$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

학생의 수학 수업에 대한 인식과 수학적 태도의 관계 분석: 자기효능감의 매개를 중심으로
The Relationship Between Students' Perception Toward Mathematics Teachers' Instructional Practices and Attitude toward Mathematics: A Mediation Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs 원문보기

한국초등수학교육학회지 = Journal of elementary mathematics education in Korea, v.23 no.4, 2019년, pp.383 - 403  

황성환 (Seoul Gaju Elementary School)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구는 수학 수업의 중요성을 인식하면서, 교사의 수업에 대한 학생들의 인식이 학생들의 수학적 태도에 미치는 직접효과와 자기효능감매개효과를 분석하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 TIMSS 2015에 참여한 4669명의 초등학교 4학년 자료를 탐색적 요인분석과 확인적 요인분석을 통해 변수들 간의 관계를 탐색하고, 구조방정식을 통해 잠재변인간의 관계를 분석하였다. 분석결과, 학생들이 교사의 수학 수업을 긍정적으로 인식할 때, 학생들은 수학에 대한 긍정적인 태도를 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 학생들의 수학에 대한 자기효능감이 교사의 수업에 대한 학생들의 인식과 학생들의 수학적 태도 사이의 관계를 매개함이 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과를 바탕으로 실질적인 그리고 방법론적인 시사점과 후속 연구의 방향을 제안하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of this study was to examine how students' perception of their mathematics teachers' instructional practices is associated with students' attitude toward mathematics, taking into account their self-efficacy in mathematics. The sample contained 4669 Korean fourth graders who participated ...

주제어

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Ampadu, E. (2012). Students' perceptions of their teachers' teaching of mathematics: The case of Ghana. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 351-358. 

  2. Arthur, W. Jr., Tubre, T., Paul, D. S., & Edens, P. S. (2003). Teaching effectiveness: The relationship between reaction and learning evaluation criteria. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 275-285. 

  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. 

  4. Bandura, A. (1996). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. 

  5. Borko, H., Stecher, B. M., Alonzo, A. C., Moncure, S., & McClam, S. (2005). Artifact packages for characterizing classroom practice: A pilot study. Educational Assessment, 10(2), 73-104. 

  6. Carpenter, T., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 

  7. Cheema, J. R., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Influences of disciplinary classroom climate on high school student self-efficacy and mathematics achievement: A look at gender and racial-ethnic differences. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1261-1279. 

  8. Clarke, D., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (2006). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider's perspective. Rotterdam: Sense publishers. 

  9. De Jong, R., & Westerhof, K. J. (2001). The quality of student ratings of teacher behaviour. Learning Environments Research, 4(1), 51-85. 

  10. Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). 'Me and maths': Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students' narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 27-48. 

  11. Eshun, B. (2004). Sex-differences in attitude of students towards mathematics in secondary schools. Mathematics Connection, 4(1), 1-13. 

  12. Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 56-83. 

  13. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324-326. 

  14. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill New York. 

  15. Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225-256). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 

  16. Hannula, M. S. (2002). Attitude towards mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 25-46. 

  17. Hannula, M. S., Di Martino, P., Pantziara, M., Zhang, Q., Morselli, F., Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Lutavac, S., Kaasila, R., Middleton, J.A., Jansen, A., & Goldin, G.A. (2016). Attitudes, beliefs, motivation and identity in mathematics education. An overview of the field and future directions. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer 

  18. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. 

  19. Hwang, S. H (2018). Teachers' beliefs, classroom norms and discourse, and equity in mathematics classrooms. Journal of Korean Society of Mathematics Education. Series C: Education of Primary School Mathematics, 21(2), 163-192. 

  20. Ifamuyiwa, S. A., & Akinsola, M. K. (2008). Improving senior secondary school students' attitude towards mathematics through self and cooperative-instructional strategies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(5), 569-585. 

  21. Jennison, M., & Beswick, K. (2010). Student attitude, student understanding and mathematics anxiety. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Fremantle, Western Australia. 

  22. Kundu, A., & Ghose, A. (2016). The relationship between attitude and self-efficacy in mathematics among higher secondary students. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 21(4), 25-31. 

  23. Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P., Panayiotou, A., Vanlaar, G., Pfeifer, M., Cankar, G., & McMahon, L. (2014). Using student ratings to measure quality of teaching in six European countries. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 125-143. 

  24. Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26-47. 

  25. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., & Hooper, M. (2016). Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). 

  26. Mayer, D. P. (1999). Measuring instructional practice: Can policymakers trust survey data? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 29-45. 

  27. McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575-596). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc. 

  28. Mulhern, F., & Rae, G. (1998). Development of a shortened form of the Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(2), 295-306. 

  29. Munter, C. (2014). Developing visions of high-quality mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(5), 584-635. 

  30. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2017). Mplus user's guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA 

  31. Nicolaidou, M., & Philippou, G. (2003). Attitudes towards mathematics, self-efficacy and achievement in problem solving. European Research in Mathematics Education III. Pisa: University of Pisa, 1-11. 

  32. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. 

  33. Papanastasiou, C. (2008). A residual analysis of effective schools and effective teaching in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(1), 24-30. 

  34. Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers' beliefs and affect. In Frank K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257-315). Charlotte, NC: NCTM. 

  35. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them? A story of research and practice, productively intertwined. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 404-412. 

  36. Shimizu, Y. (2006). Discrepancies in perceptions of mathematics lessons between the teacher and the students in a Japanese classroom. In D. Clarke, C. Keitel, & Y. Shimizu (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms in 12 countries: The insider's perspective (pp. 183-194). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. 

  37. Shin, D. R., Wang, K. S., & Kim, K. H. (2007). The effects of teaching and learning methods of mathematics utilizing to writing and corrective feedback on academic achievement and sense of self-efficacy. The Korean Association for Educational Methodology Studies, 19, 1-20. 

  38. Shin, H. Y. & Lee, J. E (2004). A study on the relationship between mathematics teachers' knowledge and teaching practice. Journal of Korean Society of Mathematics Education. Series A: The Mathematical Education, 43(3), 257-273. 

  39. Shiomi, K. (1992). Association of attitude toward mathematics with self-efficacy, causal attribution, and personality traits. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75(2), 563-567. 

  40. Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2007). Increasing student mathematics self-efficacy through teacher training. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(2), 278-312. 

  41. Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1-27. 

  42. Tapia, M., & Marsh, G. E. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 16-22. 

  43. Vandecandelaere, M., Speybroeck, S., Vanlaar, G., De Fraine, B., & Van Damme, J. (2012). Learning environment and students' mathematics attitude. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(3-4), 107-120. 

  44. Yoon, B. K., & Kim, S. Y. (2011). Effect of underachievers' mathematical communication with peers on their mathematical achievement and self-efficiency. The Korean Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 65-84. 

  45. Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 113-121. 

  46. Zimbardo, P. G., & Leippe, M. R. (1991). The psychology of attitude change and social influence. New York: McGraw Hill. 

  47. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로