최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기정보교육학회논문지 = Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, v.24 no.2, 2020년, pp.177 - 188
엄우용 (계명대학교) , 이희명 (북삼초등학교) , 이성아 (금오공과대학교)
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between techno-stress perceived by elementary school teachers and related variables in a flipped learning environment. To achieve the purpose, the following research question have been established: First, what is the difference between techno...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
테크노스트레스란? | 테크노스트레스는 Technology와 Stress의 합성어이다. 테크노스트레스는 개인이나 조직이 새로운 테크놀로지에 대한 적응에 어려움을 경험할 때 발생한다[4]. | |
플립드러닝 수업 사례가 증가하는 이유는 무엇인가? | 학습자 중심 수업을 강조하는 구성주의 패러다임과 교수-학습용 테크놀로지 발달의 결합으로 최근 초등교육에서 플립드러닝(flipped leaning) 수업 사례가 증가하고 있다[6][35]. 플립드러닝에서 교사는 학습자에게 동영상 등의 사전학습 자료를 제공하고 학습자는 이를 활용하여 교실 이외의 환경에서 학습한 후 교실 수업에서 사전에 학습한 정보 및 지식, 기능을 확장하는 활동을 한다[7]. | |
교사가 테크노스트레스를 받는 주요 원인은 무엇인가? | 교사가 테크노스트레스를 경험하는 주요 원인은 다음과 같다[1][17][28]. 첫째, 테크놀로지 수업에 필요한 자료 설치 및 사용법 설명에 소요하는 시간이 많아 실제 수업 진행 시간이 부족할 때이다. 둘째, 수업 중에 발생하는 기술적인 오류 발생 상황에 대한 두려움이다. 셋째, 테크놀로지를 활용하여 수업을 하는 데 필요한 테크놀로지 교수내용지식(technological pedagogical and content knowledge, TPACK)이 부족하다. 넷째, 동료교사나 학교에서 테크놀로지를 활용하는 수업에 대한 인식이 부족하다. 다섯째, 테크놀로지 수업 운영에 대한 학교의 지원이 부족하다. 여섯째, 교사에게 수업 이외에 주어지는 많은 업무량이다. 즉, TPACK, 학교의 지원 여부가 교사의 테크노스트레스와 관계가 있음을 알 수 있다. |
Al-Fudail, M., & Mellar, H. (2008). Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1104-1110.
Archambault, L., & Cripper, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.
Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858.
Brod, C. (1982). Managing technostress: Optimizing the use of computer technology. Personnel Journal, 61(1), 753-757.
Baek, Y., Jung, J., & Kim, B. (2008). What makes teachers use of technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education, 50(1), 224-234.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Eom, W. (2014). What is a flipped classroom? Journal of Seoul Science Education, 12, 28-31.
Eom, W., Lee, H., & Lee, S. (2017). Analysis on the intention of acceptance and practical use in flipped learning by elementary school teachers. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 23(3), 549-578.
Ertmet, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-40.
Fives, H. (2003). Exploring the relationships of teachers' efficacy, knowledge and pedagogical beliefs: A multimethod study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, MD.
Go, J. (2006). The development of evaluation criteria for career services in universities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul.
Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627-643.
Hsu, S., & Kuan, P. Y. (2013). The impact of multilevel factors on technology integration: The case of Taiwanese grade 1-9 teachers and schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(1), 25-50.
Huang, Y. (1999). Teacher efficacy and factors associated with teacher efficacy of secondary occupational foodservice teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, OH.
Joo, Y., Lim, K., & Kim, H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers & Education, 95, 114-122.
Kwak, Y., Lee, S., Kang, H., Shin, Y., & Lee, S. (2019). Qualitative inquiry of features of science education leading schools on students’ positive experiences about science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 38(3), 317-330.
Kim, C., Kim, M., Lee, C., Spector, M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76-85.
Kiraz, E., & Odmir, D. (2006). The relationship between educational ideologies and technology acceptance in pre-service teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 152-165.
Knezek, J., & Christensen, R. (2008). The importance of information technology attitudes and competencies in primary and secondary education. In J. Voogt & J. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp 321-332). New York: Springer.
Ko, Y., & Shin, W. (2020). The importance of school for teachers’ technology integration. Journal of Educational Research Institute, 22(1), 21-42.
Lam, S., Cheng, R., & Choy, H. (2010). School support and teacher motivation to implement project-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 487-497.
Lee, H., & Min, C. (2016). A study of Secondary English teachers' perceptions of the flipped classroom. Secondary English Education, 9(3), 99-122.
Lee, S., & Eom, W. (2019). Development of learner evaluation instrument for an action learning based university class. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 69-105.
Lee, S., Lee, H., & Eom, W. (2018). Design principle of learning spaces for learner-centered learning: Focus on affordance. In Proceeding of the 16th International Conference for Media in Education (pp. 83-88), Cheongju, Korea.
Lim, B. (2012). Needs on digital textbook and its implications on the policy making. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 317-346.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Pamuk, S. (2012). Understanding preservice teachers’ technology use through TPACK framework. Compute Assisted Learning, 28(5), 425-439.
Park, T., & Cha, H. (2015). Investigation of teachers’ awareness of flipped classroom of explore its educational feasibility. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 18(1), 81-97.
Shin, W. (2011). Factors influencing elementary school teachers' ICT instruction. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 17(2), 239-260.
Shin, W. (2015). Teachers' use of technology and its influencing factors in Korean elementary schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(4), 461-476.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. American Educational Research Association, 15(2), 4-14.
Son, E.., Park, J., Im, I., Lim, Y., & Hong, S. (2015). Impact of flipped learning applied at a class on learning motivation of collage students. The Journal of Cognitive Enhancement and Intervention, 6(2), 97-117.
Song, Y. (2012). A grounded theory approach on teachers' digital textbook experience: overcoming the crisis of innovation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chungbuk National University, Chungbuk.
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress in role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328.
Tondeur, J., Braak, J, Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
Weil, M. M., & Rosen, L. D. (2007). A conversation with technostress authors. Retrieved April 1, 2019, from https://www.scribd.com/doc/138410041/A-Conversation-With-TechnoStress-Authors
해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.