[논문]Review Of Internet Health Information Quality Initiatives

Risk, Ahmad; Dzenowagis, Joan

doi:10.2196/jmir.3.4.e28

Review Of Internet Health Information Quality Initiatives 원문보기

Journal of medical Internet research, v.3 no.4, 2001년, pp.e28 -

Risk, Ahmad (World Health Organization 20 Avenue Appia Switzerland) , Dzenowagis, Joan (World Health Organization 20 Avenue Appia Switzerland)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

BackgroundThe massive growth of health information on the Internet; the global nature of the Internet; the seismic shift taking place in the relationships of various actors in this arena, and the absence of real protection from harm for citizens who use the Internet for health purposes are seen to be real problems. One response to many of these problems has been the burgeoning output of codes of conduct by numerous organizations trying to address quality of health information.ObjectivesReview the major self-regulatory initiatives in the English-speaking world to develop quality and ethical standards for health information on the Internet. Compare and analyze the approaches taken by the different initiatives. Clarify the issues around the development and enforcement of standards.MethodsQuality initiatives selected meet one or more of the following criteria: Self-regulatory. A reasonable constituency. Diversity (eg, of philosophy, approach and process)-to achieve balance and wide representation, and to illustrate and compare different approaches. Historic value. A wider reach than a national audience, except when its reach is a significant sector of the Internet health information industry.The initiatives were compared in 3 ways: (1) Analysis and comparison of: key concepts, mechanism, or approach. Analysis of: the obligations that a provider has to meet to comply with the given initiative, the intended beneficiaries of that initiative, and the burdens imposed on different actors. These burdens are described in terms of their effect on the long-term sustainability and maintenance of the initiative by its developers. Analysis of the enforcement mechanisms. (2) Analysis and comparison by type of sponsoring organization, the reach of the initiative, and the sources of funding of the initiative or the sponsoring organization. (3) How the various initiatives fall under 1 of 3 key mechanisms and comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of these key mechanisms.ResultsThe issues that affect the initiatives and future work on the quality of health information on the Internet are identified and analyzed. These issues are:(a) Three key mechanisms used in the quality initiatives (b) Sustainability issues that affect the initiatives: Burdens placed on health information providers, citizens and others. Currency and maintenance issues of the initiatives. Funding. Cost. Acceptance. Market conditions. User indifference or ambivalence. (c) Enforcement issues surrounding the initiatives (d) Adequacy of approach, scope, reach, and enforcement provisions of the various quality initiatives (e) Gaps that need to be addressed to achieve good quality of health information on the internetConclusionsTen conclusions are presented. A framework of action to be undertaken by the World Health Organization in the field of quality of health information on the Internet is recommended.

주제어

참고문헌 (41)

1 Eysenbach G Jadad A R Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age J Med Internet Res 2001 6 12 3 2 e19 http://www.jmir.org/2001/2/e19/ 21578026 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e19 11720961

상세보기
2 Gerber B S Eiser A R The patient physician relationship in the Internet age: future prospects and the research agenda J Med Internet Res 2001 4 9 3 2 e15 http://www.jmir.org/2001/2/e15/ 21578022 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e15 11720957

상세보기
3 Eng TR eHealth Landscape - A Terrain Map of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies in Health and Health Care 2001 2001 Oct 6 Princeton NJ Robert Wood Johnson Foundation http://www.rwjf.org/app/rw_publications_and_links/publicationsPdfs/eHealth.pdf
4 P/S/L Research Home page 2001 Oct 2 http://www.pslgroup.com
5 California HealthCare Foundation Proceed with Caution: A Report on the Quality of Health Information on the Internet 2001 5 2001 Oct 2 http://ehealth.chcf.org/view.cfm?section=Industry&itemID=3973
6 Eysenbach G Diepgen T L Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information BMJ 1998 11 28 317 7171 1496 500 http://bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=9831581 99051215 9831581
7 Berland G K Elliott M N Morales L S Algazy J I Kravitz R L Broder M S Kanouse D E Muñoz J A Puyol J A Lara M Watkins K E Yang H Mcglynn E A Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish JAMA 2001 285 20 2612 21 http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v285n20/ffull/joc02274.html joc02274 21262346 10.1001/jama.285.20.2612 11368735

상세보기
8 Rippen H Risk A for the e-Health Ethics Initiative. e-Health Code of Ethics J Med Internet Res 2000 2001 Oct 4 2 2 e9 http://www.jmir.org/2000/2/e9/ 10.2196/jmir.2.2.e9 11720928

상세보기
9 Internet Healthcare Coalition Home page 2001 Oct 2 http://ihealthcoalition.org
10 Hi-Ethics, Inc Health Internet Ethics: Ethical Principles for Offering Internet Health Services to Consumers 2001 Oct 2 http://www.hiethics.com/Principles/index.asp
11 Hi-Ethics, Inc Home page 2001 Oct 2 http://www.hiethics.com
12 MedCERTAIN Home page 2001 Oct 2 http://www.medcertain.org
13 Eysenbach G Köhler C Yihune G Lampe K Cross P Brickley D A framework for improving the quality of health information on the world-wide-web and bettering public (e-)health: the MedCERTAIN approach Medinfo 2001 10 Pt 2 1450 1454 http://www.medcertain.org/pdf/MedCERTAIN_approach.pdf 21490753 11604966
14 Eysenbach G Diepgen T L Labeling and filtering of medical information on the Internet Methods Inf Med 1999 6 38 2 80 8 99360180 99020080 10431511

상세보기
15 Yihune G Lampe K Cross P Brickley D A metadata vocabulary for self- and third-party labeling of health web-sites: Health Information Disclosure, Description and Evaluation Language (HIDDEL) Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 2001 JAMIA Suppl [in press]
16 European Commission Safer Internet Action Plan 2001 Sep 30 http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/iap/index.html
17 Darmoni S J Leroy J P Baudic F Douyère M Piot J Thirion B CISMeF: a structured health resource guide Methods Inf Med 2000 3 39 1 30 5 20247791 10786067

상세보기
18 Department of Clinical Social Medicine, Unit for Cybermedicine and E-health at the University of Heidelberg DAERI Database of Adverse Events Related to the Internet 2001 Oct 2 http://www.medcertain.org/daeri/
19 URAC Health Web Site Accreditation 2001 Oct 2 http://www.urac.org/websiteaccreditation.htm
20 URAC progressing with web site accreditation Hosp Peer Rev 2001 26 5 67 68, 62 11346970 11346970
21 URAC American Accreditation Healthcare Commission Home page 2001 Oct 2 http://www.urac.org
22 TNO Prevention and Health Home page 2001 Oct 2 http://www.health.tno.nl/homepage_pg_en.html
23 ISO How are ISO standards developed? 2001 Oct 2 http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/stdsdevelopment/whowhenhow/how.html
24 Health On the Net Foundation HON Code of Conduct (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites 2001 Oct 2 http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html
25 Boyer C Selby M Scherrer J R Appel R D The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites Comput Biol Med 1998 9 28 5 603 10 99078508 S0010482598000377 10.1016/S0010-4825(98)00037-7 9861515

상세보기
26 Health on the Net Foundation Home page 2001 Oct 2 http://www.hon.ch/
27 European Commission Quality Criteria for Health Related Websites 2001 Sep 30 http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/ehealth/quality/index_en.htm
28 OMNI (Organising Medical Networked Information) Home page 2001 Oct 2 http://omni.ac.uk
29 Norman F Organizing medical networked information (OMNI) Med Inform (Lond) 1998 3 23 1 43 51 9618682
30 DISCERN Home page 2001 Oct 2 http://www.discern.org.uk
31 Charnock D Shepperd S Needham G Gann R DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices J Epidemiol Community Health 1999 2 53 2 105 11 http://jech.bmjjournals.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=reprint&pmid=10396471 99324793 10396471

상세보기
32 AMA staff members Web Guidelines. Principles Governing AMA Publications Web Sites 2001 Oct 2 http://pubs.ama-assn.org/ama_web.html
33 Winker M A Flanagin A Chi-lum B White J Andrews K Kennett R L Deangelis C D Musacchio R A Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association JAMA 2000 283 12 1600 6 http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v283n12/ffull/jsc00054.html 20197445 jsc00054 10.1001/jama.283.12.1600 10735398

상세보기
34 Galloway P British Healthcare Internet Association: Quality Standards for Medical Publishing on the Web 1996 12 7 2001 Oct 1 http://www.bhia.org/reference/documents/recommend_webquality.htm
35 Health Summit Working Group Information Quality Tool 2001 1 18 2001 Jul 23 http://hitiweb.mitretek.org/iq/default.asp
36 Mitretek Systems Inc Home page 2001 Jul 23 http://www.mitretek.org/index.html
37 International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations IFPMA Code of Pharmaceutical Marketing Practices 2001 Jul 23 http://www.ifpma.org/
38 Silberg W M Lundberg G D Musacchio R A Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware JAMA 1997 4 16 277 15 1244 5 97256510 10.1001/jama.278.8.632 9103351

상세보기
39 Eysenbach G Yihune G Lampe K Cross P Brickley D Kitemarking the west wind. Website labels are analogous to food labels BMJ 2001 3 31 322 7289 794 21178876 10.1136/bmj.322.7289.794 11282880
40 Baur C Deering MJ Proposed Frameworks to Improve the Quality of Health Web Sites: Review MedGenMed 2000 9 26 2001 Oct 4 http://www.medscape.com/medscape/GeneralMedicine/journal/2000/v02.n05/mgm0926.baur/mgm0926.baur-01.html
41 Delamothe T Quality of websites: kitemarking the west wind BMJ 2000 10 7 321 7265 843 4 http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/321/7265/843 20476359 10.1136/bmj.321.7265.843 11021843

상세보기

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

Review Of Internet Health Information Quality Initiatives 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (41)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트