보건소 건강증진사업 성과평가지표 개발 -금연, 운동, 영양, 절주, 고혈압사업을 중심으로- The Development of a Performance Evaluation Tool for Health Promotion Programs of Public Health Center원문보기
The ultimate goal of health promotion programs is to improve the quality of life through promoting community health. Since the performance of health promotion programs are greatly affected by the quality of the planning and implementation process of the programs, the proper quality assessment of the...
The ultimate goal of health promotion programs is to improve the quality of life through promoting community health. Since the performance of health promotion programs are greatly affected by the quality of the planning and implementation process of the programs, the proper quality assessment of the program process is very important. According to existing literature, the tool for assessing the quality of the process and implementation as well as the outcome. However, no assessment tool for the quality of the process of health promotion programs has been developed in Korea. The purpose of the study is to develop a quality assessment tool for the process of health promotion programs being conducted at public health centers in Korea. The quality assessment tool developed in the study consists of the following four domains: strategic planning (14 items), program management (11 items), monitoring and evaluation (13 items), and resources and information (15 items). The strategic planning deals with the function of the planning staff and committees, community data analysis, the feasibility of the program, and the approach methods for attaining the goal of the program. The program management includes items on the qualification and power of the program staff. Monitoring and evaluation deals with the planning and education for monitoring, reporting and communication among program units, and feedback after monitoring. Finally, the resource and information covers the planning and activities for obtaining resources and information, community networking, beneficiaries' response, and consulting activity of the staff.
The ultimate goal of health promotion programs is to improve the quality of life through promoting community health. Since the performance of health promotion programs are greatly affected by the quality of the planning and implementation process of the programs, the proper quality assessment of the program process is very important. According to existing literature, the tool for assessing the quality of the process and implementation as well as the outcome. However, no assessment tool for the quality of the process of health promotion programs has been developed in Korea. The purpose of the study is to develop a quality assessment tool for the process of health promotion programs being conducted at public health centers in Korea. The quality assessment tool developed in the study consists of the following four domains: strategic planning (14 items), program management (11 items), monitoring and evaluation (13 items), and resources and information (15 items). The strategic planning deals with the function of the planning staff and committees, community data analysis, the feasibility of the program, and the approach methods for attaining the goal of the program. The program management includes items on the qualification and power of the program staff. Monitoring and evaluation deals with the planning and education for monitoring, reporting and communication among program units, and feedback after monitoring. Finally, the resource and information covers the planning and activities for obtaining resources and information, community networking, beneficiaries' response, and consulting activity of the staff.
서영준, 이해종, 이회원, 정애숙. 보건소 건강증진 사업 수행과정의 질 평가지표 개발, 연구보고서, 2003
송현종. 보건소 건강증진사업 평가지표 개발, 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 2002
Ader, M., K. Berensson, P. Carlsson, M. Granath and V. Urwitz, Quality indicator for health promotion programmes, Health Promotion International 16(2):187-195
Department of Health. Good Practice Guide. Learning lessons from post-project evaluation. Health in Action. on-line access to health promotion & injury prevention information in Alberta. 2002
Dignan, M.B. and Carr, P.A. Program planning for health education and promotion. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia. 1992
Donabedian A Exploration in quality assessment and monitoring vol 1: The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment, Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan 1900;24(26):101-109
Hawe, H., D. Degeling, J. Hall and A. Briefly, Evaluation Health Promotion, Maclennan and Petty, Sydney Philadelphia , London 1994;86-173
Mcdonald, G.(ed.) Quality in Health Promotion. Cardiff. Health Promotion Wales 1992
Rossi, P.H. Freeman, H.E. and Lipsey, M.W. Evaluation-A Systemic Approach. 6th edition, Sage Publications, CA. 1999
Russell, E. G., T.M. Vogi, and S.M. Boles. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health 1999;89(9):1322-1327
Valnete TW. Evaluating Health Promotion Programs. Oxford University Press 2002
WHO. WHO Regional Publications European Series, No. 92. Evaluation in Health Promotion; Principles and Perspectives. 2001;28-38
WHO. Report of the WHO European Working Group on Health Promotion Evaluation. Health Promotion Evaluation: Recommendations to Policy-Makers, EUR/ICP/IVST 05 01 03 Original: English United EUR/HFA target 15, 1998
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.