참고문헌 (19)

1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airiasian, W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J. & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: Abridged edition. New York: Longman. 

2. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company. 

3. Churches, A. (2010). Bloom's digital taxonomy. Retrieved from http://burtonslifelearning.pbworks.com/f/BloomDigitalTaxonomy2001.pdf 

4. Coleman, M. & Smolkin L. (2011). Elementary teachers' use of graphical representations in science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 613-643. 

   상세보기

5. Cook, M. (2011). Teachers' use of visual representations in the science classroom. Science Education International, 22(3), 175-184. 

6. Eilam, B. & Gilbert, J. K. (2014). The significance of visual representations in the teaching of science. In Science teachers' use of visual representations (pp. 3-28). Springer International Publishing. 

7. Kim, O.-N. (2006). The comparative analysis of educational taxonomies in cognitive domain. The Korea Educational Review, 12(2), 165-189. 

8. Liu, Y., Won, M. & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Secondary biology teachers' use of different types of diagrams for different purposes. In Science teachers' use of visual representations (pp. 103-121). Springer International Publishing. 

9. Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 revised curriculum: Science. Seoul: Ministry of Education. 

10. Ozcelik, A. T. & McDonald, S. P. (2013). Preservice science teachers' uses of inscriptions in science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(7), 1103-1132. 

    상세보기

11. Parnafes, O. & Trachtenberg-Maslaton, R. (2014). Transformed instruction: Teaching in a student-generated representations learning environment. In Science teachers' use of visual representations (pp. 271-290). Springer International Publishing. 

12. Scheid, T., Mueller, A., Hettmannsperger, R. & Schnotz, W. (2013). Fostering the understanding of scientific experiments and phenomena through representational analysis tasks. In Constantinou, C. P., Papadouris, N. & Hadjigeorgiou, A. (eds), The Proceedings of 2013 European Science Education Research Association (pp. 102-108). Cyprus, Nicosia. 

13. Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F. & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605-631. 

    상세보기

14. Tytler, R., Prain, V., Aranda, G., Ferguson, J. & Gorur, R. (2019). Drawing to reason and learn in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(2), 209-231. 

15. Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P. & Waldrip, B. (2013). Constructing representations to learn in science. Sense publisher: Rotterdam. 

16. Yoon, H.-G. (2018). Development and validation of visual representation competence taxonomy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(2), 161-170. 

17. Yoon, H.-G. (2019). Analysis of elementary school students' visual representation competence for shadow phenomenon. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(2), 295-305. 

18. Yoon, H.-G., Jo, K. & Jho, H. (2017). Secondary teachers' perception about and actual use of visual representations in the teaching of electromagnetism. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(2), 253-262. 

19. Yoon, H.-G. & Park, J. (2018). Elementary school teachers' use of visual representations and their perceptions of the functions of visual representations. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 37(2), 219-231. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

윤혜경 (55)