$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

문제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 초등학생들의 협력적 발화 특성 분석
Analysis of Collaborative Utterances among Elementary Students in Problem-Solving Process 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series A. The Mathematical Education, v.57 no.3, 2018년, pp.271 - 287  

이보람 (서울강솔초등학교) ,  박만구 (서울교육대학교)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This is a case study that defined collaborative utterances and analyzed how they appear in the problem-solving process when 5th-grade students solved problems in groups. As a result, collaborative utterances consist of an interchange type and a deliver type and the interchange type is comprised of t...

주제어

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Baer, J. (2003). Grouping and achievement in cooperative learning. College Teaching 51(4), 169-174. 

  2. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 9(4), 403-436. 

  3. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12(3), 307-359. 

  4. Chiu, M. M. (2000). Group problem­solving processes: Social interactions and individual actions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30(1), 26-49. 

  5. Chiu, M. M. (2008). Flowing toward correct contributions during group problem solving: A statistical discourse analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 17(3), 415-463. 

  6. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M. J., Blaye, A. & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and Machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford: Elsevier. 

  7. Erkens, G. (2004). Dynamics of coordination in collaboration. In van der Linden J. & Renshaw P. (Eds.), Dialogic learning (pp. 191-216). Dordrecht: Springer. 

  8. Fawcett, L. M. (2002). The effect of peer collaboration on children's probl em­solving ability. Retrieved on August 20, 2017 from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/these_hons/921 

  9. Forman, E. A. & Cazden, C. B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: the cognitive value of peer interaction. In Wertsch, J. V. (Eds.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 323-347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

  10. Hersberger, J. (1995). On my mind: cooperative groups can and often should be homogeneous. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 1(6), 436-438. 

  11. Johnson, D. W., Skon, L. & Johnson, R. (1980). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic conditions on children’s problem-solving performance. American Educational Research Journal 17(1), 83-93. 

  12. Kim, S. J., Cha, J. E. & Oh, J. H. (2011). Utterance factors and utterance type. Korean Semantics, 36, 91-118. 

  13. Kong, H. J. & Shin, H. K. (2005). An analysis of communication means in the elementary mathematical small group cooperative learning. Journal of Korea Society of Mathematics Education 9(2), 181-200. 

  14. Kumpulainen, K. & Kaartinen, S. (2003). The interpersonal dynamics of collaborative reasoning in peer interactive dyads. The Journal of Experimental Education 71(4), 333-370. 

  15. Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2016). The social construction of authority among peers and its implications for collaborative mathematics problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 18(2), 107-124. 

  16. Lee, M. H. & Park, Y. H. (2004). Analysis for the influence of cooperative learning in small-group on children’s mathematics learning. A: The Mathematical Education 43(1), 51-74. 

  17. Maienschein, J. (1993). Why collaborate?. Journal of the History of Biology 26(2), 167-183. 

  18. Ministry of Education. (2015). Mathematics curriculum.. Ministry of Education Notice, No. 2015-74. 

  19. Mugny, G. & Doise, W. (1978). Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology 8(2), 181-192. 

  20. Norris-Tirrell, D. (2012). Introduction: Assessing multiple dimensions of collaboration. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration 35(1), 4-10. 

  21. OECD. (2013). PISA 2015 draft collaborative problem solving framework. Retrieved on May 2, 2016 from http://search.oecd.org/callsfortenders/Annex%20ID_PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf 

  22. Panitz, T. (1999). Collaborative versus cooperative learning: A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. Retrieved on March 29, 2017 from https://eric.ed.gov/?idED448443 

  23. Partnership for 21st century skills. (2009). P21 framework definition. Retrieved on April 14, 2017 from http://www.p21.org/ storage/ documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf 

  24. Piaget, J. (2005). Language and thought of the child: Selected works (Vol 5). London: Routledge. 

  25. Roschelle, J. & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In O'Malley C. (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning. NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences) , (vol 128, pp. 69-97). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 

  26. Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y. & Biezuner, S. (2000). Two wrongs may make a right. If they argue together!. Cognition and Instruction 18(4), 461-494. 

  27. Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research 50(2), 315-342. 

  28. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Cooperative learning and group contingencies. Journal of Behavioral Education 1(1), 105-115. 

  29. Stevens, R. J. & Slavin, R. E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students' achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal 32(2), 321-351. 

  30. Summers, M. & Volet, S. (2010). Group work does not necessarily equal collaborative learning: evidence from observations and self-reports. European Journal of Psychology of Education 25(4), 473-492. 

  31. Van Boxtel, C. (2004). Studying peer interaction from three perspectives. In van der Linden J., Renshaw P. (Eds), Dialogic learning (pp. 125-143). Dordrecht: Springer. 

  32. Verba, M. & Winnykamen, F. (1992). Expert-novice interactions: Influence of partner status. European Journal of Psychology of Education 7(1), 61. 

  33. Vygotsky, L. S. (2009). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. (Translated by Jung, H. W.) Seoul: Hagisiseup. (original edition in 1978) 

  34. Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research 52(3), 421-445. 

  35. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., Chizhik, A. W., & Sugrue, B. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal 35(4), 607-651. 

  36. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22(5), 366-389. 

  37. Wood, D. J. & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27(2), 139-162. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로