최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기환경영향평가 = Journal of environmental impact assessment, v.29 no.3, 2020년, pp.182 - 197
This study investigated the home range and characteristics of activities to contribute to the improvement of management techniques and the successful promotion of management policies of invasive nutria, which is a representative invasive species of South Korea. Six individuals were captivated for th...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
뉴트리아의 서식이 과밀한 곳은 어떤 피해가 발생하는가? | 자연에 성공적으로 정착한 개체는 번식이 가능하여 서식지역 내에서 빠른 밀도 증식을 보이는데(Gosling et al. 1980a), 뉴트리아의 서식이 과밀한 지역에서는 생물다양성의 직접적인 손실과 토속종과의 서식지 경쟁, 농업 경제 작물의 손실, 배수시설의 훼손, 습지기능의 악화 등이 보고되기도 한다(Gosling 1974; Abbas 1988; Woods et al. 1992; Leblanc 1994; Carter et al. | |
뉴트리아의 생태학적 자료을 파악하기 위해 어떤 분석을 하였는가? | 이에 본 연구에서는 한국에 정착한 뉴트리아의 기초적인 행동특성을 파악하기 위해 원격무선추적을 이용하여 행동권과 이동, 활동성을 분석하였다. 이를 통해 그간 알려지지 않은 국내 환경에서의 뉴트리아 행동특성을 확인하고 관리에 필요한 관리구역 설정, 관리구역 내 유입과 확산 제어 방안의 마련, 효과적인 포획 시기 결정 등에 필요한 기초자료를 제공하고 자 했다. | |
침입외래생물은 어디에 부정적 영향을 끼치는가? | 산업화를 계기로 국가 간 교역이 급속히 확대된 이후 나타난 인적, 물적 자원의 교류 증가는 다양한 생물종의 대륙 간 이동을 촉진하였다(Levins & D’Antonio 2003; Hulme 2009). 본래의 서식지역을 벗어나 다양한 국가에 도입되어 정착한 생물종 가운데 생물다양성을 위협하는 침입외래생물은 새롭게 정착한 지역에서 생태계와 생물다양성 뿐 아니라, 사회, 경제, 문화적인 측면에 이르기까지 부정적인 영향을 지속적으로 나타낸다(Zietsman 2011). |
Abbas A. 1988. Impact du Ragondin (Myocastor coypus Molina) sur une Culture de Mais (Zea mays L.) dans le Marais Poitevin. Acta Oecol-Oec Appl. 9(2): 173-189.
Adams WH. 1956. The nutria in coastal Louisiana. Proceedings of the Louisiana Academy of Science. 14: 28-41.
Aliev FF. 1965. Growth and development of nutrias’ functional features. Fur Trade Journal of Canada. 42(11):2-3.
Aliev FF. 1966. Numerical Changes and the Population Structure of the Coypu (Myocastor coypus) in Different Countries. Saugetierkd Mitt. 15: 238-242.
Aliev FF. 1968. Contribution to the Study of Nutria- Migrations (Myocastor coypus). Saugetierkd Mitt. 16: 301-303.
ArcGIS Pro. Tool Reference. Available from: http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/toolreference/spatial-analyst/kernel-density.htm (accessed on 8 February 2017)
Bertolino S, Angelici C, Monaco E, Monaco A, Capizzi D. 2012. Interactions between Coypu (Myocastor coypus) and bird nests in three mediterranean wetlands of central Italy. Hystrix It. J. Mamm. 22: 333-339.
Borgnia M, Galante ML, Cassini MH. 2000. Diet of the Coypu (Nutria, Myocastor coypus) in Agro- Systems of Argentinean Pampas. J Wildl Manage. 64(2): 354-361.
Bounds DL. 2000. Nutria: An Invasive Species of National Concern. Wetland Journal. 12(3): 9-16.
Carter J, Foote AL, Johnson-Randall A. 1999. Modeling the effects of nutria (Myocastor coypus) on wetland loss. Wetlands. 19: 209-219.
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). 2014. "Global Biodiversity Outlook 4". midterm assessment of progress towards the implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. Montreal. p.155.
Chabreck RH, Love JR, Linscombe G. 1981. Foods and feeding habits of nutria in brackish marsh in Louisiana. Proceedings of the Worldwide Furbearers Conference. 1(1): 531-543.
Choi TY, Kwon H, Woo DG, Park CH. 2012. Habitat selection and management of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in a rural area of Korea. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 26(3): 322-332. [Korean Literature]
Cochran WW, Lord RDJr. 1963. A radiotracking system for wild animals. J. wildl. Mgmt. 27: 9-24.
Coreil PD, Perry HRJ. 1977. A collar for attaching radio transmitter to nutria. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference, Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 31: 254-258.
Coreil PD, Zwank PJ, Perry HRJ. 1988. Female nutria habitat use in the intermediate marsh zone of coastal Louisiana. In Proceedings of the Louisiana Academy of Science. 51: 21-30.
Denena MM, Manning RW, Simpson TR. 2003. Home range and movement of Nutria (Myocastor coypus) at Spring Lake in central Texas, with anecdotal comments on the American Beaver (Castor canadensis) of the same area. Museum of Texas Tech University.
Doncaster CP, Micol T. 1989. Annual Cycle of a Coypu (Myocastor coypus) Population: Male and Female Strategies. J. Zool. (London). 217: 227-240.
Ensing EP, Ciuit S, de Wijs FA, Lentferink DH, ten Hodt A, Boyce MS, Hut RA. 2014. GPS based daily activity patterns in European red deer and North American elk (Cervus elaphus): indication for a weak circadian clock in ungulates. PloS one 9.9: e106997.
Gitzen RA, Millspaugh JJ, Kernohan BJ. 2006. Bandwidth selection for fixed-kernel analysis of animal utilization distributions. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 70(5): 1334-1344.
Gosling LM. 1974. The Coypus in East Anglia. Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists’ Society. 23: 49-59.
Gosling LM. 1977. Coypu, The Handbook of British mammals, Second Edition, (G.B. Corbet and H.N. Southern, eds) 256-265. Blackwell Scientific Press. Oxford.
Gosling LM. 1979. The twenty-four hour active cycle captive coypus (Myocastor coypus). Journal of Zoology. 187: 341-367.
Gosling LM, Hudson LW, Addison GC. 1980a. Age Estimation of Coypus (Myocastor coypus) from Eye lens Weight. J Appl Ecol. 17: 641-648.
Gosling LM, Guyon GE, Wright KM. 1980b. Diurnal activity of feral coypus (Myocastor coypus) during the cold winter of 1978-9. Journal of Zoology. 192: 143-146.
Gosling LM, Baker SJ, Skinner JR. 1983. A Simulation Approach to Investigating the Response of a Coypu Population to Climatic Variation. Bull. OEPP. 13(2): 183-192.
Gosling LM, Baker SJ. 1989. Demographic consequences of differences in the ranging behaviour of male and female coypus. Mammals as pests. 155: 167.
Guichon ML, Doncaster CP, Cassini MH. 2003. Population Structure of Coypus (Myocastor coypus) in Their Region of Origin and Comparison with Introduced Populations. J. Zool. 261(3): 265-272.
Haramis GMi, White TS. 2011. A beaded collar for dual micro GPS/VHF transmitter attachment to nutria. Mammalia. 75(1): 79-82.
Harstad AS, Bunnell FL. 1979. Home range and body weight-a reevaluation. Ecology. 60: 389-402.
Hooven EF. 1973. A wildlife brief for the clearcut logging of Douglas-Fir. Journal of Forestry. 71: 210-214.
Hulme PE. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology. 46: 10-18.
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). 2019. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. https://ipbes.net/global-assessment (accessed on 6 January 2020)
Korea Environment Institute (KEI). 2006. The Study on the status of alien animals introduced in Korea and classification of ecological risk class. Sejong.
Kernohan BJ, Gitzen RA, Millspaugh JJ. 2001. Analysis of animal space use and movements. Academic Press. 125-166.
Kim BJ, Choi TY, Park CH, Kim YJ, Lee H. 2008. A brift report of the short-term home range study of a pair of Raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides koreensis) in a rural area of Gurye, Chonnam province, South Korea using radiotracking method. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 22(3): 230-240. [Korean Literature]
Kim P. 1980. The coypu (Myocastor coypus) in the Netherlands: reproduction, home range and manner of seeking food. Lutra. 23: 55-64.
Kim YC, Kim A, Lim J, Kim TS, Park SG, Kim M, Lee DH. 2019. Distribution and Management of Nutria (Myocastor coypus) Populations in South Korea. Sustainability. 11(15): 4169.
Korea Meteorological Administration. 2020. https://www.weather.go.kr/weather/climate/average_30years.jsp?yy_st2011&stn288&normY&obs0&x19&y11 (accessed on 15 May 2020)
LeBlanc DJ. 1994. Nutria. Prevention and Control of Wildlife damage. B71-B80.
Lee DH, Kil J, Yang BG. 2012. Ecological Characteristics for the Sustainable Management of Nutria (Myocastor coypus) in Korea. National Institute of Environmental Research. [Korean Literature]
Lee DH, Kil J, Kim DE. 2013a. The Study on the Distribution and Inhabiting Status of Nutria (Myocastor coypus) in Korea. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 27(3): 316-326. [Korean Literature]
Lee DH, Lee MS, Kim YC, Kim IR, Kim HK, Jeong DG, Lee JR, Kim JH. 2018. Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Invasive Semi-Aquatic Mammal, Nutria Myocastor coypus (Rodentia; Myocastoridae). Conserv Genet Resour. 10(4): 613-616.
Levins M, D'Antonio CM. 2003. Forcasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conservation Biology, 17(1): 322-326.
Lohmeier L. 1981. Home range, movements and population density of nutria on a Mississippi pond. J. Miss. Academy. Sci. 26: 50-54.
Lowery GH. 1974. The mammals of Louisiana and its adjacent waters. Louisiana State University Press. Baton Rouge.
Masters G, Norgrove L. 2010. Climate change and invasive alien species. CABI Working Paper 1, p.30.
McNeely JA, Mooney HA, Neville LE, Schei P, Waage JK. (eds.) 2001. A Global Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. IUCN Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK. x + p.50.
Ministry of Environment (ME). 2014. National Mid-Long Term Management Plan of Alien Species (2014-2018). Ministry of Environment. Sejong. [Korean Literature]
Ministry of Environment (ME). 2019. National Mid-Long Term Management Plan of Alien Species (2019-2023). Ministry of Environment. Sejong. [Korean Literature]
Merino SJ, Carter J, Thibodeaux G. 2007. Testing Tail-mounted Transmitters with Myocastor coypus (Nutria). Southeastern Naturalist, 6(1): 159-164.
Milholland MT, Shumate JP, Simpson TR, Manning RW. 2010. Nutria (Myocastor coypus) in Big Bend National Park; a non-native species in desert wetlands. Texas Journal of Science. 62(3): 205-222.F
Moinard C, Doncaster CP, Barre H. 1992. Indirect calorometry measurements of behavioral thermoregulation in a semiaquatic social rodent, Myocastor coypus. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 70: 907-911.
National Institute of Ecology (NIE). 2019. Monitoring of invasive alien species designated by the act on the conservation and use of biological diversity(VI). [Korean Literature]
Nolfo-Clements LE. 2009. Nutria survivorship, movement patterns, and home ranges. Southeastern Naturalist. 8(3): 399-410.
Nowak RM, Walker EP. 1999. Walker's Mammals of the World. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 812-813.
Paini DR, Sheppard AW, Cook DC, De Barro PJ, Worner SP, Thomas MB. 2016. Global threat to agriculture from invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113(27): 7575-7579.
Panzacchi M, Cocchi R, Genovesi P, Bertolino S. 2007. Population control of coypu (Myocastor coypus) in Italy compared to eradication in UK: a cost-benefit analysis. Wildl. Biol. 13: 159-172.
Reggiani G, Boitani L, D'antoni S, De Stefano R. 1993. Biology and control of the coypu in the Mediterranean area. Supplementi alle Ricerche di Biologia della Selvaggina. 21: 67-100.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD). 2014. Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada.
Sekercioglu CH, Loarie SR, BRENES FO, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC. 2007. Persistence of forest birds in the Costa Rican agricultural countryside. Conservation Biology. 21(2): 482-494.
Sherfy MH, Mollett TA, McGOWAN KR, Daugherty SL. 2006. A reexamination of age-related variation in body weight and morphometry of Maryland Nutria. Journal of Wildlife Management. 70(4): 1132-1141.
Sikes RS, Gannon WL. 2011. The animal care and use committee of the American Society of Mammalogists. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy. 92(1): 235-253.
Warkentin JM. 1968. Observations on the behaviour and ecology of nutria in Louisiana. Tulane studies in Zoology and Botany. 15: 10-17.
Willner GR, Dixon KR, Chapman JA. 1983. Age determination and mortality of the nutria (Myocastor coypus) in Maryland, U.S.A. Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde. 48: 19-34.
Woods CA, Howland EB. 1979. Adaptive Radiation of Capromyid Rodents: Anatomy of the Masticatory Apparatus. J. Mammal. 60: 95-116.
Woods CA, Contreras L, Willner-Chapman G, Whidden HP. 1992. Myocastor coypus. Mammalian Species. 398: 1.
Worton BJ. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilisation distribution in home-range studies. Ecology. 70: 164-168.
Yang DH, Kim BH, Jung DH, Jeong HD, Jeong WJ, Lee BG. 2008. The studies on characteristics of home range size and habitat use of the Asiatic black bear released in Jirisan. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology. 22(4): 427-434. [Korean Literature]
Yim YJ, Jeon ES. 1980. Distribution of Naturalized Plants in the Korean Peninsula. Journal of Plant Biology. 23: 69-83. [Korean Literature]
Zietsman L. 2011.Observations on Environmental Change in South Africas. SUN Press. 177p.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.