$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

초등과학 교육연구에서 시선추적 연구방법의 고찰
A Review of Eye-tracking Method in Elementary Science Education Research 원문보기

초등과학교육 = Journal of Korean elementary science education, v.35 no.3, 2016년, pp.288 - 304  

신원섭 (서울교육대학교)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of this study is a review of previous studies and principles of eye-tracking techniques that are actively applied in recent elementary science education. Also it proposes to utilize the direction of eye tracking techniques in elementary science education research. Recent eye-tracking tec...

주제어

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
이동형 시선 추적이 고정형보다 더 많은 시간과 노력이 필요한 이유는 무엇인가? 시선추적기에 따라 분석 프로그램과 방법의 차이가 있으며, 이동형 시선 추적의 경우, 연구 참여자의 움직임에 따라 보는 장면이 달라지기 때문에, 고정형 시선추적보다 안구운동을 분석하는데 더 많은 시간과 노력이 필요하다. 그 이유는 분석하고자하는 관심영역이 연구대상자가 보고 있는 장면에 따라 그 위치가 계속 변경되기 때문에, 실시간으로 관심영역을 재설정해야하기 때문이다.
시선추적은 어떤 연구방법인가? , 2015; Lee & Park, 2015; Liu & Shen, 2011)들이 활발히 이루어지고 있다(Shin & Shin, 2014b). 시선추적은 실시간으로 안구 움직임을 추적하여 연구 참여자가 무엇을 어떻게 보는가를 분석하는 연구방법을 말한다(Andrew, 2007; Bojko, 2013; Duchowski, 2007; Holmqvist et al., 2011; Shin, 2016).
시각은 어떻게 대상을 재인할 수 있는가? 시각은 외부정보를 수집하는 가장 핵심적인 감각기관이고, 외부자극에서 수집한 시각정보를 토대로 표상을 형상화하여 그 표상을 장기기억의 표상과 비교함으로써 대상을 재인할 수 있다(Shin & Shin, 2013b, Shon et al., 2003).
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (104)

  1. Adesope, O. O., Cavagnetto, A., Hunsu, N. J., Anguiano, C. & Lloyd, J. (2016). Comparative effects of computer-based concept maps, refutational texts, and expository texts on science learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(1), 1-24. 

  2. Andrew, D. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag. 

  3. Ansari, D. & Coch, D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognition Science, 10(4), 146-151. 

  4. Ariasi, N., Hyona, J., Kaakinen, J. K. & Mason, L. (2016). An eye­movement analysis of the refutation effect in reading science text. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 1-20. 

  5. Balchin, T. (2007). Teacher nominations of giftedness: Investigating the beliefs of British G&T coordinators. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(1), 34-45. 

  6. Basaraba, D., Zannou, Y., Woods, D. & Ketterlin-Geller, L. (2013). Exploring the utility of student-think alouds for providing insights into students' metacognitive and problem-solving processes during assessment development. SREE Fall 2013 Conference. 

  7. Berg, J., Jakel, L. & Penzes, A. (2016). Digital and conventional microscopy-Learning effects detected through eye tracking and the use of interactive whiteboards. Universal Journal of Education Research, 4(6), 1319-1331. 

  8. Berliner, D. C. (1991). Educational psychology and pedagogical expertise: New findings and new opportunities for thinking about training. Educational Psychologist, 26(2), 145-155. 

  9. Bermudez, J. L. (2010). Cognitive science: An introduction to the science of the mind. Cambridge University Press. 

  10. Bojko, A. (2013). Eye tracking the user experience - A practical guide to research. New York: Rosenfeld Media Brooklyn. 

  11. Byeon, J., Lee, I. & Kwon, Y. (2011). A study on consulting of teaching behavior patterns of gaze fixation by using eye tracker: The case study. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 173-199. 

  12. Byeon, J., Lee, I. & Kwon, Y. (2011). A study on consulting of teaching behavior patterns of gaze fixation by using eye tracker: The case study. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 173-199. 

  13. Choi, H. & Shin, D. (2012). Eye-tracking on inservice elementary teachers' interpreting of science textbook tables. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(3), 358-371. 

  14. Choi, H., Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2014). The comparison of eye movement in measuring tasks between the underachievers and the overachievers. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(1), 181-194. 

  15. Choi, H., Shin, W. & Shin, D.(2012). Differences in eye movement pattern during the classification between the gifted and general students in elementary schools. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(4), 501-512. 

  16. Choi, M. (2003). A study on the method of eye tracking analysis based on the properties in visual perception of user -With emphasis on the development of analysis-framework for product design-. Journal of Korean Society of Design Science, 16(4), 197-206. 

  17. Choi, S. (2014). Exploring gender difference in reading comprehension process using eye tracking technology. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(11), 573-597. 

  18. Choi, S. (2015). The characteristics of eye movement in Korean elementary students: Landing position and word frequency effects. The Korean Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12(3), 1-18. 

  19. Choi, S., Ban S. & Lee, M. (2004). Human-like selective attention model with reinforcement and inhibition mechanism. N.R. Pal et al. (Eds.): ICONIP 2004, LNCS 3316, 694-699. 

  20. Chung, J. & Park, J. (2011). An analysis of the selection process of elementary science gifted students by teacher's recommendation focused on analysis of teacher's recommendation letters. Journal Teacher Education, 50(3), 1-12. 

  21. Davey, B. (1983). Think aloud: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, 27(1), 44-47. 

  22. Davis, G. A. & Rimm, S. B. (2003). Education of the gifted and talented. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon. pp. 46-158. 

  23. Duchowski, A. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag. 

  24. Guo, C. J. & Chiu, M. H. (2016). Opportunities and challenges for science education in Asia: Perspectives based on the Taiwan experience. In Science education research and practice in Asia, Springer Singapore, pp. 175-196. 

  25. Ha, B. G., Kim, E. A., Kim, S. U. & Yang, I. H. (2016). An analysis of elementary school student's eye movement in solving process of light and shadow tasks. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 122, 27-33. 

  26. Han, M., Kwon, S. & Kwon, Y. (2015). Analysis of eye-tracking features during visual search task between the gifted and general students in elementary schools. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(8), 67-81. 

  27. Herrlinger, S., Hoffler, T. N., Opfermann, M. & Leutner, D. (2016). When do pictures help learning from expository text? Multimedia and modality effects in primary schools. Research in Science Education, 26, 1-20. 

  28. Holmqvist, K., NystrOm, M., Anderson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H. & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. New York: Oxford University Press. 

  29. Itti, L., Koch, C. & Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 20(11), 1254-1259. 

  30. Jacob, R. J. & Karn, K. S. (2003). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. Mind, 2(3), 573-605 

  31. Jang, K. & Shin, D. (2013). An analysis of understanding and eye movement of elementary school students according to the types of science textbook illustration. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 24(4), 127-146. 

  32. Jeon, Y. & Shin, D. (2015). Comparative analysis of eye movement on performing biology classification task between the scientifically gifted and general elementary students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 34(1), 142-152. 

  33. Jeong, A. & Lee, K. (2016). Analysis of processes in understanding about illustrated science text for high science achievers and low science achievers with types of biological knowledge using eye-tracking. Biology Education, 44(1), 155-166. 

  34. Jeong, S. & Kang, C. (2015). A study on textbook reading style of the first grade students in elementary school through the eye-tracking. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 9(1), 69-88. 

  35. Jian, Y. C. (2016). Fourth graders' cognitive processes and learning strategies for reading illustrated biology texts: Eye movement measurements. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(1), 93-109. 

  36. Jones, M. G., Childers, G., Emig, B., Chevrier, J., Stevens, V. & Tan, H. (2016). The efficacy of visuohaptic simulations in teaching concepts of thermal energy, pressure, and random motion. In Insights from research in science teaching and learning (pp 73-86). Springer International Publishing. 

  37. Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441-480. 

  38. Kastens, K. A., Shipley, T. F., Boone, A. P. & Straccia, F. (2016). What geoscience experts and novices look at, and what they see, when viewing data visualizations. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, 3(1), 27-58. 

  39. Kim, H. (2015). Research for analysis of Korean reading process using eye-tracking technology - For intermediate and advanced readers among foreign Korean learners. The International Association for Korean Language Education, 479-497. 

  40. Kim, S. U., Lim, S. M., Kim, E. A. & Yang, I. H. (2016). An analysis of eye movement and cognitive load about the editorial design in elementary science textbook. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 570-575. 

  41. Kim, S., Byeon, J., Lee, I. & Kwon, Y. (2012). An eye tracking study on test-item solving of science scholastic achievement focused in elementary school students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 12(1), 65-78. 

  42. Kim, S., Byeon, J., Lee, I. & Kwon, Y. (2013). Development of an instrument to measure task commitment using eye-tracking for identifying science gifted student. Biology Education, 41(3), 421-434. 

  43. Kim, Y. & Shin, D. (2015). Development of observing and classifying process skill enhancement program using scientific thinking strategy model for elementary school students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(2), 195-214. 

  44. Kim, Y. & Shin, D. (2014). Analysis on cognitive strategies of scientific predicting according to 6th graders' predicting skills based on eye movement. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(4), 751-761. 

  45. Kim, Y., Kwon, S. & Kwom, Y. (2015) Analysis of high school students' visual attention at digital contents on biological science. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(12), 91-110. 

  46. Kim, Y., Kwon, S. & Kwon, Y. (2015). Analysis of high school students' visual attention at digital contents on biological science. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(12), 91-110. 

  47. Ko, M., Yang, I., Kim, O. & Lim, S. (2014). The differences in eye movement of pre-service teachers and elementary school students in SBF question about a visual material of the change on the lunar phases. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(2), 273-285. 

  48. Koh, S. & Yoon, N. (2007). The characteristics of eye-movement in Korean sentence reading: Cluster length, word frequency, and landing position effects. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 18(4), 325-350. 

  49. Koh, S., Yoon, S., Min, C., Choi, K., Ko, S. & Hwang, M. (2010). The characteristics of eye-movement during children read Korean texts. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 21(4), 481-503. 

  50. Kwon, S., Lee. Y., Kim, Y., Eom, J. & Kang, M. (2016). Visual attention of preschool children on popular characters in animation: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(3), 105-124. 

  51. Law, D. D., Meyer, S. & Fall, L. (2016). Using family science concept maps to gain higher order student learning outcomes. Family Science Review, 21(2), 116-134. 

  52. Lee, D., Kim, S. & Jeong, M. (2014). Influence of perceptual information of previewing stimulus on the target search process -An eye-tracking study-. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 25(3), 211-232. 

  53. Lee, I. & Han, K. (2009). The analysis of teacher's recommendation usefulness in selecting scientific gifted students. Journal of Gifted and Talented Education, 19(2), 381-404. 

  54. Lee, J. & Shin, D. (2012b). The unit-introduction development of Korean textbook in the elementary school through the eye tracking method II: Focusing on the introductory question and speech-bubbles. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 23(3), 89-109. 

  55. Lee, J. & Park, Y. (2015). Investigating rater's cognitive processes in the writing assessment. Korean Language Education Research, 50, 396-424. 

  56. Lee, J. & Shin, D. (2012a). The unit-introduction development of Korean textbook in the elementary school through the yet tracking method. Journal of Elementary Korean Education, 49, 133-159. 

  57. Lee, K. & Kang, D. (2015). A study on writing research method for analysis of writer's cognitive process. Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, 56, 173-199. 

  58. Lee, M. (2009). Selective attention concentration artificial vision system. The Journal of Korea Institute of Electronics Engineers, 36(11), 52-65. 

  59. Lee, M. & Lee, H. (2015). Elementary students' formation of relational thinking about equation - Centered for web-based balance. School Mathematics, 17(3), 391-405. 

  60. Lee, M. & Yong, N. (2009). Processing of syntactic dependency in Korean relative clauses: Evidence from aneye-tracking study. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(4), 507-533. 

  61. Lee, S. (2014). A research on traits of adolescents' reading and eye movement in internet reading. Korean Language Education Research, 49, 417-444. 

  62. Lee, S. & Suh, H. (2013). The current status and perspectives of research on reading process using eye-tracker. Korean Language Education Research, 46, 479-503. 

  63. Lee, Y. (2009). Understanding the syntactic ambiguity resolution processes of Korean garden-path sentences: An eye-tracking study. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 11(6), 3089-3104. 

  64. Lim, S., Choi, H., Yang, I. & Jeong, M. (2013). An analysis of eye movement in observation according to university students' cognitive style. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(4), 778-793. 

  65. Lim, S., Park, S. & Yang, I. (2013). Investigation of eye movement on the observation of elementary school students with different motivation system on science learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(6), 1154-1169. 

  66. Lin, L., Lee, C. H., Kalyuga, S., Wang, Y., Guan, S. & Wu, H. (2016). The effect of learner-generated drawing and imagination in comprehending a science text. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1(1), 1-13. 

  67. Liu, C. J. & Shen, M. H. (2011). The influence of different representations on solving concentration problems at elementary school. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 621-629. 

  68. Lustigova, Z. & Novotna, V. (2016, June). Cognitive strategies of students in virtual laboratories (eye tracking based case study). In Conference proceedings. The future of education (pp. 131-136). libreriauniversitaria. it Edizioni. 

  69. Milner, A. D. & Gooddale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford; Oxford University Press. 

  70. Muller, H. J. & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Visual search and selective attention. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 389-410. 

  71. Navalpakkam, V. & Itti, L. (2002) A goal oriented attention guidance model. Biologically Motivated Computer Vision Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2525, 453-461. 

  72. Park, H. & Shin, D. (2015). Analysis of processes in reading about 'science stories' in 6th grade science textbook using eye-tracking. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 383-393. 

  73. Park, Y., Kim, E. & Yang, I. (2016). Analysis of eye movements according to emotions during elementary students' observation activities. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 127, 217-221. 

  74. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R. & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174. 

  75. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422. 

  76. Roebers, C. M., Schmid, C. & Roderer, T. (2010). Encoding strategies in primary school children: Insights from an eye-tracking approach and the role of individual differences in attentional control. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 171(1), 1-21. 

  77. Ryu, J. & Moon, J. (2013). The effects of line length and information seeking in e-book for learning on eye-fixation time, cognitive load, and comprehension. The Korea Educational Review, 19(3), 293-313. 

  78. Schroth, S. T. & Helfer, J. A. (2008). Identifying gifted students: Educator beliefs regarding various policies, processes, and procedures. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, 155-179. 

  79. Shin, D. & Choi, H. (2013). Differences in eye movement between elementary school teachers and students during understanding textbook illustrations. Biology Education, 41(2), 198-210. 

  80. Shin, D. & Kwon, Y. (2007). A review on brain study methods in elementary science education -A focus on the fMRI method-. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 49-62. 

  81. Shin, W. (2016). The development of science knowledge generative learning WEDO model through cognitive-neuroscientific analysis on elementary science class. Graduate School of Education SNUE, Doctorate thesis. 

  82. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2012). Eye movement analysis on elementary teachers' understanding process of science textbook graphs. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(3), 386-397. 

  83. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2013a). Analysis of eye movement by the science achievement level of the elementary students on observation test. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 185-197. 

  84. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2013b). Development of the heuristic attention model based on analysis of eye movement of elementary school students on discrimination task. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(7), 1471-1485. 

  85. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2014a). Analysis of eye movement of pre-service elementary teacher about "life cycle of plant" external representation in 2007, 2009 reform science textbook. Biology Education, 42(2), 115-131. 

  86. Shin, W. & Shin, D. (2014b). The development of intervention program for enhancing elementary science-poor students' basic science process skills - Focus on eye movement analysis -. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(8), 797-808. 

  87. Shin, W., Kim, M. & Shin, D. (2013a). Analysis of elementary students' eye movement in science problems solving process applying multiple representation. Biology Education, 41(4), 544-555. 

  88. Shin, W., Shin, D. & Jhun, Y. (2013b). The educational games' UI study from the point of view of UX by eye-tracking. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 17(2), 211-224. 

  89. Shon, Y. S., Lee, H. K., Ok, A. N. & Kim, M. S. (2003). The effect of selective attention and perspective changes on the recognition of meaningless figure. Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 15(2), 259-274. 

  90. Siegle, D. & Powell, T. (2004). Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gigted Child Quarterly, 48, 21-29. 

  91. Snowden, R., Tnompson, P. & Troscianko, T. (2012). Basic vision: An introduction to visual perception. New York: Oxford University Press. 

  92. Tang, H., Day, E., Kendhammer, L., Moore, J. N., Brown, S. A. & Pienta, N. J. (2016). Eye movement patterns in solving science ordering problems. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9(3), 1-13. 

  93. Taricani, E. (2016). Collaborative knowledge in online learning environments. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 1, 733-737. 

  94. Tippett, C. D. (2016). What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 725-746. 

  95. Treisman, A. M. & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. 

  96. Tsuchida, S. & Matsuura, S. (2016, July). A role of augmented reality in educational contents: Intermediating between reality and virtual reality. In International conference on virtual, augmented and mixed reality (pp. 736-745). Springer International Publishing. 

  97. Van Tassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D. & Avery, L. (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 110-123. 

  98. Vaz-Rebelo, P., Fernandes, P., Morgado, J., Monteiro, A. & Otero, J. (2016). Students' conscious unknowns about artefacts and natural objects. Educational Psychology, 36(1), 176-190. 

  99. Wolfe, J. M. & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Review: Neuroscience, 5(6), 495-501. 

  100. Yang, F. Y., Chang, C. C., Chen, L. L. & Chen, Y. C. (2016). Exploring learners' beliefs about science reading and scientific epistemic beliefs, and their relations with science text understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1-15. 

  101. Yang, F. Y., Huang, R. T. & Tsai, I. J. (2016). The effects of epistemic beliefs in science and gender difference on university students' science-text reading: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 473-498. 

  102. Yoon, N. & Koh, S. (2009). Eye-movements in reading easy and difficult texts. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(3), 291-307. 

  103. You, M., Kang, Y. & Yeh, H. (2011). Analysis identification results of gifted students by class observations and nominations in the science-gifted education center at university. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 3(2), 27-38. 

  104. Zheng, R. & Wang, Y. (2016). Optimizing students' information processing in science learning: A knowledge visualization approach. In Knowledge visualization and visual literacy in science education (pp 307-329). IGI Global. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로