초록 ▼

□ 논의 배경
○ 최근 과학기술계 대학이나 출연(연) 연구조직을 둘러싼 대내외 환경이 급변하면서 창의적 연구의 중요성 부각
○ 이명박 정부 출범 이후 기초․원천연구에 대한 투자확대가 예상됨에 따라 대학과 출연(연)의 창의성 발현을 위한 연구 환경 조성에 대한 관심 증가
○ 이와 같은 중요성과 관심 증가에도 불구하고 공공연구조직의 창의성 발현에 대한 국내 연구는 거의 전무한 실정
○ 본 연구에서는 사전연구의 성격으로 공공연구조직의 창의성 발현에 영향을 주는 요인과 시사점을 규명
□ 연구의 범위 및 방법

□ 논의 배경
○ 최근 과학기술계 대학이나 출연(연) 연구조직을 둘러싼 대내외 환경이 급변하면서 창의적 연구의 중요성 부각
○ 이명박 정부 출범 이후 기초․원천연구에 대한 투자확대가 예상됨에 따라 대학과 출연(연)의 창의성 발현을 위한 연구 환경 조성에 대한 관심 증가
○ 이와 같은 중요성과 관심 증가에도 불구하고 공공연구조직의 창의성 발현에 대한 국내 연구는 거의 전무한 실정
○ 본 연구에서는 사전연구의 성격으로 공공연구조직의 창의성 발현에 영향을 주는 요인과 시사점을 규명
□ 연구의 범위 및 방법
○ 본 연구에서는 공공연구조직의 개념을 공공연구를 수행하는 단위 기관(예, 한국생명공학연구원, KAIST 등)뿐만 아니라 단위 기관내 소규모 집단(예, 바이오융합연구부, 창의사업단 등), 혹은 단위기관 간 컨소시엄 집단(예, 미래융합 파이오니어 사업팀 등)을 모두 포괄하는 개념으로 정의
○ 이와 같은 공공연구조직의 개념 정의 하에 창의성 발현에 영향을 주는 변수들의 시사점을 도출
○ 공공연구조직의 창의성 발현에 영향을 미치는 변수규명과 시사점 도출을 위해 국내외 관련문헌 고찰과 사례분석, 전문가 인터뷰 분석방법 등을 활용

Abstract ▼

With the rapid changes in the environment surrounding science and technology community including universities and government research institutes (GRIs), creative research has become more important than ever before. As the human civilization is transforming into a knowledge-based society at the globa

With the rapid changes in the environment surrounding science and technology community including universities and government research institutes (GRIs), creative research has become more important than ever before. As the human civilization is transforming into a knowledge-based society at the global front, a serious attention is now being paid to creativity, a source of knowledge creation. Since the 1990s, there has been a need for Korea to transform its national innovation system to post catch-up technology innovation system. As result, the need for creative research at universities and GRIs, whose prime responsibility is to conduct basic and original research, has been further intensified. Especially, with the inauguration of President Lee Myung-bak government, investment in basic and original research is expected to increase. In this context, increased attention is being paid to the issue of building research environment that promotes creativity at universities and GRIs, key stakeholders of basic and original research.
Despite the increased importance or attention, there have been few studies in Korea on the issue of promoting creativity at public research organizations. No studies have been conducted on such topics as the factors affecting creativity at public research organizations, key characteristics of creativity, case examples in major countries, and roles of the government in promoting creativity at public research organizations.
In this context, this study attempts to identify factors influencing the generation of creativity at public research organizations and their implications. For this purpose, a conceptual framework of this study has been developed based on the review of the basic concept of creativity and the creativity at public research institutes in Chapter 2. In the following Chapters 3 & 4, internal factors affecting the generation of creativity at public research institutes and variables affecting the formation of creative research culture are reviewed respectively. Chapters 5 & 6 deal with such topics as creative research cooperationand research funding, external factors affecting the generation of creativity at public research organizations. In the last chapter, a synthesis of this study and future initiatives to be pursued are presented.
Four factors affecting creativity at public research organizations have the following implications. First, in relation to the designing of creative research organizations, reforming software like operational system is more important than reforming hardware like governance reform and experts should be appointed as the head of an organization or as a teamleader. To promote creative research, manpower flexibility should be enhanced between departments of GRIs, between GRIs, and between industry, academia and research institutes. In addition, seed research by individual researchers should be guaranteed.
Second, with regard to the creation of creative research culture, defining vision and culture at GRIs should be the highest priority initiative with the second priority placed on designing organizational structure and operational system of GRIs suitable for their organizational culture. Since the practical leadership of GRIs is exercised by the governmentministries in charge, reative reform of the mindset of responsible ministries or their officials in charge should be preceded. Campaign to build creative research culture at GRIs is more effective when it is led by research circles than by individual researchers. In addition, voluntary reform efforts at the individual institute level should be coupled with campaigns to reform organizational culture led by government officials.
Third, from the perspective of cooperation for creative research, cooperation should be designed and pursued in a bigger framework of industry-academia-research institute cooperation than a smaller-scale bilateral cooperation between universities and research institutes. For this purpose, reviewing imminent challenges in cooperation is more important than expanding scale in university-research institute cooperation. In addition, top-down execution unilaterally led by the government should be replaced with a bottom-up approach based on mutual needs of cooperating parties. It is also important to review the introduction of initiatives starting form those with biggest potential impact and the highest feasibility. At the same time, to help promote university-research institute cooperation, it is necessary to strengthen activities supporting interfaces at the levels of government ministries and research circles.
Lastly, regarding funding for creative research, stable long-term funding is absolutely important rather than competitive short-term funding. To ensure stable long-term funding, embedding research ethics in the researchers’ community and diffusing creative research culture need to be further enhanced at the national level. Additionally, alternatives of a peer review, which is currently widely applied, should be explored. For this purpose, public organizations or departments dedicated to creative research need to be operated and private organizations supporting creative research should be activated.
In order for these factors to be fully functioning, the following conditions should be met. First, leaders of public research institutes or government policy makers should design the above-mentioned four variables to be well harmonized with each other from a holistic perspective. Second, in-depth study of each of these variables should be conducted and implications of these variables need to be explored. Third, in-depth study on the diverse types (e.g. universities, GRIs, or small organizations under public agencies) of public research organizations should be conducted.

목차 Contents

• 표지 ... 1
• 발간사 ... 3
• 요약 ... 5
• 목차 ... 9
• 표목차 ... 11
• 그림목차 ... 12
• 제1장 서론 ... 13
• 제1절 논의 배경 ... 13
• 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 ... 14
• 제2장 기본개념과 연구의 틀 ... 15
• 제1절 창의성의 이해 ... 15
• 1. 창의성 ... 15
• 2. 과학 창의성 ... 19
• 제2절 공공연구조직의 창의성 ... 23
• 1. 공공연구조직과 민간연구조직의 차이 ... 23
• 2. 공공연구조직의 창의성 영향요인: 본 연구의 틀 ... 25
• 제3장 창의적 연구조직 설계 ... 27
• 제1절 창의적 연구조직의 영향요인 및 특징 ... 27
• 1. 조직의 창의성 영향요인 ... 27
• 2. 창의적 연구조직의 특징 ... 32
• 제2절 정책 시사점 ... 39
• 제4장 창의적 연구문화 조성 ... 43
• 제1절 창의적 연구문화의 중요성 및 특징 ... 43
• 1. 창의적 연구문화의 중요성 및 개조수단 ... 43
• 2. 출연(연) 연구문화의 특징 및 한계 ... 45
• 제2절 정책 시사점 ... 48
• 제5장 창의적 연구협력 구축 ... 52
• 제1절 학연협력의 중요성 및 특징 ... 52
• 1. 학연협력의 중요성 및 영향요인 ... 52
• 2. 학연협력의 유형 및 특징 ... 59
• 제2절 정책 시사점 ... 68
• 제6장 창의적 연구펀딩 지원 ... 72
• 제1절 창의적 연구펀딩 프로그램의 중요성 및 특징 ... 72
• 1. 창의적 연구펀딩 프로그램의 중요성 및 관련연구 ... 72
• 2. 창의적 연구펀딩 프로그램 유형 및 특징 ... 75
• 제2절 정책 시사점 ... 83
• 제7장 종합 및 결론 ... 89
• 참고문헌 ... 93
• SUMMARY ... 97
• CONTENTS ... 101
• 끝페이지 ... 103