$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

수학학습에서 구분-대조 가설에 의한 교차연습의 효과
The Effect of Interleaved-practice by the Discriminative-contrast hypothesis in Mathematics 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, v.37 no.2, 2023년, pp.199 - 212  

류지민 (경북대학교 대학원) ,  박미정 (경북대학교 대학원)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구의 목적은 수학교과에서 학습하는 내용이 영역과 유형의 차이에 따라 구획연습과 교차연습의 성취도 차이가 나는지 알아보고 이 결과를 통해 수학학습에서의 교차연습의 효과가 '분산-연습 가설'에 의한 것인지 혹은 '구분-대조 가설'에 의한 것인지를 확인하는 것이다. 교차연습이 구획연습보다 효과적이라는 연구가 대부분이지만 그 원인에 대해서 선행 연구들은 일관된 결과를 보이고 있지 않다. 이에 본 연구에서는 D광역시 중학교 1학년 103명을 구획연습, 교차연습, 먼-구획연습, 먼-교차연습 집단으로 무작위 배치하여 4회에 걸쳐 학습활동을 하였고 일주일의 파지간격을 둔 후 최종검사를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 동일한 영역에서의 유사한 유형에서는 교차연습의 효과가 나타났고, 서로 다른 영역의 다른 유형에서는 교차연습의 효과가 나타나지 않았다. 또한, 이 결과를 통해 교차연습의 효과는 '분산-연습 가설'보다는 '구분-대조 가설'에 의한 것임을 확인할 수 있었다. 연구결과와 연구방법에 대한 논의를 통해 후속 연구가 필요한 연구문제를 제안하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of this study is to find out whether there is a difference in achievement between blocked practice and interleaved practice according to the difference in domain and type of learning content in mathematics subject, and through this result, it is to confirm whether the effect of interleav...

주제어

#수학   #교차연습   #구획연습   #학습전략   #구분-대조 가설   #분산-연습 가설  

표/그림 (11)

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Ministry of Education (2019a). Mathematics 5-1. Chunjae Education.？ 

  2. Ministry of Education (2019b). Mathematics 5-2. Chunjae Education.？ 

  3. Ministry of Education (2019c). Mathematics 6-1. Chunjae Education.？ 

  4. Ministry of Education (2019d). Mathematics 6-2. Chunjae Education.？ 

  5. Ministry of Education (2019e). Mathematics workbook 5-1. Chunjae Education.？ 

  6. Ministry of Education (2019f). Mathematics workbook 5-2. Chunjae Education.？ 

  7. Ministry of Education (2019g). Mathematics workbook 6-1. Chunjae Education.？ 

  8. Ministry of Education (2019h). Mathematics workbook 6-2. Chunjae Education.？ 

  9. Ministry of Education (2022.10.11.). The 1st comprehensive plan for basic academic skills guarantee. Ministry of Education.？ 

  10. Lan, A. D, & Lee. H. S. (2020). Why they chose What they chose: Exploring effects of test performance and？metacognitive judgments on learners' selection of interleaving schedule. Korean Journal of Cognitive and？Biological Psychology, 32(2), 169-188.？ 

  11. Ryu, J. M., & Kang, E. C. (2021). Interaction effect of retrieval practice methods and math achievement levels in math？learning. The Journal of Thinking Development, 17(2), 23-42.？ 

  12. Pang, J. S., Kim, L. N., & Kim, S. H. (2022). A comparative analysis of introducing addition and subtraction in the？Korean, Singaporean, American, and Japanese elementary textbooks. Communication of Mathematics Education,？36(2), 229-252.？ 

  13. Shin, H. Y., & Park, S. Y. (2023). Possibilities and limitations of basic academic skills support policy : Focusing on the？1st comprehensive plan for basic academic skills guarantee. The Journal of Politics of Education, 30(1), 1-30.？ 

  14. Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2020). Desirable difficulties in theory and practice. Journal of Applied Research？in Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 475-479.？ 

    상세보기

  15. Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L. III, & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make it stick: The science of successful？learning. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.？ 

  16. Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014a). Effects of interleaved and blocked study on delayed test of？category learning generalization. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 936.？ 

    상세보기

  17. Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014b). Putting category learning in order: Category structure and？temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study. Memory & cognition,？42, 481-495.？ 

    상세보기

  18. Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2015a). The benefits of interleaved and blocked study: Different tasks？benefit from different schedules of study. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22(1), 281-288.？ 

    상세보기

  19. Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2015b). What you learn is more than what you see: What can？sequencing effects tell us about inductive category learning?. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(505),？1-12.？ 

  20. Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2017). The sequence of study changes what information is attended to,？encoded, and remembered during category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,？Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1699-1719.？ 

    상세보기

  21. Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2019). When does interleaving practice improve learning? In J. Dunlosky？& K. A. Rawson (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 411-436).？Cambridge University Press.？ 

  22. Cervin-Ellqvist, M., Larsson, D., Adawi, T., Stohr, C., & Negretti, R. (2021). Metacognitive illusion or？self-regulated learning? Assessing engineering students' learning strategies against the backdrop of recent advances in cognitive science. Higher Education, 82(3), 477-498.？ 

  23. Digirolamo, G. J., & Hintzman, D. L. (1997). First impressions are lasting impressions: A primacy effect in？memory for repetitions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(1), 121-124.？ 

    상세보기

  24. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students'？learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational？psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.？ 

  25. Foster, N. L., Mueller, M. L., Was, C., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2019). Why does interleaving improve？math learning? : The contributions of discriminative contrast and distributed practice. Memory and？Cognition, 47(6), 1088-1101.？ 

    상세보기

  26. Gleddie, A. (2021). The effects of iInterleaving on mathematical understanding. University of Alberta？Libraries. https://doi.org/10.7939/r3-0amm-7287？ 

    crossref

  27. Kang, S. H. (2016a). Spaced repetition promotes efficient and effective learning: Policy implications for？instruction. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 12-19.？ 

  28. Kang, S. H. (2016b). The benefits of interleaved practice for learning. In J. C. Horvath, J. Lodge, & J. A. C.？Hattie (Eds.), From the laboratory to the classroom (pp. 79-90). Routledge.？ 

  29. Kang, S. H., & Pashler, H. (2012). Learning painting styles: Spacing is advantageous when it promotes？discriminative contrast. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 97-103.？ 

    상세보기

  30. Kost, A. S., Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2015). Can you repeat that? The effect of item repetition？on interleaved and blocked study. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T.？Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (eds.), Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the？Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1189-1194). Cognitive Science Society.？ 

  31. Le Blanc, K., & Simon, D. (2008). Mixed practice enhances retention and JOL accuracy for mathematical？skills. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL.？November, 2008.？ 

  32. Lu, X., Penney, T. B., & Kang, S. H. (2021). Category similarity affects study choices in self-regulated？learning. Memory & Cognition, 49, 67-82.？ 

    상세보기

  33. Mayfield, K. H., & Chase, P. N. (2002). The effects of cumulative practice on mathematics problem solving.？Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(2), 105-123.？ 

    상세보기

  34. Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2013). Interleaved practice in multi-dimensional learning tasks:？Which dimension should we interleave? Learning and Instruction, 23, 98-114.？ 

    상세보기

  35. Roediger III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications？for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181-210.？ 

    상세보기

  36. Rohrer, D. (2009). Research commentary: The effects of spacing and mixing practice problems. Journal for？Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 4-17.？ 

    상세보기

  37. Rohrer, D. (2012). Interleaving helps students distinguish among similar concepts. Educational Psychology？Review, 24(3), 355-367.？ 

    상세보기

  38. Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Burgess, K. (2014). The benefit of interleaved mathematics practice is not？limited to superficially similar kinds of problems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5),？1323-1330.？ 

    상세보기

  39. Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., Hartwig, M. K., & Cheung, C. N. (2020). A randomized controlled trial of interleaved mathematics practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 40-52.？ 

    상세보기

  40. Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Stershic, S. (2015). Interleaved practice improves mathematics learning. Journal？of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 900-908.？ 

    상세보기

  41. Rohrer, D., & Hartwig, M. K. (2020). Unanswered questions about spaced and interleaved mathematics？practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9, 433-438.？ 

  42. Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2007). The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional？Science, 35(6), 481-498.？ 

    상세보기

  43. Sana, F., Yan, V. X., & Kim, J. A. (2017). Study sequence matters for the inductive learning of cognitive？concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 84-98.？ 

    상세보기

  44. Taylor, K., & Rohrer, D. (2010). The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6),？837-848.？ 

    상세보기

  45. Wahlheim, C. N., Dunlosky, J., & Jacoby, L. L. (2011). Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts:？An investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging. Memory and Cognition, 39(5), 750-763.？ 

    상세보기

  46. Warshauer, H. K. (2015). Strategies to support productive struggle. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle？School, 20(7), pp. 390-393.？ 

    상세보기

  47. Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. J ournal of？Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 442-452.？ 

  48. Weltman, H. R., Timchenko, V., Sofios, H. E., Ayres, P., & Marcus, N. (2019). Evaluation of an adaptive？tutorial supporting the teaching of mathematics. European Journal of Engineering Education,？44(5), 787-804.？ 

    상세보기

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로