[논문]Injection strategies for large-scale CO2 storage sites

Michae, K.; Neal, P.R.; Allinson, G.; Ennis-King, J.; Hou, W.; Paterson, L.; Sharma, S.; Aiken, T.

doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.376

Injection strategies for large-scale CO2 storage sites 원문보기

Energy procedia, v.4, 2011년, pp.4267 - 4274

Michae, K. (Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies, GPO Box 463, Canberra ACT, Australia) , Neal, P.R. (Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies, GPO Box 463, Canberra ACT, Australia) , Allinson, G. (Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies, GPO Box 463, Canberra ACT, Australia) , Ennis-King, J. (Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies, GPO Box 463, Canberra ACT, Australia) , Hou, W. (Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies, GPO Box 463, Canberra ACT, Australia) , Paterson, L. (Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies, GPO Box 463, Canberra ACT, Australia) , Sharma, S. (Schlumberger, Australia) , Aiken, T. (IEA Greenhouse Gas Programme, United Kingdom)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

AbstractExisting pilot, demonstration and commercial storage projects have demonstrated that CO2 geological storage is technically feasible. However, these projects do not operate at a scale that is necessary to make a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. The infrastructure for injecting carbon dioxide will need to be an order of magnitude larger than current CCS projects, at comparable size of existing petroleum installations. In most cases, the CO2 injection scheme will consist of multiple wells, potentially including wells for monitoring and pressure control.Despite the advanced understanding of subsurface flow processes and development of modelling tools, there are still conflicting results in the literature on the estimation of pressure build-up, the resulting number of injection wells required for large-scale CO2 geological storage and storage efficiency. For these issues, there do not appear to be any adequate analogues. As a result, studies on the regional impacts of CO2 storage and the role of hydraulic properties of the sealing unit have been limited to more or less generic numerical modelling exercises. Since there are typically large uncertainties in model parameters, such as relative permeability, conclusions drawn from generic studies will have limited applicability until they can be tested against field data.Uncertainties in predicting reservoir properties and therefore in predicting injectivity will clearly affect the design and economics of the injection system. Potential trade-offs with respect to costs for transport and reservoir stimulation need consideration. Also, strategies and contingencies will need to be incorporated in development plans to allow for unforeseen changes in injection conditions during project life. Continuously updating reservoir models when new data become available and adapting injection strategies will be essential for the success of large-scale CO2 geological storage.

주제어

참고문헌 (33)

Int. J. of Greenhouse Gas Control Michael 4 4 659 2010 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.12.011 Geological storage of CO2 in saline aquifers-A review of the experience from existing storage operations

상세보기
Transp. in Por. Media Mathias 79 2 265 2008 10.1007/s11242-008-9316-7 Approximate solutions for pressure buildup during CO2 injection in brine aquifers

상세보기
Int. J. of Greenhouse Gas Control Mathias 3 5 577 2009 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.05.002 Screening and selection of sites for CO2 sequestration based on pressure buildup

상세보기
10.2118/113937-MS M. Burton, N. Kumar, S. Bryant, Time-dependent injectivity during CO2 storage. Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 19-23 April 2008, SPE 113937.
10.2118/124430-MS M.J. Economides, C.A. Ehlig-Economides, Sequestering carbon dioxide in a closed underground volume. SPE Annual Technical Conferences & Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 4-7 October 2009, SPE 113937: 1-8.
Comp. Geosc. Class 13 409 2009 10.1007/s10596-009-9146-x A benchmark study on problems related to CO2 storage in geologic formations

상세보기
Energy Pruess 29 9-10 1431 2004 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.077 Code intercomparison builds confidence in numerical simulation models for geologic disposal of CO2

상세보기
10.2118/114028-MS Y. Cinar, O. Bukhteeva, P. Neal, G. Allinson, L. Paterson, CO2 Storage in low permeability formations. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 19-23 April 2008, SPE 114028.
10.2118/116355-MS J. Zakrisson, I. Edman, Y. Cinar, Multiwell injectivity for CO2 storage. SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, 20-22 October 2008.
10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.04.004 M. Person, A. Banerjee, J. Rupp, C. Medina, P. Lichtner, C. Gable, et al. Assessment of basin-scale hydrologic impacts of CO2 sequestration, Illinois basin. Int. J. of Greenhouse Gas Control. In Press, available online 2010.

상세보기
Int. J. of Greenhouse Gas Control Nicot 2 582 2008 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.03.004 Evaluation of large-scale CO2 storage on fresh-water sections of aquifers: An example from the Texas Gulf Coast Basin

상세보기
Int. J. of Greenhouse Gas Control Birkholzer 3 2 181 2009 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.08.002 Large-scale impact of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers: A sensitivity study on pressure response in stratified systems

상세보기
10.2118/116372-MS M. Flett, G. Beacher, J. Brantjes, A. Burt, C. Dauth, F. Koelmeyer, et al. Gorgon project: Subsurface evaluation of carbon dioxide disposal under Barrow Island. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, 20-22 October 2008, SPE 116372.
10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.10.017 J. Rutqvist, D.W. Vasco, L. Myer, Coupled reservoir-geomechanical analysis of CO2 injection and ground deformations at In Salah, Algeria. Int. J. of Greenhouse Gas Control. 4(2): 225-230.

상세보기
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering Christensen 4 2 97 2001 10.2118/71203-PA Review of WAG field experience

상세보기
Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control Ide 1 4 481 2007 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00091-6 Storage of CO2 in saline aquifers: Effects of gravity, viscous, and capillary forces on amount and timing of trapping

상세보기
Environ. Sci. Technol. Leonenko 42 8 2742 2008 10.1021/es071578c Reservoir engineering to accelerate the dissolution of CO2 stored in aquifers

상세보기
Int. J. of Greenhouse Gas Control Qi 3 2 195 2009 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.08.004 Design of carbon dioxide storage in aquifers

상세보기
10.2118/89343-MS A. Kumar, M. Noh, G.A. Pope, K. Sepehrnoori, S. Bryant, L.W. Lake, Reservoir simulation of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers. SPE/DOE 14th Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA 17-21 April, 2004.
Energy Procedia Burton 1 3707 2009 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.169 Surface dissolution: Minimizing groundwater impact and leakage risk simultaneously

상세보기
10.2118/35584-MS H.L. Longworth, G.C. Dunn, M. Semchuck, Underground disposal of acid gas in Alberta, Canada: Regulatory concerns and case histories. SPE Gas Technology Conference, April 28-May 1, 1996 in Calgary, Alberta, SPE 35584: 181-192.
Oil Gas J. Kopperson 96 32 64 1998 Two cases illustrate acid gas/water injection scheme
Oil & Gas J. Moritis 106 15 41 2008 Special report: More US EOR projects start but EOR production continues to decline
10.2118/126446-MS R.E. Sweatman, M.E. Parker, S.L. Crookshank, Industry experience with CO2-enhanced oil-recovery technology. SPE International Conference on CO2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization, San Diego, California, 2-4 November 2009, SPE 126446.
Environ. Geol. Tsang 54 8 1723 2008 10.1007/s00254-007-0949-6 A comparative review of hydrologic issues involved in geologic storage of CO2 and injection disposal of liquid waste

상세보기
Bachu 225 2004 Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide for Emissions Reduction: Technology Acid gas injection in the Alberta Basin, Canada: A CO2 storage experience
Bachu 623 2005 Underground injection science and technology. Advances in water sciences Deep injection of acid gas in Western Canada
10.2118/91861-MS G. Benge, E.G. Drew, Meeting the challenges in design and execution of two high rate acid gas injection wells. SPE/IADC Drill ing Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 23-25 February 2005, SPE 91861.
Petrol. Geosc. Chadwick 15 1 59 2009 10.1144/1354-079309-793 Flow processes and pressure evolution in aquifers during the injection of supercritical CO2 as a greenhouse gas mitigation measure

상세보기
Int. J. of Greenhouse Gas Control Yamamoto 3 5 586 2009 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.04.007 Numerical investigation concerning the impact of CO2 geologic storage on regional groundwater flow

상세보기
10.2118/101122-MS G. Allinson, R. Dunsmore, P. Neal, M. Ho, The cost of carbon capture and storage in the Perth Region. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, 11-13 Sept. 2006, Adelaide, Australia.
P. Neal, M. Ho, R. Dunsmore, G. Allinson, G. McKee, The economics of carbon capture and storage in the Latrobe Valley, Victoria, Australia. International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), 19-22 June 2006, Trondheim, Norway.
P. Neal, Y. Cinar, G. Allinson, Trade-offs for injecting carbon dioxide. SPE Eastern Regional/AAPG Eastern Section Joint Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 11-15 October 2008.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

Injection strategies for large-scale CO2 storage sites 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (33)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트