최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.40 no.5, 2020년, pp.515 - 529
백종호 (한국교육과정평가원) , 변태진 (한국교육과정평가원) , 이동원 (한국교육과정평가원) , 심현표 (한국교육과정평가원)
'Scientific inquiry experiments', which was newly created subjects in the 2015 revised curriculum, was expected in the aspect of learning science and developing core competences through science practices. Based on changed view of evaluation, assessments of a practice-centered subject 'Scientific inq...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
학교 교육에서 평가란? | 학교 교육에서 평가는 학생들이 교과 수업에서 설정한 목표에 얼마만큼 도달하였는지를 판단하고, 목표에 도달하기 위해서 어떠한 교육이 필요한지에 대한 정보를 제공받을 수 있다는 점에서 매우 중요한 요소이다. 그러나 평가는 성적이나 등급을 산출하는 기능 또한 담당하고 있기 때문에, 학교 현장에서 평가 본래의 목적이 희석되기 쉽고 이를 달성하기 위해서 교사들의 많은 노력이 요구되는 것이 현실이다. | |
과학 교육은 과학 탐구의 실천을 통해 무엇을 이해하고 신장시켜 나갈 수 있는가? | , 2014). 과학 탐구의 실천을 통해서 학생들은 과학 개념에 대해 이해할 수 있고(Fogleman, McNeill, & Krajcik, 2011), 과학적 사고 및 탐구 능력을 신장시켜 나갈 수 있다. 학생들의 과학 탐구 과정에서의 평가는 이러한 성장의 촉진제로서 기능할 수 있으며, 이를 위해 적절한 평가가 무엇이고 평가 실천의 방안을 탐색해 보는 것은 과학 교육 연구의 핵심적인 과제 중 하나로 볼 수 있다. | |
평가는 어떤 기능 또는 담당을 하고 있는가? | 학교 교육에서 평가는 학생들이 교과 수업에서 설정한 목표에 얼마만큼 도달하였는지를 판단하고, 목표에 도달하기 위해서 어떠한 교육이 필요한지에 대한 정보를 제공받을 수 있다는 점에서 매우 중요한 요소이다. 그러나 평가는 성적이나 등급을 산출하는 기능 또한 담당하고 있기 때문에, 학교 현장에서 평가 본래의 목적이 희석되기 쉽고 이를 달성하기 위해서 교사들의 많은 노력이 요구되는 것이 현실이다. 한편, 과학 교육에서 과학 탐구는 오랫동안 중요한 요소로 간주되어왔으며, 과학의 본성(Nature of science)의 관점에서 과학적 소양을 기르고 과학을 수행하는 방법을 학생들에게 가르치는 데 있어서 중요한 요소이다(Song, 2006; Lederman et al. |
Baek, J., Koh, E., Cho, Y. H., & Jeong, D. H. (2015). Authentic thinking with argumentation: putting on the thinking caps of scientists and designers. In Cho, Y. H., Caleon, I. S., & Kapur, M. (Eds.). Authentic Problem Solving and Learning in the 21st Century: Perspectives from Singapore and Beyond (pp. 173-191). Springer.
Byun, T., Baek, J., Shim, H.-P., & Lee, D. (2019). An investigation on the implementation of the 'scientific inquiry experiment' of the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(5), 669-679.
de Vries, E., Lund, K., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11 (1), 63-103.
Fogleman, J., McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Examining the effect of teachers’ adaptations of a middle school science inquiry-oriented curriculum unit on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 149-169.
Ha, M., Park, H., Kim, Y.-J., Kang, N.-H., Oh, P. S., Kim, M.-J., Min, J.-S., Lee, Y., Han, H.-J., Kim, M., Ko, S.-W., & Son, M.-H. (2018). Developing and applying the questionnaire to measure science core competencies based on the 2015 revised national science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(4), 495-504.
Jang, Y-R., Kang, N-H., Kang, S., Ko, S., Kwak, Y., Kwon, H., Kim, K., Kim, M., Kim, S., Kim, Y., Kim, J., Kim, H., Kim, H-K., Kim, H., Na, J., Min, B., Park, K., Park, B., Park, S., Park, S., Park, C., Park, H., Bang, D., Byun, T., Son, J., Song, J., Shin, Y., Sim, K., Ahn, J., Ahn, P., Oh, S., Oh, W., Yoon, H., Lee, K., Lee, M., Lee, M., Lee, M., Lee, Y., Lee, Y., Lee, I., Lee, J., Lee, H., Lee, H., Lim, H., Jang, S., Jeon, H., Jeong, W., Jwa, Y., Choi, I., Cho, J., Choi, H., Choi, H., Hyeon, J., Hong, J., Hwang, U., & Hwang, I. (2015). A study on development prototype of 2015 science national curriculum. BD15070002, Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
Jho, H. (2018). An analysis of elements of scientific inquiry presented in 2015 revised national science curriculum: focusing on scientific inquiry experiment. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 22(3), 208-218.
Kim, H.-K., Lee-M., Lee, J., Lee, S., Lee, Y-.R., Shin, Y., Ahn, J., Lee, S., Cho, S., Ji, J., J, H., Ihm, H., Park, C., & Ko, S. (2017). Research and development of the assessment standards of the 2015 revised national science curriculum at the high school levels. CRC 2017-5-7, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
Kim, M. & Kang, N-H. (2018). Analysis of inquiry activities in high school science inquiry laboratory textbooks. Chungram Science Education Journal, 24(2), 60-69.
Kim, M., & Ha, S. (2020). Development of process-oriented inquiry-based science performance assessment method and application to science gifted high school students. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 70(5), 454-465.
Kim, M., Kim, S., Hoh, T., & Choi, S. (2019). The influences of integrated science and science inquiry experiment developed under the 2015 revised national curriculum on students’ interest in science, scientific attitude, views on science-technology-society relationship, and views on nature of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(6), 791-797.
Kim, Y.-J., Jang, W., & Hong, H.-G. (2019). The analy sis and implication of student evaluation in 2015 science curriculum using text network analysis (TNA) method: focused on the connection with process centered evaluation. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 22(3), 225-250.
Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry: The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65-83.
Lee, H.-N., Lee, Y.-J., & Lee, H.-D. (2017). Development and application of rubric for assessing scientific inquiry process. Secondary Education Research, 65(1), 145-171.
Lee, I., Park, S., Shim, H.-P., & Lee, J. (2017). Development and application of an assessment procedure to enhance core competencies: focusing on communication and social competencies. RRE 2017-7, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015a). The general explanation of 2015 revised national curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 1]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015b). Science curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 9]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
National Research Council(NRC) (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core idea. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
OECD (2017). Pisa 2015 assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. OECD Publishing.
Osborne J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
Park, H., Sim, J-H., Choi, H., Lim, H., Park, J., Ahn, H., & Yang, S. (2019). Study on the monitoring and implementation of the 2015 science national curriculum. BD19030006, Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
Park, J., Jin, K.-A., Kin, S., & Lee, S.-A. (2018). A Study for enhancing the teacher' expertise in student assessment for stabilizing process-fortified assessment policy. RRE 2018-5, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
Sampson, V., Enderle, P. J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). The development and validation of the assessment of scientific argumentation in the classroom (asac) observation protocol: a tool for evaluating how students participate in scientific argumentation. Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation, 235-264.
Shin, S., Park, C., Lee, C. & Hong, H.-G. (2018). A case study on the practice of 'science inquiry experiment' in the 2015 revised national curriculum: an understanding in the perspective of cultural-historical activity theory(CHAT). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(6), 885-899.
Shin, Y., Kwak, Y., Sung, J., Lee, J., & Lim, E. (2018). Research on the quality control for the implementation of new courses according to the 2015 revised curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
Song, J. (2006). J. J. Schwab's life and his ideas of science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(7), 856-869.
Song, J., Kang, S.-J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Na, J., Do, J.-H., Park, S. C., Son, Y.-A, Son, J. W., Oh, P. S., Lee, J.-K., Lee, H. J., Ihm, H., Jeong, D. H., Joung, Y. J., & Kim, J. (2019). Developing performance expectations, school implementation strategies, evaluation indicators of the korean science education standards (kses) for the next generation. BD19080002, Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
Song, S., & Shim, K. (2019). Analysis of key competencies in inquiry activity of science inquiry experiment textbooks for high school students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(22), 363-383.
Victoria, A. S. C., & Lee, R. J. (2017). Timss 2019 science framework, In I. V. S., Mullis & M. O. Martin (Eds.). Timss 2019 assessment frameworks. Retrieved from Boston College, IEA TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Retrieved 2020. 10. 5. from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/frameworks/
Yang, I.-H, Lee, H.-J,, Lee, H., Cho, H. (2009). The development of rubrics to assess scientific argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(2), 203-220.
Yun, D., Ko, E., & Choi, A. (2018). Identifying and applying components of five scientific core competencies in the 2015 science curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(24), 1301-1319.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.