초록

용어보기논문에서 용어와 풀이말을 자동 추출한 결과로, 시범 서비스 중입니다. AI-Helper

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

This paper aims to introduce various attempts to reevaluate the connection between republicanism and human rights with the conception of liberty as nondomination, to explain the reason that those attempts are insufficient to reduce the incompatibility of democratic deliberation with universal rights...

This paper aims to introduce various attempts to reevaluate the connection between republicanism and human rights with the conception of liberty as nondomination, to explain the reason that those attempts are insufficient to reduce the incompatibility of democratic deliberation with universal rights, and to present reciprocal nondomination as a regulative principle by which the universality of human rights could be in concord with sociopolitical particularities. Recently a number of scholars under the banners of republicanism have argued that in the republican tradition where human rights are comprehended not as naturally given but sociopolitically constructed, an appropriate account of human rights across sociopolitical and cultural borders could be justified. However, they did pay too little attention to deliberation with persuasion and nondomination through reciprocity, whereby the justification of human rights in the lights of republicanism are unduly reduced to individual motivation on the one hand and arguably transposed for the sake of building cosmopolitan civil society. By exploring the political justifications of humanitarian solidarity in classical republicanism with relation to human rights, I develop two arguments. First, critically reviewing various attempts to explain human rights in the lights of republicanism, I claim that too little attention has been paid to the sociopolitical meanings of nondomination as a minimal condition for democratic deliberation. Second, analyzing two distinct classical republican justifications for humanitarian solidarity, I argue that the politics of persuasion with reciprocal nondomination as a regulative principle may help us form another reasonable republican justification for human rights which is at once anti-foundational and anti-relativist.

주제어