최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기KJWHN : Korean journal of women health nursing, v.23 no.4, 2017년, pp.221 - 232
김현경 (KC대학교 간호학부)
Purpose: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and to describe characteristics of the birth experience assessment instrument. Methods: Literature related to the development of the birth experience assessment instrument was examined using a systematic review method. A literature search was ...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
분만에 관한 정보는 어떻게 습득되는가? | 17명으로 사회적으로 출산율이 저하되어 한 여성이 일생동안 낳는 아이의 수가 감소하게 되면서 여성 개인에게 분만의 경험은 더욱 중요하게 인식되었다[1]. 여성은 분만에 관한 정보를 지인의 경험, 대중매체, 이전의 분만 경험에 의해 습득하게 되며, 이에 따라 분만 경험에 대한 기대(expectation)가 형성된다[2]. 분만에 대한 경험이 긍정적이면 분만 만족도가 높게 되지만 부정적인 경험을 하게 되면 분만의 만족도는 낮아지게 된다. | |
모성 사망률과 신생아 사망률을 통해 측정된 분만 간호의 단점은 무엇인가? | 과거에 분만 간호의 질은 사회적 건강지표인 모성 사망률과 신생아 사망률을 통하여 측정해 왔다. 이는 사회적 건강수준을 극명하게 드러내지만 여성 개인이 받는 간호의 질과 경험을 알 수 없다는 단점이 있다. 과거의 가정 분만에 비해 최근 20년간 분만방식은 기술발전에 의해 변화되어 왔으며, 태아와 모체 모니터기술, 무통 분만기술 등에 의해 산모와 가족의 요구도 달리하게 되었다[2]. | |
분만경험이란? | 분만경험(birth experience)이란 분만에 대한 개인적 평가이다[4]. 분만 만족도(birth satisfaction)란 긍정적인 분만경험이다[5]. |
Statistics Korea. 2017 population statistics [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Statistical Information Service; 2017 [cited 2017 March 2]. Available from: http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsList_01List.jsp?vwcdMT_ZTITLE&parentIdA.
Janssen PA, Dennis CL, Reime B. Development and psychometric testing of the care in obstetrics: Measure for testing satisfaction (COMFORTS) scale. Research in Nursing and Health. 2006;29(1):51-60.
Sandin-Bojo AK, Larsson BW, Hall-Lord ML. Women's perception of intrapartal care in relation to WHO recommendations. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2008;17(22):2993-3003.
Martin CH, Fleming V. The birth satisfaction scale. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2011;24(2):124-135.
Ford E, Ayers S, Wright DB. Measurement of maternal perceptions of support and control in birth (SCBI). Journal of Women's Health. 2009;18(2):245-252.
Mohammad K, Shaban I, Homer C, Creedy D. Women's satisfaction with hospital-based intrapartum care: A Jordanian study. International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2014;6(3):32-39.
Smith LF. Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: Dimensions, validity, and internal reliability. Quality in Health Care. 2001;10(1):17-22.
Harvey S, Rach D, Stainton MC, Jarrell J, Brant R. Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care. Midwifery. 2002;18(4):260-267.
Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systemic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;186(5):160-172.
Denker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): Development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010;10:81.
Uludag E, Mete S. Development and testing of women's perception for the scale of supportive care given during labor. Pain Management Nursing. 2015;16(5):751-758.
Kim SY, Park JE, Seo HJ, Lee YJ, Jang BH, Son HJ, et al. NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analysis for intervention. Seoul: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency; 2011. 271 p.
Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research of Methodology. 2003;3(25):1-13.
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011;155(8):529-536.
Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York, NY: Wiley, John and Sons; 2003. 336 p.
Redshaw M, Martin CR. Validation of a perceptions of care adjective checklist. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2009;15(2):281-288.
Sandin Bojo AK, Hall-Lord ML, Axelsson O, Uden G, Wilde Larsson B. Midwifery care: Development of an instrument to measure quality based on the World Health Organization's classification of care in normal birth. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2004;13(1):75-83.
Cavalho EMP, Gottems LBD, Pires MRGM. Adherence to best care practices in normal birth: Construction and validation of an instrument. Journal of School of Nursing. 2015;49(6):889-897.
Fleming SE, Donovan-Batson C, Burduli E, Barbosa-Leiker C, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Birth Satisfaction Scale/Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS/BSS-R): A large scale United States planned home birth and birth center survey. Midwifery. 2016;41:9-15.
Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2014;30(6):610-619.
World Health Organization. Maternal and Newborn Health/Safe Motherhood Unit. Care in normal birth: A practical guide. Geneva: WHO; 1996. 53 p.
Simbar M, Ghafari F, Zahrani ST, Majd HA. Assessment of quality of midwifery care in labour and delivery wards of selected Kordestan Medical Science University hospital. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2009;22(3):266-277.
Gungor I, Beji NK. Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and cesarean birth. Midwifery. 2012;28(3):348-357.
Lavender T, Wallymahmed AH, Walkinshaw SA. Managing labor using partograms with different action lines: A prospective study of women's view. Birth. 1999;26(2):89-96.
Park KH, Lee SH, Jin BK, Won JS. The effects of labor support behavior (LBS) one-to-one application and partner's delivery participation on the delivery satisfaction and delivery results among mothers who delivered premature birth and low weight infant. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2011;17(2):239-250.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.