$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Integrated framework for the external cost assessment of nuclear power plant accident considering risk aversion: The Korean case

Energy policy, v.92, 2016년, pp.111 - 123  

Lee, S.H. ,  Kang, H.G.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Recently, the estimation of accident costs within the social costs of nuclear power plants (NPPs) has garnered substantial interest. In particular, the risk aversion behavior of the public toward an NPP accident is considered an important factor when integrating risk aversion into NPP accident cost....

주제어

참고문헌 (79)

  1. Ascari, S., Bernasconi, M., 1997. The economics of risk and uncertainty and the valuation of severe accidents. ExternE working document. 

  2. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. Alberini 37 239 2007 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.08.008 Urban environmental health and sensitive populations: how much are the Italians willing to pay to reduce their risks? 

  3. Econometrica Andersen 76 583 2008 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00848.x Eliciting risk and time preferences 

  4. J. Econ. Psychol. Andersen 31 553 2010 10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.017 Behavioral econometrics for psychologists 

  5. Fed. Regist. Arrow 58 4601 1993 Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation 

  6. Bickel, P., Friedrich, R., Droste-Franke, B., Bachmann, T.M., Gressmann, A., Rabl, A., et al., 2005. ExternE Externalities of Energy Methodology 2005 Update. 

  7. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Burgherr 14 5 947 2008 10.1080/10807030802387556 A comparative analysis of accident risks in fossil, hydro, and nuclear energy chains 

  8. Biausque 2010 The Value of Statistical Life: A Meta-analysis 

  9. Energy Policy Burgherr 74 S45 2014 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.035 Comparative risk assessment of severe accidents in the energy sector 

  10. Am. J. Agric. Econ. Binswanger 62 395 1980 10.2307/1240194 Attitudes toward risk: experimental measurement in rural India 

  11. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. Cropper 19 160 1990 10.1016/0095-0696(90)90066-8 Valuing future risks to life 

  12. Collins 1978 Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants: NUREG-0396 

  13. 10.2172/461285 Chanin, D.I., Young, M.L., Randall, J., Jamali, K., 1997. Code Manual for MACCS2: Volume 1, User’s Guide, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, SAND97-SA0594. 

  14. Dockins, C., Maguire, K., Simon, N., Sullivan M.U.S., 2004. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Enviornmental Economics. Value of Statistical Life Analysis and Environmental Policy: A White Paper. Available at: 〈http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwAN/EE-0483-01.pdf/$file/EE-0483-01.pdf〉. 

  15. J. Risk Uncertain. Dave 41 219 2010 10.1007/s11166-010-9103-z Eliciting risk preferences: when is simple better? 

  16. European Commission, 2005. ExternE: Externalities of Energy, Methodology 2005 Update. Project report EUR 21951. Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. 

  17. J. Environ. Manag. Eeckhoudt 58 109 2000 10.1006/jema.1999.0314 Risk aversion and the external cost of a nuclear accident 

  18. Land Econ. Edwards 63 168 1987 10.2307/3146578 Overlooked biases in contingent valuation surveys: some considerations 

  19. Ferguson 1992 Environmental Costs of Energy Technologies: Accidental Radiological Impacts of Nuclear Power 

  20. J. Policy Anal. Manag. Fisher 8 1 88 1989 10.2307/3324426 The value of reducing risks of death: a note on new evidence 

  21. Freeman 1993 The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values Resources for the Future 

  22. Hohmeyer 1988 Social Costs of Energy Consumption: External Effects of Electricity Generation in the Federal Republic of Germany 

  23. Hirschberg, S., Cazzoli, E., 1994. Contribution of Severe Accidents to External Costs of Nuclear Power. ENS Topical Meeting on PSA/PRA and Severe Accidents '94, Ljubljana, Slovenia. 

  24. Am. J. Agric. Econ. Hanemann 66 332 1984 10.2307/1240800 Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses 

  25. Am. J. Agric. Econ. Hanemann 69 185 1987 10.2307/1241323 Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses: reply 

  26. Am. Econ. Rev. Holt 92 1644 2002 10.1257/000282802762024700 Risk aversion and incentive effects 

  27. J. Polit. Econ. Hansen 249 1983 10.1086/261141 Stochastic consumption, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of asset returns 

  28. Res. Exp. Econ. Harrison 12 41 2008 10.1016/S0193-2306(08)00003-3 Risk aversion in the laboratory: research in experimental 

  29. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. Herriges 30 112 1996 10.1006/jeem.1996.0008 Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning 

  30. J. Risk Insur. Halek 68 1 2001 10.2307/2678130 Demography of risk aversion 

  31. J. Hazard. Mater. Hirschberg 111 57 2004 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.009 Severe accidents in the energy sector: comparative perspective 

  32. Econom.: J. Econom. Soc. Heckman 153 1979 10.2307/1912352 Sample selection bias as a specification error 

  33. Environ. Resour. Econ. Itaoka 33 3 371 2006 10.1007/s10640-005-3605-1 The effect of risk characteristics on the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions from electric power generation 

  34. International Atomic Energy Agency (Internet), 2014. Power Reactor Information System (PRIS), Vienna, Austria. Available from: 〈http://www.iaea.org/pris/〉, (cited 2014 Aug 6). 

  35. IEA, NEA, OECD, 2010. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity, OECD, Paris, France. 

  36. Prog. Nucl. Sci. Technol. Jang 1 468 2011 10.15669/pnst.1.468 A probabilistic cost assessment of a nuclear reactor accident focused on evacuation and radiological health effects 

  37. J. Radiat. Prot. Kim 33 67 2008 An external costs assessment of the impacts on human health from nuclear power plants in Korea 

  38. Am. J. Agric. Econ. Krupnick 75 1273 1993 10.2307/1243471 The external costs of nuclear power: “Ex ante” damages and lay risks 

  39. J. Risk Uncertain. Krupnick 24 161 2002 10.1023/A:1014020027011 Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents 

  40. Am. J. Agric. Econ. Kristrom 79 1013 1997 10.2307/1244440 Spike models in contingent valuation 

  41. Korea Nuclear Enegy Agency, 2013. The 2012 Survey of Social Recognition on Nuclear Power (Korean). Available at: 〈http://www.knea.or.kr/new/news/insidedata_view.asp〉. 

  42. Water Kwak 5 1638 2013 10.3390/w5041638 Measuring the willingness to pay for tap water quality improvements: results of a contingent valuation survey in Pusan 

  43. Energy Policy Laes 39 9 5664 2011 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.016 On the contribution of external cost calculations to energy system governance: the case of a potential large-scale nuclear accident 

  44. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. Lewis 26 4686 1979 10.1109/TNS.1979.4330198 Risk assessment review group report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

  45. Lee, Y.S., Lee, B.C., 2006. The external cost evaluation of the nuclear severe accident using CVM. Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, Gyeongju, Korea, November 2006. 

  46. Nucl. Eng. Technol. Lee 47 461 2015 10.1016/j.net.2015.01.009 Integrated societal risk assessment framework for nuclear power and renewable energy sources 

  47. Lazo 1995 Methodologies for Assessing the Economic Consequences of Nuclear Reactor Accidents 

  48. Markandya, A., Dale, N., Schneider, T., 1998. Improvement in the Assessment of the External Costs of Severe Nuclear Accident. CEPN Report 260. 

  49. Masuhr, K.P., Oczipka, T., 1994. Die externen Kosten der Stromerzeugung aus Kernenergie (in German). Materialen zu PACER. Bericht 724.270.2d. 

  50. Markandya 1994 Externalities of fuel cycles 'ExternE' project Economic valuation Economical valuation:An impact pathway approach 

  51. Myerson 2005 Probability Models For Economic Decisions 

  52. Environ. Res. Econ. Morrison 16 407 2000 10.1023/A:1008368611972 Minimising payment vehicle bias in contingent valuation studies 

  53. Eur. J. Dev. Res. Mosley 17 59 2005 10.1080/09578810500066548 Risk attitudes and the ‘vicious circle of poverty’ 

  54. Nuclear Energy Agency, 2002. Society and Nuclear Energy: Towards a Better Understanding. 

  55. NEA, 2012. The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Low-carbon Energy Future. OECD/NEA, Paris, France. 

  56. OECD/NEA, 2003. Nuclear Electricity Generation: What Are the External Costs? 

  57. Ottinger 1990 Environmental Costs of Electricity 

  58. O'Riordan 1994 Interpreting the Precautionary Principle 

  59. OECD/NEA, 2010. Comparing Nuclear Accident Risks With Those From Other Energy Sources. Available online: 〈http://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/reports/2010/nea6862-comparing-risks.pdf〉. 

  60. U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 1996. Economic Analysis of Federal Regulations Under Executive Order 12866. Washington, DC: The White House. Available online: 〈https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg_riaguide〉 

  61. OECD, 2011. Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions in Regulatory Analysis of Environmental, Health and Transport Policies: Policy Implications. Available online: 〈www.oecd.org/env/policies/vsl〉, (accessed 07.07,15). 

  62. Pearce D.W., 2000. Valuing Risks to Life and Health: Towards Consistent Transfer Estimates in the European Union and Accession States. 

  63. Pyo, H.-D., Yoo, S.-H., Kwak, S.-J., 2000. Measuring the Conservation Value Of Korean Coastal Wetlands: Application of the Contingent Valuation Method. Report to the Ministry of Ocean and Maritime Affairs. Seoul, Korea. 

  64. Energy Policy Rabl 57 575 2013 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.028 External costs of nuclear: greater or less than the alternatives? 

  65. Risk Anal. Roth 10 3 375 1990 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb00520.x What do we know about making risk comparisons? 

  66. Geneva Pap. Risk Insur. Rocard 65 468 1992 10.1057/gpp.1992.35 A socio-economic analysis of controls of land-use around hazardous installations 

  67. Osong Public Health Res. Perspect. Rhee 4 1 16 2013 10.1016/j.phrp.2012.12.003 Willingness to pay for avoiding infection of climate change diseases, in particular tsutsugamushi disease 

  68. Shepard 1982 Life-Cycle Consumption and Willingness to Pay for Increased Survival 

  69. Smith 1986 Measuring Water Quality Benefits 

  70. Statistics Korea (KOSTAT), 2015. Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Available online: 〈http://kosis.kr/〉, (accessed 27.07.15). 

  71. J. Radiol. Prot. Thorne 33 709 2013 10.1088/0952-4746/33/3/B01 Actions to protect the public in an emergency due to severe conditions at a light water reactor: emergency preparedness and response report 

  72. Am. Econ. Rev. Tanaka 100 557 2010 10.1257/aer.100.1.557 Risk and time preferences: linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam 

  73. Global Environ. Change Torvanger 21 303 2011 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.017 The political economy of technology support: making decisions about carbon capture and storage and low carbon energy technologies 

  74. J. Risk Uncertain. Viscusi 27 1 5 2003 10.1023/A:1025598106257 The value of statistical life - a critical review of market estimates throughout the world 

  75. Wheeler, G., Hewison, R.C., 1994. The External Costs of Accidents at a UK PWR. Report IS3538-2 Version 2.0. 

  76. Am. J. Ind. Med. Weil 40 4 418 2001 10.1002/ajim.1114 Valuing the economic consequences of work injury and illness: a comparison of methods and findings 

  77. Growth Change Whitehead 22 1 10 1991 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1991.tb00538.x Environmental interest group behavior and self­selection bias in contingent valuation mail surveys 

  78. Appl. Econ. Yoo 33 523 2001 10.1080/00036840122117 Modelling willingness to pay responses from dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys with zero observations 

  79. Energy Policy Yoo 37 5408 2009 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.062 Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: a contingent valuation study 

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로