$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

수학교사의 교수능력과 수업활동유형이 학습자의 정의적 태도에 미치는 영향: 다층구조방정식 모형을 적용하여
The effects of math teachers' teaching ability and class activity types on learners' affective attitudes: A multilevel structural equation model 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series A. The Mathematical Education, v.62 no.2, 2023년, pp.195 - 209  

송효섭 (유원대학교) ,  정희선 (성균관대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구는 TIMSS 2019 국내 중학교 2학년 학생들의 자료를 다층구조방정식모형에 적용하여 학생수준과 교사수준에서 수학교사의 교수능력과 수업활동유형이 학습자의 수학가치인식과 수학자신감, 그리고 수학흥미에 미치는 영향 및 구조적 관계를 분석하였다. 분석결과, 학생수준과 교사수준에서 수학교사의 교수능력은 수학가치인식과 수학자신감, 수학흥미에 정적인 영향을 미쳤으며, 수학가치인식과 수학자신감 역시 수학흥미에 정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 또한, 수학교사의 교수능력은 수학가치인식과 수학자신감을 매개하여 수학흥미에 간접적인 정적 영향을 미쳤다. 그리고 수업활동유형 중 학습내용을 새로운 문제상황에 스스로 적용하기는 수학가치인식에 정적인 영향을 미쳤지만, 수학흥미에는 부적 영향을 미쳤으며, 동질 능력 그룹활동은 수학자신감과 수학흥미에 정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 학생수준과 교사수준의 다층적 분석을 통해 학교현장의 수학수업에 의미있는 시사점을 제시한다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study examined the effect and structural relationship of math teachers' teaching ability and class activity types on learners' value perception, confidence, and interest of mathematics at the student level and teacher level. To this end, data from 2nd graders of korea middle school in TIMSS 201...

주제어

표/그림 (9)

참고문헌 (57)

  1. Akyuz, G. (2014). The effects of student and school factors on mathematics achievement in TIMSS 2011. Education and Science, 39, 150-162. 

  2. An, I. K., & Oh, Y. G. (2018). An analysis of mathematical modeling process and mathematical reasoning ability by group organization method.?Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 22(4), 497-515. 

  3. An, J. S. (2018). The effect of mathematical disposition and learning attitude in instruction utilizing STAD cooperative learning model.?Communications of Mathematical Education, 32(2), 147-174. http://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2018.32.2.147 

  4. Azina, I. N., & Halimah, A. (2012). Student factors and mathematics achievement: Evidence from TIMSS 2007. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,?Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.843a 

  5. Barcikowski, R. S. (1981). Statistical power with group mean as the unit of analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(3), 267-285. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164877 

  6. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability. In K. J. Kline & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory,?research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). Jossey-Bass. 

  7. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition?models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234-246. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234 

  8. Cheong, M. J., Kim, H. K., & Moon, Y. H. (2015). The relationship between Teaching Methods accepted by learners and Academic Achievement?Factors on Academic Achievement. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 22(7), 129-150. 

  9. Cho, H. J., & Kim, I. S. (2016). Analyzing research trend of affective aspects in mathematics in Korea. Communications of Mathematical Education,?30(1), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2016.30.1.67 

  10. Choe, S. H., Park, S. W., & Hwang, H. J. (2014). Analysis of the current situation of Affective Characteristics of Korean Students Based on the?Results of PISA and TIMSS. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 17(1), 23-43. 

  11. Choi, K. H., & Han, H. S. (2013). A study on the effects of the reciprocal peer tutoring in high school students' affective characteristics of?mathematics. The Mathematical Education, 52(3), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2013.52.3.423 

  12. DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational?Studies in mathematics, 63(2), 131-147. 

  13. Dijk, W., Gage, N. A., & Grasley-Boy, N. (2019). The relation between classroom management and mathematics achievement: A multilevel?structural equation model. Psychology in the Schools, 56(7), 1173-1186. 

  14. Fishbein, B., Foy, P., & Yin, L. (2021). TIMSS 2019 user guide for the international database. Hentet fra. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-database 

  15. Hong, S. S., & Lee, D. H. (2015). The effect of ability grouping on Mathematics achievement: Utilizing the Propensity Score Matching. Journal of?the Korean School Mathematics Society, 18(1), 149-167. 

  16. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new?alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. 

  17. Hwang, J. H., Tak, B. J., Lee, S. E., Kim, H. M., & Lee, H. Y. (2022). Relationships Among Students' Attitude Toward Mathematics, Mindset, and?Teachers' Mindset. School Mathematics, 24(4), 525-549. https://doi.org/10.57090/sm.2022.12.24.4.525 

  18. Hwang, S., & Son, T. (2020). Exploring Effects of Elementary Teachers' Mathematics Instruction, Mathematics Teaching Efficacy, and Student?Mathematical Interest on Mathematics Achievement: An Application of Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling. Education of Primary School?Mathematics, 23(4), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEC.2020.23.4.175 

  19. Hwang, S. W., & Lew, K. H. (2018). Relationship Between Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematical Achievement of Middle School Students?According to Gender and Grade. Communications of Mathematical Education, 32(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2018.32.2.175 

  20. James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229. 

  21. Jang, J. H. (2019). Analysis of teachers' instructional ability and method type recognized by students and influence factor [Doctoral dissertation].?Korea University. 

  22. Jung, B. S. (2022). Gender Differences in Variables Affecting High School Students' Attitudes toward Mathematics and Achievement in the?COVID-19 Pandemic. The Women's Studies, 114(3), 141-165. http://dx.doi.org/tws.2022.114.3.006 

  23. Kim, D. S., & Jo, H. J. (2013). The effects of streaming on students achievement focused on ability. The Journal of Research in Education, 26(2),?1-24. 

  24. Kim, H. S., & Ham, E. H. (2014). What school characteristics affect Korean students' non-cognitive outcomes in mathematics. Journal of?Educational Evaluation, 27(5), 1311-1335. 

  25. Kim, S. H. (2015). An analysis of teacher effects on fourth-grade students' attitudes toward mathematics based on TIMSS 2011 results. The?Mathematical Education, 54(2), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2015.54.2.195 

  26. Klein, K. J. & S. W. J. Kozlowski. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research, Organizational?Research Methods, 3(3), 211-236. 

  27. Ko, D. H., & Jung, H. S. (2020). Analysis on the Effect of Mathematics Class Characteristics and Mathematical Confidence on Mathematical?Academic Achievement: Applying Hierarchical Linear Model. School Mathematics, 22(2), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2020.06.22.2.313 

  28. Kozlowski, S. W., & Hattrup, K. (1992). A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus.?Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(2), 161-167. 

  29. Kwon, J. R. (2022). A study analyzing the students' affective characteristics about mathematics in elementary, middle and high school. Journal of?Curriculum and Evaluation, 25(2), 195-224. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2022.25.2.195 

  30. Lim, H. J., & Lee, J. E. (2016). The longitudinal changes of students' perception on teachers' teaching ability, self-efficacy, and academic?achievement. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 23(6), 71-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.21509/KJYS.2016.06.23.6.71 

  31. Lee, H. C., Kim, H. W., Baeck, S. G., Ko, H. K., & Yi, H. S. (2017). A causal model analysis of non-cognitive characteristics of mathematics?learning. Communications of Mathematical Education, 31(2), 187-201. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2017.31.2.187 

  32. Lee, H. C., Kim, H. W., Ee, J. H., Yi, H. S., & Ko, H. K. (2017). The development and validation of the survey of students' affective characteristics?in the non-cognitive domain of mathematics learning. School Mathematics, 19(2), 267-287. 

  33. Lee, H. J., Bong, C. W., Yoon, M. R., & Hong, S. H. (2018). An application of multilevel structural equation model to testing the effect of?mathematics self-efficacy and educational environment on mathematical interest: Comparison of results between Korea and Singapore. Journal?of Educational Evaluation, 31(1), 353-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.31158/JEEV.2018.31.1.353 

  34. Lee, J. H., & Kim, S. H. (2010). Analysis on differences between affective achievement for middle and high school students. Journal of Research in?Curriculum & Instruction, 14(4), 759-785. http://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2010.14.4.759 

  35. Lee, J. R. (2009). The effects of ability grouping and perceived class characteristics upon academic achievement. The Korean Journal of Human?Development, 16(2), 51-65. 

  36. Lee, K. S., Rim, H. M., Park, I. Y., Seo, M. H., & Kim, B. M. (2016). A study on development of the survey items for affective domain in?mathematics of NAEA. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 19(4), 45-70. 

  37. Lee, S. H. (2021). A study on teachers' instructional strategies affecting students' mathematical value [Master's thesis, Hanyang University]. 

  38. Lee, S. J., Kim, H. R., & Mo, W. S. (2018). A longitudinal study on the relationship between academic achievement and self-efficacy: Korean?and mathematics among Korean middle school students. Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 18(4), 675-697. http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.4.675 

  39. Lee, Y. H., & Han, Y. K. (2015). A hierarchical analysis of the factors influencing on middle schoolers' character. The Journal of Korean Teacher?Education, 32(3), 305-325. http://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2015.32.3.305 

  40. McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and?learning, 1, 575-596. 

  41. Ministry of Education. (2022). Mathematics curriculum. Proclamation of the Ministry of Education #2022-33[Annex 8]. Ministry of Education. 

  42. Ministry of Education. (2020). The 3rd Mathematics Education Plan. 

  43. Mullis, I. V., & Martin, M. O. (2017). TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational?Achievement. 

  44. Park, S. W., Kim, H. K., Sang, K. A., Jeon, S. K., & Choi, I. S. (2019). Trends in international mathematics and science study: TIMSS 2019 main?survey. RRE 2019-10. KICE. 

  45. Park, J. H., Kang, Y. G., & Han, S. Y. (2019). The development and application of the instrument for measuring Korean high school students'?interests in mathematics learning. School Mathematics, 21(2), 319-346. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2019.06.21.2.319 

  46. Park, J. H., Kim, Y. M., & Choi, S. H. (2014). A study about confidence with mathematics. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 24(2),?145-164. 

  47. Park, W. W., & Ko, S. K. (2005). Procedures and methods of multilevel analysis: With a focus on WABA. The Korean business journal, 39(1), 59-90. 

  48. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage. 

  49. Sang, K., Kwak, Y., Choi, J., Park, S., & Jeon, S. (2017). In-depth analysis of TIMSS 2015 Korean results. RRO 2017-5-1. KICE. 

  50. Sang, K. A., Kim, S. S., Kim, K. H., Kim, S. J., Si, K. J., & Han, J. A. (2015). The influence of educational context variables on students'?mathematics achievement and affective characteristics. RRE 2015-8. KICE. 

  51. Seo, K. H. (2004). The perspectives and conceptions about good instructional practice: An interview study of teachers and students. The Journal of?Curriculum Studies, 22(4), 165-187. 

  52. So, Y. H. (2011). Analysis of the structural relations between Learners' perception on instruction, self-directed learning, learning flow, and academic?achievement. The Korean Journal of Child Education, 20(2), 19-32. 

  53. Song, H. S., & Jung, H. S. (2021). Effects of learner-centered mathematical instruction perceived by middle school students on math self-efficacy?and class engagement: Multi-group analysis based on achievement level. The Mathematical Education, 60(4), 493-508. http://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2021.60.4.493 

  54. Song, H. S., & Jung, H. S. (2022). Detecting types for the influence of math teaching methods perceived by high school students on math self-efficacy: Using REBUS-PLS. The Mathematical Education, 61(4), 613-629. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2022.61.4.613 

  55. Yu, J. P. (2022). Concept and understanding of structural equation model. hannarae Academy. 

  56. Yu, S. B., & Kim, N. O. (2020). The structural relationship of learner-centered instruction, feedback experience, affective achievement,?and mathematical competencies by middle schoolers. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 33(4), 791-814. http://dx.doi.org/10.31158/JEEV.2020.33.4.791 

  57. Yu, S. B., & Song, Y. M. (2022). The effect of middle school students' perceived teaching and assessment practices and characteristics of?learners on subject interest and academic achievement. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 22(16), 1053-1065. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2022.22.16.1053 

저자의 다른 논문 :

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로