$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Predicting the cost of the consequences of a large nuclear accident in the UK 원문보기

Process safety and environmental protection : transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B, v.112 pt.A, 2017년, pp.96 - 113  

Ashley, S.F. (Department of Engineering and Innovation, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK) ,  Vaughan, G.J. (Safety Systems Research Centre, Queen’s School of Engineering, University of Bristol, Queen’s Building, University Walk, Clifton BS8 1TR, UK) ,  Nuttall, W.J. (Department of Engineering and Innovation, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK) ,  Thomas, P.J. (Safety Systems Research Centre, Queen’s School of Engineering, University of Bristol, Queen’s Building, University Walk, Clifton BS8 1TR, UK) ,  Higgins, N.A. (Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Abstract Nuclear accidents have the potential to lead to significant off-site effects that require actions to minimise the radiological impacts on people. Such countermeasures may include sheltering, evacuation, restrictions on the sale of locally-grown food, and long-term relocation of the populat...

주제어

참고문헌 (58)

  1. AREVA and EDF Energy 2012 Pre-Construction Safety Report. Chapter 15.4: Level-2 PSA (No. UKEPR-0002-154 Issue 06) 

  2. Bexon 2008 Presented at the ANS PSA 2008 Topical Meeting - Challenges to PSA during the Nuclear Renaissance Level 3 PSA use and developments in the United Kingdom 

  3. Bosley 2014 Switzerland Hands Out Iodine in Case of Nuclear Disaster [WWW Document]. Bloomberg 

  4. Burton 1981 The Mississauga Evacuation Final Report. Ministry of the Solicitor General 

  5. Cancer Research UK 2017 Cancer Statistics for the UK 

  6. Charnock 2013 Presented at the ANS PSA 2013 International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis PACE: A geographic information system based level 3 probabilistic accident consequence evaluation program 

  7. Darzi 2014 Better health for London. Report of the London Health Commission Supported by the Mayor of London [WWW Document] 

  8. OECD NEA report Devell 1995 The Chernobyl reactor accident source term: development of a consensus view (No. NEA/CSNI/R(95)24) 

  9. European Commission 1998 EU Food Restriction Criteria for Application after an Accident (No. 105), Radiation Protection 

  10. Fukushima on the Globe 2014 The Number of Evacuees from the Fukushima Prefecture to Other Prefectures 

  11. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. Golikov 41 3 185 2002 10.1007/s00411-002-0167-2 External exposure of the population living in areas of Russia contaminated due to the Chernobyl accident 

  12. Government of Japan 2011 Nuclear emergency response headquarters. Report of the Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety: The Accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations. [WWW Document] 

  13. J. Radiol. Prot. Grimston 34 R1 2014 10.1088/0952-4746/34/2/R1 The siting of UK nuclear reactors 

  14. Monthly Lab. Rev. Groen 131 3 32 2008 Hurricane Katrina evacuees: who they are, where they are, and how they are faring 

  15. Haywood 2011 Estimating and Visualising Imprecision in Radiological Emergency Response Assessments (PhD Thesis) 

  16. Prog. Nucl. Energy Heffron 90 1 2016 10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.02.019 The global nuclear liability regime post Fukushima Daiichi 

  17. Higgins 2008 COCO-2: a Model to Assess the Economic Impact of an Accident 

  18. Higgins 2017 Economic Consequences of a Large Hypothetical Accident: Supporting NREFS methodology development 

  19. HM Government 2013 2011 Rural Urban Classification - Publications - GOV.UK [WWW Document] 

  20. HM Government 2014 Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) Rural Urban GIS Shapefiles. Statistical data sets [WWW Document] 

  21. HM Government 2015 GDP Deflators at Market Prices, and Money GDP [WWW Document] 

  22. IAEA 1991 The International Chernobyl Project: Technical Report: Assessment of Radiological Consequences and Evaluation of Protective Measures 

  23. IAEA 2002 The Human Consequences of the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident: a Strategy for Recovery: a Report 

  24. IAEA 2010 Development and Application of Level 1 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants Specific Safety Guide (No. SSG-3) 

  25. IAEA 2010 Development and Application of Level 2 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants Specific Safety Guide (No. SSG-4) 

  26. IAEA 2014 Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards (No. GSR Part 3) 

  27. Jones 580 2007 Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XVII The U.K. met office’s next-generation atmospheric dispersion model, NAME III 

  28. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. Jones 85 4 269 2007 10.1205/psep06047 Numerical techniques for speeding up the calculation of the life extension brought about by removing a prolonged radiation exposure 

  29. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. Jones 85 6 599 2007 10.1205/psep.er.0706 Erratum: numerical techniques for speeding up the calculation of the life extension brought about by removing a prolonged radiation exposure 

  30. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. Jones 87 2 81 2009 10.1016/j.psep.2008.10.002 Calculating the life extension achieved by reducing nuclear accident frequency 

  31. Marshall 1983 Big Nuclear Accidents. AERE-R10532 

  32. Ministry for Economy, Trade and Industry 2014 Areas to Which Evacuation Orders Have Been Issued 

  33. Ministry of Finance Japan 2015 Highlights of the Draft Budget for FY2015 

  34. PLoS One Murakami 10 9 2015 10.1371/journal.pone.0137906 Was the risk from nursing-home evacuation after the Fukushima accident higher than the radiation risk? 

  35. NRPB 1(1-4 5 1990 

  36. National Research Council 2004 Distribution and Administration of Potassium Iodide in the Event of a Nuclear Incident 

  37. OECD 2017 Purchasing Power Parities (PPP) 

  38. OECD-NEA 2000 Methodologies for Assessing the Economic Consequences of Nuclear Reactor Accidents 

  39. OECD-NEA 2014 Expert Group on Costs of Nuclear Accidents, Liability Issues and their Impact on Electricity Costs (EG-COSTNA) [WWW Document] 

  40. Office for National Statistics 2003 2001 Census: Digitised Boundary Data (England and Wales) [Computer File]. UK Data Service Census Support 

  41. Office for National Statistics 2013 Long-term Profile of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the UK 

  42. Presented at the EUROSAFE Forum 2012, Brussels. [WWW Document] Pascucci-Cahen 2012 Massive radiological releases profoundly differ from controlled releases 

  43. Pascucci-Cahen 2013 The Cost of Nuclear Accidents. OECD/NEA Workshop on Approaches to Estimation of the Costs of Nuclear Accidents 28-29 May. [WWW Document] 

  44. Public Health England 2015 PHE-CRCE-018 - UK Recovery Handbooks for Radiation Incidents 2015 (Version 4) 

  45. Ranghieri 2014 Learning from Megadisasters: Lessons from the Great East Japan Earthquake (No. 89069) 

  46. Sandia National Laboratory 2012 MACCS2. [WWW Document] 

  47. Strawn 2013 The Price-Anderson Act and the Three Mile Island Accident. Oecd/nea Workshop on Nuclear damages, liability issues and compensation Schemes 10-11 December 2013. [WWW Document] 

  48. TEPCO 2015 Records of Applications and Payouts for Indemnification of Nuclear Damage 

  49. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. Thomas 87 3 161 2009 10.1016/j.psep.2008.11.001 Calculating the benefit to workers of averting a prolonged radiation exposure for longer than the working lifetime 

  50. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. Thomas 84 5 344 2006 10.1205/psep05007 The life extension achieved by eliminating a prolonged radiation exposure 

  51. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. Thomas 85 3 230 2007 10.1205/psep06044 Analytical techniques for faster calculation of the life extension achieved by eliminating a prolonged radiation exposure 

  52. The Reconstruction Agency 2015 Fiscal Year 2015: Budget Request and Overview 

  53. UNSCEAR 2014 UNSCEAR 2013 Report to the General Assembly, Scientific Annex A: Levels and Effects of Radiation Exposure Due to the Nuclear Accident after The 2011 great east-Japan Earthquake and Tsunami 

  54. US Department of Energy 2004 MACCS2 Computer Code Application Guidance for Documented Safety Analysis. DOE-EH-4.2.1.4-MACCS2-Code Guidance 

  55. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. Waddington 112 16 2017 10.1016/j.psep.2017.03.012 J-value assessment of relocation measures following the nuclear power plant accidents at Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi 

  56. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. Waddington 112 50 2017 10.1016/j.psep.2017.07.003 J-value assessment of remediation measures following the nuclear power plant accidents at Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi 

  57. World Bank 2017 World Development Indicators: GDP Deflators 

  58. J. Disaster Res. Wu 9 699 2014 10.20965/jdr.2014.p0699 The impact of disasters on Japan’s inbound tourism demand 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD(Hybrid)

저자가 APC(Article Processing Charge)를 지불한 논문에 한하여 자유로운 이용이 가능한, hybrid 저널에 출판된 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로