[논문]고령층 디지털 정보 역량과 디지털 정보 활용 영향요인에 관한 연구

김유나; 변은지

doi:10.14400/jdc.2021.19.3.089

고령층 디지털 정보 역량과 디지털 정보 활용 영향요인에 관한 연구
A Study of the Determinants of Digital Capacity and Digital Utilization among Older People 원문보기

디지털융복합연구 = Journal of digital convergence, v.19 no.3, 2021년, pp.89 - 97

김유나 (유한대학교 보건복지학과) , 변은지 (서울노인복지센터 부설 서울시어르신취업지원센터)

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구는 고령층의 디지털 정보역량과 정보활용의 상호 관련성에 주목하면서 하나의 모형 속에서 이들의 영향요인을 동시적으로 분석하며 관계의 양상들을 종합적으로 파악하는데 초점을 둔다. 분석자료는 「2019 디지털정보격차 실태조사」를 사용하였고, 분석대상은 만55에 이상 고령층 1,703명 이었다. 분석방법은 SUR(seemingly unrelated regression)을 사용하였다. 분석결과 인지된 유용성, 자기효능감, 자신감과 같은 심리적 변수가 정보역량에 정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났고, 자기효능감과 자신감과 같은 심리적 요인과 함께 디지털 조력과 같은 사회적 요인이 정보활용에 정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타나 정보역량과 정보활용 간 영향요인에서 차이가 있음을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 고령층의 정보역량과 정보활용 영향요인을 보다 세밀하게 분석함으로써 고령층 정보격차 해소 관련 이해의 확장에 기여하고, 이를 토대로 고령층 정보격차 해소 전략 방향을 제시하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

This study attempts to examine determinants of both digital capacity and digital utilization among older people by using the seemingly unrelated regression. Using '2019 Survey of Digital divide', the study has the following results: first, perceived usefulness, self-efficacy and confidence have significant relationship with digital capacity; second, not only self-efficacy and confidence but also digital support has significant relationship with digital utilization. By examining the common factors and differential factors which explain digital capacity and digital utilization, it contributes to broadening and deepening knowledge on digital divide and building effective strategies for overcoming digital divide among older people in Korea.

주제어

표/그림 (4)

그림 Fig. 1. Research model
표 Table 1. Demographic Characteristics
표 Table 2. Main Variable Characteristics
표 Table 3. Seemingly Unrelated Regression(SUR) Models Result

참고문헌 (38)

Robinson, L., Schulz, J., Khilnani, A., Ono, H., Cotten, S. R., McClain, N., Levine, L., Chen, W., Huang, G., Casilli, A. A., Tubaro, P., Dodel, M., Quan-Haase, A., Ruiu, M. L., Ragnedda, M., Aikat, D., & Tolentino, N.(2020). "Digital inequalities in time of pandemic: COVID-19 exposure risk profiles and new forms of vulnerability". First Monday, 25(7) DOI : 10.5210/fm.v25i7.10845
B. S. Kim & J. H. Ko. (2020). A Study on the Impact of Digital Supporter on Digital Social Capital in the Elderly : Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Digital Usage. Discourse and Policy in Social Science 13(2), 27-57.

상세보기
Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New media & society, 16(3), 507-526.

상세보기
K. Ju, D. Kim & J. Kim. (2018). Analysis of Factors Influencing Digital Divide on Elderly and Difference of Gender Social Welfare Policy, 45(20), 95-121.
Cotten, S. R., Ford, G., Ford, S., & Hale, T. M.(2012). "Internet use and depression among older adults". Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), .496-499.

상세보기
Xie, D.(2007). "Buffering or strengthening: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on stressor-strain relationship". Journal of Career Assessment, 15, .351-366.

상세보기
M. Y. Kim & H. J. Jun. (2017). The Effects of Smartphone Use on Life Satisfaction in Older Adults: The Mediating Role of Participation in Social Activities, Korean Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare. 72(3), 343-370.
H. J. Lee & M. K. Park. (2020). Older Adults' Digital Divide and Life Satisfaction : Comparing Mobile and PC-based Digital Divide. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 29(2), 209-241.
S. Um, H. Shin. & Y. S. Kim. (2020). A Study on the Factors Influencing Technology Utilization of Middle-aged and Older Adults: Focusing on the Difference between middle-aged and Older Adults, The Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 23(2), 173-204.
Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second-and third-level digital divide. Telematics and informatics, 34(8), 1607-1624.

상세보기
H. W. Shin & S. W. Ji(2014). A Normative Study on the Paradigm and Solution of the New Digital Divide in the Smart Media Era. Study on the American Constitution 25(3), 171-203.
S. Jin. (2013). An Analysis On The Trend of Digital Divide: Case Of Korea, The Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 16(3), 147-174..
P. S. Kim., H. S. Kim & M. S. Lee(2014). An Analysis on the Internet Use of the Korean Older Adults focused on their Socioeconomic Characteristics, Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 19(8), 197-205.

원문보기 상세보기
T. N. Friemel(2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313-331.

상세보기
H. J. Hwang & Y. S. Hwang.(2017). Gaps and Reasons of Digital Divide within the Elderly in Korea: Focusing on Household Composition. Journal of Social Science, 24(3), 359-386.

상세보기
Blazic, B. J., & Blazic, A. J. (2020). Overcoming the digital divide with a modern approach to learning digital skills for the elderly adults. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 259-279.

상세보기
Hunsaker, A., Nguyen, M., Fuchs, J., Djukaric, T., Hugentobler, L., & Hargittai, E. (2019). "He explained it to me and I also did it myself": How older adults get support with their technology uses. Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5, 1-13.
Tsai, H. Y. S., Shillair, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2017). Social support and "playing around" an examination of how older adults acquire digital literacy with tablet computers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36(1), 29-55.

상세보기
J. Cho. (2014). Expanded Reproduction of Digital Divide: Acceptance of Smartphones among the Elderly. Korean Journal of Sociology, 48(5), 211-242.
Chopik, William J., Rikard, R. V. & Cotten, Shelia R.(2017). Individual difference predictors of ICT use in older adulthood: A study of 17 candidate characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 526-533.

상세보기
Niehaves, B., & Plattfaut, R. (2014). Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 708-726.

상세보기
Courtois, C., & Verdegem, P. (2016). With a little help from my friends: An analysis of the role of social support in digital inequalities. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1508-1527.

상세보기
Helsper, E. J., & Van Deursen, A. J. (2017). Do the rich get digitally richer? Quantity and quality of support for digital engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 20(5), 700-714.

상세보기
C. H. Park & S. J. Chang(2013). The Smart Media of Elderly and Digital Welfare: focused on the access and use gap of smart device, Locality & Communication, 17(4), 79-105.
Y. Min(2011). The Digital Divide among Internet Users: An Analysis of Digital Access, Literacy, and Participation, Journal of Communication Research, 48(1), 150-187.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for information systems, 12(1), 50.
Lee, C., & Coughlin, J. F. (2015). PERSPECTIVE: Older adults' adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 747-759.

상세보기
K, Paek, J, Bong & Y, Shin. (2015). An Empirical Study on the Factors and Resolution Methods of the Smart Divide of Older Adults. Korean Information Science Society, 42(10), 1207-1221.
Steele, R., Lo, A., Secombe, C., & Wong, Y. K. (2009). Elderly persons' perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(12), 788-801.

상세보기
Walsh, K., & Callan, A. (2011). Perceptions, preferences, and acceptance of information and communication technologies in older-adult community care settings in Ireland: A case-study and ranked-care program analysis. Ageing International, 36(1), 102-122.

상세보기
Chung, J. E., Park, N., Wang, H., Fulk, J., & McLaughlin, M. (2010). Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1674-1684.

상세보기
Mitzner, T. L., Boron, J. B., Fausset, C. B., Adams, A. E., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., ... & Sharit, J. (2010). Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in human behavior, 26(6), 1710-1721.

상세보기
Demiris, G., Rantz, M. J., Aud, M. A., Marek, K. D., Tyrer, H. W., Skubic, M., & Hussam, A. A. (2004). Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of 'smart home'technologies: a pilot study. Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine, 29(2), 87-94.

상세보기
Lam, J. Y., & Lee, M. K. O. (2006). "Digital inclusiveness-longitudinal study of Internet adoption by older adults". Journal of Management Information System, 22(4), 177-206.

상세보기
B. S. Kim & J. H. Ko. (2020). A Study on the Impact of Digital Supporter on Digital Social Capital in the Elderly : Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Digital Usage, Discourse and Policy in Social Science 13(2), 27-57

상세보기
Bellini, C. G. P., Isoni Filho, M. M., de Moura Junior, P. J., & de Faria Pereira, R. D. C. (2016). Self-efficacy and anxiety of digital natives in face of compulsory computer-mediated tasks: A study about digital capabilities and limitations. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 49-57.

상세보기
H. J. Eom & M. J. Lee. (2020). A Study on Labor Market Changes from Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Intelligence Information Society, Information Society & Media 21(2), 1-20

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증