$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Nonlinear finite element analysis of three implant–abutment interface designs 원문보기

International journal of oral science. = 國際口腔科學雜誌. 英文版, v.4 no.2, 2012년, pp.101 - 108  

Tang, Chun-Bo (Dental Research Institute, Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing, China) ,  Liu, Si-Yu (Dental Research Institute, Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing, China) ,  Zhou, Guo-Xing (Dental Research Institute, Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing, China) ,  Yu, Jin-Hua (Dental Research Institute, Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing, China) ,  Zhang, Guang-Dong (Dental Research Institute, Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing, China) ,  Bao, Yi-Dong (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics , Nanjing, China) ,  Wang, Qiu-Ju (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics , Nanjing, China)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The objective of this study was to investigate the mechanical characteristics of implant–abutment interface design in a dental implant system, using nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA) method. This finite element simulation study was applied on three commonly used commercial dental implan...

주제어

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Jemt T Single implants in the anterior maxilla after 15 years of follow-up: comparison with central implants in the edentulous maxilla Int J Prosthodont 2008 21 5 400 408 18950060 

  2. Moeintaghavi A Radvar M Arab H Evaluation of 3- to 8-year treatment outcomes and success rates with six implant brands in partially edentulous patients. J Oral Implantol e-pub ahead of print 2 December 2010; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00117 

  3. Simonis P Dufour T Tenenbaum H Long-term implant survival and success: a 10-16-year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants Clin Oral Implants Res 2010 21 7 772 777 20636731 

  4. Albrektsson T Brånemark PI Hansson HA Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man Acta Orthop Scand 1981 52 2 155 170 7246093 

  5. Kitagawa T Tanimoto Y Odaki M Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005 75 2 457 463 16041789 

  6. Theoharidou A Petridis HP Tzannas K Abutment screw loosening in single-implant restorations: a systematic review Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008 23 4 681 690 18807565 

  7. Geng JP Tan KB Liu GR Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature J Prosthet Dent 2001 85 6 585 598 11404759 

  8. Binon PP Implants and components: entering the new millennium Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000 15 1 76 94 10697942 

  9. Balik A Ozdemir Karatas M Keskin H Effects of different abutment connection designs on the force distribution around commercially available dental implants: a 3d finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol e-pub ahead of print 16 May 2011; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00127 

  10. Bernardes SR de Araujo CA Neto AJ Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant-abutment interfaces Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009 24 5 781 789 19865617 

  11. Rodriguez-Ciurana X Vela-Nebot X Segala-Torres M Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009 29 5 479 487 19888491 

  12. Wakabayashi N Ona M Suzuki T Nonlinear finite element analyses: advances and challenges in dental applications J Dent 2008 36 7 463 471 18455859 

  13. Burak Ozcelik T Ersoy E Yilmaz B Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis J Prosthodont 2011 20 1 16 28 21251117 

  14. Kong L Gu Z Li T Biomechanical optimization of implant diameter and length for immediate loading: a nonlinear finite element analysis Int J Prosthodont 2009 22 6 607 615 19918598 

  15. Akca K Iplikcioglu H Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001 16 5 722 730 11669255 

  16. Pierrisnard L Hure G Barquins M Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002 17 3 353 362 12074450 

  17. Alkan I Sertgoz A Ekici B Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws J Prosthet Dent 2004 91 4 319 325 15116032 

  18. Yu HY Cai CZ Zhou ZR Fretting behavior of cortical bone against titanium and its alloy Wear 2005 259 7/8/9/10/11/12 910 918 

  19. Grant JA Bishop NE Götzen N Artificial composite bone as a model of human trabecular bone: the implant-bone interface J Biomech 2007 40 5 1158 1164 16806236 

  20. Kawaguchi T Kawata T Kuriyagawa T In vivo 3-dimensional measurement of the force exerted on a tooth during clenching J Biomech 2007 40 2 244 251 16549071 

  21. Albrektsson T Zarb G Worthington P The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986 1 1 11 25 3527955 

  22. Berglundh T Lindhe J Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited J Clin Periodontol 1996 23 10 971 973 8915028 

  23. Tabata LF Assuncao WG Adelino Ricardo Barao V Implant platform switching: biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis J Craniofac Surg 2010 21 1 182 187 20098182 

  24. Chun HJ Shin HS Han CH Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006 21 2 195 202 16634489 

  25. Maeda Y Satoh T Sogo M In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication J Oral Rehabil 2006 33 1 75 78 16409521 

  26. Akca K Cehreli MC Iplikcioglu H Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis Clin Oral Implants Res 2003 14 4 444 454 12869007 

  27. Segundo RM Oshima HM Silva IN Stress distribution on external hexagon implant system using 3d finite element analysis Acta Odontol Latinoam 2007 20 2 79 81 18590255 

  28. Maeda Y Miura J Taki I Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale Clin Oral Implants Res 2007 18 5 581 584 17608737 

  29. Bilhan H Kutay O Arat S Astra Tech, Brånemark, and ITI implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: two-year results Implant Dent 2010 19 5 437 446 20881815 

  30. Ostman PO Wennerberg A Albrektsson T Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010 12 1 39 47 20148916 

  31. Chu CM Huang HL Hsu JT Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation J Periodontol 2011 83 1 111 118 21563947 

  32. Steinebrunner L Wolfart S Ludwig K Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants Clin Oral Implants Res 2008 19 12 1276 1284 19040443 

  33. Juodzbalys G Kubilius R Eidukynas Stress distribution in bone: single-unit implant prostheses veneered with porcelain or a new composite material Implant Dent 2005 14 2 166 175 15968189 

  34. Davarpanah M Martinez H Etienne D A prospective multicenter evaluation of 1,583 3i implants: 1- to 5-year data Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002 17 6 820 828 12507242 

  35. Bhatavadekar N Helping the clinician make evidence-based implant selections. A systematic review and qualitative analysis of dental implant studies over a 20 year period Int Dent J 2010 60 5 359 369 21141209 

  36. Xiao JR Li YF Guan SM The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011 69 7 273 281 

  37. Pessoa RS Muraru L Junior EM Influence of implant connection type on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants—CT-based nonlinear, three-dimensional finite element analysis Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009 12 3 219 234 19438946 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로