Immediate Effects of Myofascial Release Using Vibration Foam Rolling Methods on Hamstrings Range of Motion, Flexibility, Pressure Pain Thresholds and Dynamic Balance원문보기
Background: Many trials have been conducted the methods and types of intervention of form rollers, but no research has been done yet that mixes the methods and types of intervention. Objectives: To analyze the effects of myofascial release on the improvement of range of motion (ROM), flexibility, pa...
Background: Many trials have been conducted the methods and types of intervention of form rollers, but no research has been done yet that mixes the methods and types of intervention. Objectives: To analyze the effects of myofascial release on the improvement of range of motion (ROM), flexibility, pain pressure threshold, and balance. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: All subjects measured ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance by pre-test. After pre-test, subjects were randomized that static-vibration foam rolling group (n=12), dynamic-vibration foam rolling group (n=12), general foam rolling group (n=12). For the intervention, 3 sets of 90 seconds were applied to each group, and rest time was set to 60 seconds between sets. In the post-test and follow-up test after 10 minutes, all three groups were measured the ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance. Results: The results of comparing ROM, flexibility, pressure pain thresholds, dynamic balance ability appeared higher significant difference in the pre-post-10 minutes follow up test in comparison between time in the intragroup (P<.001). As a result of comparing the change of pre-post-10 minutes follow up, static vibration foam rolling showed higher significant difference compared to control groups (P<.001). Conclusion: Through this study, when foam rolling is applied within the same intervention time, static foam rolling can be expected to have a better effect than the existing dynamic foam rolling as well as vibration foam roller can expect better effect than general foam rolling.
Background: Many trials have been conducted the methods and types of intervention of form rollers, but no research has been done yet that mixes the methods and types of intervention. Objectives: To analyze the effects of myofascial release on the improvement of range of motion (ROM), flexibility, pain pressure threshold, and balance. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Methods: All subjects measured ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance by pre-test. After pre-test, subjects were randomized that static-vibration foam rolling group (n=12), dynamic-vibration foam rolling group (n=12), general foam rolling group (n=12). For the intervention, 3 sets of 90 seconds were applied to each group, and rest time was set to 60 seconds between sets. In the post-test and follow-up test after 10 minutes, all three groups were measured the ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance. Results: The results of comparing ROM, flexibility, pressure pain thresholds, dynamic balance ability appeared higher significant difference in the pre-post-10 minutes follow up test in comparison between time in the intragroup (P<.001). As a result of comparing the change of pre-post-10 minutes follow up, static vibration foam rolling showed higher significant difference compared to control groups (P<.001). Conclusion: Through this study, when foam rolling is applied within the same intervention time, static foam rolling can be expected to have a better effect than the existing dynamic foam rolling as well as vibration foam roller can expect better effect than general foam rolling.
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
제안 방법
All subjects measured ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance by pre-test. After the pre-test, the subjects were randomized to the S-VFR (Static-Vibration Foam Rolling), D-VFR (Dynamic-Vibration Foam Rolling), or GFR (General Foam Rolling) group thought randomizing computer program R (R Studio Desktop 1.2.5033). The intervention method was to apply the foam rolling form for a total of 3 sets for 90 seconds per set for each group, and rest time was set to 60 seconds between sets.
The measurement was conducted by the researcher to minimize variables. All subjects measured ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance by pre-test. After the pre-test, the subjects were randomized to the S-VFR (Static-Vibration Foam Rolling), D-VFR (Dynamic-Vibration Foam Rolling), or GFR (General Foam Rolling) group thought randomizing computer program R (R Studio Desktop 1.
Star excursion balance test (SEBT) was performed to measure the dynamic balance ability. For the scoring of SEBT, anterior, posterior-medial, and posteriorlateral directions were selected and used. After receiving a demonstration of motion from the same examiner, they practiced three times in three directions.
In this study, static and dynamic compression using vibration foam roller applied on shortened hamstrings muscles in the adults in their twenties, comparing changes that immediately effect of ROM, flexibility, pressure pain thresholds and dynamic balance ability. As a result, this study showed higher significant differences in vibration foam roller compared to normal foam roller in comparison of ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance ability according to various foam roller and intervention methods.
21,22 In another study, self-myofascial release using foam roller apply to the myofascial trigger point of calf muscles as static and dynamic compression to mention the importance of various foam rolling intervention methods for changes in pressure pain thresholds.23Research is also being conducted according to the type of foam roller. In a study comparing vibration foam roller and general foam roller, the effect of the vibrating foam roller on improving flexibility of the hamstrings muscle was demonstrated.
5033). The intervention method was to apply the foam rolling form for a total of 3 sets for 90 seconds per set for each group, and rest time was set to 60 seconds between sets. In the follow-up test after 10 minutes, all three groups measured the ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance (Figure 1).
This study was randomized controlled trial aimed to examine the immediate effects of three various foam rolling methods including static and dynamic vibration foam roller and general foam roller. The measurement was conducted by the researcher to minimize variables. All subjects measured ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance by pre-test.
The subject is supported by wrapping the thigh with both hands to maintain the 90° bend of the hip joint and relax the ankle through bending the foot.
This study compared the immediate effect to the ROM, flexibility, pressure pain thresholds, and dynamic balance by applying the intervention of vibrating foam roller to adults in their twenties with shortened hamstrings in a static and dynamic methods. As result, this study showed significant differences in vibration foam roller compared to normal foam roller in comparison of ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance ability according to various foam roller and intervention methods.
This study was randomized controlled trial aimed to examine the immediate effects of three various foam rolling methods including static and dynamic vibration foam roller and general foam roller. The measurement was conducted by the researcher to minimize variables.
Thus, this purpose of this research is to apply static and dynamic compression using vibration foam roller on shortened hamstrings muscles in the adults in their twenties, comparing changes that immediately effect of ROM, flexibility, pressure pain thresholds and dynamic balance ability. To this end, we would like to prove the effectiveness of foam rollers according to their types and how to apply them effectively.
To compare the selection criteria of the subjects and the change in the ROM, modified active knee extension test was performed. For those with an angle of more than 20° following the line perpendicular to the ground and the line on the front of the subject's maximum extended tibia.
To measure flexibility, stand-to-reach test was performed. All subjects take off their shoes, climbs on the table, and extends their arms toward the floor.
대상 데이터
They were recruited from 'D' University in Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Thirty-six subjects participated in this study. They were recruited from 'D' University in Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
데이터처리
The one-way ANOVA was performed to identify the homogeneity of the subjects, and the normality test was conducted through the Shapiro- Wilk test. One-way ANOVA with repeated measure was performed for compare of changes pre-post-10 min follow up of the within a group intervention, and one-way ANOVA was conducted and analyzed to compare the intergroup intervention effects. Bonferroni correction was used for post-hoc analysis.
The mean and standard deviation values of general characteristics of subjects were reported using descriptive statistics. The one-way ANOVA was performed to identify the homogeneity of the subjects, and the normality test was conducted through the Shapiro- Wilk test. One-way ANOVA with repeated measure was performed for compare of changes pre-post-10 min follow up of the within a group intervention, and one-way ANOVA was conducted and analyzed to compare the intergroup intervention effects.
이론/모형
One-way ANOVA with repeated measure was performed for compare of changes pre-post-10 min follow up of the within a group intervention, and one-way ANOVA was conducted and analyzed to compare the intergroup intervention effects. Bonferroni correction was used for post-hoc analysis. An alpha level of .
성능/효과
In this study, static and dynamic compression using vibration foam roller applied on shortened hamstrings muscles in the adults in their twenties, comparing changes that immediately effect of ROM, flexibility, pressure pain thresholds and dynamic balance ability. As a result, this study showed higher significant differences in vibration foam roller compared to normal foam roller in comparison of ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance ability according to various foam roller and intervention methods. In the case of ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold significant differences could be seen in the same way as in previous studies.
This study compared the immediate effect to the ROM, flexibility, pressure pain thresholds, and dynamic balance by applying the intervention of vibrating foam roller to adults in their twenties with shortened hamstrings in a static and dynamic methods. As result, this study showed significant differences in vibration foam roller compared to normal foam roller in comparison of ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance ability according to various foam roller and intervention methods. Through this study, if foam rolling is applied within the same intervention time, foam rolling through static compression can be expected to have a better effect than the existing dynamic foam rolling and vibration foam roller may expect better effect than general foam rolling.
As result, this study showed significant differences in vibration foam roller compared to normal foam roller in comparison of ROM, flexibility, pressure pain threshold, and dynamic balance ability according to various foam roller and intervention methods. Through this study, if foam rolling is applied within the same intervention time, foam rolling through static compression can be expected to have a better effect than the existing dynamic foam rolling and vibration foam roller may expect better effect than general foam rolling.
후속연구
Third, intervention was applied only to the dominant leg rather than measuring the both legs of the subject. Finally, further studies on medium and long-term effects will be needed in future studies, as we have only looked at the immediate effects of foam rolling on ROM, flexibility, pressure pain thresholds and dynamic balance.
참고문헌 (47)
Decoster LC, Scanlon RL, Horn KD, Cleland J. Standing and supine hamstring stretching are equally effective. J Athl Train. 2004;39(4):330.
Stephens, J, Davidson J, DeRosa J, Kriz M, Saltzman N. Lengthening the hamstring muscles without stretching using "awareness through movement". Phys Ther. 2006;86(12):1641-1650.
Brodersen A, Pedersen B, Reimers J. Incidence of complaints about heel-, knee-and back-related discomfort among Danish children, possible relation to short muscles. Ugeskrift for laeger. 1994;156(15):2243-2245.
Kumar GP. Comparison of cyclic loading and hold relax technique in increasing resting length of hamstring muscles. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2011;29(1):31-33.
Witvrouw E, Danneels L, Asselman P, D'Have T, Cambier D. Muscle flexibility as a risk factor for developing muscle injuries in male professional soccer players: a prospective study. Am J Sport Med. 2003;31(1):41-46.
Bastos CLB, Miranda H, de Souza Vale RG, et al. Chronic effect of static stretching on strength performance and basal serum IGF-1 levels. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(9):2465-2472.
Nishikawa Y, Aizawa J, Kanemura N, et al. Immediate effect of passive and active stretching on hamstrings flexibility: a single-blinded randomized control trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(10):3167-3170.
Yokota Y, Tashiro Y, Suzuki Y, et al. Effect of capacitive and resistive electric transfer on tissue temperature, muscle flexibility and blood circulation. J Nov Physiother. 2017;7(325):2.
Brooks JHM, Erith SJ. Warm-up programmes in sport. BMJ. 2008;337:61-62.
Curry BS, Chengkalath D, Crouch GJ, et al. Acute effects of dynamic stretching, static stretching, and light aerobic activity on muscular performance in women. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(6):1811-1819
McGowan CJ, Pyne DB, Thompson KG, Rattray B. Warm-up strategies for sport and exercise: mechanisms and applications. Sports Med. 2015;45(11):1523-1546.
Morales-Artacho AJ, Lacourpaille L, Guilhem G. Effects of warm-up on hamstring muscles stiffness: Cycling vs foam rolling. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(12):1959-1969.
O'Sullivan, K., McAuliffe S, DeBurca N. The effects of eccentric training on lower limb flexibility: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(12):838-845.
Cheatham SW, Kolber MJ, Cain M. Comparison of video-guided, live instructed, and self-guided foam roll interventions on knee joint range of motion and pressure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017;12(2):242.
Cheatham SW, Stull KR. Comparison of a foam rolling session with active joint motion and without joint motion: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018;22(3):707-712.
DeBruyne DM, Dewhurst MM, Fischer KM, Wojtanowski MS, Durall C. Self-mobilization using a foam roller versus a roller massager: which is more effective for increasing hamstrings flexibility? J Sport Rehabil. 2017;26(1):94-100.
Kim H, Shin W. Immediate Effect of Pressure Pain Threshold and Flexibility in Tensor Fascia Latae and Iliotibial Band According to Various Foam Roller Exercise Methods. J Int Acad Phys Ther Res. 2019;10(4):1879-1888.
Vaughan B, McLaughlin P, Lepley AS. Immediate changes in pressure pain threshold in the iliotibial band using a myofascial (foam) roller. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2014;21(12):569-574.
Wilke J, Vogt L, Banzer W. Immediate effects of self-myofascial release on latent trigger point sensitivity: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Biol Sport. 2018;35(4):349.
Lee CL, Chu IH, Lyu BJ, Chang WD, Chang NJ. Comparison of vibration rolling, nonvibration rolling, and static stretching as a warm-up exercise on flexibility, joint proprioception, muscle strength, and balance in young adults. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(22):2575-2582.
Lim JH, Park CB. The immediate effects of foam roller with vibration on hamstring flexibility and jump performance in healthy adults. J Exerc Rehabil. 2019;15(1):50.
Smith KLF. The role of and relationship between hamstring and quadriceps muscle myofascial trigger points in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome [mini-dissertation]. Republic of South Africa: Durban University of Technology; 2012.
Connor SO, McCaffrey N, Whyte E, Moran K. Reliability of a modified active knee extension test for assessment of hamstring flexibility. Int J Athl Ther Trai. 2015;20(4):32-36.
Fetz F, Kornexl E. Sportmotorische Tests: praktische Anleitung zu sportmotorischen Tests in Schule und Verein. OBV, Padag. Verlag; 1993.
Chesterton LS, Sim J, Wright CC, Foster NE. Interrater reliability of algometry in measuring pressure pain thresholds in healthy humans, using multiple raters. Clin J Pain. 2007;23(9):760-766.
Madruga-Parera M, Romero-Rodriguez D, Bishop C, et al. Effects of maturation on lower limb neuromuscular asymmetries in elite youth tennis players. Sports. 2019;7(5):106.
Han SW, Lee YS, Lee DJ. The influence of the vibration form roller exercise on the pains in the muscles around the hip joint and the joint performance. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(10):1844-1847.
De Benito AM, Valldecabres R, Ceca D, Richards J, Igual JB, Pablos A. Effect of vibration vs nonvibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue. Peer J. 2019;7:e8000.
Kim DH, Lee SH, Lee BH. Effects of mechanical intervention on cutaneous sensory change and pressure pain threshold in the same spinal segment of myofascial pain. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2019;8(1):15-21.
Lee DW, Shin HK, Kim KS. Effects of dynamic myofascial release on trunk mobility and standing balance in persons with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2019;8(2):74-78.
Pablos A, Ceca D, Jorda A, et al. Protective Effects of Foam Rolling against Inflammation and Notexin Induced Muscle Damage in Rats. Int J Med Med Sci. 2020;17(1):71.
An SJ, Kwon HY. A Study on The Effects of Aerobic and Foam Roller Exercise Programs on Body Balance in Senior Women. J Int Acad Phys Ther Res. 2017;8(2):1182-1189.
Cho S. Effects of Myofascial Release and Posture Correction Exercise on the Neck Movement and the Quality of Sleep in Patients with Chronic Tension-Type Headaches. J Int Acad Phys Ther Res. 2019;10(4):1897-1902.
Wall III C, Kentala E. Effect of displacement, velocity, and combined vibrotactile tilt feedback on postural control of vestibulopathic subjects. J Vestib Res. 2010;20(1,2):61-69.
Cheatham SW, Stull KR, Kolber MJ. Comparison of a vibration roller and a nonvibration roller intervention on knee range of motion and pressure pain threshold: a randomized controlled trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2019;28(1):39-45.
Okamoto T, Masuhara M, Ikuta K. Acute effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roller on arterial function. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(1):69-73.
Lau WY, Nosaka K. Effect of vibration treatment on symptoms associated with eccentric exerciseinduced muscle damage. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90(8):648-657.
Pamukoff, DN, Ryan ED, Blackburn JT. The acute effects of local muscle vibration frequency on peak torque, rate of torque development, and EMG activity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014;24(6):888-894.
Palop Montoro MV, Parraga Montilla JA, Lozano Aguilera E, Arteaga Checa M. The vibration training as sarcopenia intervention: impact on the neuromuscular system of the elderly. Nutr Hosp. 2015;32(4):1454-1461.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.