[논문]잉글랜드 그린벨트 정책 담론과 쟁점 분석 - 주택 개발과 여가 기회를 중심으로 -

남진보

doi:10.13087/kosert.2021.24.3.1

잉글랜드 그린벨트 정책 담론과 쟁점 분석 - 주택 개발과 여가 기회를 중심으로 -
Exploring Discourse and Issue on the Policy of England Greenbelt - Delivering Opportunities for Housing Development and Recreation - 원문보기

環境復元綠化 = Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, v.24 no.3, 2021년, pp.1 - 18

남진보 (국립목포대학교 조경학과)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

England's green belt policy as it delivered its framework to designating the development restriction zones(DRZ) in Korea is the key to address issues which try to change green belt boundary or/and housing development. Therefore it should necessarily be reviewed on the understanding of how England has been formulating a national policy to deal with the issues focusing on opportunities for housing development and recreation. This study explored the discourse and framework of England's green belt policy as well as driver changes of housing development and recreation. Results show several characteristics of England's green belt policy which are civil society consensus on conservation and management, limited small-scale housing development through management of release rates, a systematic procedure for application and approval, open-recreation space expansion and utilisation under the premise of conservation of natural green areas, and management structure by the involvement of NGO organisations. Therefore, five suggestions can be delivered to developing Korea's DRZ frameworks: first, preceding social consensus on the preservation value of development-restricted zones, second, addressing housing shortages in different alternatives e.g.) environmental-friendly small-scale housing, third, institutionalising the total proportion of release, fourth, establishing an open-recreation space, fifth, introducing expanded public-private partnerships. Ultimately securing the legitimacy of the nation's development-restricted zone system can contribute positively to the environment preservation and human health by promoting public leisure activities in terms of the recent increase in external activities caused by the Covid-19 crisis. Concluding remarks are here that the understanding of England's green belt policy can be delivered to and help formulate domestic policy addressing current issues.

주제어

표/그림 (12)

그림 Figure 1. Number of lifting the clustered settlement (Reformed graph derived from Kim and Lee, 2016)
그림 Figure 2. Map of Greenbelts in England (source from Natural England, 2010)
표 Table 1. Purposes of Green Belt in two policies 'PPG 2, 1995 and NPPF, 2012'
표 Table 2. Green belts policies and core approaches
그림 Figure 3. The framework of green belts policy in NPPF 2019, charted by the author
그림 Figure 4. The cases of 'Paragraph 79 Houses': resources from Urbanist Architecture
그림 Figure 5. The process of application for green belts (LA: Local Authority), charted by the author.
그림 Figure 6. Changing rates of approved applications and units for residential planning in green belt from 2009 to 2018 (AA: Approved Applications, AU: Approved Units)
표 Table 3. Residential planning application(units) and approvals in green belt between 2007 and 2018
표 Table 4. Opportunities for nature preservation and recreation in green belt
표 Table 5. Data of Public Rights of Way and National Cycle Network in 14 green belt areas
표 Table 6. The areas of NGO-managed green belts

참고문헌 (37)

Booth, R. 2017. Campaigners accuse Conservatives of failing to protect England's green belt. Planning policy. The Guardian.
Buxton, M. 2019. Green Belts: Past; Present; Future?, Planning Theory & Practice, 20(2) : 311-314.

상세보기
Campaign to Protect Rural England(CPRE). 2009. Vision for the Countryside. London: CPRE.
Choi, YJ and Kim, DY. 2008. An Analysis on the Economic Effects of the Reduction of Green-Belt by Housing Market Model. Environmental and Resource Economics Review. 17(2) : 235-254. (in Korean with English summary)
DCLG. 2017. Housing white paper: Fixing our broken housing market. London: Department of Communities ad Lcoal Government.
Elson, M. 1993. The Effectiveness of Green Belt Policy, paragraph 1.1. (for Department for the Environment). HMSO.
Grimwood, G.G and Barton, C. 2020. Green Belt: Briefing Paper. London: House of Commons Library.
Hall, P.G. 2002. Urban and regional planning. London: Routledge.
Hall, P. 2007. Rethinking the Mark Three Green Belt. Town & Country Planning, August: 229.
Holman, N., Fernandez-Arrigoitia, M., Scanlon, K., and Whitehead, C. 2015. Housing in London: Addressing the supply crisis. London: LSE.
Hong, JP, 2018. Evaluating Quantitative Expansion Goals of the National Protected Areas Integrated System. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 21(3) : 57-65. (in Korean with English summary)

원문보기 상세보기
Howard, E. 1898. To-morrow: a Peaceful Path to Real Reform, (reissued in 1902 as Garden Cities of To-morrow). Kessinger Publishing.
Kim, DH, Park, MI. 2020. Installing sports facilities in limited development districts. The Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law. 23(3) : 177-190. (in Korean with English summary)
Kim, EJ, Lee, MJ. 2016. KRIHS POLICY BRIEF, N0 590. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
Kim, EJ, Lee, SW, Kim, DW, Kim, TW, Kim, DG, Lim, JY. 2017. Green Belt Management Strategy in Consideration of Metropolitan Spatial Structure. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
Kim, JE, Lee, MJ, Kim, SH. 2017. Survey and Policy Implications for Improvement of Infrastructure in Collective Villages Released from Development Restriction Zone. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association, 30(4) : 105- 127. (in Korean with English summary).
Kim, SY. 2013. A Study on the Problem and Improvement Plan of the Restricted Zone Management. Research report to Audit and Inspection Research Institute.
Kwon, YW. 2004. Regional Policy after the Deregulation of Greenbelt in Korea. The Geographical Journal of Korea., 38(3) : 241-258. (in Korean with English summary)
Lee, S. 2018. The Impacts of Greenbelt Policies on Anti-Sprawl. Journal of Korea Planning Association. 53(2) : 45-65. (in Korean with English summary)
Lee, SW. 2018. The Impacts of Greenbelts Policies on Anti-Sprawl. Journal of Korea Planning Association. 53(2) : 45-65. (in Korean with English summary)
Lee, YH, Jeong, WT. 2019. A Study of on the Improvements of Land Use in the Development Restricted Zone Act. Korean Law Association. 19(2) : 287- 304. (in Korean with English summary)
Mace, A. 2018. The Metropolitan Green Belt, changing an institution. Progress in Planning. 121 (2018) : 1-28.
MHCLG. 2012. The National Planning Policy Framework. Ministry of Housing and Local Government.
MHCLG. 2019. The National Planning Policy Framework. Ministry of Housing and Local Government.
MHCLG. 2019. Local authority green belt statistics for England: 2018 to 2019. Research report to Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government.
Ministry of Land, Transport and Marintime Affairs(MLTMA). 2008. Revision of guidelines for adjustment and release of development-restricted zones. Ministry of Land, Transport and Marintime Affairs.
Nam, JV, Kim, NC, Kim, DW, 2019. Exploring Policy Contexts and Sustainable Management Structure for Park Regeneration-A Focus on the Case of Green Estate Ltd, Sheffield, UK -. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 22(4) : 15-34. (in Korean with English summary)
Nam, JV, Kim, NC, 2019. An understanding of green space policies and evaluation tools in the UK: A focus on the Green Flag Award. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 22(1) : 13-31. (in Korean with English summary)

원문보기 상세보기
ODPM. 1988. Planning Policy Guidance Notes 2. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
Park, EK. 2013. A Study on the Improvement of Facility Site Standards in the Development Restriction Zone, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
Rye, JW. 2017. A Study on the Improvement Plan of the Restricted Zone Management. The Journal of Comparative Law. 17(1) : 7-40. (in Korean with English summary)
Sung, HC, Jeon, SW, Lee, EJ, 2020. A Study on the Environmental Enhancement of the Development Restricted Zone(DRZ) Management Plan. 23(6) : 1-14. (in Korean with English summary)
Tizot, JY. 2018 Ebenezer Howard's Garden City Idea and the Ideology of Industrialism. Cahiers victoriens & edouardiens, 87.

상세보기
Yun, SY, Son, YH. 2019 Land Use Changes according to Recent Land Use Policy in the Greenbelt of Seoul Metropolitan Area. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 103(2019.12) : 99-114. (in Korean with English summary)
Yun, SY, Son, YH. 2018. Changes of rural landscape in the lifted green-belt area using resident employed photography(REP). Journal of the Korea Society of Rural Planning. 24(4) : 15-25. (in Korean with English summary)
https://urbanistarchitecture.co.uk/how-to-get-planning-permission-for-building-on-greenbelt-land-in-the-uk/
https://www.ons.gov.uk/

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증