$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] ePCK와 pPCK 간 지식 교환을 통한 초등교사의 pPCK 변화 탐색 -모델링 기반 과학 탐구 수업 사례-
Exploring Elementary Teachers' pPCK Change through the Knowledge Exchange between ePCK and pPCK: The Case of Modeling-based Science Inquiry Instruction 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, v.44 no.5, 2024년, pp.361 - 378  

김현주 (서울아주초등학교) ,  임채성 (서울교육대학교) ,  이기영 (강원대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

이 연구는 모델링 기반 과학 탐구 수업 실행 과정에서 ePCK(실행된 PCK)와 pPCK(개인적 PCK) 간 지식 교환을 통해 초등교사의 pPCK가 어떻게 변화하는지 탐색하였다. 이를 위해 초등교사 3인을 연구참여자로 선정한 뒤 연구참여자가 수업 실행 전⋅후로 두 차례 작성한 CoRe(내용 표상)를 질적 내용 분석하여 pPCK 변화를 포착하고, 연구참여자들이 실행한 모델링 기반 과학 탐구 수업 관련 자료(교수 학습 과정안, 수업 영상, 심층 면담 등)를 근거 이론적 연구 방법으로 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 모델링 기반 과학 탐구 수업 실행 과정에서 ePCK와 pPCK 간 지식 교환으로 초등교사의 pPCK는 교육과정 지식, 학생에 대한 지식, 교수적 지식, 평가 지식 측면에서 변화하였다. 또한 모델링 기반 과학 탐구 수업을 실행한 교사들의 pPCK 변화에는 수업을 계획하고(ePCKP) 수행하며(ePCKT) 성찰하는(ePCKR) ePCK와 pPCK 간 지식 교환이 영향을 미쳤음을 수업 관련 자료 분석을 통해 알 수 있었다. 이러한 연구 결과를 토대로 초등교사의 PCK 영역 간 지식 교환에 영향을 미치는 개인적 요인 규명의 필요성과 효과적인 모델링 기반 과학 탐구 수업 방식 개발의 필요성 등을 제언하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study explores elementary teachers' PCK change through the knowledge exchange between ePCK (enacted PCK) and pPCK (personal PCK) during modeling-based science inquiry instruction. For this purpose, three elementary school teachers were selected as research participants, and the CoRes(content re...

Keyword

표/그림 (15)

참고문헌 (80)

  1. Alonzo, A. C., & Kim, J. (2016). Declarative and dynamic pedagogical?content knowledge as elicited through two video-based interview?methods. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(8), 1259-1286. 

  2. Alonzo, A. C., Berry, A., & Nilsson, P. (2018). Capturing and representing?the complexity of PCK in action. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A.?Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in?teachers' professional knowledge. New York: Springer. 

  3. Alonzo, A. C., Berry, A., & Nilsson, P. (2019). Unpacking the complexity?of science teachers' PCK in action: Enacted and personal PCK. Lee,?K., Park, J., Kim, H., Chae, Y. (Eds). (2024). Repositioning?pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching?science. Paju: Kyoyookgwahaksa. 

  4. Barendsen, E., & Henze, I. (2019). Relating teacher PCK and teacher practice?using classroom observation. Research in Science Education, 49,?1141-1175. 

  5. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., …?Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive?activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational?Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180. 

  6. Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of?pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G.?Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp.?147-161). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

  7. Bertram, A., & Loughran, J. (2012). Science teachers' views on CoRes and?PaP-eRs as a framework for articulating and developing pedagogical?content knowledge. Research in Science Education, 42, 1027-1047. 

  8. Brophy, J. (2004). Using video in teacher education. JAI. 

  9. Carlson, J., Daehler, K. R., Alonzo, A. C., Barendsen, E., Berry, A.,?Borowski, A., ... & Wilson, C. D. (2019). The refined consensus model?of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. Lee, K., Park,?J., Kim, H., Chae, Y. (Eds). (2024). Repositioning pedagogical content?knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science. Paju:?Kyoyookgwahaksa. 

  10. Carpendale, J., & Hume, A. (2019). Investigating practising science teachers'?pPCK and ePCK development as a result of collaborative CoRe design. Lee, K., Park, J., Kim, H., Chae, Y. (Eds). (2024). Repositioning?pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching?science. Paju: Kyoyookgwahaksa. 

  11. Chamizo, J. A. (2013). A new definition of models and modeling in?chemistry' teaching. Science and Education, 22(7), 1613-1632. 

  12. Chan, K. K. H., & Yau, K. W. (2021). Using video-based interviews to?investigate pre-service secondary science teachers' situation-specific?skills for informal formative assessment. International Journal of?Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 289-311. 

  13. Cho, H., Kim, H., Kang, E., Nam, J. (2019). Analysis of Preservice?Chemistry Teachers' Modelling Ability and Perceptions in Science?Writing for Audiences of General Chemistry Experiment Using?Argument-based Modeling Strategy. Journal of the Korean Chemical?Society, 63(6), 459-472. 

  14. Clement, J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism. In G.?Glover & R. Ronning, C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity:?Assessment, theory and research (pp. 341-381). New York: Plenum. 

  15. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures,?canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3-21. 

  16. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research?design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications. 

  17. Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to?sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 

  18. Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional?work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113-136. 

  19. Fortus, D., Hug, B., Krajcik, J., Kuhn, L., McNeill, K. L., Reiser, B., ...?& Shwartz, Y. (2006). Sequencing and supporting complex scientific?inquiry practices in instructional materials for middle school students.?In Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science?Teaching, San Francisco, CA. 

  20. Gaudin, C., & Chalies, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and?professional development: A literature review. Educational research?review, 16, 41-67. 

  21. Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and?skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit.?In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining?pedagogical content knowledge in science education. New York,?London: Routledge. 

  22. Hand, B., Cavagnetto, A., Chen, Y.-C., & Park, S. (2016). Moving past?curricula and strategies: Language and the development of adaptive?pedagogy for immersive learning environments. Research in Science?Education, 42(2), 223-241. 

  23. Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers' epistemological beliefs?in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official?Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,?33(1), 47-63. 

  24. Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration?of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and?Practice, 11(3), 273-292. 

  25. Henze, I., van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2008). Development of experienced?science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of models of the solar?system and the universe. International Journal of Science Education,?30(10), 1321-1342. 

  26. Hume, A. (2015). Getting to the core of the matter: Developing a primary?school's science plan. New Zealand Science Teacher, 134, 18-22. 

  27. Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2013). Enhancing the practicum experience for?pre-service chemistry teachers through collaborative CoRe design with?mentor teachers. Research in Science Education, 43, 2107-2136. 

  28. Hume, A., Eames, C., Williams, J., & Lockley, J. (2013). The benefits of?collaborative content representation (CoRe) design. SET: Information?for Teachers, 2, 35-43. 

  29. Jang, E., Ko, W., Kang, S. (2012). The Analysis of University Student's?Modeling Patterns and Perceptions Through Modeling Experiments.?Journal of the Korean association for science education, 32(1), 1-14. 

  30. Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling, teachers' views on the nature?of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers.?International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369-387. 

  31. Kang, N. (2017). Korean Teachers' Conceptions of Models and Modeling?in Science and Science Teaching. Journal of the Korean association?for science education, 37(1), 143-154. 

  32. Kang, N., & Lee, E. (2013). An Analysis of Inquiry Activities in High School?Physics Textbooks for the 2009 Revised Science Curriculum. Journal?of the Korean association for science education, 33(1), 132-143. 

  33. Ke, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2021). Supporting students' meaningful?engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages:?A case study of contrasting teaching approaches. Journal of Research?in Science Teaching, 58(3), 335-365. 

  34. Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Thompson, B. J., Santagata, R., & Stigler,?J. W. (2012). Measuring usable knowledge: Teachers' analyses of?mathematics classroom videos predict teaching quality and student?learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 568-589. 

  35. Kim, D. (2006). Student's Theory on Classroom-Level Curriculum?Implementation: An Analysis from the Perspective of Post-modernism.?The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(1), 1-40. 

  36. Kim, H., Lim, C., & Lee, K. (2023). Composition and attributes of modeling?instructions and factors of teacher competence in elementary science?classes: A qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Korean Elementary?Science Education 42(3), 434-454. 

  37. Kim, H., Lim, C., & Lee, K. (2024). Exploring the Changes in Elementary?Teachers' Modeling pPCK for Science Modeling Instructions Through?Knowledge Exchange of the Refined Consensus Model. Journal of the?Korean Association for Science Education, 44(1), 105-117. 

  38. Kim, N., & Yeo, S. (2023). Structural Relationships between Learning?Organizational Culture, Science Epistemological Beliefs, Science?Teaching Efficacy, Science Teaching Professionalism Perceived by?Elementary School Teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for?Science Education, 43(1), 37-47. 

  39. Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education:?Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education,?45(2), 169-204. 

  40. Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M.,?& Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content?knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of educational psychology, 100(3), 716-725. 

  41. Krell, M., & Kruger, D. (2017). University students' meta-modelling knowledge.?Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(3), 1-13. 

  42. Lee, H. (2006). Development of supporting programs for teaching?consultation and pedagogical content knowledge by subjects (RRI?2006-1). Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. 

  43. Lee, M. (2019). A Practical Analysis on the Modeling Application Lessons?of High School Science Teachers : focused on the Experiential?Implementation-based Science Teacher Training through the Science?Lessons. Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. 

  44. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1990). Judging the quality of case study?reports. Internation Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(1),?53-59. 

  45. Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Modeling-based learning in science?education: Cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological?contributions. Educational Review, 64(4), 471-492. 

  46. Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing?science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht: Sense?Publishers. 

  47. Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and developing?science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Sense Publishers. 

  48. Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Mulhall, P., & Gunstone, R. (2001).?Science cases in action: Documenting science teachers' pedagogical?content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education,?31, 289-307. 

  49. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical?content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and?documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science?Teaching, 41(4), 370-391. 

  50. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and?development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching.?In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical?content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science?education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. 

  51. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage?publications. 

  52. Mazibe, E. N., Coetzee, C., & Gaigher, E. (2020). A comparison between?reported and enacted pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) about?graphs of motion. Research in Science Education, 50, 941-964. 

  53. Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015). Science curriculum. notification No.?2015-74. Sejong: Ministry of Education. 

  54. Mitchell, I., Keast, S., Panizzon, D., & Mitchell, J. (2017). Using 'big ideas'?to enhance teaching and student learning. Teachers and teaching, 23(5),?596-610. 

  55. Morrison, M., & Morgan, M. S. (1999). Models as mediating instruments.?In M. Morrison & M. S. Morgan (Eds.), Models as mediators (pp.?10-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

  56. Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge:?Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of research?in Science teaching, 42(7), 767-790. 

  57. National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards.?Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 

  58. Newman, J. W. (1994). America's teachers: An introduction to education?(2nd). Longman Publishing Group. 

  59. NGSS Lead States (Ed.). (2013). Next generation science standards: For?states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 

  60. Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service?science elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal?of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 699-721. 

  61. Park, S. (2019). Reconciliation between the refined consensus model of PCK?and extant PCK models for advancing PCK research in science. Lee,?K., Park, J., Kim, H., Chae, Y. (Eds). (2024). Repositioning pedagogical?content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science. Paju:?Kyoyookgwahaksa. 

  62. Park, S., & Suh, J. (2019). The PCK map approach to capturing the?complexity of enacted PCK (ePCK) and pedagogical reasoning in?science teaching. Lee, K., Park, J., Kim, H., Chae, Y. (Eds). (2024).?Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge?for teaching science. Paju: Kyoyookgwahaksa. 

  63. Passmore, C. M., & Svoboda, J. (2012). Exploring opportunities for?argumentation in modelling classrooms. International Journal of?Science Education, 34(10), 1535-1554. 

  64. Rich, P. J., & Hannafin, M. (2009). Video annotation tools: Technologies?to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of?teacher education, 60(1), 52-67. 

  65. Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008).?The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content?knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the?amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International journal?of science education, 30(10), 1365-1387. 

  66. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Qualitative?content analysis in practice, 1-280. 

  67. Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus,?D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning?progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling?accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science?Teaching, 46(6), 632-654. 

  68. Shi, F., Wang, L., Liu, X., & Chiu, M. H. (2021). Development and?validation of an observation protocol for measuring science teachers'?modeling-based teaching performance. Journal of Research in Science?Teaching, 58(9), 1359-1388. 

  69. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new?reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. 

  70. Sorge, S., Stender, A., & Neumann, K. (2019). The development of science?teachers' professional competence. Lee, K., Park, J., Kim, H., Chae,?Y. (Eds). (2024). Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in?teachers' knowledge for teaching science. Paju: Kyoyookgwahaksa. 

  71. Stroupe, D. (2015). Describing "Science Practice" in learning settings.?Science Education, 99(6), 1033-1040. 

  72. Suk, Y., & Yoon, H. (2022). Analysis of elementary students modeling using?the globe on the cause of seasonal change. Journal of Korean?Elementary Science Education, 41(4), 673-689. 

  73. Uhm, J., & Kim, H. (2020). Changes in Teaching Practices of Elementary?School Teachers in Scientific Modeling Classes: Focused on Modeling?Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK). Journal of the Korean?Association for Science Education, 40(5), 543-563. 

  74. van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2010). Science teacher education. In P.?Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia?of education (3rd ed., pp. 712-718). Oxford: Elsevier. 

  75. van Driel, J. H., & Henze, I. (2012). Extended paper for PCK Summit,?Colorado 2012. Retrieved from http://pcksummit.bscs.org. 

  76. van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2002). Experienced teachers' knowledge?of teaching and learning of models and modeling in science education.?International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1255-1272. 

  77. Vo, T., Forbes, C., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2019). Longitudinal?investigation of primary inservice teachers' modelling the hydrological?phenomena. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18),?2788-2807. 

  78. Windschitl, M., & Thompson, J. (2006). Transcending simple forms of school?science investigation: The impact of preservice instruction on teachers'?understandings of model-based inquiry. American Educational Research?Journal, 43(4), 783-835. 

  79. Yoo, Y., & Oh, P. (2016). Effects of modeling-based science inquiry?instruction on elementary students' learning in the unit of seasonal?changes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(2),?265-276. 

  80. Yoon, H. (2011). Pre-service Elementary Teachers' Inquiry on a Model of?Magnetism and Changes in Their Views of Scientific Models. Journal?of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(3), 353-366. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

활용도 분석정보

상세보기
다운로드
내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로