$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Comparative risk assessment of severe accidents in the energy sector

Energy policy, v.74 suppl.1, 2014년, pp.S45 - S56  

Burgherr, P. ,  Hirschberg, S.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Comparative assessment of accident risks in the energy sector is a key aspect in a comprehensive evaluation of sustainability and energy security concerns. Safety performance of energy systems can have important implications on the environmental, economic and social dimensions of sustainability as w...

주제어

참고문헌 (91)

  1. Ann. Nucl. Energy Al Shehhi 59 63 2013 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.03.017 Analysis of economics and safety to cope with station blackout in PWR 

  2. Energy Policy Aoki 53 240 2013 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.058 A comparative institutional analysis of the Fukushima nuclear disaster: lessons and policy implications 

  3. Energy Environ. Sci. Beyea 6 1042 2013 10.1039/c2ee24183h Accounting for long-term doses in “worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident” 

  4. Energy Policy Brook 42 4 2012 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.041 Could nuclear fission energy, etc., solve the greenhouse problem? The affirmative case 

  5. 10.1073/pnas.1212729110 Bruine de Bruin, W., Bostrom, A., Assessing what to address in science communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 2013, 14062-14068. 

  6. J. Hazard. Mater. Burgherr 140 245 2007 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.030 In-depth analysis of accidental oil spills from tankers in the context of global spill trends from all sources 

  7. Burgherr 2009 Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications Using GIS and Multivariate Analyses to Visualize Risk Levels and Spatial Patterns of Severe Accidents in the Energy Sector 

  8. Burgherr, P., 2011. Accidents and Risks (Chapter 9.3.4.7). In: Sathaye, J., O. Lucon, A. Rahman, J. Christensen, F. Denton, J. Fujino, G. Heath, S. Kadner, M. Mirza,H. Rudnick, A. Schlaepfer, A. Shmakin, 2011: Renewable Energy in the Context of Sustainable Energy (Chapter 9). In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation [O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlomer, C. von Stechow (Eds.)],. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. 

  9. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. Burgherr 105 97 2012 10.1016/j.ress.2012.03.020 Comparative assessment of severe accident risks in the coal, oil and natural gas chains 

  10. Burgherr, P., Eckle, P., Hirschberg, S., Cazzoli, E., 2011. Final report on severe accident risks including key indicators. SECURE Deliverable No. D5.7.2a. SECURE Project - Security of Energy Considering its Uncertainty, Risk and Economic Implications, Brussels, Belgium. 

  11. Burgherr, P., Eckle, P., Michaux, E., 2012b. Oil tanker transportation risk: driving factors and consequence assessment, In: Proceedings of the 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference & European Safety and Reliability Conference (PSAM11 & ESREL2012). Helsinki, Finland. 

  12. Burgherr 2005 Comparative assessment of natural gas accident risks. PSI Report No. 05-01 

  13. Int. J. Risk Assess. Manag. Burgherr 7 1157 2007 10.1504/IJRAM.2007.015299 Assessment of severe accident risks in the Chinese coal chain 

  14. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Burgherr 14 947 2008 10.1080/10807030802387556 A comparative analysis of accident risks in fossil, hydro and nuclear energy chains 

  15. Energy Burgherr 33 538 2008 10.1016/j.energy.2007.10.015 Severe accident risks in fossil energy chains: a comparative analysis 

  16. Burgherr 2009 Wiley Handbook of Science and Technology for Homeland Security Comparative Risk Assessment for Energy Systems: A Tool for Comprehensive Assessment of Energy Security 

  17. Burgherr, P., Hirschberg, S., Cazzoli, E., 2008. Final report on quantification of risk indicators for sustainability assessment of future electricity supply options. NEEDS Deliverable no. D7.1 - Research Stream 2b. NEEDS project “New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability”, Brussels, Belgium. 

  18. Burgherr 2004 Severe Accidents in the Energy Sector. Final Report to the European Commission of the EU 5th Framework Programme “New Elements for the Assessment of External Costs from Energy Technologies” (NewExt) 

  19. Saf. Sci. Chen 50 745 2012 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.040 Research on 10-year tendency of China coal mine accidents and the characteristics of human factors 

  20. Chernobyl Forum (IAEA, W., UNDP, FAO, UNEP, UN-OCHA, UNSCEAR, World Bank, Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine), 2005. Chernobyl?s legacy: health, environmental and socio-economic impacts and recommendations to the governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. The Chernobyl Forum: 2003-2005. Second revised version. IAEA, Vienna, Austria. 

  21. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. Cherp 3 202 2011 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.07.001 The three perspectives on energy security: intellectual history, disciplinary roots and the potential for integration 

  22. Chessel, D., Doledec, S., 1996. ADE version 4: hypercard stacks and quick basic Microsoft programme library for the analysis of environmental data, user’s manual. Lyon, France: Ecologie des Eaux Douces et des Grands Fleuves, Universite Lyon 1. 

  23. Energy Policy Chester 38 887 2010 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.039 Conceptualising energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature 

  24. Energy Policy Coaffee 36 4633 2008 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.048 Risk, resilience, and environmentally sustainable cities 

  25. Safety Science Colli 47 591 2009 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.022 Indicators to compare risk expressions, grouping, and relative ranking of risk for energy systems: application with some accidental events from fossil fuels 

  26. Energy Delzeit 34 662 2009 10.1016/j.energy.2008.09.007 Steps to discern sustainability criteria for a certification scheme of bioethanol in Brazil: approach and difficulties 

  27. Ecol. Econ. Dietz 61 617 2007 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.007 Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: concepts and measurement 

  28. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy Dubois 38 8108 2013 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.027 Safety cost of a large scale hydrogen system for photovoltaic energy regulation 

  29. Eckle, P., Burgherr, P., Hirschberg, S., 2011. Final report on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). SECURE Deliverable No. D6.2. SECURE Project - Security of Energy Considering its Uncertainty, Risk and Economic Implications, Brussels, Belgium. 

  30. Energy Policy Felder 37 5744 2009 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.059 A critical assessment of energy accident studies 

  31. Filippini, R., Silva, A., 2012. Resilience analysis of networked systems-of-systems based on structural and dynamic interdependencies, PSAM 11 & ESREL 2012, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 10. 

  32. Risk Anal. Fritzsche 9 565 1989 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb01267.x The health risks of energy production 

  33. Risk Anal. Fritzsche 12 327 1992 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00682.x Severe accidents: can they occur only in the nuclear production of electricity? 

  34. Sol. Energy Fthenakis 85 1609 2011 10.1016/j.solener.2009.10.002 Photovoltaics: life-cycle analyses 

  35. J. Risk Res. Gray 2 201 1999 10.1080/136698799376808 Risk management and sustainable development: mutual lessons from approaches to the use of indicators 

  36. Energy Policy Hartmann 62 1366 2013 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.058 Nuclear power threats, public opposition and green electricity adoption: effects of threat belief appraisal and fear arousal 

  37. Hirschberg Vol. 4 587 2003 Assessment of Severe Accident Risks 

  38. J. Hazard. Mater. Hirschberg 111 57 2004 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.009 Severe accidents in the energy sector: comparative perspective 

  39. Hirschberg 1998 Severe accidents in the energy sector - first edition. PSI Report No. 98-16 

  40. J. Educ. Psychol. Hotelling 24 417-441 498 1933 10.1037/h0070888 Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components 

  41. Ecol. Econ. Hueting 50 249 2004 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.031 Broad sustainability contra sustainability: the proper construction of sustainability indicators 

  42. Inhaber Volume 5 469 2004 Risk Analysis Applied to Energy Systems 

  43. J. Clean. Prod. Jeswani 18. 2010 Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches 

  44. Saf. Sci. Johansen 62 386 2014 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.011 Foundations and choice of risk metrics 

  45. Energy Johansson 53 199 2013 10.1016/j.energy.2013.03.012 A broadened typology on energy and security 

  46. Jolliffe 2002 Principal Component Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics 

  47. 10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.004 Kampanart, S., Yuki, I., Shogo, T., 2014. Cost per severe accident as an index for severe accident consequence assessment and its applications. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 123, 110-122 

  48. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. Karakosta 22 187 2013 10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.035 Renewable energy and nuclear power towards sustainable development: characteristics and prospects 

  49. Environ.: Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. Kates 47 8 2005 What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice 

  50. Environ. Sci. Technol. Kharecha 47 4889 2013 10.1021/es3051197 Prevented mortality and greenhouse gas emissions from historical and projected nuclear power 

  51. Mar. Pollut. Bull. Kontovas 60 1455 2010 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.05.010 An empirical analysis of IOPCF oil spill cost data 

  52. Kroger 2011 Vulnerable Systems 

  53. Energy Policy Laes 39 5664 2011 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.016 On the contribution of external cost calculations to energy system governance: the case of a potential large-scale nuclear accident 

  54. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. Larsson 30 170 2014 10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.028 Reviewing electricity production cost assessments 

  55. J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. A (Stat. Soc.) Levett 161 291 1998 10.1111/1467-985X.00109 Sustainability indicators - integrating quality of life and environmental protection 

  56. Energy Lior 40. 2012 Sustainable energy development (May 2011) with some game-changers 

  57. Energy Mabel 5217 2010 10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.044 Adequacy evaluation of wind power generation systems 

  58. Saf. Sci. Maiti 47 1033 2009 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.11.007 Severity analysis of Indian coal mine accidents - a retrospective study for 100 years 

  59. Energy Policy Molyneaux 47 188 2012 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.057 Resilience and electricity systems: a comparative analysis 

  60. Energy Sustain. Dev. Musango 15 84 2011 10.1016/j.esd.2010.10.005 A conceptual framework for energy technology sustainability assessment 

  61. Soc. Indic. Res. Noll 58 47 2002 10.1023/A:1015775631413 Towards a European system of social indicators: theoretical framework and system architecture 

  62. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) 2012 The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Low-carbon Energy Future 

  63. 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.04.002 Okoh, P., Haugen, S., 2013. Maintenance-related major accidents: classification of causes and case study. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26, 1060-1070. 

  64. Philos. Mag. Pearson 2 559 1901 10.1080/14786440109462720 On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space 

  65. Mar. Pollut. Bull. Psarros 62 116 2011 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.09.003 Risk acceptance criterion for tanker oil spill risk reduction measures 

  66. Energy Policy Rabl 57 575 2013 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.028 External costs of nuclear: greater or less than the alternatives? 

  67. Ecol. Econ. Rapp Nilsen 69 495 2010 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.011 The joint discourse ‘reflexive sustainable development’ - from weak towards strong sustainable development 

  68. Annu. Rev. Energy Rasmussen 6 123 1981 10.1146/annurev.eg.06.110181.001011 The application of probabilistic risk assessment techniques to energy technologies 

  69. Ambio Renn 40 231 2011 10.1007/s13280-010-0134-0 Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: a synthesis 

  70. Energy Policy Rentizelas 65 134 2014 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.023 Incorporating life cycle external cost in optimization of the electricity generation mix 

  71. Energy Environ. Sci. Richter 5 8758 2012 10.1039/c2ee22658h Opinion on worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident by J.E. Ten Hoeve and M.Z. Jacobson 

  72. Ann. Nucl. Energy Roth 36 409 2009 10.1016/j.anucene.2008.11.029 Sustainability of electricity supply technology portfolio 

  73. Saf. Sci. Saleh 49 764 2011 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.017 Safety in the mining industry and the unfinished legacy of mining accidents: safety levers and defense-in-depth for addressing mining hazards 

  74. Ecol. Indic. Singh 9 189 2009 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011 An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies 

  75. Energy Policy Sovacool 36 1802 2008 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.040 The costs of failure: a preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, 1907-2007 

  76. Ecol. Econ. Sovacool 88. 2013 An international assessment of energy security performance 

  77. Energy Policy Srinivasan 52 726 2013 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.036 Fukushima and thereafter: reassessment of risks of nuclear power 

  78. Energy Szklo 32 1075 2007 10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.008 Fuel specification, energy consumption and CO2 emission in oil refineries 

  79. 10.1039/c2ee22658h Ten Hoeve, J.E., Jacobson, M.Z., 2012a. Reply to the opinion on worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident by B. Richter, Energy Environ. Sci., 5, 8760, 10.1039/c2ee22658h. 

  80. Energy Environ. Sci. Ten Hoeve 5 8743 2012 10.1039/c2ee22019a Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident 

  81. Glob. Environ. Change Torvanger 21 303 2011 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.017 The political economy of technology support: making decisions about carbon capture and storage and low carbon energy technologies 

  82. Saf. Sci. Vinnem 49 178 2011 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.07.010 Evaluation of offshore emergency preparedness in view of rare accidents 

  83. Nucl. Eng. Des. Vitazkova 262 106 2013 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.03.053 Common risk target for severe accidents of nuclear power plants based on IAEA INES scale 

  84. Vitazkova, J., Cazzoli, E., 2011. Estimate of consequences from the Fukushima disaster, Nordic PSA Conference, Stockholm, Sweden. 

  85. von Carlowitz, H.C., 2000. Sylvicultura oeconomica: Anweisung zur wilden Baum-Zucht/Hannss Carl von Carlowitz; bearb. von Klaus Irmer, Angela Kiessling - Reprint der Ausgabe Leipzig: Braun, 1713. TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany. 

  86. Energy Policy von Hippel 39 6719 2011 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.001 Energy security and sustainability in Northeast Asia 

  87. Bull. At. Sci. von Hippel 67 27 2011 10.1177/0096340211421588 The radiological and psychological consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi accident 

  88. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) 1987 Our Common Future 

  89. World Health Organization (WHO) 2013 Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, based on a preliminary dose estimation 

  90. Energy Policy Winzer 46 36 2012 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.067 Conceptualizing energy security 

  91. Energy Policy Yustaa 39 6100 2011 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.010 Methodologies and applications for critical infrastructure protection: state-of-the-art 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로