본 연구의 목적은 국내외 문헌정보학 학술지들에서 나타나는 협업 범위를 저자수를 이용하여 측정하고 비교하는데 있다. 연구에 필요한 데이터세트를 위해, 2010-2016년도에 발간된 논문으로서 문헌정보분야와 관련된 국외학술지중 Scimago Journal Rank (SJR)에 기재된 최상위권 30개와 4개의 국내 문헌정보분야와 관련된 학술지를 선택하였다. 국내 학술지 저자 정보들은 RISS 데이터베이스에서 수집하였고 국외학술지 저자 정보들은 Scopus 데이터베이스를 사용하여 수집하였다. 연구결과 학술지의 경우 문헌정보 학술지에서는 단독저자부터 3인 공저자 까지가 가장 흔한 저자협업 정보임을 보여주었다. 국외 학술지는 저자협업이 국내학술지보다 더 다수의 경우가 많았다. 특별히, 국내의 경우 단독저자가 가장 흔했는데 국외 학술지에서는 2인 공저가 가장 흔했다. 연구분야를 살펴보면 도서관 관련 분야에서는 단독저자가 가장 흔하였고 과학/기술 분야는 3인 공저가 가장 흔하였다. 결론적으로 문헌정보학 분야에서는 연구분야의 다양성으로 인해 저자수도 상당히 다양해 질 수 있음을 제시하고 있다.
본 연구의 목적은 국내외 문헌정보학 학술지들에서 나타나는 협업 범위를 저자수를 이용하여 측정하고 비교하는데 있다. 연구에 필요한 데이터세트를 위해, 2010-2016년도에 발간된 논문으로서 문헌정보분야와 관련된 국외학술지중 Scimago Journal Rank (SJR)에 기재된 최상위권 30개와 4개의 국내 문헌정보분야와 관련된 학술지를 선택하였다. 국내 학술지 저자 정보들은 RISS 데이터베이스에서 수집하였고 국외학술지 저자 정보들은 Scopus 데이터베이스를 사용하여 수집하였다. 연구결과 학술지의 경우 문헌정보 학술지에서는 단독저자부터 3인 공저자 까지가 가장 흔한 저자협업 정보임을 보여주었다. 국외 학술지는 저자협업이 국내학술지보다 더 다수의 경우가 많았다. 특별히, 국내의 경우 단독저자가 가장 흔했는데 국외 학술지에서는 2인 공저가 가장 흔했다. 연구분야를 살펴보면 도서관 관련 분야에서는 단독저자가 가장 흔하였고 과학/기술 분야는 3인 공저가 가장 흔하였다. 결론적으로 문헌정보학 분야에서는 연구분야의 다양성으로 인해 저자수도 상당히 다양해 질 수 있음을 제시하고 있다.
The purpose of this study is to measure the extent of collaboration by comparing team size patterns of Korean LIS journals with international LIS journals. For the sample dataset, the top 30 ranked international journals in the field of LIS were selected using the Scimago Journal Rank (SJR), and 4 K...
The purpose of this study is to measure the extent of collaboration by comparing team size patterns of Korean LIS journals with international LIS journals. For the sample dataset, the top 30 ranked international journals in the field of LIS were selected using the Scimago Journal Rank (SJR), and 4 Korean LIS journals were selected for the years between 2010-2016. The size of the team who authored Korean journal articles were collected from the RISS database, while the size of team who authored international journal articles from the top LIS journals were collected using the Scopus database. The result of this study shows that the most common team size ranged from one member team to three member teams. Overall, the collaborative team size in international journals was higher than Korean journals. In particular, one member team was the most common team size in Korean journals, whereas two members team was most common in the international journals. At the subject level, the most common team size was one team member in the subject area of Library Related, while the most common team size was three team members in the subject area of Science/Engineering. The result of this study suggests that within LIS, the size of teams may vary considerably due to differences in subject areas.
The purpose of this study is to measure the extent of collaboration by comparing team size patterns of Korean LIS journals with international LIS journals. For the sample dataset, the top 30 ranked international journals in the field of LIS were selected using the Scimago Journal Rank (SJR), and 4 Korean LIS journals were selected for the years between 2010-2016. The size of the team who authored Korean journal articles were collected from the RISS database, while the size of team who authored international journal articles from the top LIS journals were collected using the Scopus database. The result of this study shows that the most common team size ranged from one member team to three member teams. Overall, the collaborative team size in international journals was higher than Korean journals. In particular, one member team was the most common team size in Korean journals, whereas two members team was most common in the international journals. At the subject level, the most common team size was one team member in the subject area of Library Related, while the most common team size was three team members in the subject area of Science/Engineering. The result of this study suggests that within LIS, the size of teams may vary considerably due to differences in subject areas.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
문제 정의
To this end, the aim of this study is to investigate collaboration characteristics in the production of Korean and international LIS journal articles. This study will compare the team size of journal articles of Korean and international LIS journals at various levels: journal level, macro level (i.
제안 방법
This study extends the previous studies in this regard by focusing on comparing the team size at a macro level. In this study, an attempt was made to investigate the characteristics of team size in relation to varying subject areas using a much larger number of LIS international journals than in previous studies.
As shown in Table 3, the top 30 ranked international journals were sampled using the Scimago Journal Rank (SJR). Instead of using a random sample of international LIS journals, a decision was made to select a reasonable subset of the top LIS journals that were indexed and ranked by SJR. Since SJR ranks the journals according to the journal's influence, selecting the top 30 ensured the highest quality.
Moreover, while there have been studies that examined team sizes in LIS, no previous studies have been conducted to compare the collaboration pattern at the macro level; that is, the team member sizes of Korean LIS journal articles being compared to the team member sizes of international LIS journal articles. This study extends the previous studies in this regard by focusing on comparing the team size at a macro level. In this study, an attempt was made to investigate the characteristics of team size in relation to varying subject areas using a much larger number of LIS international journals than in previous studies.
To this end, the aim of this study is to investigate collaboration characteristics in the production of Korean and international LIS journal articles. This study will compare the team size of journal articles of Korean and international LIS journals at various levels: journal level, macro level (i.e., Korean to international), and subject area level. By analyzing the team size patterns of journal articles, this journal article demonstrates a collaborative pattern of articles published in Korean journals and international journals.
대상 데이터
In particular, they found that in all of journals over 50% of published journal articles were produced by one member team in all of the journals. In spite of their useful findings, the study only included three domestic LIS journals.
As discussed earlier, the overall team sizes of journal articles in a discipline tends to evolve over the years. Since this study focused on revealing only recent team size pattern in LIS publications, the date of the publications was limited to the years between 2010 to 2016.
To conduct this study, a total of 4 Korean journals and 30 international journals were selected. As mentioned in the Introduction, these four Korean journals are considered as a mainstream core LIS journal.
후속연구
By analyzing the team size patterns of journal articles, this journal article demonstrates a collaborative pattern of articles published in Korean journals and international journals. By comparing the team size of LIS journal articles at various levels, this study intends to show where collaborations are commonly made and how collaborative patterns vary among LIS Korean and international journals.
참고문헌 (19)
Abrizah, et al. 2013. "LIS Journals Scientific Impact and Subject Categorization: A Comparison Between Web of Science and Scopus." Scientometrics, 94(2): 721-740.
Franceschet, Massimo and Antonio Costantini. 2010. "The Effect of Scholar Collaboration on Impact and Quality of Academic Papers." Journal of informetrics, 4(4): 540-553.
Gazni, Ali, Cassidy R. Sugimoto and Fereshteh Didegah. 2012. "Mapping World Scientific Collaboration: Authors, Institutions, and Countries." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2): 323-335.
Grossman, Jerrold W. 2002. "Patterns of Collaboration in Mathematical Research." SIAM News, 35(9): 8-9.
Han, Pu et al. 2014. "International Collaboration in LIS: Global Trends and Networks at the Country and Institution Level." Scientometrics, 98(1): 53-72.
Hart, Richard L. 2007. "Collaboration and Article Quality in the Literature of Academic Librarianship." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2): 190-195.
Kim, Eungi. 2017. "A Comparative Analysis on Keywords of International and Korean Journals in Library and Information Science." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(1): 207-225.
Laudel, Grit. 2002. "What Do We Measure By Co-Team Sizes?." Research Evaluation, 11(1): 3-15.
Mani, K. Thavamani. 2014. "Authorship Patterns and Collaborative Research in Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 1996-2012." Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1.
Manton, Edgar J. and Donald E. English. 2007. "The Trend Toward Multiple Authorship in Business Journals." Journal of Education for Business, 82(3): 164-168.
Milojevic, Stasa and Loet Leydesdorff. 2013. "Information Metrics (iMetrics): A Research Specialty with a Socio-Cognitive Identity?." Scientometrics, 95(1): 141-157.
Milojevic, Stasa. 2014. "Principles of Scientific Research Team Formation and Evolution." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(11): 3984-3989.
Petersen, Alexander M., Loannis Pavlidis and Loanna Semendeferi. 2014. "A Quantitative Perspective on Ethics in Large Team Science." Science and Engineering Ethics, (20)4: 923-945.
Seo, Eun-Gyoung et al. 2015. "Informetric Analysis of Research Trends in The Journal of Korean Biblio Society for Library and Information Science." Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science, (26)3: 315-343.
Sin, Sei-Ching Joanna. 2011. "International Coauthorship and Citation Impact: A Bibliometric Study of Six LIS Journals, 1980-2008." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, (62)9: 1770-1783.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.