table 2. Summary of Detailed Classification of The Engineer's Roles (FIDIC, 2017)
표 Table 3. Sub-Clauses to be Agreed or Determined according to Sub-Clause 3.7
표 Table 4. Questionnaire Survey by Delphi Technique
표 Table 5. Expert Panel
표 Table 6. Scale of the Probability and Impact
표 Table 7. The Result of Evaluating Probability & Impact Score on 49 Sub-Clauses to be Applied Sub-Clause 3.7
그림 Fig. 2. Risk Matrix of Probability and Impact
그림 Fig. 3 Distribution map of Extreme Risk by PI Risk Matrix
표 Table 8. Key Risk Sub-Clauses Derived by PI Risk Matrix

참고문헌 (18)

Abdul-Malak, M. A. and El Masri, F. Y. (2016). "Understanding？the engineer's role in administering the construction contract."？Conference Paper, Interaction between Theory and Practice in？Civil Engineering and Construction, 2016 ISEC Press, The First？European and Mediterranean Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (Euro-Med-Sec 1), ISEC (the International？Structural Engineering and Construction) Society, May 2016, Yildiz？Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, ISBN: 978-0-9960437-2-4.
Akulenka, I. (2013). The users' perceptions on the impartiality of？the engineer under the FIDIC red book in the UAE, MSc. Course？& Doctoral Dissertation, The British University in Dubai (BUiD),？Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
An, B. H., Kim, J. E. and Kim, Y. S. (2013). "The analysis of the？weights of country risk by participants of overseas construction？projects." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and？Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 150-159 (in Korean).
Chung, H. S. (2015). "Engineer's dual roles and liabilities in fidic？construction model forms- employer's agent? mediator? or fair？adjudicator?." Korean Lawyers Association Journal, Vol. 707,？No. 8, pp 212-258 (in Korean).
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2004). International project？risk management: A management approach, Research Summary？181-1, Austin,TX :CII.
Dymond, T. (2013). "The engineer's role in contract management."？Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law, Vol.？22, No. 1, pp. 39-64 (in Korean).
Federation Internationale Des Ingenieurs-Conseils (FIDIC). (2017).？International federation of consulting engineers, conditions of？contracts for construction, 2nd edition, Federation Internationale？des Ingenieurs-Conseils (FIDIC), ISBN: 978-2-88432-084-9, Geneva,？Switzerland.
Han, S. H., Sun, S. M., Park, S. H. and Jung, D. Y. (2006). "The？hierarchical structures of cause-and-effect relationships on the？profit factors in overseas construction projects." Korean Journal？of Construction Engineering & Management, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp.？64-76 (in Korean).
Hyun, H. B. (2010). "Disputes resolution system in overseas construction contracts-based on difference review against disputes？resolution procedure defined in old Vs. new FIDIC international？construction standard contract conditions." Journal of the Korea？Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 11,？No. 4, pp. 45-50 (in Korean).
International Contractors Association of Korea (ICAK) (2022).？Total contract status by engineering type of construction contract？award statistics (2017 to 2021), International Construction？Information Services, International Contractors Association of？Korea, Acailable at: http://www.icak.or.kr/sta/sta_1004.php?f_date2017/01/01&t_date2021/12/31 (Accessed: August 11, 2022)
Jaeger, A. V. and Hok, G. S. (2010). "FIDIC -A guide for practitioners,？2010 participants of overseas construction projects." Korean？Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 14,？No. 2, pp. 150-159 (in Korean).
Kim, S. H. (2018). "An introduction and analysis of 2017 revised？FIDIC conditions of contract." Korean Forum on International？Trade and Business Law, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 157-195 (in Korean).
Mulcahy, R. (2003). Risk management-tricks of the trade for project？manager, RMC Publication, Inc., Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA,？pp. 105-201.
Park, H. P. (2018b). "Policy evaluation and improvement plan of？overseas construction engineering industry." Korea Institute of？Building Construction, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 375-384 (in Korean).
Park, H. S. (2018a). The comparative study of FIDIC's claim？clauses-focusing on employer and contractor, MSc. Course, The？Chung-Ang University, Korea (in Korean).
Project Management Institute (PMI) (2008). Project management？body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide), fourth edition, PMI, USA,？pp. 291-292.
Roh, S. Y. (2006). "Delphi-technique: Forecasting the future by？technical insight." Planning and Policy, KRIHS, Vol. 299, pp. 53-62？(in Korean).
Zoppis, E. (2018). "The role of the engineer: A Contractor's Viewpoint."？FIDIC Conference, In Proceedings of the FIDIC-ACEG European？Regional Infrastructure Conference, pp. 1-6 March, 2018, Tbilisi,？Georgia.

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format