[논문]대학생들의 정보원에 대한 인식과 이용간의 차이에 대한 분석연구

김경선; 유이은영; 권나현

doi:10.3743/kosim.2013.30.3.007

대학생들의 정보원에 대한 인식과 이용간의 차이에 대한 분석연구
Bridging Gaps in College Students' Source Perception and Use 원문보기

정보관리학회지 = Journal of the Korean society for information management, v.30 no.3 = no.89, 2013년, pp.7 - 21

김경선 (School of Library and Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison) , 유이은영 (School of Library and Information Sciences, North Carolina Central University) , 권나현 (Department of Library & Information Science, Myongji University)

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구는 대학생들의 학업과제수행에 필요한 정보원에 대한 인식 및 선택과 그 이용과 관련하여, 학생들이 (1) 유용하다고 인식하는 정보원과 자주 이용하는 정보원의 차이를 비교하고, (2) 정보원 선택 시 중요하게 생각하는 정보원의 특성과 자주 이용하는 정보원의 특성을 비교, 분석함으로써, 학생들의 정보원에 대한 인식과 실제 이용행동간의 차이를 파악하고자 하는 목적으로 수행되었다. 미국 대학생 총 251명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시한 연구결과에 따르면, 학생들이 가장 빈번히 이용하는 정보원이자 가장 유용한 정보원은 웹자원으로 밝혀졌다. 온라인DB/저널은 가장 빈번히 사용된 정보원은 아니었지만 유용한 정보원으로는 인식되고 있었다. 또한 '정확성'이나 '망라성' 등과 같은 정보의 품질을 정보원 선택의 중요한 기준으로 생각은 하지만 실제로는 편리하고 접근가능한 정보원을 선택하고 있음이 밝혀졌는데, 이는 대학생들이 중요하다고 생각하는 선택기준에 근거해 정보원을 선택하지 않고 있음을 보여준다. 정보원의 선택기준과 실제 이용간의 간극을 보여주는 이러한 연구결과를 토대로 대학생들이 양질의 정보원을 선택하도록 도울 수 있는 정보활용교육과 더 사용하기 쉽고 편리한 정보시스템 설계를 위한 방안을 제시하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The study examines two aspects that relate to undergraduates' selection and use of information sources for their academic assignments: (1) sources perceived useful vs. sources frequently used, and (2) source characteristics considered important as selection criteria vs. selection criteria used as reflected in characteristics of frequently used sources. A survey of 251 undergraduate students attempted to address the gaps between what students think they should do and what they actually do with regard to source selection. Characteristics of frequently used sources were analyzed to find out the criteria used for source selection. Friends/family were among the frequently used sources although they were not perceived as useful. Unlike other sources suffering gaps between the perceived usefulness and the use behavior, Web sources were the ones not only perceived most useful but also used most frequently. When the important selection criteria were compared with the characteristic of sources used often, students did not seem to actually use the selection criteria they thought important. While students considered some characteristics related to information quality (e.g., accuracy, comprehensiveness) as important criteria for source selection, the actual criteria they applied for choosing information sources could be described as 'convenient' or 'accessible' (e.g., efficient/time saving, easy to use, familiar, accessible). Based on the findings, suggestions were made to help bridge such gaps through information literacy programs and information systems design.

주제어

참고문헌 (36)

Burton, V., & Chadwick, S. (2000). Investigating the practices of student researchers: Patterns of use criteria for use of internet and library sources. Computers and Composition, 17(3), 309-328.

상세보기
Cox, C. (2007). Hitting the spot: Marketing federated searching tools to students and faculty. Serials Librarian, 53(3), 147-164.

상세보기
Davis, P. (2003). Effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior: Guiding student scholarship in a Networked age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(1), 41-51.

상세보기
Gardner, S., & Eng., S. (2005). What students want: Generation Y and the changing function of the academic library. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 5(3), 405-420. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/pla/

상세보기
Generation Y. (August 30, 1993). Ad Age, p. 16.d.
Gerstberger, P., & Allen, T. (1968). Criteria used by research and development engineers in the selection of an information source. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(4), 272-279.

상세보기
Hamilton, L. (2008). Embedding information literacy into the prehospital care curriculum. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care, 6(1), Article 3. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/jephc/vol6/iss1/3/
Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2009). Lessons learned: How college students seek information in the digital age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report, University of Washington's Information School. Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2009_finalv_YR1_12_2009v2.pdf
Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2010a). How today's college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. First Monday, 15(3). Retrieved from http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2830/2476
Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2010b). Truth be told: How college students evaluate and use information in the digital age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report, University of Washington's Information School. Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2010_Survey_FullReport1.pdf
Himmelfarb, S. (1993). The measurement of attitudes. In A.H. Eagly & S. Chaiken (Eds.), Psychology of Attitudes, 23-88. Thomson/Wadsworth.
Holiday, W., & Li, Q. (2004). Understanding the Millennials: Updating our knowledge about students. Reference Services Review, 32(2), 356-365.

상세보기
Kim, K., & Sin, S. (2007). Perception and selection of information sources by undergraduate students: Effects of avoidant style, confidence, and personal control in problem-solving. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(6), 655-665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.012

상세보기
Kuhlthau, C., Heinstrom, J., & Todd, R. (2008). ISP revisited: Is the ISP-model still useful. Information Research, 13(4). paper 355. Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper355.html
Lee, H.-L. (2008). Information structures and undergraduate students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(3), 211-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.03.004

상세보기
Lee, J.-M. (2010). Seeking and using information sources by college students: Comparisons of information seeking in everyday life and during elections. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 36(1), 41-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.3.117
Lim, S. (2009). How and why do college students use Wikipedia? Journal of the American Society for Information science and Technology, 60(11), 2089-2202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21142

상세보기
Mann, T. (1987). A guide to library research methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nagy, A. (2011). Analyzing the next-generation catalog. Library Technology Reports, 47(7), 5-28.
North Carolina State University (2013). Library's online catalog. Retrieved from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/catalog/index.html
OCLC. (2005). Perceptions of libraries and information resources. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/reports/pdfs/Percept_all.pdf
Osgood, C. E. (1962). Studies of the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist, 17, 10-28.

상세보기
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Rockman, I. F. (2004). Information literacy into the higher education curriculum: Practical models for transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rogers, J. (2010). Some thoughts on federated search. Posted in attempting elegance. Retrieved from http://rogersurbanek.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/some-thoughts-on-federated-search/
Ruddock, B., & Hartley, D. (2010). How UK academic libraries choose metasearch systems. Aslib Proceedings, 62(1), 85-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00012531011015226

상세보기
Scoyoc, A., & Cason, C. (2006). The electronic academic library: Undergraduate research behavior in a library without books. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(1), 47-58. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/pla/v006/6.1van_scoyoc.html

상세보기
Tang, R., Hsieh-Yee, I., & Zhang, S. (2007). User perceptions of metaLib combined search: An investigation of how users make sense of federated searching Internet. Reference Services Quarterly, 12(1&2), 211-236.
Tomeo, M. L. (2012). Adding users to the Website design process. Public Services Quarterly, 8(4), 350-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2012.730414

상세보기
Tversky, A., & Fox, C. (2000). Weighing risk and uncertainty. In Choices, values and frames, New York: Russell Sage Foundation. (pp. 93-117).
University of Chicago (2013). Library's online catalog: http://lens.lib.uchicago.edu/
Valentine, B. (1993). Undergraduate research behavior: Using focus groups to generate theory. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 19(5), 300-304.

상세보기
Warwick, C., Rimmer, J., Blandford, A., Gow, J., & Buchanan, G. (2009). Cognitive economy and satisficing in information seeking: A longitudinal study of undergraduate information behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2402-2415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21179

상세보기
Yoon, J-O. (2004). Information seeking in context: content analysis of information search by college students. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 35(2), 199-218.
Young, N., & Seggern, M. (2001). General information seeking in changing times. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 41(2), 159-169.
Zipf, G. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, Mass: Addison-Wesley.

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증