[논문]학생의 수학적 능력에 대한 초등학교 교사의 마인드셋 분석

방정숙; 김리나; 곽기우

doi:10.7468/mathedu.2024.63.3.485

[국내논문] 학생의 수학적 능력에 대한 초등학교 교사의 마인드셋 분석
An analysis of elementary school teachers' mindset regarding students' mathematical ability 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series A. The Mathematical Education, v.63 no.3, 2024년, pp.485 - 503

방정숙 (한국교원대학교) , 김리나 (한국교원대학교) , 곽기우 (한국교원대학교)

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구의 목적은 학생의 수학적 능력에 대한 초등학교 교사의 마인드셋을 분석하는 것이다. 이를 위해 선행연구를 고찰하여 학생의 수학적 능력에 초점을 두고 교사의 마인드셋을 측정하기 위한 20개의 문항으로 구성된 검사 도구를 개발하였다. 개발된 검사 도구를 검증하기 위하여 초등학교 교사 158명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하고, 이를 활용한 탐색적 요인 분석을 통해 문항의 구조를 분석하였다. 그 결과 '수학적 능력의 변화에 대한 성장 마인드셋', '수학적 능력의 변화에 대한 고정 마인드셋', '타고난 수학적 능력에 대한 마인드셋'이라는 세 가지 요인이 발견되었다. 이 세 가지 요인별 점수를 변수로 설정하여 마인드셋에 따른 교사 집단별 특징을 알아보기 위해 잠재프로파일 분석을 시행하였다. 그 결과, 네 개의 집단이 도출되었다. 가장 많은 연구 참여자가 속한 집단은 '성장 마인드셋을 지닌 교사'이고 다음으로 '중립 마인드셋을 지닌 교사'가 많았다. '강한 성장 마인드셋을 지닌 교사'와 '고정 마인드셋을 지닌 교사'가 뒤를 이었다. 각 프로파일에 속한 교사의 특징을 자세히 알아보기 위해 선정된 교사와 면담을 진행하여 해당 교사의 응답 결과를 탐색하였다. 이를 바탕으로 학생의 수학적 능력에 대한 교사의 마인드셋의 분류, 우리나라 초등학교 교사의 성장 마인드셋의 경향, 타고난 수학적 능력에 대한 교사의 마인드셋 연구 등의 측면에서 마인드셋에 대한 시사점을 논의하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The purpose of this study is to analyze elementary school teachers' mindsets about students' mathematical ability. For this purpose, we developed a 20-item scale to measure teachers' mindset through a review of the literature. In order to verify the developed scale, a survey was conducted among 158 elementary school teachers, and the structure of the items was analyzed by exploratory factor analysis. As a result, three factors were identified: "growth mindset toward change in mathematical ability", "fixed mindset toward change in mathematical ability", and "mindset toward innate mathematical ability". Four groups were distinguished by latent profile analysis, using the scores on these three factors as variables, to characterize the different groups of teachers based on their mindset. The groups with the most participants in the study were, in order, growth mindset teachers, neutral mindset teachers, strong growth mindset teachers, and fixed mindset teachers. Interviews were also conducted with representative participants from each group to learn more about the characteristics of teachers in each profile. Based on the results of the study, we discussed the implications of mindset in terms of the classification of teachers' mindset about students' mathematical ability, the popularity of growth mindset among elementary school teachers in Korea, and research on teachers' mindset about innate mathematical ability.

Keyword

표/그림 (11)

표 Table 1. Implicit Theories of Intelligence Scale for adults (Dweck, 2000, p. 178)
표 Table 2. Mindset scale about students' mathematical abilities (others form for teachers)
표 Table 3. Descriptive statistics for each item
표 Table 4. Results of EFA
그림 Figure 1. Graphical representation of mean estimates by profile.
표 Table 5. Fit indices for each profile
표 Table 6. Results of EFA
그림 Figure 2. Graph of response results and mean estimates for participants in profile 1.
그림 Figure 3. Graph of response results and mean estimates for participants in profile 2.
그림 Figure 4. Graph of response results and mean estimates for participants in profile 3.
그림 Figure 5. Graph of response results and mean estimates for participants in profile 4.

참고문헌 (43)

Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294359？

상세보기
Berlin, K. S., Williams, N. A., & Parra, G. R. (2014). An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling (part 1): Overview？and cross-sectional latent class and latent profile analyses. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(2), 174-187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst084？

상세보기
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across？an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x？

상세보기
Boaler, J. (2019). Limitless mind: Learn, lead, and live without barriers. HarperCollins.？
Boaler, J. (2022). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative mathematics, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. John Wiley & Sons.？
Bostwick, K. C., Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., & Durksen, T. L. (2020). Teacher, classroom, and student growth orientation in？mathematics: A multilevel examination of growth goals, growth mindset, engagement, and achievement. Teaching and？Teacher Education, 94, 103100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103100？

상세보기
Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal？of Classification, 13, 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01246098？

상세보기
Chestnut, E. K., Lei, R. F., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2018). The myth that only brilliant people are good at math and its？implications for diversity. Education Sciences, 8(2), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020065？

상세보기
Clark, S. L. (2010). Mixture* modeling with behavioral data [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles].？
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the？most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868？
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology？Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.？
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review,？95(2), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256？

상세보기
Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2011). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.？
Gutshall, C. A. (2013). Teachers' mindsets for students with and without disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 50(10),？1073-1083. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21725？

상세보기
Heo, H. J., & Kim, S. M. (2022). A study on the beliefs of primary and secondary pre-teachers with a focus on math？mindset. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 22(15), 765-779. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlc-ci.2022.22.15.765？
Hwang, J. H., Tak, B. J., Lee, S. E., Kim, H. M., & Lee, H. Y. (2022). Realationships among students' attitude toward？mathematics, mindset, and teachers' mindset. School Mathematics, 24(4), 525-549. https://doi.org/10.57090/sm.2022.12.24.4.525？
Infurna, F. J., & Grimm, K. J. (2018). The use of growth mixture modeling for studying resilience to major life stressors in？adulthood and old age: Lessons for class size and identification and model selection. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(1), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx019？

상세보기
Jonsson, A. C., Beach, D., Korp, H., & Erlandson, P. (2012). Teachers' implicit theories of intelligence: Influences from different disciplines and scientific theories. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2012.662636？

상세보기
Kim, S. M., & Heo, H. J. (2023). A study on the mathematical beliefs of elementary school teachers with a focus on mathematical mindset. School Mathematics, 25(1), 31-58. https://doi.org/10.57090/sm.2023.03.25.1.31？

상세보기
Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In M. Williams, & W. P. Vogt？(Eds), The Sage handbook of innovation in social research methods (pp. 562-589). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261？
Laine, S., & Tirri, K. (2023). Literature review on teachers' mindsets, growth-oriented practices and why they matter.？Frontiers in Education, 8, 1275126. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1275126？

상세보기
Lee, H. Y., Kim, H. M., Ko, H. K., Park, J. H., Oh, S. J., Lim, M. Y., Tak, B. J., & Hwang, J. H. (2021). A study on ways to？improve students' mathematical affective achievement. KOFAC A22040003.？
Lee, S. L., Chan, H. S., Tong, Y. Y., & Chiu, C. Y. (2023). Growth mindset predicts teachers' life satisfaction？when they are challenged to innovate their teaching. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 17, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909231167533？

상세보기
Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3),？767-778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767？

상세보기
Makkonen, T., Lavonen, J., & Tirri, K. (2019). General and physics-specific mindsets about intelligence and giftedness: A？study of gifted Finnish upper-secondary-school students and physics teachers. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 7(1), 39-52.？
McLachlan, G. J. (1987). On bootstrapping the likelihood ratio test statistic for the number of components in a normal mixture. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 36(3), 318-324. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347790？

상세보기
Muthen, L., & Muthen, B. (1998). MPlus (version 8.10) [Computer software]. Muthen & Muthen.？
Park, D., Gunderson, E. A., Tsukayama, E., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). Young children's motivational frameworks？and math achievement: Relation to teacher-reported instructional practices, but not teacher theory of intelligence.？Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 300-313. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000064？

상세보기
Patterson, M. M., Kravchenko, N., Chen-Bouck, L., & Kelley, J. A. (2016). General and domain-specific beliefs about intelligence, ability, and effort among preservice and practicing teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 180-190.？https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.004？

상세보기
Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). "It's ok-Not everyone can be good at math": Instructors with an entity？theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012？

상세보기
Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., Hanhimaki, E., & Tirri, K. (2018). Teachers' implicit meaning systems and their implications for？pedagogical thinking and practice: A case study from Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(4),？487-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258667？

상세보기
Ronkainen, R., Kuusisto, E., & Tirri, K. (2019). Growth mindset in teaching: A case study of a Finnish elementary？school teacher. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(8), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.8.9？

상세보기
Scherer, R., Campos, D. G. (2022). Measuring those who have their minds set: An item-level meta-analysis of the implicit theories of intelligence scale in education. Educational Research Review, 37, 100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100479？

상세보기
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464.？

상세보기
Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360？

상세보기
Sun, K. L. (2018). Brief report: The role of mathematics teaching in fostering student growth mindset. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(3), 330-335. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.3.0330？

상세보기
Wang, Q., & Ng, F. F. Y. (2012). Chinese students' implicit theories of intelligence and school performance: Implications？for their approach to schoolwork. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(8), 930-935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.024？

상세보기
Willingham, J. C. (2016). The role of mindset in a mathematics teacher's interpretations and enactments of professional？development activities (Publication No. 10146909) [Doctoral dissertation, Middle Tennessee State University]. ProQuest？Dissertations Publishing.？
Willingham, J. C., Barlow, A. T., Stephens, D. C., Lischka, A. E., & Hartland, K. S. (2021). Mindset regarding mathematical？ability in K-12 teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 121(4), 234-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12466？

상세보기
Yeager, D. S., Carroll, J. M., Buontempo, J., Cimpian, A., Woody, S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Murray, J., Mhatre, P., Kersting, N., Hulleman, C., Kudym, M., Murphy, M., Duckworth, A. L., Walton, G. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2022). Teacher mindsets help explain where a growth-mindset intervention does and doesn't work. Psychological Science, 33(1), 18-32.？https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211028984？

상세보기
Zhang, J., Kuusisto, E., & Tirri, K. (2020). Same mindset, different pedagogical strategies: A case study comparing Chinese and Finnish teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(2), 248-262.？https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.2.15？

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

활용도 분석정보

상세보기

다운로드

내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증