최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기초등과학교육 = Journal of Korean elementary science education, v.40 no.4, 2021년, pp.520 - 544
This study aims to develop a scientific creativity test for exploring the relationship between elementary students' creative process and product. For this, the researcher reviewed the literatures of scientific creativity and developed the items based on the constructs of creative process and product...
강정하, 최인수(2008). 과학적 창의성과 시각예술적 창의성. 영재교육연구, 18(2), 201-237.
강충열(2006). 창의성 교육과 초등교육의 근본적 성격. 아동교육, 15(3), 33-52.
강호감, 최선영(2004). 초등 생물교육에서 창의력 신장을 위한 교수.학습 방안: 창의력 구성요소를 중심으로. 생물교육, 32(4), 287-297.
교육부(2015). 과학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제 2015-74호, [별책9].
박명희, 박윤복, 권용주(2005). 초등학생의 어항 관찰활동에서 나타난 관찰의 유형과 그 변화. 한국초등과학교육학회지, 24(4), 345-350.
박현주.(2014). 과학적 관찰 활동이 중학생들의 창의성 변화에 미친 영향. 과학교육연구지, 38(2), 443-453.
성진숙(2002). 과학에서의 창의적 문제해결력에 영향을 미치는 제 변수 분석. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
성태제(2002). 타당도와 신뢰도. 서울: 학지사.
손정우(2009). 과학글쓰기를 통한 과학영재학생들의 과학적 사고력과 창의적 문제해결력 연구. 과학영재교육, 1(3), 21-32.
송성수(2013). 과학사의 사례를 활용한 과학자의 창의성에 관한 탐색적 연구: 다윈, 에디슨, 아인슈타인을 중심으로. 교사교육연구, 52(2), 227-236.
유용현, 강유진, 김지나(2013). 고등학생의 과학영역 창의성과 일반창의성, 메타인지, 과학 정의적 특성과의 관계. 교과교육학연구, 17(1), 109-128.
윤회정, 박은미, 김지영, 이윤하, 방담이(2015). 중학생들의 과학적 창의성 관련 변인 간 관계 분석 연구. 교과교육학연구, 19(4), 1005-1025.
임성만, 양일호, 임재근(2009). 영역 특수적인 입장에서의 과학적 창의성에 대한 정의, 구성요인에 대한 탐색. 과학교육연구지, 33(1), 31-43.
임채성(2012). 뇌기반진화적 접근법에 따른 창의적 과학문제해결 지도 모형 개발. 생물교육, 40(4), 429-452.
임채성, 김재영, 정다운(2013). 초등과학 생명 영역 수업에서 학생의 흥미 변화에 영향을 미치는 요인: '꽃'주제를 중심으로. 생물교육, 41(4), 638-656.
최인수(2000). 유아용 창의성 측정도구에 관한 고찰. 유아교육연구, 20(2), 139-166.
최일호, 최인수(2001). 새로운 생각은 어떻게 가능한가: 전문분야 창의성에 대한 학습과정 모형 접근. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 20(2), 409-428.
한기순, 배미란(2004). 과학영재와 일반 학생들 간의 사고 양식과 지능 및 창의성간의 관계 비교. 교육심리연구, 18(2), 49-68.
홍세희(2000). 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 161-177.
Adolf, J. (1982). Creative thinking through science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 232 785). Retrieved September 1, 2008, from http://eric.ed.gov
Alin, A. (2010). Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(3), 370-374.
Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Macmillan.
Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173-177.
Baer, J. (2011). How divergent thinking tests mislead us: Are the Torrance Tests still relevant in the 21st century? The Division 10 debate. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(4), 309-313.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1998). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Basadur, M. (1995). Optimal ideation-evaluation ratios. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 63-75.
Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 447-465). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for "mini-c" creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 361-379). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380-400.
Cropley, A. J. (1999). Creativity and cognition: Producing effective novelty. Roeper review, 21(4), 253-260.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domains of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity, London: Sage.
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403.
Kind, P., & Kind, V. (2007). Creativity in science education: Perspectives and challenges for developing school science. Studies in Science Education, 43, 1-37.
Liang, J. C. (2002). Exploring scientific creativity of eleventh grade students in Taiwan. Doctoral dissertation, Texas state University.
Lipps, J. H. (1999). This is Science!. The Paleontological Society Special Publications, 9, 3-16.
Lubart, T. I. (1999). 17 Creativity across cultures. Handbook of creativity (pp. 339-350). UK: Cambridge University Press.
Luger, G. F., Johnson, P., Stern, C., Newman, J. E., & Yeo, R. (1994). Cognitive science: The science of intelligent systems. San Diego: Academic Press.
Meador, K. S. (2003). Thinking creatively about science: Suggestions for primary teachers. Gifted Child Today, 26(1), 25-29.
Mohamed, A. (2006). Investigating the scientific creativity of fifth-grade students. Doctoral dissertation, Arizona state University.
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 107-120.
Newton, D. P. (2010). Assessing the creativity of scientific explanations in elementary science: an insider-outsider view of intuitive assessment in the hypothesis space. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(3), 187-201.
Newton, L., & Newton, D. (2010). Creative thinking and teaching for creativity in elementary school science. Gifted and Talented International, 25(2), 111-124.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states: National Academies Press Washington, DC.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi delta kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 317-324.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66-75.
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity research journal, 24(1), 92-96.
Sak, U., & Ayas, M. B. (2013). Creative Scientific Ability Test (C-SAT): A new measure of scientific creativity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55(3), 316.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Exceptional creativity and chance: Creative thought as a stochastic combinatorial process. Beyond knowledge: Extracognitive aspects of developing high ability (pp. 39-72). UK: Routledge.
Simonton, D. K. (2007). Creativity: Specialized expertise or general cognitive processes? In M. J. Roberts (Ed.), Integrating the mind: Domain general versus domain specific processes in higher cognition (pp. 351-367). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The journal of psychology, 36(2), 311-322.
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.) (1998). Handbook of human creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Domain-generality versus domain-specificity of creativity. In Milieus of Creativity (pp. 25-38). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
Sun, J. (2005). Assessing goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, 37(4), 240-256.
Tamassia, C., & Schleicher, A. (2002). Sample Tasks from the PISA 2000 Assessment: Reading, Mathematical and Scientific Literacy. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33692744.pdf
Torrance, E. P. (1998). The Torrance tes ts of creative thinking norms-technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
Yang, K. K., Lin, S. F., Hong, Z. R., & Lin, H. S. (2016). Exploring the assessment of and relationship between elementary students' scientific creativity and science inquiry. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 16-23.
Yu, J. P. (2012). The concept and understanding of structural equation modeling by the professor Yujongpil. Seoul: Hannarae Publishing Co.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.