최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기의학교육논단 = Korean medical education review, v.22 no.1, 2020년, pp.16 - 27
정한나 (연세대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실) , 전우택 (연세대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실) , 안신기 (연세대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실)
The accreditation process (AccP) is both an opportunity and a burden for medical schools-which one it becomes depends on how medical schools recognize and utilize the AccP. In other words, if a medical school recognizes the AccP only as a formal procedure or as a means for continuing medical educati...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
교육동맹이란? | 의학교육 평가인증에서 의과대학과 인증기관 간의 상호관계가 이처럼 중요하다는 점에서 의학교육 제공자이자 피평가자로서의 의과대학과 의학교육 평가자이자 피드백 제공자로서의 인증기관은 “교육동맹(educational alliance)”을 결성 하는 것으로 개념화할 수 있다. 교육동맹이란 의학교육에서 교육자와 훈련생 간의 피드백을 이해하고 탐구하기 위한 이론적 틀이다. 이는 심리치료(psychotherapy) 분야에서 발전한 “치료동맹(therapeutic alliance)”이라는 개념에서 기원하고 있다[15]. | |
의학교육 평가인증이 부담이면서 기회인 이유는 무엇인가? | 평가는 어떤 의무나 책임을 져야한다는 측면에서는 부담이 되지만, 앞으로 발전할 수 있는 가능성이 주어진다는 측면에서는 기회가 될 수 있기 때문이다. 의과대학이 평가받는 일도 마찬가지이다. 의과대학을 평가하는 방식이 인증의 형태로 발전하면서 그 부담은 더욱 가중되었지만, 다른 한편으로 인증은 의학교육의 질을 향상시킬 수 있는 “골드 스탠다드(gold standard)”로서 더 없이 좋은 기회가 되고 있다[1]. 많은 문헌에서는 평가인증이 교육과정을 개편하고, 교육프 로그램을 발전시킬 수 있는 기회임을 언급하고 있다[2-9]. | |
국제 인증기준의 한계점으로는 무엇이 있는가? | 이상과 같은 이점이 있는 반면, 국제 인증기준은 강력한 통제력으로 의과대학의 자율성을 침해할 수 있고, 의과대학이 최소한의 요구사항에만 집중하도록 하며, 인증기준을 따르고 순응하기만 하면서 기준 이외에 다른 시도를 하지 않는 위험이 따를 수 있다. 또한 국제 인증기준을 설정한다는 것은 특정 지역의 독특성이 인정되지 않을 수도 있어 지역 간에 두드러지는 차이가 무시될 수 있다. |
Gordon D, Karle H. The state of medical and health care education: a review and commentary on the Lancet Commission report. World Med Health Policy. 2012;4(1):1-18.
Blouin D, Tekian A, Kamin C, Harris IB. The impact of accreditation on medical schools' processes. Med Educ. 2018;52(2):182-91.
Schirlo C, Heusser R. Quality assurance of medical education: a case study from Switzerland. Neth J Med Educ. 2010;29(1):80-6.
Maccarrick G, Kelly C, Conroy R. Preparing for an institutional self review using the WFME standards: an international medical school case study. Med Teach. 2010;32(5):e227-32.
Tackett S, Zhang C, Nassery N, Caufield-Noll C, van Zanten M. Describing the evidence base for accreditation in undergraduate medical education internationally: a scoping review. Acad Med. 2019;94(12):1995-2008.
Abdalla ME. Social accountability of medical schools: do accreditation standards help promote the concept? J Case Stud Accredit Assess. 2014;3:1-12.
Sethi A, Javaid A. Accreditation system and standards for medical education in Pakistan: it's time we raise the bar. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33(6):1299-300.
Field MJ. Medical school accreditation in Australia: issues involved in assessing major changes and new programs. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2011;8:6.
Zhang Q, Lee L, Gruppen LD, Ba D. Medical education: changes and perspectives. Med Teach. 2013;35(8):621-7.
Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching [Internet]. New York (NY): The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1910 [cited 2019 Jan 10]. Available from: http://archive.carnegiefoundation.org/pdfs/elibrary/Carnegie_Flexner_Report.pdf.
Irby DM, Cooke M, O'Brien BC. Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med. 2010;85(2):220-7.
Paul S. The social transformation of American medicine. Lee JC, translator. Seoul: Korean Medical Association; 2012.
Abdalla ME. Accreditation in medical education: concepts and practice. Jazan: Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University; 2012.
Telio S, Regehr G, Ajjawi R. Feedback and the educational alliance: examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Med Educ. 2016;50(9):933-42.
Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The "educational alliance" as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(5):609-14.
van Zanten M, McKinley D, Durante Montiel I, Pijano CV. Medical education accreditation in Mexico and the Philippines: impact on student outcomes. Med Educ. 2012;46(6):586-92.
World Health Organization. Accreditation of medical education institutions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
Wall D. Evaluation: improving practice, influencing policy. In: Swanwick T, editor. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 336-51.
Boelen C, Woollard B. Social accountability and accreditation: a new frontier for educational institutions. Med Educ. 2009;43(9):887-94.
Mustafa Alsheikh GY. WHO/WFME guidelines for accreditation of basic medical education. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation. KIMEE is recognized by the World Federation of School Education (WFME) as an accreditation agency [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation; 2016 [cited 2020 Jan 10]. Available from: http://kimee.or.kr/news-and-events/press-release/?pageid2&moddocument&uid189.
Karle H. Global standards and accreditation in medical education: a view from the WFME. Acad Med. 2006;81(12 Suppl):S43-8.
The Executive Council, The World Federation for Medical Education. International standards in medical education: assessment and accreditation of medical schools' educational programmes: a WFME position paper. Med Educ. 1998;32(5):549-58.
Grant J, Marshall J, Gary N. Evaluation of the implementation in pilot sites of the World Federation for Medical Education's international standards. Milton Keynes: Open University Centre for Education in Medicine; 2004.
General Medical Council. Review of our quality assurance process [Internet]. London: General Medical Council; 2019 [cited 2019 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance -and-curricula/projects/review-of-our-quality-assurance-process.
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Guidelines for the planning and conduct of accreditation survey visits [Internet]. Washington (DC): Liaison Committee on Medical Education; 2019 [cited 2019 Jan 10]. Available from: https://lcme.org/wp-content/uploads/filebase/guide lines_and_procedures/2019-Guidelines-for-Planning-and-Conduct_2019-05-15.docx.
General Medical Council. Overview of proposed QA process [Internet]. London: General Medical Council [cited 2019 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/projects/review-of-our-quality-assurance-process/overview-of-proposed-qa-process.
The Academy of Korean Studies. Education policy [Internet]. Seongnam: Encyclopedia of Korean Culture; 2019 [cited 2019 Jan 10]. Available from: https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Contents/SearchNavi?keyword교육정책&ridx0&tot15.
Wirt F, Mitchell D, Marshall C. Culture and education policy: analyzing values in state policy systems. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1988;10(4):271-84.
Kim YI. Educational policy and its intrinsic value. J Korean Educ. 2001;28(1):283-301.
Jung HN. A study on the typological classification of private tutoring market using the latent class analysis [dissertaion]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2016.
World Federation for Medical Education. Basic medical education WFME global standards for quality improvement [Internet]. Ferney-Voltaire: World Federation for Medical Education; 2015 [cited 2019 Jan 10]. Available from: https://wfme.org/download/wfme-global-standardsfor-quality-improvement-bme/?wpdmdl831&refresh5e26a3650f70d1579590501%27;return%20false;%22%3EDownload%3C/a%3E%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%3C/div%3E%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%3C/div%3E%20%20%20%20%3C/div%3E%3C/div%3E%3C/div%3E.
Jeon WT. Accreditation in medical education. Proceedings of the 3rd Medical Education Evaluation Conference; 2019 Dec 3-4; Seoul, Korea. Seoul: Korean Society of Medical Education; 2019.
Geffen L, Cheng B, Field M, Zhao S, Walters T, Yang L. Medical school accreditation in China: a Sino-Australian collaboration. Med Teach. 2014;36(11):973-7.
Education Research Institute, Seoul National University. The dictionary of educational studies. Seoul: Education Research Institute, Seoul National University; 1994.
Committee on CDP2004 of Yonsei University College of Medicine. Curriculum development 2004 report. Seoul: Committee on CDP2004 of Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2002.
Education Plan Committee of Yonsei University College of Medicine. Curriculum development 2013 report. Seoul: Education Plan Committee of Yonsei University College of Medicine; 2012.
An S. A diachronic study of the curriculum development of the undergraduate medical education: based on the case of Yonsei University Medical College [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2018.
Barzansky B, Hunt D, Moineau G, Ahn D, Lai CW, Humphrey H, et al. Continuous quality improvement in an accreditation system for undergraduate medical education: benefits and challenges. Med Teach. 2015;37(11):1032-8.
Lilley PM, Harden RM. Standards and medical education. Med Teach. 2003;25(4):349-51.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.