최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기정보교육학회논문지 = Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, v.24 no.4, 2020년, pp.379 - 390
장원영 (교육부 교육과정정책과)
Recently, interest in online teaching·learning and evaluation tools has increased in the context of Covid-19. In order to use tools effectively, it is necessary to identify the structural influence and causal relationship between the learner's affective and cognitive variables. In this study,...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
자기효능감은 무엇인가? | 자기효능감(Self-efficacy)은 원하는 결과를 얻기 위해 요구되는 일련의 행동들을 조직화하고 실행할 수 있는 능력에 대한 개인의 자기 확신을 의미한다[6]. 특히, 학습자가 자신의 학업적 수행 능력에 대해 보이는 기대나 신념을 의미하는 학업적 자기효능감은 학습자의 지식 습득과 수행을 매개하는 중요한 변수로서[1], 학습자가 새로운 상황에서 새로운 지식과 기술을 학습하고 수행할 수 있도록 유도하는 원동력이 되며[7], 학습동기와 학업 성취에 직접적인 영향을 줄 뿐만 아니라[8][9][10], 노력의 유지, 장애 상황에서의 학업의 지속, 인지적 활동의 조절, 정서 반응 등을 통하여 학업 성취에 간접적인 영향을 미친다[11]. | |
논리적 사고의 하위요소는 무엇인가? | 논리적 사고력(Logical Thinking, 줄여서 LT)은 사상(event)들 간의 관계와 의미 등이 타당성이 확보되었는지, 모순은 없는지 등을 추리하고 분석하는 능력이다. 논리적 사고의 하위요소는 Piaget 이론에 기반을 둔 표준 논리 검사 요소인 계열화 논리, 비례 논리, 확률 논리, 변인 통제 논리, 조합 논리, 명제 논리 등 총 6가지가 있다[18]. | |
온라인 저지가 평가의 정확성과 객관성을 담보하는 것 외에 가지는 장점은? | 이러한 평가 도구로서의 유용성 외에도 온라인 저지는 장원영, 김성식(2014)[3], 김성식, 오소희, 정상수 (2018)[4], 심재권, 채정민(2018)[5]의 연구에서 보고한 것처럼 프로그래밍 성취도, 흥미나 만족, 몰입 등에 긍정적인 영향을 미치며 효과적인 프로그래밍 교수‧학습도구로서 유용하다고 보고 되고 있다. |
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prectice Hall.
You, J.W.(2011). The structural relationship among social factor, psychological mediators and motivational factor for enhancing learners' engagement. Doctoral thesis, Ewha Womans University.
Chang, W.Y., Kim, S.S.(2014). Development and Application of Algorithm Judging System: Analysis of Effects on Programming Learning. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 17(4), 45-57.
Shim, J,K., Chae, J.M.(2018). Develpment of On-line Judge System based on Bloick Programming Environment. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 21(4), 1-10.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, NY: W. H. Freemana and Company.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Schunk, D.H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
Zimmerman, B.J. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Ed.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 154-196). New York: Guilford Publications.
Bak, B.G., Jung, K.S., Kim, S.M., Lee, J.U. (2005). Development and Validation of a Complex Scale of Self-Regulated Learning: Focused on Integrating the Subscale of Motivation Regulation. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(2), 455-476.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Marks, H.M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity:Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37 (1), 153-184.
Park, J.Y. (2015). An Investigation of the Structural Relationships among Students' Characteristics, Flow, and Learning Effects in a SCRATCH Programming Course for Elementary School Students. Doctoral thesis, Ewha Womans University.
Kim, M.Y., Kim, M.J., Park, H.J., Koo, J.A. (2009). Investigating the Relationships among Prior knowledge, Cognitive Load, Flow, and Achievement. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 13(2), 369-391.
Park, S.I., Kim, Y.K. (2006). An Inquiry on the Relationships among Learning-Flow Factors, Flow Level, Achievement under On-line Learning Environment. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 14(1), 93-115.
Chae, Y.M., Cho, S.H., Kim, S.S. (2008). The Effect of a Programming WBI Based on the Flow Theoryon Flow Level and Academic Achievement. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 12(1), 15-22.
Lee, J.T., Lee, S.B. (2004). A Study on the Development and Verification of a Logical Thinking Ability Measuring Tool in Computer Programming Learning. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 7(4), 15-23.
Ministry of Education (2015). Software Education Operating Guide, Sejong: Ministry of Education in Korea.
ISTE & CSTA. (2011). Operational Definition of Compuatational Thinking for K-12 Eduction.
Choi, Y.H. (2001). The Relationships Between Children's Attribution Style and Learned Helpessness?Self-Efficacy. Master thesis, Korea National University of Education.
Sherer, M. & Maddux, J. E. (1982). The Self-Efficacy scale: construction and validation. Psychological Report, 51, 663-671
Jeong, T.H. (1987). A study on motivation determinants and effects of Out-Of-School learning time investment. Doctoral thesis, Korea University.
Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Optimal Experience: The Flow State Scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18, 17-35.
KERIS (2018). 2017 Software Eucation Effectiveness Measurement tool Development Research, Korea Education and Research Information Service Research Report CR 2017-8.
Lee, J.H. (2009). Analysis of the structural relationships among self-determination motivation to learn, metacognition, self-directed learning ability, learning flow, and school achievement. Doctoral thesis, Chungbuk National University.
Kim, J.U., Kim, H.E. (2012). The Relationship of Self-efficacy and Stress to Children s Learning Flow and Academic Achievement. Learner centered Curriculum and Instruction, 12(1), 97-118.
Park, K.S. (2015). Effect of self-determination motivation and self-efficacy on student engagement : the mediating effects of subjects interest. Master thesis, Ewha Womans University.
Han, S.J. (2018). The Effects of PBL-based App Programming Education on the Specialized High School Students' Learning Attitude and Computational Thinking. Doctoral thesis, Korea National University of Education
Kim, J.E. (2018). The Effects of Physical Computing-Based Programming Education on Computational Thinking, Learning Flow, and Recognition concerning SW. Master thesis. Ajou University.
West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structual equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies, In R. H. Hoyle(Ed), Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues, and applications, Thounsand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., and Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Noh, K.S, (2019). Statistical analysis of papers you know and use properly SPSS & AMOS. Seoul: Hanit Academy
Bae, B.Y. (2017). Structural equation modeling with Amos 24. Seoul: Book Publishing Cheonglam.
Malhotra N. K., Dash S. 2011)Malhotra, N. K., & Dash, S. (2011). Marketing Research an Applied Orientation. London: Pearson Publishing.
Woo, J.P. (2014). Structural equation model concepts and understanding. Seoul: Hannalae.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.