최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기감성과학 = Science of emotion & sensibility, v.20 no.3, 2017년, pp.151 - 168
이현주 (연세대학교 심리학과) , 한광희 (연세대학교 심리학과)
Current research aimed to demonstrate a way to enhance the aesthetic experience of the general public while appreciating contemporary art via online platform. Contemporary art is highly complicated and are avoided by the general public. Meanwhile, previous research confirmed that external informatio...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
기본적 시각 자극 분석 단계에는 어떤 요인이 포함되는가? | 처리 절차의 첫 번째 단계는 기본적 시각 자극 분석(perceptual analyses)이다. 이 단계에는 색 대비, 복잡도, 균형 등 단순 시지각 요인들의 포함된다(Reber, Schwarz, & Winkielman, 2004; Reber, Winkielman, & Schwarz, 1998). 두 번째 단계는 내재적 기억 요소와의 통합(implicit memory integration)이다. | |
오늘날의 미술의 특징은 무엇인가? | 근현대미술에 이르면 이러한 문제는 더욱 심각해진다. 오늘날의 미술은 예술(art)과 비예술(non-art)의 경계가 모호하고 작가 개개인의 스타일만 남은 극단적 다양성이 특징이다(Leder et al., 2004). | |
미학적 감상 경험은 무엇이라 정의되는가? | 연구자들에 따르면 사람들은 예술이라는 특수한 대상과 마주할 때 감정적 경험만 하는 것이 아니라 예술을 정의하고 분류하고 이해하기 위해서도 많은 노력을 기울인다. 즉, 미학적 감상 경험(aesthetic experience)이란 끊임없이 변화하는 정서적 반응과 인지적 처리 과정의 합이라고 정의된다(Leder, Belke, Oeberst, & Augustin, 2004). |
Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. London: Univ of California Press.
Belke, B., Leder, H., & Augustin, D. (2006). Mastering style. Effects of explicit style-related information, art knowledge and affective state on appreciation of abstract paintings. Psychology Science, 48(2), 115.
Belke, B., Leder, H., Harsanyi, G., & Carbon, C. C. (2010). When a Picasso is a "Picasso": The entry point in the identification of visual art. Acta Psychologica, 133(2), 191-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.007
Belke, B., Leder, H., Strobach, T., & Carbon, C. C. (2010). Cognitive fluency: High-level processing dynamics in art appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(4), 214. DOI: 10.1037/a0019648
Bentkowska-Kafel, A., Cashen, T., & Gardiner, H. (2005). Digital art history: A subject in transition (Vol. 1). Portland: Intellect Books.
Bourriaud, N., Pleasance, S., Woods, F., & Copeland, M. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Dijon: Les pressesdu reel.
Bourriaud, N., Schneider, C., & Herman, J. (2002). Postproduction: culture as screenplay: how art reprograms the world. New York: Lukas & Sternberg.
Bullot, N. J., & Reber, R. (2013). The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(2), 123-137. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12000489
Cela-Conde, C. J., Marty, G., Munar, E., Nadal, M., & Burges, L. (2002). The "style scheme" grounds perception of paintings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95(1), 91-100. DOI: 10.2466/pms.2002.95.1.91
Cleridou, K., & Furnham, A. (2014). Personality correlates of aesthetic preferences for art, architecture, and music. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 32(2), 231-255. DOI: 10.2190/EM.32.2.f
Cupchik, G. C., & Gebotys, R. J. (1988). The search for meaning in art: Interpretive styles and judgments of quality. Visual Arts Research, 14(2), 38-50.
Cupchik, G. C., & Laszlo, J. (1992). Emerging Visions of the Aesthetic Process: In Psychology, Semiology, and Philosophy. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cupchik, G. C., Shereck, L., & Spiegel, S. (1994). The effects of textual information on artistic communication. Visual Arts Research, 20(1), 62-78.
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
Feist, G. J., & Brady, T. R. (2004). Openness to experience, non-conformity, and the preference for abstract art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(1), 77-89. DOI: 10.2190/Y7CA-TBY6-V7LR-76GK
Foster, H. (2003). Arty Party. London Review of Books, 25(23), 21-22.
Franklin, M. B. (1988). "Museum of the Mind": An Inquiry Into the Titling of Artworks. Metaphor and Symbol, 3(1), 157-174. DOI: 10.1207/s15327868ms0303_4
Franklin, M. B., Becklen, R. C., & Doyle, C. L. (1993). The influence of titles on how paintings are seen. Leonardo, 26(2), 103-108. DOI: 10.2307/1575894
Fried, M. (2003). Art and objecthood. Auslander Prformance, 165-87.
Furnham, A., & Walker, J. (2001). Personality and judgements of abstract, pop art, and representational paintings. European Journal of Personality, 15(1), 57-72. DOI: 10.1002/per.340
Gartus, A., & Leder, H. (2014). The white cube of the museum versus the gray cube of the street: The role of context in aesthetic evaluations. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 311. DOI: 10.1037/a0036847
Gilmore, J. (2013). Normative and scientific approaches to the understanding and evaluation of art. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(2), 144-145. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12001641
Hager, M., Hagemann, D., Danner, D., & Schankin, A. (2012). Assessing aesthetic appreciation of visual artworks-The construction of the Art Reception Survey (ARS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 320. DOI: 10.1037/a0028776
Hartley, J., & Homa, D. (1981). Abstraction of stylistic concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7(1), 33. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.7.1.33
Hekkert, P., & van Wieringen, P. C. (1996). The impact of level of expertise on the evaluation of original and altered versions of post-impressionistic paintings. Acta psychologica, 94(2), 117-131. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00055-0
Hodge, S. (2012). Why your five year old could not have done that: Modern art explained. UK: Thames & Hudson.
Jakesch, M., & Leder, H. (2009). Finding meaning in art: Preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(11), 2105-2112. DOI: 10.1080/17470210903038974
Jucker, J. L., & Barrett, J. L. (2011). Cognitive constraints on the visual arts: an empirical study of the role of perceived intentions in appreciation judgements. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 11(1), 115-136. DOI: 10.1163/156853711X568716
Jucker, J. L., Barrett, J. L., & Wlodarski, R. (2014). “I Just Don'T Get it”: Perceived Artists' Intentions Affect Art Evaluations. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 32(2), 149-182. DOI: 10.2190/EM.32.2.c
Koo, B. (2009). The appreciation and experience of digital images-Critical review of use of digital images in museum environment. Art Education Review, 34, 1-29.
Krauss, R. (2009). The Guarantee of the Medium, In Tiina Arpee (Ed), Writing in Context: French Literature, Theory and The Avant-Gardes (pp. 139-145). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Krauss, R. E. (1999). Reinventing the medium. Critical Inquiry, 25(2), 289-305. DOI: 10.1086/448921
Lauring, J. O., Pelowski, M., Forster, M., Gondan, M., Ptito, M., & Kupers, R. (2016). Well, if they like it... Effects of social groups' ratings and price information on the appreciation of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(3), 344. DOI: 10.1037/aca0000063
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489-508. DOI: 10.1348/0007126042369811
Leder, H., Carbon, C. C., & Ripsas, A. L. (2006). Entitlin g art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121(2), 176-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005
Lester, P. (2006). Is the virtual exhibition the natural successor to the physical? Journal of the Society of Archivists, 27(1), 85-101. DOI: 10.1080/00039810600691304
Levinson, J. (1985). Titles. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 44(1), 29-39. DOI: 10.2307/430537
Locher, P., Overbeeke, K., & Wensveen, S. (2010). Aesthetic interaction: A framework. Design Issues, 26(2), 70-79.
Maffei, L., & Fiorentini, A. (1995). Arte e Cervello.[Art and Brain]. Bologna: Zanichelli.
Martindale, C. (1984). The pleasures of thought: A theory of cognitive hedonics. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5(1), 49-80.
Martindale, C., & Moore, K. (1988). Priming, prototypica lity, and preference. Journal of Experimental Psycho logy: Human Perception and Performance, 14(4), 661. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.14.4.661
Maslow, A. H. (1937). The influence of familiarization on preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21(2), 162. DOI: 10.1037/h0053692
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258
Millis, K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: the influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1(3), 320. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.320
Neperud, R. W. (1986). The relationship of art training and sex differences to aesthetic valuing. Visual Arts Research, 12(2), 1-9.
Parsons, M. J. (1987). How we understand art: A cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45-48. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00008
Roseman, I., & Evdokas, A. (2004). Appraisals cause experienced emotions: Experimental evidence. Cognition and Emotion, 18(1), 1-28. DOI: 10.1080/02699930244000390
Russell, P. A. (2003). Effort after meaning and the hedoni c value of paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 99-110. DOI: 10.1348/000712603762842138
Russell, P. A., & Milne, S. (1997). Meaningfulness and hedonic value of paintings: Effects of titles. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 15(1), 61-73. DOI: 10.2190/EHT3-HWVM-52CB-8QHJ
Schimmel, K., & Forster, J. (2008). How temporal distance changes novices' attitudes towards unconventional arts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(1), 53. DOI: 10.1037/1931-3896.2.1.53
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
Silvia, P. J. (2005). What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion, 5(1), 89. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.89
Silvia, P. J. (2012). Human emotions and aesthetic experience: An overview of empirical aesthetics. In A. P. Shimamura & S. E. Palmer (Eds.), Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience (pp. 250-275). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Smith, J. K., & Smith, L. F. (2001). Spending time on art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19(2), 229-236. DOI: 10.2190/5MQM-59JH-X21R-JN5J
Smith, L. F., Bousquet, S. G., Chang, G., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Effects of time and information on percep tion of art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 24(2), 229-242. DOI: 10.2190/DJM0-QBDW-03V7-BLRM
Specht, S. M. (2010). Artists' statements can influence perceptions of artwork. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(2), 193-206. DOI: 10.2190/EM.28.2.e
Temme, J. E. V. (1992). Amount and kind of information in museums: Its effects on visitors satisfaction and appreciation of art. Visual Arts Research, 28-36.
Viralingam, N., & Ramaiah, C. (2008). Comparative study of HTML and animated user interfaces of an online exhibition. Journal of Library and Information Technology, 28(4), 43-54.
Wang, N., & Shen, X. (2013). The research on interactive exhibition technology of digital museum resources. Green Computing and Communications (GreenCo m), 2013 IEEE and Internet of Things (iThings/CPS Com), IEEE International Conference on and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing. IEEE, 2013 (pp. 2070-2070). DOI: 10.1109/GreenCom-iThings-CPSCom.2013.387
Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989
Winston, A. S., & Cupchik, G. C. (1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art by naive and experienced viewers. Visual Arts Research, 18(2), 1-14.
Yenawine, P. (1991). How to look at modern art. New York: HN Abrams.
Yoon, Y., & Lee, S. (2016). Does the preference for emotional paintings depends on personality? Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 19(3), 15-26. DOI: 10.14695/KJSOS.2016.19.3.15
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1. DOI: 10.1037/h0025848
Zorich, D. (2015). Report of the summit on digital curation in art museums. Johns Hopkins University, October.(http://advanced.jhu.edu/academics/certific ate-programs/digital-curation-certificate/program-resources/)
Zuckerman, M., Ulrich, R. S., & McLaughlin, J. (1993). Sensation seeking and reactions to nature paintings. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(5), 563-576. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90340-9
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.