최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기Energy policy, v.92, 2016년, pp.111 - 123
Lee, S.H. , Kang, H.G.
Recently, the estimation of accident costs within the social costs of nuclear power plants (NPPs) has garnered substantial interest. In particular, the risk aversion behavior of the public toward an NPP accident is considered an important factor when integrating risk aversion into NPP accident cost....
Ascari, S., Bernasconi, M., 1997. The economics of risk and uncertainty and the valuation of severe accidents. ExternE working document.
Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. Alberini 37 239 2007 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.08.008 Urban environmental health and sensitive populations: how much are the Italians willing to pay to reduce their risks?
Econometrica Andersen 76 583 2008 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00848.x Eliciting risk and time preferences
J. Econ. Psychol. Andersen 31 553 2010 10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.017 Behavioral econometrics for psychologists
Fed. Regist. Arrow 58 4601 1993 Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation
Bickel, P., Friedrich, R., Droste-Franke, B., Bachmann, T.M., Gressmann, A., Rabl, A., et al., 2005. ExternE Externalities of Energy Methodology 2005 Update.
Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Burgherr 14 5 947 2008 10.1080/10807030802387556 A comparative analysis of accident risks in fossil, hydro, and nuclear energy chains
Biausque 2010 The Value of Statistical Life: A Meta-analysis
Energy Policy Burgherr 74 S45 2014 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.035 Comparative risk assessment of severe accidents in the energy sector
Am. J. Agric. Econ. Binswanger 62 395 1980 10.2307/1240194 Attitudes toward risk: experimental measurement in rural India
J. Environ. Econ. Manag. Cropper 19 160 1990 10.1016/0095-0696(90)90066-8 Valuing future risks to life
Collins 1978 Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants: NUREG-0396
Dockins, C., Maguire, K., Simon, N., Sullivan M.U.S., 2004. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Enviornmental Economics. Value of Statistical Life Analysis and Environmental Policy: A White Paper. Available at: 〈http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwAN/EE-0483-01.pdf/$file/EE-0483-01.pdf〉.
J. Risk Uncertain. Dave 41 219 2010 10.1007/s11166-010-9103-z Eliciting risk preferences: when is simple better?
European Commission, 2005. ExternE: Externalities of Energy, Methodology 2005 Update. Project report EUR 21951. Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
J. Environ. Manag. Eeckhoudt 58 109 2000 10.1006/jema.1999.0314 Risk aversion and the external cost of a nuclear accident
Land Econ. Edwards 63 168 1987 10.2307/3146578 Overlooked biases in contingent valuation surveys: some considerations
Ferguson 1992 Environmental Costs of Energy Technologies: Accidental Radiological Impacts of Nuclear Power
J. Policy Anal. Manag. Fisher 8 1 88 1989 10.2307/3324426 The value of reducing risks of death: a note on new evidence
Freeman 1993 The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values Resources for the Future
Hohmeyer 1988 Social Costs of Energy Consumption: External Effects of Electricity Generation in the Federal Republic of Germany
Hirschberg, S., Cazzoli, E., 1994. Contribution of Severe Accidents to External Costs of Nuclear Power. ENS Topical Meeting on PSA/PRA and Severe Accidents '94, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Am. J. Agric. Econ. Hanemann 66 332 1984 10.2307/1240800 Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses
Am. J. Agric. Econ. Hanemann 69 185 1987 10.2307/1241323 Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses: reply
Am. Econ. Rev. Holt 92 1644 2002 10.1257/000282802762024700 Risk aversion and incentive effects
J. Polit. Econ. Hansen 249 1983 10.1086/261141 Stochastic consumption, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of asset returns
J. Environ. Econ. Manag. Herriges 30 112 1996 10.1006/jeem.1996.0008 Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning
J. Risk Insur. Halek 68 1 2001 10.2307/2678130 Demography of risk aversion
J. Hazard. Mater. Hirschberg 111 57 2004 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.009 Severe accidents in the energy sector: comparative perspective
Econom.: J. Econom. Soc. Heckman 153 1979 10.2307/1912352 Sample selection bias as a specification error
Environ. Resour. Econ. Itaoka 33 3 371 2006 10.1007/s10640-005-3605-1 The effect of risk characteristics on the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions from electric power generation
International Atomic Energy Agency (Internet), 2014. Power Reactor Information System (PRIS), Vienna, Austria. Available from: 〈http://www.iaea.org/pris/〉, (cited 2014 Aug 6).
IEA, NEA, OECD, 2010. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity, OECD, Paris, France.
J. Radiat. Prot. Kim 33 67 2008 An external costs assessment of the impacts on human health from nuclear power plants in Korea
Am. J. Agric. Econ. Krupnick 75 1273 1993 10.2307/1243471 The external costs of nuclear power: “Ex ante” damages and lay risks
J. Risk Uncertain. Krupnick 24 161 2002 10.1023/A:1014020027011 Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents
Am. J. Agric. Econ. Kristrom 79 1013 1997 10.2307/1244440 Spike models in contingent valuation
Korea Nuclear Enegy Agency, 2013. The 2012 Survey of Social Recognition on Nuclear Power (Korean). Available at: 〈http://www.knea.or.kr/new/news/insidedata_view.asp〉.
Water Kwak 5 1638 2013 10.3390/w5041638 Measuring the willingness to pay for tap water quality improvements: results of a contingent valuation survey in Pusan
Energy Policy Laes 39 9 5664 2011 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.016 On the contribution of external cost calculations to energy system governance: the case of a potential large-scale nuclear accident
IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. Lewis 26 4686 1979 10.1109/TNS.1979.4330198 Risk assessment review group report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Lee, Y.S., Lee, B.C., 2006. The external cost evaluation of the nuclear severe accident using CVM. Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, Gyeongju, Korea, November 2006.
Nucl. Eng. Technol. Lee 47 461 2015 10.1016/j.net.2015.01.009 Integrated societal risk assessment framework for nuclear power and renewable energy sources
Lazo 1995 Methodologies for Assessing the Economic Consequences of Nuclear Reactor Accidents
Markandya, A., Dale, N., Schneider, T., 1998. Improvement in the Assessment of the External Costs of Severe Nuclear Accident. CEPN Report 260.
Masuhr, K.P., Oczipka, T., 1994. Die externen Kosten der Stromerzeugung aus Kernenergie (in German). Materialen zu PACER. Bericht 724.270.2d.
Markandya 1994 Externalities of fuel cycles 'ExternE' project Economic valuation Economical valuation:An impact pathway approach
Myerson 2005 Probability Models For Economic Decisions
Environ. Res. Econ. Morrison 16 407 2000 10.1023/A:1008368611972 Minimising payment vehicle bias in contingent valuation studies
Eur. J. Dev. Res. Mosley 17 59 2005 10.1080/09578810500066548 Risk attitudes and the ‘vicious circle of poverty’
Nuclear Energy Agency, 2002. Society and Nuclear Energy: Towards a Better Understanding.
NEA, 2012. The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Low-carbon Energy Future. OECD/NEA, Paris, France.
OECD/NEA, 2003. Nuclear Electricity Generation: What Are the External Costs?
Ottinger 1990 Environmental Costs of Electricity
O'Riordan 1994 Interpreting the Precautionary Principle
OECD/NEA, 2010. Comparing Nuclear Accident Risks With Those From Other Energy Sources. Available online: 〈http://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/reports/2010/nea6862-comparing-risks.pdf〉.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 1996. Economic Analysis of Federal Regulations Under Executive Order 12866. Washington, DC: The White House. Available online: 〈https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg_riaguide〉
OECD, 2011. Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions in Regulatory Analysis of Environmental, Health and Transport Policies: Policy Implications. Available online: 〈www.oecd.org/env/policies/vsl〉, (accessed 07.07,15).
Pearce D.W., 2000. Valuing Risks to Life and Health: Towards Consistent Transfer Estimates in the European Union and Accession States.
Pyo, H.-D., Yoo, S.-H., Kwak, S.-J., 2000. Measuring the Conservation Value Of Korean Coastal Wetlands: Application of the Contingent Valuation Method. Report to the Ministry of Ocean and Maritime Affairs. Seoul, Korea.
Energy Policy Rabl 57 575 2013 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.028 External costs of nuclear: greater or less than the alternatives?
Risk Anal. Roth 10 3 375 1990 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb00520.x What do we know about making risk comparisons?
Osong Public Health Res. Perspect. Rhee 4 1 16 2013 10.1016/j.phrp.2012.12.003 Willingness to pay for avoiding infection of climate change diseases, in particular tsutsugamushi disease
Shepard 1982 Life-Cycle Consumption and Willingness to Pay for Increased Survival
Smith 1986 Measuring Water Quality Benefits
Statistics Korea (KOSTAT), 2015. Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). Available online: 〈http://kosis.kr/〉, (accessed 27.07.15).
J. Radiol. Prot. Thorne 33 709 2013 10.1088/0952-4746/33/3/B01 Actions to protect the public in an emergency due to severe conditions at a light water reactor: emergency preparedness and response report
Am. Econ. Rev. Tanaka 100 557 2010 10.1257/aer.100.1.557 Risk and time preferences: linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam
Global Environ. Change Torvanger 21 303 2011 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.017 The political economy of technology support: making decisions about carbon capture and storage and low carbon energy technologies
J. Risk Uncertain. Viscusi 27 1 5 2003 10.1023/A:1025598106257 The value of statistical life - a critical review of market estimates throughout the world
Wheeler, G., Hewison, R.C., 1994. The External Costs of Accidents at a UK PWR. Report IS3538-2 Version 2.0.
Am. J. Ind. Med. Weil 40 4 418 2001 10.1002/ajim.1114 Valuing the economic consequences of work injury and illness: a comparison of methods and findings
Growth Change Whitehead 22 1 10 1991 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1991.tb00538.x Environmental interest group behavior and selfselection bias in contingent valuation mail surveys
Appl. Econ. Yoo 33 523 2001 10.1080/00036840122117 Modelling willingness to pay responses from dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys with zero observations
Energy Policy Yoo 37 5408 2009 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.062 Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: a contingent valuation study
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.