[논문]간호대학생의 자기주도 학습에 대한 인식과 수행 실태

김정아; 배문혜; 고자경

doi:10.5762/kais.2016.17.12.621

간호대학생의 자기주도 학습에 대한 인식과 수행 실태
A Study on the Level of Awareness and the Current Performance Level of Self-directed Learning in Nursing Students 원문보기

한국산학기술학회논문지 = Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, v.17 no.12, 2016년, pp.621 - 633

김정아 (세명대학교 간호학과) , 배문혜 (두원공과대학교 간호학과) , 고자경 (간호학교육연구소)

초록
AI-Helper

본 논문은 간호학생들의 자기 주도 학습에 대한 인식수준과 수행수준을 파악하기 위하여 시도되었다. 각종 자기주도 학습과 관련 문헌을 고찰하여 자기 주도 학습의 핵심개념을 규명한 다음 이에 부합되는 루브릭을 개발하였다. 이를 간호 대학생에게 적용하여 자기 주도 학습에 대한 인식수준과 실행수준을 확인하였다. 연구결과에 의하면 간호학생들의 자기 주도 학습에 대한 인식수준과 수행수준은 모든 항목에서 유의한 차이가 있었다. 또한 간호학생들의 자기 주도 학습에 대한 수행수준은 입시성적에 따라 간호학을 선택한 학생이 낮았지만, 학년에 따른 유의한 차이가 없었다. 자기 주도 학습에 대한 인식수준은 전공만족도별, 학업성취도별, 전공 선택 동기 별로 유의한 차이가 없었다. 결론적으로 간호대학생의 자기주도 학습에 대한 인식수준과 수행수준은 일치하지 않았으며, 이는 학생들이 자기 주도 학습의 필요성은 충분히 인식하고 있지만 실제로 실행에 옮기고 있지 않고 있음을 의미한다. 이에 간호육자들은 교육대상 학생들의 자기 주도 학습 능력과 현황을 구체적으로 파악하고 이를 강화하고 향상시킬 수 있는 교수학습 전략을 개발해야 할 필요성이 있다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The purpose of this study is to investigate the level of awareness and current performance level of self-directed learning (SDL) in nursing students. The core concepts were defined and a rubric was developed through literature review. It was applied later to subjects and the results were analyzed. According to the results, there were significant differences between the current performance level and the awareness level of SDL in all items. Students who chose nursing as a major due to their high school/SAT grades showed lower current performance level than others. There were insignificant differences in the current performance level influencing the next grade. The level of awareness showed insignificant differences according to the reason for selecting nursing as a major, satisfaction on major, and grade point average (GPA). In conclusion, there was a discrepancy between the level of awareness and the current performance level of SDL of nursing students, which indicates that they were aware of the necessity of SDL, but did not actually perform it. Nursing educators should seek for strategies that can improve SDL ability of their students as well as to better grasp the level of the SDL of their student and the current performance level of SDL to apply them to the instructional design.

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

The purpose of this study is to find out nursing students’ level of awareness and current performance level of SDL.
A rubric is a rating standard which descriptively indicates the explanation for the characteristics of outcomes or performance of learners[22]. Therefore, the rubric for assessing SDL utilized in this study evaluates the level of awareness of subjects on SDL as well as the current performance level. We reviewed 63 precedent researches including Garrison[23] related to SDL or metacognition and then established the criteria, itemizing features and key contents of SDL.

제안 방법

SMU-2015-04-004-01) from the institutional review board of S university. After that, written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before applying the rubric for assessing SDL to subjects. With detailed explanations about the research purpose and procedure, data were collected from June 2 to 5, 2015.
, the rubric had 30 items and each of them inquired about the level of awareness and the current performance level. In order to secure the content validity of the items, the rubric was applied to 12 students by each grade and then the items were modified or complemented in cases where the students misperceive or misunderstood the question. The final rubric is presented as Table 1.
In this descriptive research, the key terms were defined by identifying core concepts of SDL through literature reviews and grasping its related variables. Based on this, SDL and its necessity were understood as well as a rubric for evaluating the level of awareness and the current performance level of SDL was developed.
Based on this, SDL and its necessity were understood as well as a rubric for evaluating the level of awareness and the current performance level of SDL was developed. The rubric was applied later to nursing students and then the results from self-reported instruments were analyzed. Through this process, relations between SDL and its related variables including academic achievement were verified.
Therefore, we will identify the core concepts of SDL, and then assess the level of awareness on necessity and the current performance level of SDL of nursing students in order to provide the baseline data for improving teaching-learning methods which cultivate SDL ability of nursing students.

대상 데이터

The research was performed on the total of 688 nursing students of S university in Chungbuk province and D university in Gyeonggi province which had passed the accreditation for nursing education of Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing. All the subjects understood the purpose of this study and consented to participation.
The subjects of this study consisted of 32.1% (n=221) of freshmen, 33.0% (n=227) of sophomores, 12.5% (n=86) of juniors, and 22.4% (n=154) senior students. The average age of the subjects was 20.

데이터처리

Pearson correlation was analyzed for correlation between the level of awareness and the current performance level. Differences between the level of awareness and the current performance level as well as differences according to each variable were verified using t-test and ANOVA.
In order to verify validity and reliability, internal consistency is measured with Cronbach’s α. Pearson correlation was analyzed for correlation between the level of awareness and the current performance level. Differences between the level of awareness and the current performance level as well as differences according to each variable were verified using t-test and ANOVA.

성능/효과

Among all the variables, variables with significant differences by each group were gender, understanding of SDL, reason for selecting nursing as a major, satisfaction on major, and GPA. The gender differences were significant only in the level of awareness while differences according to the other variables were significant in the current performance level.
As a result, the highest mark of the level of awareness was 2.93 and the lowest was 2.66, meaning that subjects are highly aware of the necessity of SDL, while the highest mark of the current performance level was 2.44 and the lowest was 1.73, meaning the subjects’ lack of practice of SDL.
The level of awareness on SDL according to satisfaction on major showed insignificant differences except for the cognition part, while all three subcategories of SDL which are cognition, volitional action and motivation of the current performance level of SDL showed significant differences. In other words, subjects who are ‘very satisfied’ or ‘satisfied’ with their major showed significantly higher current performance level of SDL than those who are ‘very unsatisfied’ or ‘unsatisfied’ with their major (F=24.
There was a significant low correlation between the level of awareness and that of its each subcategory including volitional action, cognition and motivation, and the current performance level and that of its each subcategory (r=.084∼129, p< .05) (Table 3).
Thirdly, we found out lack of validity of SDLRS by Guglielmino when it comes to verifying the leaner’s actual SDL ability or current performance level of SDL.

참고문헌 (38)

B. Majumdar, Self-directed Learning in the context of a nursing curriculum: development of a learning plan. South African Journal of Nursing, vol. 19, pp. 43-46, 1996. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v19i2.1323

상세보기
O. L. Lunyk-Child, D. Crooks, P. J. Ellis, C. Ofosu, L. O'Mara & E. Rideout, Self-directed Learning: faculty and student perceptions. Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 40, pp. 116-123, 2001.

상세보기
M. Y. Jho & M. O. Chae, Impact of Self-directed Learning Ability and Metacognition on Clinical Competence among Nursing Students. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 513-522, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2014.20.4.513

원문보기 상세보기
OECD, PISA(program for International Student Assessment) 2009 Results: Learning to Learn-.Student Engagement, Strategies and Practices(Volume III), 2010. Student Engagement, Strategies and Practices (Volume III), 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264083943-en
E. O'Shea, Self-directed Learning in nurse education: a review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 62-70, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02673.x

상세보기
A. K. Yang, H. J. Cho, An analysis on the influence of self-regulated learning upon academic achievement. Journal of Korean Educational Forum, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 61-82, 2010.
N. J. Huh, An Analytical Study on the Predictability of Self-directed Learning on Learners' Variables, Thesis, Graduate School Hong-Ik University, 2004.
M. J. Sim, H. S. Oh, Influence of Self Efficacy, Learning Motivation, and Self-directed Learning on Problem-Solving Ability in Nursing Students. Journal of the Korea Contents society, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 328-337, 2012.

원문보기 상세보기
S. H. Lee, M. H. Kim, K. S. Sun, The Clinical Competence and Related Factors of the Nursing Students: Focused on the Subjects who studied Problem-Based Learning. Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 70-79, 2007.
I. K. Kim, J. A. Kim, Self-regulated Learning, Attention Control and Yangseng of Nursing Undergraduates. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 197-205, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.2.197

원문보기 상세보기
W. O. Oh, Factors Influencing Self-directedness in Learning of Nursing Students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 684-693, 2002.

원문보기 상세보기
L. M. Guglielmino, Development of the Self-directed Learning readiness scale. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia, 1977. from Dissertation Abstracts International, vol. 38, pp. 6467A.
M. J. Lee, The problems and challenges for self-regulation studies. Journal of Research in Education, vol. 39, pp. 161-193, 2011.
H. B. Kwon, N. S. Kim, English learning student's perception on the night self-study program at a Korean High school. Journal of Educational Research, vol. 21, pp. 45-74, 2013.
M. S. Knowles, Self-directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. 1975 Cited by S. W. Choi, K. Lee, The Relationship between Self-directed Learning Ability and Teacher-efficacy among Secondary School Teacher, Korean Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24-44, 2012
L. Corno, E. B. Mandinach, The Role of Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Learning and Motivation. American Psychological Association, vol. 18, pp. 88-108, 1983.
H. B. Long, "Self-directed Learning: challenges and opportunities", Asia-Pacific seminar on Self-directed Learning, 1995.
J. Garofalo, F. K. Lester, Metacognition, cognitive monitoring and mathematical performance. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 163-176, 1985. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/748391

상세보기
S. P. Lajoie, Metacognition, self-regulation and self-regulated learning: A rose by any other name? Educational Psychological Review, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 469-475, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9088-1

상세보기
J. Cohen, statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
H. Goodrich, Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 1996. Cited by W. K. Noh, A study for the development and effects of learning strategy rubrics: Focused on college students' learning strategy educational program. Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 259-294, 2008.
J. A. Kim, J. K. Ko, A Study on Clinical Reasoning Ability and Academic Achievements in Nursing Students, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1874-1883, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.3.1874

원문보기 상세보기
D. R. Garrison, Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 18-33, 1997. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074171369704800103

상세보기
B. J. Zimmerman, A social cognitive view of self-regulated learning and academic learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 329-339, 1989. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329

상세보기
R. R. Pintrich, E. V. De Groot, Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 33-40, 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

상세보기
S. M. Park, Development of Learning Strategy Scale for College Students. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 16-27. 2009.
J. H. Lee, A study on the Differences of University Students' Self-directed Learning Readiness Among gender, Grade and Major, Master's Thesis, Kyungnam University. Masan, Korea. 1997.
Brockett, R.G. & Hiemstra, R. Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research and practice. London: Routledge, 1991. Cited by S. J. Kang, B. K. Kim, T. H. Noh, Relationships among Self-directed Learning Ability, Science Teaching Efficacy Beliefs, and Other Background Variables of Elementary School Teachers, Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 326-331, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104515959100200802

상세보기
S. G. Paris, R. S. Newman, Development aspects of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 87-102, 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_7

상세보기
Y. P. Hong, The Self-directed Learning Readiness of Specialized High School Students and Its Related Variables, Master's Thesis Seoul national University, Seoul, 2002.
H. S. Cho, A Study on the Critical Thinking Disposition and Self-directed Learning, Academic Achievement of Nursing Students, Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 57-72, 2007.
H. G. Kim, Fundamental Research on the Academic Achievements and Sociocultural Backgrounds of Undergraduates, Ministry policy research-2000-S-15. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development, 2001. http://library.moe.go.kr/search/DetailView.ax?sid1&cid15119&rid5
J. J. Cornin, S. A. Taylor, Measuring service quality a reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, vol. 56, July, pp. 55-68, 1992. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252296

상세보기
R. T. Rust, R. L. Oliver, Service quality: Insights and managerial implications from the frontier. In Oliver and Rust (Eds). Service quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice. Sage, CA,, pp. 1-20, 1994.
H. S. Lee, Y. Kim, Service Quality and Service Value, Asia Marketing Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 77-99, 1999.
E. J. Kim, An analysis of the structural relationship among college satisfaction, professor-students interaction, Self-directed Learning, and learning outcomes of students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 209-231, 2014.
B. J. Zimmerman, M. Martinez-Pons, Construct validation of Strategy Model of Student Self-Regulated Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 284-290, 1988. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284

상세보기
L. V. Morris, S. S. Wu, C. L. Finnegan, Predicting retention in online general education courses. American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 23-36. 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1901_3

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증